top
International
International
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Intifada, Iraqi Style: Naomi Klein and Andrew Stern report from Baghdad

by Andrew Stern / Naomi Klein (expectresistance [at] yahoo.com)
April 9, 2003 was the day Baghdad fell to U.S. forces. One year later, it is rising up against them.

Text: Naomi Klein
Photo essay: Andrew Stern

**Free usage for the Indymedia network. All others please contact me for permission to use these photos in web or print.
dscf0369.jpg
Donald Rumsfeld claims that the resistance is just a few “thugs, gangs and terrorists.” This is dangerous, wishful thinking. The war against the
occupation is now being fought out in the open, by regular people defending their homes and neighbourhoods - an Iraqi intifada.

“They stole our playground,” an eight-year-old boy in Sadr City told me this week, pointing at six tanks parked in a soccer field, next to a rusty jungle gym. The field is a precious bit of green in an area of Baghdad that is otherwise a swamp of raw sewage and uncollected garbage.

Sadr City has seen little of Iraq's multi-billion-dollar “reconstruction,”
which is partly why Muqtader Sadr and his Mahadi army have so much support here. Before U.S. occupation chief Paul Bremer provoked Sadr into an armed conflict by shutting down his newspaper and arresting and killing his deputies, the Mahadi army was not fighting coalition forces, it was doing their job for them.


After all, in the year it has controlled Baghdad, the Coalition Provisional
Authority still hasn’t managed to get the traffic lights working or to
provide the most basic security for civilians. So in Sadr City, Sadr's
so-called “outlaw militia” can be seen engaged in such subversive activities as directing traffic and guarding factories from looters. In a way, the Mahadi army is as much Bremer’s creation as it al Sadr’s: it was Bremer who created Iraq's security vacuum -- Sadr simply filled it.


But as the June 30 “handover” to Iraqi control approaches, Bremer now sees Sadr and the Mahadi as a threat that must be taken out - along with the communities that have grown to depend on them. Which is why stolen
playgrounds were only the start of what I saw in Sadr City this week. At Al Thawra Hospital, I met Raad Daier, a 36-year-old ambulance driver with a bullet in his lower abdomen, one of 12 shots fired at his ambulance from a U.S. Humvee. According to hospital officials, at the time of the attack, he was carrying six people injured by U.S. forces, including a pregnant woman who had been shot in the stomach and lost her child.

I saw charred cars that dozens of eye-witnesses said had been hit by U.S.missiles, and confirmed with local hospitals that their drivers had beenburned alive. I also visited Block 37 of the Sadr City's Chuadir District, a row of houses where the every door was riddled with holes. Resident said U.S. tanks rolled down their street firing into their homes. Five people were killed, including Murtada Muhammad, age 4.


And yesterday I saw something that I feared more than any of this: a copy of the Koran with a bullet hole through it. It was lying in the ruins of what was Sadr's headquarters in Sadr City. A few hours earlier, witnesses say that two U.S. tanks broke down the walls of the center while two guided missiles pierced its roof, leaving giant craters in the floor and missile debris behind.



The worst damage, however, was done by hand. The clerics at the Sadr office say that U.S. soldiers entered the building and crudely shredded photographs of the Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani, the top Shiite cleric in Iraq. When I arrived at the destroyed center, the floor was covered in torn religious texts, including several copies of the Koran that been ripped and shot through with bullets. And it did not escape the notice of the Shiites here that hours earlier, U.S. soldiers had bombed a Sunni mosque in Fallouja.

For months the White House has been making ominous predictions of a civil war breaking out between the majority Shiites, who believe it's their turn to rule Iraq, and the minority Sunnis, who want to hold on to the privileges they amassed under Hussein's regime. But this week the opposite appears to have taken place. Both Sunni and Shiite have seen their neighbourhoods attacked and their religious sites desecrated. Up against a shared enemy, they are beginning to bury ancient rivalries and join forces against the occupation. Instead of a civil war, they are on the verge of building a common front.

