From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Indigenous artist fixes racist Piedmont Mural
After 24 years the racist mural on 41st and Piedmont avenue had finally been fixed. Neighbors hugged with joy as they celebrated the artistic amendment that finally included depictions of indigenous resistance to colonial violence.
After 24 years the racist mural on 41st and Piedmont avenue had finally been fixed. Neighbors hugged with joy as they celebrated the artistic amendment that finally included depictions of indigenous resistance to colonial violence.
“Well, ultimately this mural should be removed, this addition was a much needed intervention in such a problematic representation.”
The mural in focus “The Capture of Solid, Escape of the Soul” by non-native artist Rocky Rische-Baird was painted in 2006 to the loud and persistent protest of local indigenous community. (No one interviewed on local news was sure why, however wealthy white people just loved the mural).
After more than two decades of indigenous-led protest, the mural has again gained notoriety in local news after it was made public that property management SG Real Estate Co. promised to remove it. “Over the past several weeks, we’ve received feedback from members of our community identifying aspects of the mural that may be interpreted as offensive.”
After the larger community became aware of the news, many decried removal of the work, reducing valid cultural critiques by native people to a controversy about public nudity. (“Woke California Town to Paint Over Historical Mural Over Complaints That It’s “Crass”.” - Daily Mail) Those interviewed were all white people claiming there were no opposing viewpoints, while glaringly no Ohlone community members were interviewed. The thin narrative largely ignores the decades of documented grievances from the local native and urban indigenous communities. (And any of their allies, for that matter.)
While news coverage alleges that the mural is a “historically accurate representation,” or a critique on modernity that should be saved, the imagery of missionaries giving small pox blankets to the Ohlone is inaccurate and regurgitates harmful violence.
Additionally, the central figure, a nude man, depicts a stereotypical image of an “Indian” and is culturally insensitive and offensive.
“They would never put a white mans dick on Piedmont Ave. Show me a white man’s dick on a wall anywhere in the bay…”
-Usdi, a native passerby in support of the mural coming down
After cow-tailing to white pressure, the property manager went back on their promise to remove the offensive mural to “help make the community more inclusive,” announcing that they have paused plans to remove the mural indefinitely.
One supporter interviewed said “I just don’t care if indigenous people don’t like it, it’s my favorite work of art.” Bay muralist Dan Fontes added “Can’t we have some nice things?”
The controversy continues... Community members of conscience are encouraged to reach out to the Piedmont Avenue Merchants Association and to SG Property Management in support of removal of the mural to honor the request of the local indigenous community.
“Well, ultimately this mural should be removed, this addition was a much needed intervention in such a problematic representation.”
The mural in focus “The Capture of Solid, Escape of the Soul” by non-native artist Rocky Rische-Baird was painted in 2006 to the loud and persistent protest of local indigenous community. (No one interviewed on local news was sure why, however wealthy white people just loved the mural).
After more than two decades of indigenous-led protest, the mural has again gained notoriety in local news after it was made public that property management SG Real Estate Co. promised to remove it. “Over the past several weeks, we’ve received feedback from members of our community identifying aspects of the mural that may be interpreted as offensive.”
After the larger community became aware of the news, many decried removal of the work, reducing valid cultural critiques by native people to a controversy about public nudity. (“Woke California Town to Paint Over Historical Mural Over Complaints That It’s “Crass”.” - Daily Mail) Those interviewed were all white people claiming there were no opposing viewpoints, while glaringly no Ohlone community members were interviewed. The thin narrative largely ignores the decades of documented grievances from the local native and urban indigenous communities. (And any of their allies, for that matter.)
While news coverage alleges that the mural is a “historically accurate representation,” or a critique on modernity that should be saved, the imagery of missionaries giving small pox blankets to the Ohlone is inaccurate and regurgitates harmful violence.
Additionally, the central figure, a nude man, depicts a stereotypical image of an “Indian” and is culturally insensitive and offensive.
“They would never put a white mans dick on Piedmont Ave. Show me a white man’s dick on a wall anywhere in the bay…”
-Usdi, a native passerby in support of the mural coming down
After cow-tailing to white pressure, the property manager went back on their promise to remove the offensive mural to “help make the community more inclusive,” announcing that they have paused plans to remove the mural indefinitely.
One supporter interviewed said “I just don’t care if indigenous people don’t like it, it’s my favorite work of art.” Bay muralist Dan Fontes added “Can’t we have some nice things?”
The controversy continues... Community members of conscience are encouraged to reach out to the Piedmont Avenue Merchants Association and to SG Property Management in support of removal of the mural to honor the request of the local indigenous community.
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
Thank you to the artists that led this intervention. Ive been really taken aback by those defending the representation and saying this is our history, this is historically accurate. This is an outdated and offensive representation that was created when there was no oversight process and no approval process for public art, people just put up what they wanted to. Why is it still here?
What does it teach us to have a tribute to colonial violence decorating a shopping district in the expensive part of town?
Everyone supposedly loves this horrible piece now but the private areas of the Native men and women have been gouged away for years, a further violation. if this is such an important art that everyone cares about, why was this not fixed?
Its been dissapointing (but not surprising) to see how shallow the news coverage of the issue is, turning real critiques into a joke about nudity. Whats been largely missing is any Native American voices in the the public discussions.
Hopefully a future art can replace this, led and created by Native artists.
What does it teach us to have a tribute to colonial violence decorating a shopping district in the expensive part of town?
Everyone supposedly loves this horrible piece now but the private areas of the Native men and women have been gouged away for years, a further violation. if this is such an important art that everyone cares about, why was this not fixed?
Its been dissapointing (but not surprising) to see how shallow the news coverage of the issue is, turning real critiques into a joke about nudity. Whats been largely missing is any Native American voices in the the public discussions.
Hopefully a future art can replace this, led and created by Native artists.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network



