top
Police State
Police State
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Arrest in dog rescue outrages pet lovers

by Mary Williams
Firefighters and police defend actions as criticism mounts
Jarrod Martin was repeatedly told to back away from a roaring fire in his apartment building, but the sight of his dog jumping up and down against a glass door in a room filled with smoke was too much, he said.

The other side of the building was engulfed in flames and the fire was moving toward Bishop, his year-old pit bull.

''He was pressed up against the glass as it was,'' Martin said last night. ''The fire was coming right toward him.''

He said he had waited 30 minutes for firefighters to rescue his dog and decided he must either get the pet himself or Bishop would never make it out of the apartment alive.

Martin saved the dog from Wednesday's fire but found himself at odds with the police.

Now some local residents are outraged, and authorities are defensive about a decision by police to charge Martin.

VOICE YOUR OPINION: How should authorities react when a resident tries to enter a burning building to save a pet?

Martin, 26, was handcuffed, held by police and cited for the misdemeanors disorderly conduct and reckless endangerment after entering the burning building through a balcony and throwing the dog to safety, authorities said.

''I just don't know what the big deal is,'' said Old Hickory resident Josh Fisher, who called The Tennessean to express his outrage. ''I have four dogs, two cats and two birds, and you'd better believe I would get every one of them out if the place was on fire.''

Fisher, who attended Sylvan Park Elementary with Martin but hasn't seen him in at least 10 years, said he is upset by the way the man was treated by authorities.

Fire officials said Martin used a fireman's hook pole to break a glass door on his apartment balcony and reach inside the smoke-filled apartment for the dog. Martin said he used a barbell. The fire at Premier West Apartment complex, 6565 Premier Drive, started about 6:20 p.m. About 16 families lost their apartments in the blaze; the cause was still being investigated.

Martin put firefighters in danger by entering the building, diverting their attention from the blaze, and he could have caused a ''backdraft,'' a flash fire caused by a sudden rush of oxygen, said Assistant Chief Kim Lawson, spokeswoman for the Nashville Fire Department. Martin, noting that the other half of the building was on fire, disagreed.

Fire Department officials and Metro police held a joint news conference yesterday and defended their accusations amid a growing flurry of complaints. Lawson was asked what fire officials would have done if Martin had run to save his child from a burning building. ''That would be something that would be a split-second decision depending on the circumstances,'' she said. Lawson said it's the Fire Department's responsibility, not that of citizens, to rescue animals and people from burning buildings.

''We don't draw lines. We are here for lives, period. If any situation proves safe, we would go in for a child, a dog, a pet, when the situation was safe enough.''

Asked whether fire department policy dictates when to go in to rescue a person as opposed to an animal, Lawson said, ''We don't really have a point. We will always do a primary search for any life at all. Obviously, you've got to have some of the flames knocked down.'' Lawson added: ''We always go in and make a primary search on any area for any life at all. It's common to see pets taken out and given oxygen by our firefighters. We do the best we can.''

Firefighters had not entered the building when Martin rushed in, officials said. Lawson said the situation was too dangerous for anyone to enter the burning building at that time. ''The floors were collapsing, the fire was escalating and there was a lot of smoke coming from the building. I'm really sorry that this happened. We cannot have citizens or other people creating additional problems, which probably took a little bit of time. No, we do not wait to go in. We will go in and search and do the best we can with any life — human, animal, any life.''

In June, for example, Metro firefighters worked hard, even performing CPR — in saving the lives of 200 exotic birds trapped in a burning residence. They tried to evacuate the parrots quickly, performed a form of cardiopulmonary resuscitation on them and used oxygen masks. Fewer than 10 were saved, the rest dying of smoke inhalation.

The Tennessean received numerous letters and phone calls yesterday from angry readers who wondered why police would bother to handcuff Martin and treat him like a criminal. ''Shame on the police department for not taking pity on a man who was losing everything he owned to a fire and couldn't bear to part with his four-legged roommate!'' Melissa Hinton of Brentwood wrote. ''Shame on them for adding insult to injury.''

Nashvillian Bobby Braddock wrote: ''For years, I have been a contributor to police and firefighter organizations, but as an animal lover, I strongly protest the shabby treatment of this man who risked his life to save his dog. In my eyes, he is a hero.''

Several others, responding to a Tennessean online forum, defended the police actions, saying Martin endangered the lives of firefighters.

Police said Martin initially told an officer on the scene that he wanted to go back into his second-story apartment to save the dog. The officer denied his request but immediately told firefighters that a dog was in the unit, police said. Firefighters told the officer it was too hot to go in the building, but they would make a rescue attempt as soon as they could knock down the flames.

Martin ran toward the burning building, climbed to his second-story balcony, broke out a window and got the dog. Martin pushed his pet to safety and jumped off the balcony.

The charge of disorderly conduct carries a maximum sentence of up to 30 days in jail and a $50 fine. Reckless endangerment is punishable by up to 11 months, 29 days in jail and a fine of up to $2,500, according to state law.

Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by Mary Williams
This man is a hero and should be treated as such, not as a criminal. The article said that he waited for 30 minutes for the fire fighters to rescue Bishop before taking matter into his own hands. As a pet owner I would do the same thing.
by Disgusted
Can you believe this? I mean, I can imagine how I would feel if my flat were on fire, and my beloved Freedom was trying to get out. Nothing on earth would keep me from saving him.

Why in the name of all that is holy do these people not go out and arrest the real criminal element in society, not some poor soul trying to save his pet. What the hell were the firefighters doing anyway? Could they not have rescued the dog?

