Publish to Newswire
Add an EventFrom the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
ACLU and National Lawyers Guild File Suit Against Oakland Police Department
Suit Seeks to Stop Police Violence Against Protesters
For Immediate Release: November 14, 2011
Media Contacts: Rebecca Farmer, ACLU-NC, 415.621.2493 ext 374, rfarmer@aclunc.org
Rachel Lederman, NLG, 415.350.6496, rlederman@2momslaw.com
ACLU and National Lawyers Guild File Suit Against Oakland Police Department
Suit Seeks to Stop Police Violence Against Protesters
Today the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California (ACLU-NC) and the National Lawyers’ Guild (NLG) filed a lawsuit in federal court against the Oakland Police Department (OPD) for its egregious constitutional violations against Occupy Oakland demonstrators. The lawsuit asks for an emergency temporary restraining order to stop police violence against political protesters. The restraining order is urgent because another police encounter with demonstrators is imminent, after the removal of the Occupy Oakland camp early this morning. The case is currently before United States District Court Judge Richard Seeborg, who immediately issued an order requiring the City to respond by 5pm tomorrow. If OPD uses excessive force against protesters again, it will need to justify its actions to the court.
The ACLU-NC and the NLG are suing OPD on behalf of Timothy Scott Campbell, a videographer who was shot with a bean bag projectile while filming police presence during Occupy Oakland on the night of November 2-3, 2011, and other demonstrators subjected to excessive force during recent demonstrations. Video of Campbell being shot can be viewed online. Additional plaintiffs include Kerie Campbell, Marc McKinnie, Michael Siegel, and NLG Legal Observer Marcus Kryshka.
“I was filming police activity at Occupy Oakland because police should be accountable,” said Campbell. “Now I’m worried about my safety from police violence and about retaliation because I’ve been outspoken.”
“Excessive police force is never acceptable, especially when it’s in response to political protest,” said Linda Lye, staff attorney at the ACLU of Northern California.
“OPD’s unconstitutional actions against protestors on those two nights were wholesale and flagrant violations of Oakland’s own Crowd Control Policy,” said Rachel Lederman, an NLG attorney.
On two recent occasions, October 25, 2011 and November 2, 2011, OPD and cooperating police agencies under their direction attacked the plaintiffs and other Occupy Oakland supporters who were peacefully participating in political demonstration. Police indiscriminately shot flash bang grenades, other projectiles and excessive amounts of tear gas into crowds of peaceful protesters. Police also fired other projectiles at individuals who posed no risk of harm, but were clearly engaged in First Amendment protected activity, such as filming police at a demonstration. This conduct violates the Fourth Amendment by subjecting protesters who posed no safety concerns to unnecessary and excessive force and violates the First Amendment by interfering with their rights to assemble and demonstrate.
The lawsuit asks for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because OPD has shown by its recent actions that it will continue to violate protesters’ constitutional rights unless a court intervenes.
OPD’s recent conduct violates its own Crowd Control Policy, adopted in the settlement of a lawsuit arising from OPD’s prior mishandling of a large protest in 2003. The policy strictly limits the use force and prohibits the indiscriminate use of shot-filled “bean” bags and other projectiles against crowds or peaceful protesters.
On October 26, 2011 The ACLU-NC and NLG sent a public records request seeking information about OPD’s use of force against Occupy demonstrators. OPD refused to hand over information about its actions.
The lawsuit, Timothy Scott Campbell, et al, vs. City of Oakland and Interim Police Chief Howard Jordan was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Attorneys for the plaintiffs are: Alan L. Schlosser, Michael T. Risher and Linda Lye for the ACLU Foundation of Northern California; Rachel Lederman, Carol Sobel, Bobbie Stein and R. Michael Flynn for the National Lawyers’ Guild; and James B. Chanin and Julie M. Houk from the Law Offices of James B. Chanin.