You could see it at the mosques in Sadr City on Thursday: thousands of
Shiites lined up to donate blood, destined for Sunnis hurt in the attacks in
Fallouja. “We should thank Paul Bremer,” Salih Ali told me. “He has finally
united Iraq. Against him.”
§Burned car
by Andrew Stern / Naomi Klein (expectresistance [at] yahoo.com)
dscf0079.jpg
A car whose driver was burned alive after being hit by a US missile in Sad'r City. Baghdad, Iraq. April 7, 2004.
§Little girl
by Andrew Stern / Naomi Klein (expectresistance [at] yahoo.com)
dscf0106.jpg
The entrance point of the tank shell that killed Murtada Muhammad, age 4, in his family home on Block 37 of Sad'r City's Chuadir District. Baghdad, Iraq. April 7, 2004.
§Ambulance driver
by Andrew Stern / Naomi Klein (expectresistance [at] yahoo.com)
dscf0131.jpg
Raad Daier, who was hit by a bullet when a US Humvee opened fire on him while driving his ambulance. He was carrying 6 people injured by US forces in Sad'r City. Baghdad, Iraq. April 7, 2004.
§Body
by Andrew Stern / Naomi Klein (expectresistance [at] yahoo.com)
dscf0154.jpg
A man killed the night before during clashes with US troops in Sad'r City. Baghdad, Iraq. April 7, 2004.
§Funeral procession
by Andrew Stern / Naomi Klein (expectresistance [at] yahoo.com)
dscf0210.jpg
Mourners carry a coffin of a family member killed the night before when US forces attacked the Moqtadah Al-Sad'r offices in Shia neighborhood of Shualla. Baghdad, Iraq. April 6, 2004.
§Koran shot
by Andrew Stern / Naomi Klein (expectresistance [at] yahoo.com)
dscf0216.jpg
A copy of the Koran shot by US troops in the destroyed Muqtadah Al-Sad'r offices in Sad'r City. Baghdad, Iraq. April 4, 2004.
§Guided missile
by Andrew Stern / Naomi Klein (expectresistance [at] yahoo.com)
dscf0230.jpg
The remains of the guided missile that slammed into the Moqtadah Al-Sad'r offices in Sad'r City. Baghdad, Iraq. April 8, 2004.
§Occupied playground
by Andrew Stern / Naomi Klein (expectresistance [at] yahoo.com)
dscf0255.jpg
Children on their playground in Sad'r City, which has been occupied by tanks, and had coils of barbed wire run across it. Baghdad, Iraq. April 6, 2004.
§Directing traffic
by Andrew Stern / Naomi Klein (expectresistance [at] yahoo.com)
dscf0356.jpg
A member of the Mahadi Army directing traffic in Sad'r City. Baghdad, Iraq. April 8, 2004.
§Mahadi Army fighter
by Andrew Stern / Naomi Klein (expectresistance [at] yahoo.com)
dscf0347.jpg
A member of the Mahadi Army stands guard on the roof of the Moqtadah Al-Sad'r offices in Sad'r City. Baghdad, Iraq. April 6, 2004.
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by American
As an American, I find it harder and harder to mourn our own U.S. dead.

My sympathies are more and more with the Iraqi victims of Bush.
by sigurd
washington and the white house is occupied by cowards; rich white powerful elitists hiding behind fortresses built of blood and greed...
by poster
I wholeheartedly agree with the previous posters.

Amerikkka: the government, the corporations, the banks, the military, the CIA FBI NSA, the truth comes out more & more all the time, so many of the people of America are hating your f*ck1n guts more & more every day. Go to he11.
by Just Wondering
When are people around the world going to start responding to the Empire's crimes by attacking the Empire's government and corporate personnel and institutions?

If the Empire had to send its mercenary thugs to guard thousands of buildings and persons around the world, that would be tens of thousands less such thugs to attack and suppress the peoples of the occupied countries! At a time when the Empire's military is stretched thin, it would make a difference! Moreover, if the class of people who actually have influence over imperial policy had to worry about their own asse(t)s, they might act as a restraining influence on their fellow scum who are calling the shots.

Of course, the mass-murdering capitalist vermin, through their media division, would scream "terrorism". But, to paraphrase Malvina Reynolds, "you ain't been doing nothing if you ain't been called a terrorist"!
by furiousblank (furiousblank [at] hotmail.com)
I look at those Korans with the bullet-holes in them and I feel terrible for the Americans over there, the living and the dead. I remember my students looking up at me with fear the day the war started, when I tried to make them talk about it and they kept repeating, "We can't talk about it. We have to support our troops." One girl repeating, "This is wrong, wrong." (The conversation, not the war.) One boy saying, "All I need to know is that he's a bad man." These are twenty-year-olds from Iowa, mind you, not high school students. Some of them have family over there, who don't understand why they're there, who went there with the best intentions and now have to hate people every day, have to be afraid that every woman with a baby basket is a suicide bomber, and all they know is that Islam is the reason why they're there. Islam is why people blew up the towers. So they shoot at Korans and Clerics, frustrated and enrages that everything can't be simpler, that everyone couldn't just be Christian and get along with each other. And their leaders at home cutting the funds to the schools that might have helped them understand this, that might have given them the psychological and spiritual faculties to remain more human in these circumstances. And they'll go home and find out that there's no money for them to see therapists, since their nightmares aren't "real" injuries. Mourn the Americans, too. With the exception of a handful of CEOs and administration bigwigs, we're all victims here. We're all in this together.
by Joseph
Come on now. One thing I like about INDYNEWS is that it present information that isn't usually available via the mainstream/corp. news. BUT....one thing I DO NOT like about some of the articles presented here is that they are blantantly one-sided...one-sided and blantantly anti-U.S. military. There is no doubt that women and children have been killed in the recent battles. Let me tell you the reason.

