top
Peninsula
Peninsula
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

No on Prop 23 Press Conference at Palo Alto Medical Center

by Amanda Fox
Members of the Stanford community and retired nurses testified to the adverse health consequences of Proposition 23 in front of the Palo Alto Medical Foundation today.
Photos by R. Wilson for indybay.
640_23-3pamf1.jpg
Senior citizens, parents, retired nurses and "Raging Grannies" spoke out against the passage of Proposition 23 today at a press conference in front of the Palo Alto Medical Foundation adjacent to the Stanford University campus.

Speakers applauded the strong stance against Proposition 23 taken by the California chapter of the American Lung Association, the California Nurses Association, Kaiser Permanente, and many California hospitals and public health advocates. Jane Warner, President and CEO of the American Lung Association in California said recently that the impacts of air pollution affect everyone in the state, and that 19,000 people in California die prematurely every year because of air pollution. "Prop 23 will do nothing but cause more air pollution, cause more children to have asthma, send more seniors to the emergency room, and take more lives of Californians," she said.

Today's action in Palo Alto began with a rally at the major intersection of El Camino Real and Embarcadero at noon. Senior citizen activists dramatized their anger at Texas oil companies with a skit "Raging Grannies v. Oil Billionaires for Pollution"; the grannies lashed out at oil company representatives in top hats for their heartless support of Proposition 23.

Ruth Robertson, the parent of an asthmatic son said, "Big oil companies Valero and Tesoro are trying to weaken the rules California has for energy and air quality standards by donating millions of dollars to get Proposition 23 passed. Their executives don't live in California and breathe California air, and it's a sure bet they aren't raising small children here." Gail Sredanovic, a lung patient, also gave personal testimony.

Retired nurses Barbara Goodwin and Ellyn O'Toole spoke into a microphone to the gathered crowd. They agreed that it is critical to the health of all Californians that Proposition 23 be defeated.
§Raging Grannies listen
by Amanda Fox
640_23-3gslunggu.jpg
Testimony given by lung patient
§Signs Against 23
by Amanda Fox
640_23-3community1.jpg
§Noon rally
by Amanda Fox
640_23-3ralcommunity.jpg
§Testimony from RN
by Amanda Fox
640_23-3rn1.jpg
§On the street corner after the press conference
by Amanda Fox
640_23-3wave1.jpg
About 15 demonstrators stuck around after the press conference to appeal to drive-bys to vote no on 23.
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by Earl Richards
The California Jobs Initiative (CJI) is an oil corporation farce and fraud. There is no connection, whatsoever, between greenhouse gas emission reduction and the loss of jobs. This notion is an insult to the intelligence of the people of California. In fact, there is job growth in the clean, renewable energy industry. Chevron employs 65,000 worldwide and CJI is not going to change this. The only jobs created by the oil industry are clean-up jobs after oil spills and deep water, blow-outs and pump-handler jobs. CJI will make fanastic profits for the oil industry, increase air pollution, especially in communities around their refineries and there will not be lower gas prices. Koch Industries, Valero and Tesoro are super Enrons. Since when did the oil companies start to show any concern for the unemployed and their families and for small businesses?
by Wayne
Points to ponder on AB 32:

° CARB over-estimated diesel emmisions by 340%

° Key CARB personnel caught lying about credentials and then failing to reveal this after it is discovered internally before AB 32 passed, until after AB 32 passed

° Sacramento State University reports estimated cost of $3734 per year per family due strictly to this AB 32.

° CARB has admitted that California alone cannot have an impact on reducing global warming and CO2 emissions.

° US EPA acknowledges that US action alone will not impact the world CO2 levels;

° US EPA (11 July 2010) said that bills in Congress will not reduce the total use of gas and oil of 20 million gallons per day for decades.

° LAO (CA Legislative Analyst Office) stated: CA economy at large will be adversely affected by implementation of climate-related policies that are not in place elsewhere. (Letter to Dan Logue, 13 May 2010)

° Even CARB’s own economic experts have recognized the fact that jobs will be lost because of AB 32. In fact, they recommend establishing a “Worker Transition Program” to provide assistance to people who lose their jobs because of AB 32 regulations.

° AB 32 does nothing for local pollution, nor does Proposition 23 do anything to increase local pollution.

° 5.5% unemployment for 4 consecutive quarters has occurred 7 times since 2005, 14 times since 1999, and 22 times since 1987.

When the loudest objections to any candidacy or initiative are focused on vilifying its financial backers, this often indicates that its opponents' arguments on its merits are weak.

Vote yes on Prop 23 and suspend AB32.
by ...jj....
As for Wayne's "facts" above...where did they come from (no documentation of course). The sponsors are OIL companies, dude. Yeah that DOES say it all! So Wayne found indybay. Welcome to the left coast, buddy.
The American Lung Association of California has come out strongly against proposition 23. Whenever air quality gets bad, hospitals see a rise in emergency admissions for asthma, and air pollution causes premature deaths from lung and cardiac conditions. Air pollution in the Bay Area was dramatically bad in the late 60's and early 70's and we passed laws that made a positive difference. Greenhouse gases include a number of pollutants that not only contribute to global warming, but also harm human health, which is why the Lung Association wants to keeps the current laws. Greenhouse gas regulations are not only an obvious promoter of new green energy jobs, they will also help with pollutants that cause immediate harm to human health. Asthma is on the rise, especially among children and costs millions in medical expenses and lost productivity. We need to protect California's laws against a proposition funded largely by Texas oil companies. Like to breathe? I do. Join me in voting NO on 23.
by Wayne
Thanks JJ, but I live on the Left Coast. I'd like to be able to afford to keep living here...

My facts come mostly from California government studies.

Prop 23 is not going to hurt air quality as no clean air laws are suspended by it.
by Frances Griffin
Newsflash:
Global warming gases include substances harmful to human health.
I have a hunch the American Lung Association knows what they are talking about.-- Just a hunch.
by Mark
@Wayne: Wayne, A quick Google search shows that you've posted the identical response 13 times to various stories on Prop 23. Casual reader or paid shill? Yes, I thought so.
Don't go away, Wayne, indybay is very educational. Especially this page http://www.indybay.org/environment/
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$120.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network