From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Related Categories: California | East Bay | Government & Elections | Police State & Prisons
EFF Submits Letter Opposing Oakland's Domain Awareness Center
by Nadia Kayyali, EFF
Tuesday Feb 18th, 2014 8:02 PM
February 18, 2014

EFF submitted a letter to the Oakland City Council opposing the Domain Awareness Center, a surveillance system that would aggregate information from multiple sources across the city—including 35 CCTV cameras, 40 live video surveillance cameras, 25 traffic camera sites, license plate readers, and Oakland’s “[gun]shot spotter” system. The project would also include partnerships with other agencies and intelligence centers, such as the Northern California Regional Intelligence Center, a fusion center located in San Francisco that has access to the FBI’s eGuardian database, among others.

Today's letter joins earlier statements from ACLU of Northern California and the Oakland Privacy Working Group against the DAC:

EFF opposes the idea of extending the DAC into a citywide system for law enforcement use, far from its original intended use as a port security measure to prevent terrorist attacks. Furthermore, the privacy policy that has been drafted by City Administrator Santana is inadequate; although given the expanded purpose of the DAC, it is doubtful that any privacy policy could salvage it.

Oakland residents have also vocally opposed the DAC. This resistance has led to the creation of a completely inadequate privacy policy framework, but the project has continued to move forward, apparently because deadlines are looming for the federal grant money that will enable the expansion of the DAC from the Port. The reason for opposing the DAC is clear:

The DAC, by its very nature, enables unconstitutional surveillance. It will enable unprecedented access to information from around the city by aggregating previously unrelated data sources. This aggregation exponentially increases the reach of every piece of technology included, creating a web of surveillance that stretches across the city and allows for a comprehensive picture of the activities of Oakland residents. Under the California Constitution, surveillance should be specific and targeted. Instead, this allows for persistent and pervasive surveillance of all Oakland residents.

EFF is happy to join in the call to halt the DAC project where it stands now.

Comments  (Hide Comments)


Download PDF
Here is the bogus proposed Privacy and Data Retention policy submitted by Oakland city staffers. Even if the policy were perfect, OPD should not be trusted to follow it, because they can't get in compliance with the 2003 Negotiated Settlement Agreement, even today, especially on officer discipline, they regularly neglect to use their lapel cameras properly, and they seriously injured dozens of Occupy protesters and journalists, not to mention the countless people of color abused and killed without accountability every year.

Oakland Police MisUsing Their Video Cameras

Jim Chanin Speaks on Federal Receivership for the Oakland Police Department

National Lawyers Guild Wins Settlement for Occupy Oakland Injuries in Campbell vs Oakland