The insurgents in Iraq purposely hide among women and children.

Why? So the U.S. soldiers can't respond to the attacks against them, and so that when women and children are killed by U.S. soldiers (again, because the Iraqi insurgents purposely put them at risk by their own actions), they can use these victims as propaganda tools against the U.S. forces.

WAKE UP!

One-sided information--no matter which side it is coming from--is propaganda and does nothing to help properly inform the citizenry.

JOE
by Steve
What is the other side of the arguement that you are speaking of? The Americans never should have been there to begin with. It is wrong for the American troops to be there at all. I'm not anti-american but I am anti-occupation.

There should only one arguemnt and that is an Iraq free of american occupation.


by Free the Kurds
" There should only one arguemnt and that is an Iraq free of american occupation."

I'm with you man! Kurdiastan should be free of Arab occupation too!
by Strypey (strypey [at] indymedia.org)
There is a reason why 'insurgents' (a dehumanising word) are 'hiding' among women and children. It's because they are at home with their families. Like the Zapatistas they are ordinary people resorting to extraordinary means to defend themselves from an unprovoked and extremely bloody invasion of their neighbourhoods by foreign military US or otherwise.

Imagine you woke up one morning to find tanks rolling down the street you live on firing shells into people's houses in case there were 'insurgents' hiding there that might resist them. What would you do?
by Hermes
Exactly. If I woke up and saw the US had invaded my country, and I wanted to fight back, I would never have to leave home. What do you expect?!? That all the resistance fighters leave their towns and go sit in the desert?!?
You are such an idiot that you don't understand this. Palestinians hide among women and children too, its true. They stay with their wives and children, because they live there, in Palestine. What, do you expect them to all go move somewhere nice and convenient for Israeli F-16s and Apache helicopters to kill them?
They LIVE there goddammit...
by carlo (carlo.bailey [at] laposte.net)
It is easy to criticize the "one-side"-dedness of an article, what is interesting is to have the point of view of someone developping an information we don't get through the mass-media canal. And i believe it easy to contest the "hiding amongst women techniques", from afar and comfortably seated in front of our computers, whereas iraqis have to defend themselves with the not-much they have, face to face with tanks and missiles and soldiers.

We must, after reading and understanding, make our own opinions. but be thankful for the possibility to have different view points. Thank you indymedia and the two reporters in iraq, you are precious.
by a different joe
"Kurdiastan should be free of Arab occupation too!"

tell that to turkey, they've been using our weapons to massacre Kurds since the first gulf war. But they're "our kind of government" i believe someone said... but here i go being unpatriotic again...

the kurd have nothing to do with why we're there

http://members.aol.com/drovics/kurdsl.htm

check this for lyrics to a funny song that give some background on the situation.
by Dave
Do you really think the Iraqi insurgents would "hide" at home. They're going to pop out from behind the window with the baby in one hand and the kalashnikov in the other?

This is another tactic of the right. Elevate thine enemy to status of cartoonish-supervillian and everybody will agree with everything you do!

These fighters fight locally, in their neighbourhoods, maybe even on the same street they live on. But they're not inhuman, they're not savages who would gladly sacrifice their grandmother once they can pop off a few more shots at the Americans.

The balance here lies in blaming the Americans for using Israeli strong arm tactics in the first place. This is collective punishment. 60,000 residents have fled the town its so bad there! They carry this out by blocking the entrances to the town, preventing people from leaving, using F-16s and attack helicopters & artillery (as the Marines did use) to take out "resistance" targets in the town - no consideration given to the fact that the these buildings are probably also schools, mosques, civil authority buildings - make unreasonable demands you know won't be accepted, and then having no information about who or what youre looking for rampage through the town, sending the most brutal people you can find to fight your through the town with with bradleys, destroying civic buildings and rubbing peoples nose in it. Then withdraw, tell everybody youre the good guy here & start thinking about your next move. Your media in the US probably won't have shown this, but Sky News in the UK (Murdoch channel) did show about 2 edited minutes of Marines firing on Fallujah, at nothing in particular. They just fired heavy machines guns at anything that they felt like, the sniper was shooting at various targets, this at nightime. It didn't appear that the Marines were being fired upon nor was any insurgent or terrorist ever identified as a target by the Marines on the tape. Sky News did not feel the need to point out they were firing at nothing at all in particular.

