top
US
US
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Leaked Draft Opinion Reveals the Supreme Court Intends to Completely Overturn Roe v Wade

by Dave Id
In a stunning breach of US Supreme Court secrecy, a draft majority opinion written by justice Samuel Alito has been leaked. The would-be ruling is outrageous, sneering at the concept of a constitutional right to privacy and bodily autonomy. Alito makes a case for completely overturning Roe v Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v Casey (1992), allowing states to outlaw all abortions without exceptions for rape and incest. Half of the country will lose access to safe and legal reproductive services, with ominous implications for countless other long-established rights.
sm_scotus-alito-overrule-roe-2022.jpg
[Screenshot from the Supreme Court draft overturning Roe]


"We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled.... no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision" — Samuel Alito


Politico has published a draft majority opinion for the US Supreme Court in the matter of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. Oral arguments were made in the case in December 2021 and the draft ruling is dated February 2022. With hearings concluded for this SCOTUS term, a final ruling in the case is expected within the next month or two. The actual decision may or may not read exactly as the draft does, but a majority agreed to end legal protections for a woman's right to choose, and they chose Alito to write the opinion for them. Without defections from the court's right-wing justices such that that they lose their majority before a ruling is issued, Roe v Wade will officially be history within a matter of weeks.

The Mississippi law at issue makes most abortions illegal after 15 weeks of pregnancy, about two months earlier than Roe and later decisions allow. But, that restriction is about to become moot with the SCOTUS completely overturning Roe v Wade. Around ten states have anti-abortion "trigger laws" on the books, set to go into effect should Roe be overruled. It won't be long before abortion is illegal in at least two dozen US states.

Abortion has already been effectively been outlawed in Texas, since September of last year when the state passed its anti-abortion vigilante bounty law, enabling anyone from any state to sue any woman who receives an abortion in Texas, as well as anyone who assists in any capacity. The Supreme Court allowed that law to stand in a "shadow docket" maneuver, signaling their intent with the Mississippi case to severely damage Roe or to even toss it.

Fortunately, California protects a woman's right to choose in statute and the state constitution, which covers tens of millions of women. New York and other populous left-leaning states have similar protections. But, most states do not, leaving upwards of a hundred million or more American women to fend for themselves with at-home or black market abortions. Those with enough means can travel to abortion "sanctuary" states. Untold numbers will be forced to bear children against their will, no exceptions under the law.

Laws copycatting Mississippi and Texas have already passed in a number of states, and the post-Roe wave of draconian reproductive laws will be even worse. Needless misery and cruel punishments for women and abortion providers are about to explode across the country, whenever they dare defy the misogynistic laws of their home states. Some states even threaten women who leave their state for reproductive care.

Meanwhile, pusillanimous Democrats will undoubtedly bemoan the loss of reproductive choice. They'll pretend that they didn't see this coming, that they didn't squander the opportunity to do something during recent periods when they controlled the White House and the US Congress; that protecting the "tradition" of the filibuster was more important than women's rights, civil rights, or democracy; that it was just too radical to expand the courts, even after a seat was stolen from Obama and one-term president Trump, who lost the popular vote, got three picks for the high court, along with placing hundreds of other reactionaries on the federal bench, many grossly unqualified. There's still time for Democrats to act, yet it would be surprising if serious legislation is enacted at the federal level before January, when the next Congress convenes.

At this point, Republicans have a good shot at winning control of one or both houses of Congress this November, and they have at least a 50/50 chance at retaking the presidency in 2024, too. With whatever power they hold, they'll to try to drag the country back to the 19th century, wildly emboldened now that the Supreme Court has untethered them, likely attempting to diminish and destroy civil liberties nationally, despite their claims of an interest in "states' rights."

Until Democrats and so-called moderates grow a spine, things are about to get a whole lot worse on this and many other fronts. The majority in this country still supports a woman's right to choose, voting rights, equal protection under the law, and privacy, things we've come to expect throughout our lifetimes, at least nominally over the last half century. What's left for the people to do? Take to the streets? Shut a whole lotta shit down?
scotus-initial-draft_overturn-roe-casey-2022.pdf_600_.jpg
98-page PDF of Supreme Court anti-choice draft written by Samuel Alito, circulated February 10, 2022 (14mb)
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
This an interpretation that, if carried to its logical conclusion, would eradicate many of Americans’ other rights that the court has recognized based on so-called substantive due process concerns, among them the right to contraception, the right to gay marriage, and the decriminalization of gay sex. The end of legal abortion will not be where the court’s reactionaries stop. They aim to hurt, punish and narrow the lives of Americans in many more cruel and inventive ways.

