Central Valley
Central Valley
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Political Prisoner Correspondence and the FBI

by Sacramento Prisoner Support
FOIA documents uncover interesting information...
Recently we began receiving documents in response to a FOIA request we filed with the FBI about Eric McDavid. The documents have uncovered a few alarming pieces of information, but one in particular we felt it necessary to share with the public as soon as possible. For years people have been speculating that writing political prisoners would result in a person being “put on a list.” Unfortunately, it seems that those speculations were not unfounded.

We have received perhaps hundreds of pages documenting Eric's correspondence with other people. These letters are not just kept on file – the Sacramento County Main Jail forwarded all of these letters to the Sacramento FBI field office, which then forwarded them to local field offices around the country (and to law enforcement internationally) to warn the FBI in other cities of a “possible environmental/animal rights extremist” or “a possible anarchist extremist” in their community. Originally, the FBI's communications included a statement that “Sacramento is forwarding this communication for information purposes only.” But later, they began including a much longer statement which read, in part: “this information has been determined to be of such a nature that some follow-up as to the possibility of criminal activity is warranted...” These statements were included no matter what was the content of the letter – often the documents include the statement that the letter was “benign in nature.”

It is unclear whether or not the FBI is still forwarding Eric's correspondence to local field offices. We have not received any documents dated after his move to a federal facility. It is also unknown whether or not all correspondence with political prisoners is treated in the same manner. What we do know is that if a person sent Eric a letter to the Sacramento County Main Jail with their full name and address on it, the local FBI field office more than likely now has that information.

We are not sharing this information to raise alarm or spread fear. We have every intention of continuing to write political prisoners, and we urge others to do the same. That said, we hope to expose the FBI's politically motivated investigations and, unlike the FBI, we believe people have a right to know when they have been spied on. This kind of government intrusion could cause the “chilling effect” so often thrown about in conversations about 1st amendment activities. But when we give in to those fears, political prisoners are the ones who suffer. And this is exactly what the government wants. The state is constantly trying to expand its reach by gathering information about social movements and those who participate in them. Instead of letting this new information scare us into silence, we should use it to make informed decisions about how we support and prioritize political prisoners. This kind of repression has implications for more than just people involved in “activism.” Millions of people are incarcerated in this country. It is possible that the government uses similar tactics to investigate other communities that they actively repress. Writing our friends, family members and comrades should not be a justified excuse for investigation – no matter who our friends are.

We are attaching three documents. The first is typical of the documents the FBI sent towards the beginning of Eric's time at Sac County. The second is an example of what they sent to international law enforcement agencies. The final document is an example of the later version with the language about “follow up” being “warranted.”

If you would like to find out if the FBI has been collecting information on you, here is a website that explains how to request information under the freedom of information act.

by Sacramento Prisoner Support
by Sacramento Prisoner Support
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by Edward Campbell (edward.h.campbell [at]
These kind of alerts are really more libel than they are alerts of any legitimate law enforcement use. The Sacramento JTTF is just supplying grist for the local surveillance mill they contacted, more information for their files. You shouldn't be afraid of this activity being used lawfully, it's when the material exploited unlawfully which should cause some concern.

I've heard from some very stupid liberal lawyers that "you shouldn't worry because the information that's being collected by spying (such as eavesdropping on lawyer client conversations) because it can't be used against you in court." But it can be used against through illegal methods, like gang stalking, which have been used against me.

Its part of what I believe to be a covert operation which followed "Operation Total Recall," which investigated every possible connection to the 9/11 plot, called "Operation Omniscience," which is guided by the philosophy of "Total Awareness," which is being supplemented by technology referred to by the same name intended to give the powers that be "Real-time Total Awareness," etc.

The whole idea, furthermore, which is being trotted out in the press that they're reaching "information overload" and like William Arkin and Dana Priest of the Washington Post asserted, and is reasserted in the Progressive this month, that it's a lumbering beast which can't maintain focus and doesn't know what's doing, is totally false. This system that they have and continue to develop is capable of intense focus.

The information is simply collected and stored and then employed later on when they need it. Deploying the proverbial "post hoc ergo propter hoc" they should hope to obtain a conviction by showing that criminal intent was always present in the mind of the defendant, and that they can prove a history of it. But it's even more dangerous when they decide to simply "take your out," because then they won't be abiding by any of the restrictions the law imposes. But the laws change too, what is illegal procedure today might not be illegal procedure tomorrow.

Don't accept the propaganda that Operation Omniscience is too big to be useful.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!


$70.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.


Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network