The balance of blame here doesn't lie 50/50. That's not objectivity either, thats bias too.

Right wing commentators have been telling the US Military to "do what's necessary" and not to worry about civilian casualties. This even last week even after the siege started.
What they meant was the US Military should bomb the shit out the town and see who opposes them then. And then do it again if there's more trouble. This is what Stalin & Hitler did during WW2. No mention of the 350 Iraqi civilian dead. And no mention that Fallujah, as a town as it exists now, will never accept American occupation and will never change their minds, even if you do bomb them. They'll say it's only a few "thugs, criminals & terrorists" yet they maintain there's a need to lay siege to a town of 300,000 to stop them. Thugs & criminals don't organise themselves to fight against and hold their own against the US Military, a few thugs wouldn't be able to co-ordinate attacks with troops of 100 or more fighters.

This is an insurgency, with considerable popular support both in Baghdad and Fallujah and with Shia and Sunni alike. Again, your corporate media might have ignored this, but Indymedia reported that a convoy of aid of 100 cars and thousands of marchers broke the roadblocks laid out by US forces several times by stoning the troops.

There is some Sunni who hate the Kurds, but ethnic tensions haven't led to too much fighting between the two. Its been relatively peaceful in areas they both share.
by Free Iraq
They are patriots defending their country from a foreign invader. We'd do the same, if a foreign army tried to occupy America.
by HR
----
One-sided information--no matter which side it is coming from--is propaganda and does nothing to help properly inform the citizenry.
----

Exactly. This is what B(hush) B(Liar) did right from the pre planning days. Engaged media for "Propaganda" to convince Americans what America is doing id right.

Till B(Hush) and B(Liar) either Win their elections or are out of power, these things will continue. They seem to be clones of each other with liking for Non American/English Human Blood. Oh to satiate their Political Hunger with Blood they can stoop down to any level...

It's pathetic.... I really wonder what the meaning of Democracy is?? WHat Human Rights Is All ABout ...

by Dog matic
I was going to say what a bunch of hypocrites our governments are (I'm English), but the other comments here have made the point well enough.

I'll just drop a link to a great site. The chronology in here is shocking, and outlines the intent of the transnational elite gunning for the Middle east with shocking clarity: http://www.markcurtis.info

Mark Curtis' seminal book detailing the UK's complicity in global profiteering (thought by some to be a purely US agenda), Web of Deceit is a necessary read for anyone who thinks our governments are competent (let alone 'moral')enough to lead the world anywhere.

Another great site is: http://www.firethistime.org

It contains surprisingly straightforward quotes and documents from US government sources, outlining their intent and leaving no room for misinterpretation!

Sorry 'bout the lengthy post! D.
by Leela
The author who wrote, "They are not inhuman," is obviously not a patriot. Don't worry, we will defeat the terrorists and any other criminal group that threatens the stability of Iraq and the safety of Americans, British and our allies who defend freedom. You will also be defeated along with your buddies who spread negative and dangerous propaganda against the United States, England and our allies.
by Leela
To the author of "They are not inhuman," who stated "we would fight if our country was invaded." "We" who exactly is "We?" Believe me, you are a coward and the brave men and women of our country would never count on people like yourself to do anything in defense of the United States, England and our allies. Our troops are currently fighting for our country while you sit there passing judgement on them, and support terrorists and murderers. You would fight? Yeah sure, it is more likely that you and your buddies would be fighting each other for a hiding place, like the hole in the ground Saddam Hussein was found cowering in.
by Leela
To the author who finds it hard to mourn Americans who die fighting for this country, but can mourn the dead terrorists and their supporters--- You do not deserve to live in the United States. You are a sick weirdo. I wish you it were you and your kind who would drop dead instead of our heroic soldiers.
by Leela
Don't threaten the United States because you will fail and be destroyed. The only thing you are good for is your sad little fantasies of being a tough guy.
by JASON (farrell_jason [at] hotmail.com)
A neighbour of mine has been acting suspiciously of late and i'm was fairly sure he had a big gun in his house, I called the police and they told me there was no evidence, so another friend of mine and I broke into his house and took all his belongings and sold them to the highest bidder.....we are still looking for that darned gun!!!
by tavgar bulbas (http://www.tavgarchawresh@yahoo.com">http://www.tavgarchawresh [at] yahoo.com)
the kurds have een under alot of presure since it has had enemies.people now say that the arabs need the kurds to mae iraq but athey dont give te kurds the freedom that tey want and the kurds had chemical weapons used on them nobody helped them or said anything.the kurds have adifferent language and culture but the arabs wot let tem have the freedom
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$255.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network