top
US
US
Newswire
Calendar
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Meet Your New Overlord!
by subMedia.tv
Wednesday Nov 16th, 2016 8:19 AM
Roughly a quarter of Americans just elected a feckless dips**t into the most powerful muthafu**in position on earth!
Copy the code below to embed this movie into a web page:
Yeah that’s right, roughly a quarter of Americans just elected a feckless dipshit into the most powerful muthafuckin position on earth! Donald Trump! Here’s our forecast of things to come.

Support independent anti-fascist media – http://submedia.tv/donate

Meet your new overlord
https://vimeo.com/191715995

https://submedia.tv/stimulator/2016/11/16/meet-your-new-overlord/
§Good Morning World!
by subMedia.tv Wednesday Nov 16th, 2016 8:19 AM
sm_your-new-overlord.jpg

Comments  (Hide Comments)

by openculture.com
Wednesday Nov 16th, 2016 12:49 PM
nytimeshitler-2

The New York Times' First Profile of Hitler: His Anti-Semitism Is Not as "Genuine or Violent" as It Sounds (1922)

http://www.openculture.com/2016/11/the-new-york-times-first-profile-of-hilter.html

In 1922—at the dawn of Hitler's budding nationalist movement—The New York Times published its first profile, and explained his demagoguery away. The article, titled "New Popular Idol Rises in Bavaria," begins with several alarming subheadings: "Hitler credited with extraordinary powers of swaying crowds to his will," "forms gray-shirted army... They obey orders implicitly," "Leader a reactionary," "Anti-Red and Anti-Semitic." It then goes on to undermine these charges.

According to "several reliable, well-informed [unnamed] sources," we're told, "Hitler's anti-Semitism was not so genuine or violent as it sounded," though "the Hitler movement is not of a mere local or picturesque interest."

He was merely using anti-Semitic propaganda as a bait to catch masses of followers and keep them aroused, enthusiastic and in line for the time when his organization is perfected and sufficiently powerful to be employed effectively for political purposes.

What purposes? The paper quotes one admiring "sophisticated politician" as saying, "You can't expect the masses to understand or appreciate your finer real aims. You must feed the masses with cruder morsels and ideas like anti-Semitism. It would be politically all wrong to tell them the truth about where you really are leading them." Where might this be? The shadowy source did not say. We cynically expect all politicians to lie, to feed us "cruder morsels." But assuming that racism, bigotry, and scapegoating—whether sincere or not—will go down so easily with so many people constitutes a very dark view of "the masses."

Ten years later, after Hitler was released from prison for treason and had begun his candidacy for president, many, even more complimentary, articles would follow—as Rafael Medoff documents in The Daily Beast—all the way up to Time magazine's naming him "Man of the Year" for 1938. "Why did many mainstream American newspapers portray the Hitler regime positively," asks Medoff, "especially in its early months? How could they publish warm human-interest stories about a brutal dictator? Why did they excuse or rationalize Nazi anti-Semitism? These are questions that should haunt the conscience of U.S. journalism to this day."

One reporter in a 1933 Christian Science Monitor dispatch from Germany informed his readers that "the train arrived punctually"—indulging a trope about fascists making the "trains run on time" that has astonishingly come back in circulation via former Cincinnati mayor Ken Blackwell. "Traffic was well regulated." The correspondent found "not the slightest sign of anything unusual afoot." The word we often hear for what happened during the 30s is "normalization," a process by which the most harrowing portents were blended into the landscape, rendered signs of nothing "unusual afoot."

The normalization of Nazism in Germany involved a tremendous propaganda effort, much of it aimed at children. In the U.S., the press seemed more than willing to turn an ethno-nationalist movement with frightening—and plainly stated—objectives into an ordinary, rational state actor. Anti-Semitism was described as legitimate political resentment or reasonable anger at German Jews' "commercial clannishness." Somehow the victims of Nazism had to be responsible for their own murder and persecution. "There must be some reason," wrote The Christian Century in an April, 1933 editorial, "other than race or creed—just what is that reason?" Few people, it seems, could or would allow themselves to imagine that the new German Führer actually meant what he said.

We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

donate now

$ 102.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network