top
US
US
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

It Is Possible to Find Out What Happened to the WTC on 9/11

by David R. Kimball
To solve a crime, it is first necessary to find out what happened. To do that, it is necessary to carefully examine not some, but ALL of the available empirical evidence, and then from that formulate a hypothesis. Using this method it is possible to determine what happened to the World Trade Center in NYC on 9/11/01.
9/11, regardless of how it was defined by the authorities, was a monstrous crime. To solve this crime, or any crime, it is necessary to first find out what happened, and only after that can there be any accurate determination of blame.

To find out what happened, it is necessary to examine the empirical* evidence, and then form a hypothesis about what happened based on that evidence.

If a hypothesis is formulated after considering only some of the evidence, and additional evidence is discovered that does not support that hypothesis, then that hypothesis must be discarded as no longer valid. Then, a new hypothesis based on ALL of the evidence can be formulated.

The evidence does not lie.

I credit the work of Dr. Judy Wood for educating me about this, and it is by this method that it is possible to determine what happened at the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.

To learn what happened, I suggest considering with an open mind the following hypotheses, and testing each hypothesis against ALL of the available evidence. This listing of researchers is partial, and is intended as an aid to further independent research.

*Empirical: Verifiable or provable by means of observation or experiment.

Two hypotheses about airplanes at the WTC:

[1] Planes at the WTC

Media – radio, TV, magazines, school textbooks, film (worldwide)
9/11 Commission Report http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report_Ch1.htm
NIST Investigation http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/faqs_wtctowers.cfm
Richard Gage, AIA (airplane in website logo) http://www1.ae911truth.org/en/home.html
David Ray Griffin, PhD (assumes airplanes) http://911review.com/articles/griffin/nyc1.html & http://davidraygriffin.com/
Steven Jones, PhD (assumes airplanes)
http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/JonesAnswersQuestionsWorldTradeCenter.pdf (page 22)

[2] No Planes at the WTC

Morgan Reynolds, PhD http://nomoregames.net/
Andrew Johnson
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=134&Itemid=60
John Lear http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=17660
Christopher Holmes, PhD http://www.zeropoint.ca/FabledAirplanes.html
Collin Alexander https://www.youtube.com/user/CollinAlexander

Five hypotheses about what caused the destruction of the WTC:

[1] Burning Jet Fuel

Media – radio, TV, magazines, school textbooks, film (worldwide)
9/11 Commission Report (2004) http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report.pdf
NIST Investigation (2005) http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/faqs_wtctowers.cfm

[2] Controlled Demolition

Richard Gage, AIA http://www.911truth.org/tag/richard-gage/
David Ray Griffin, PhD http://911review.com/articles/griffin/nyc1.html
Steven Jones, PhD http://benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOCPJ/TOCPJ-2-7.pdf

[3] Thermite, Nanothermite and derivatives

Steven Jones, PhD http://benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOCPJ/TOCPJ-2-7.pdf
Niels Harrit, PhD (Danish) http://nielsharrit.org/
Richard Gage, AIA http://www1.ae911truth.org/faqs/646-faq-8-what-is-nanothermite-could-it-have-been-used-to-demolish-the-wtc-skyscrapers.html

[4] Nuclear and/or Mini-nuclear devices

Gordon Duff http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/06/02/vt-nuclear-education-undeniable-proof-of-911-as-a-nuclear-event/
Jim Fetzer, PhD http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/05/01/on-c-span-richard-gage-leaves-911-truth-in-a-time-warp/ & http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/
Dimitri Khalezov (Russian) http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_154.htm

[5] Directed Energy Weapons, cold and/or hot

Judy Wood, PhD http://drjudywood.com/towers/ & http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/
Morgan Reynolds, PhD http://nomoregames.net/category/911/
Andrew Johnson (British) http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/
Abraham Rodriguez, MD http://pookzta.blogspot.com/



We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$110.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network