The sudden illegality of abortion in most states come June will also create new legal landmines that will rapidly erode other individual rights. As women cross state borders for care, red states will try to limit interstate travel. As activists send abortion pills through the mail, aggressive searches and seizures of packages and personal belongings will become more frequent.

As women find ways to end their pregnancies, many of them will be arrested on criminal charges and some of them will be convicted. As doctors face patients with life-threatening pregnancy complications, many of them will not know what they are legally permitted to do, and in fear, they will let their patients die. Some of those who make the other choice, and help their patients live, will be arrested.

All of this will create legal precedents that erode American freedom, making life more burdensome, more brutish and less safe.

...

In making abortion illegal, the court is imposing a legal status that is so cruel, so personal and so life-altering on half its population, that those subject to this imposition cannot be called free. Is there any condition more essential to democratic citizenship than a person’s control over her own body? Can we call ourselves a free country without it?
The Court was the midwife of Jim Crow, the right hand of union busters, and the dead hand of the Confederacy, and is now one of the chief architects of America’s democratic decline.

the judiciary, for reasons laid out by Rosenberg and others, structurally favors conservatives

institutions like the Electoral College and Senate malapportionment give Republicans a huge leg up in the battle for control of the judiciary.
by NYMag
It is not enough to urge voters to turn out in November, as prominent Democrats including President Joe Biden have suggested. The suggestion is an insult. Pro-choice women have voted, and run for office, and done all the party has asked them to do. Now is the time for action
One of the most durable myths in recent history is that the religious right, the coalition of conservative evangelicals and fundamentalists, emerged as a political movement in response to the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling legalizing abortion. The tale goes something like this: Evangelicals, who had been politically quiescent for decades, were so morally outraged by Roe that they resolved to organize in order to overturn it.

This myth of origins is oft repeated by the movement’s leaders. In his 2005 book, Jerry Falwell, the firebrand fundamentalist preacher, recounts his distress upon reading about the ruling in the Jan. 23, 1973, edition of the Lynchburg News: “I sat there staring at the Roe v. Wade story,” Falwell writes, “growing more and more fearful of the consequences of the Supreme Court’s act and wondering why so few voices had been raised against it.” Evangelicals, he decided, needed to organize.

Some of these anti- Roe crusaders even went so far as to call themselves “new abolitionists,” invoking their antebellum predecessors who had fought to eradicate slavery.

But the abortion myth quickly collapses under historical scrutiny. In fact, it wasn’t until 1979—a full six years after Roe—that evangelical leaders, at the behest of conservative activist Paul Weyrich, seized on abortion not for moral reasons, but as a rallying-cry to deny President Jimmy Carter a second term. Why? Because the anti-abortion crusade was more palatable than the religious right’s real motive: protecting segregated schools. So much for the new abolitionism.
President Joe Biden signed a law Friday that will increase financial disclosure requirements for federal judges and Supreme Court justices, a move legal experts describe as a small but meaningful step towards reform at a time when public trust in the federal judiciary is at an all time low.

The legislation was introduced after the Wall Street Journal reported in September that more than 130 federal judges had violated U.S. law and judicial ethics by overseeing court cases involving companies in which either they or members of their family owned stock, and found that federal judges had improperly failed to disqualify themselves from 685 court cases since 2010.
by The Atlantic
It is now the middle of 2022, and we have just been shown a leaked opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States that would overthrow settled law of 50 years on the grounds that abortion is not mentioned in the Constitution, and is not “deeply rooted” in our “history and tradition.” True enough. The Constitution has nothing to say about women’s reproductive health. But the original document does not mention women at all.

Women were deliberately excluded from the franchise. Although one of the slogans of the Revolutionary War of 1776 was “No taxation without representation,” and government by consent of the governed was also held to be a good thing, women were not to be represented or governed by their own consent—only by proxy, through their fathers or husbands. Women could neither consent nor withhold consent, because they could not vote. That remained the case until 1920, when the Nineteenth Amendment was ratified, an amendment that many strongly opposed as being against the original Constitution. As it was.

Women were nonpersons in U.S. law for a lot longer than they have been persons. If we start overthrowing settled law using Justice Samuel Alito’s justifications, why not repeal votes for women?

...

If Justice Alito wants you to be governed by the laws of the 17th century, you should take a close look at that century. Is that when you want to live?
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$225.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network