###
Media Contacts: Rebecca Farmer, ACLU-NC, 415.621.2493 ext 374, rfarmer@aclunc.org
Rachel Lederman, NLG, 415.350.6496, rlederman@2momslaw.com
ACLU and National Lawyers Guild File Suit Against Oakland Police Department
Suit Seeks to Stop Police Violence Against Protesters
Today the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California (ACLU-NC) and the National Lawyers’ Guild (NLG) filed a lawsuit in federal court against the Oakland Police Department (OPD) for its egregious constitutional violations against Occupy Oakland demonstrators. The lawsuit asks for an emergency temporary restraining order to stop police violence against political protesters. The restraining order is urgent because another police encounter with demonstrators is imminent, after the removal of the Occupy Oakland camp early this morning. The case is currently before United States District Court Judge Richard Seeborg, who immediately issued an order requiring the City to respond by 5pm tomorrow. If OPD uses excessive force against protesters again, it will need to justify its actions to the court.
The ACLU-NC and the NLG are suing OPD on behalf of Timothy Scott Campbell, a videographer who was shot with a bean bag projectile while filming police presence during Occupy Oakland on the night of November 2-3, 2011, and other demonstrators subjected to excessive force during recent demonstrations. Video of Campbell being shot can be viewed online. Additional plaintiffs include Kerie Campbell, Marc McKinnie, Michael Siegel, and NLG Legal Observer Marcus Kryshka.
“I was filming police activity at Occupy Oakland because police should be accountable,” said Campbell. “Now I’m worried about my safety from police violence and about retaliation because I’ve been outspoken.”
“Excessive police force is never acceptable, especially when it’s in response to political protest,” said Linda Lye, staff attorney at the ACLU of Northern California.
“OPD’s unconstitutional actions against protestors on those two nights were wholesale and flagrant violations of Oakland’s own Crowd Control Policy,” said Rachel Lederman, an NLG attorney.
On two recent occasions, October 25, 2011 and November 2, 2011, OPD and cooperating police agencies under their direction attacked the plaintiffs and other Occupy Oakland supporters who were peacefully participating in political demonstration. Police indiscriminately shot flash bang grenades, other projectiles and excessive amounts of tear gas into crowds of peaceful protesters. Police also fired other projectiles at individuals who posed no risk of harm, but were clearly engaged in First Amendment protected activity, such as filming police at a demonstration. This conduct violates the Fourth Amendment by subjecting protesters who posed no safety concerns to unnecessary and excessive force and violates the First Amendment by interfering with their rights to assemble and demonstrate.
The lawsuit asks for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because OPD has shown by its recent actions that it will continue to violate protesters’ constitutional rights unless a court intervenes.
OPD’s recent conduct violates its own Crowd Control Policy, adopted in the settlement of a lawsuit arising from OPD’s prior mishandling of a large protest in 2003. The policy strictly limits the use force and prohibits the indiscriminate use of shot-filled “bean” bags and other projectiles against crowds or peaceful protesters.
On October 26, 2011 The ACLU-NC and NLG sent a public records request seeking information about OPD’s use of force against Occupy demonstrators. OPD refused to hand over information about its actions.
The lawsuit, Timothy Scott Campbell, et al, vs. City of Oakland and Interim Police Chief Howard Jordan was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Attorneys for the plaintiffs are: Alan L. Schlosser, Michael T. Risher and Linda Lye for the ACLU Foundation of Northern California; Rachel Lederman, Carol Sobel, Bobbie Stein and R. Michael Flynn for the National Lawyers’ Guild; and James B. Chanin and Julie M. Houk from the Law Offices of James B. Chanin.
###
For more information:
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2011/11/0...
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
After watching the news coverage and videos of the Oakland Police Department's disturbing violence against citizens exercising their constitutional rights of Free Speech and right to assemble, as well as their treatment of Scott Olson, I find myself transported back to the civil rights movement of the 1960's. Police didn't give a damn about the rights of Americans then either. Just because you have a badge and weapons don't think that the law doesn't apply to you.
Not only should the Oakland Police Department get reprimanded, but those officers issuing the orders should be fired and prosecuted.
Not only should the Oakland Police Department get reprimanded, but those officers issuing the orders should be fired and prosecuted.
Long overdue.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Donate
$200.00 donated
in the past month
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network