The mind continues to boggle.
by phu
I think the jurisprudence idea behind this is that most people seriously underestimate the ability of smoke in a housefire to incapacitate someone. Many people visualize that if flames were not in the immediate area of a burning apartment, they would probably be able to run back and forth carrying stuff out by holding their breath, and taking a few whiffs of smokey air that would be equivalent to standing by a barbecue. However, firepeople have discovered that the removal of all oxygen from the air in a housefire, plus toxic components of smoke that sink to the floor, have been able to knock people unconscious, which would require a fireperson to spend time rescuing this person still in the house and possibly endangering themselves.
by Curious
But why did this pet owner have to wait there for 30 minutes? Why didn't fhe firefighters do it long before this? From what I read it was not a difficult maneuver thirty minutes later, so why the delay? Surely 30 minutes earlier it would have been that much easier. I don't understand what they were waiting for. Can someone help us here?
by zip
HE has the right to fend his famley his life is his own
and If that was one of the firemens dogs in the building
we would not be haveing this convesashon i hope that jarrod sues the pants off them for unjust cause

by R James (rjames [at] becon.org)
I too am curious why the firemen didn`t go in earlier, it certainly would have been easier to go in 30 minutes earlier than later. And why was a man that risked his life for his companion animal treated like a common criminal, handcuffed and thrown to the ground. This man should be treated like the hero he is.
by Penelope
Shame on the Nashville Police. I understand one of the fireman told Mr. Martins that he could always get another dog. How sickening! Then to add insult to injury, the police read Mr. Martins entire arrest record in a public venue to divert attention from their boo-boo. Get your handcuffs ready, Nashville Police because if were placed in the same situation I would have acted the same way.
by Angie
I simply cannot believe it. Surely the police have something better to do? Get another dog indeed! I can well imagine how those of us who love our pets would react to something so horrific as that. It's disgusting.
by Average Jeff
At worse the dude will get a small fine with a wink and a nod from the judge.

The reason the law exsist, is because had the guy not come back out, firemen would have had to risk their own lives attempting to save him, when he didn't need to be there in the first place..

It's all cool.

Sheesh, the stuff you people get excited about...
by WhizWart
I support that the use of cuffs was over the top, but think of this. What if he'd gone back and NOT made it? Then the police and firefighters get blamed for letting him in. They made a judgement call. Maybe not the right one, but hindsight is always 20/20
We’re upset for a reason. This is not an isolated incident. This is an all too typical symptom of an an all to common syndrome. Cops are out of control. They are above the law and they know it, and many behave accordingly. They abuse their privilege and they abuse us, the very people they are supposed to protect, and the ones who pay their salary.

Every just and righteous person is outraged at this egregious injustice. If you’re not outraged , there is something seriously wrong with you. You have parts missing, vital parts, parts without which, you are not completely human. Where is your empathy, your common human decency, your love of justice? Are you hollow inside, or what? Sheesh, Jeff, what a cold and callous man you are.

Or maybe you're just ignorant about what real cops are really like. They're not like the cops on TV, not even a little. In the real world, cops are worse than useless. They’re in the way. They wont protect you, and they wont allow you to protect yourself. When you call a cop for help, if he shows up at all, he's just as likely to shoot your dog as he is to actually help you. And that's if you're lucky. If you're not lucky, he might just shoot you, or rob you, or worse, and all with virtual impunity. Can you imagine what kind of men are attracted to a job like that? You don’t have to imagine. You can ask their victims.

Ask the Smoak family:

http://www.indybay.org/news/2003/01/1557205


Ask Max Castro:

http://www.indybay.org/news/2003/01/1557205_comment.php#1557763


Ask nessie:

http://www.indybay.org/news/2002/01/114770_comment.php#114793
by Average Jeff
Anarchy is dead as a politcal philosphy.

Has been for years here in America.

The reason is because: There is not now, nor has there EVER been, ANY successful society based on the anarchrist principles.

Obey they law and stop whining when the cops enforce them.

Don't agree with the the law?

Then CHANGE it through the democratic process.

The fact IS that the vast majority of Americans disagree with your point of view.

Change their minds and you change the laws.

Until then, you WILL live within the confines of what the "community" has deemed acceptable.

Whether you like it or not.

It's the American way, and has worked better than ANY other system yet devised.

Doesn't that just make you crazy?

:D
by Carl
I'm not too surprised by this news, to be honest. They send in dogs TO rescue humans (did anyone ask them?), but God forbid a human risks his/her life to save one of them, and they ARREST HIM??? And they say ANIMALS are dumb?!
by Barney
Unfortunately, this is yet another consequence of a society which does not allow people to take responsibility for their own actions.

What if the police had given permission? Next week the guy sues the police department because he's now traumatised from the experience.

Yeah, I know it's dumb, but in your 'thank God we're American' country that kind of thing happens all the time. The only way out is for the authorities to protect themselves by denying the individual any choice in their own actions.

P.S. I'm really glad the guy got his dog out.

P.P.S I'm even happier that I don't live in America!
by Mary Williams (dansden [at] earthlink.net)
I'm outraged and incensed at the reaction of police and fire officials in the Jarrod Martin case. I was a peace officer for 22 years and in fact have trained officers in virtually every state in the United States. I hold fire fighters in the highest esteem an am well aware of the extreme danger they risk in their profession. One of the cornerstones of all of my training programs for peace officers was for them to act reasonably, objectively, honestly, prudently and with discretion. It's obvious to me that both police and fire authorities in this case regard the badges they wear on their chests as pure authority NOT responsibility. I'm more sorry for their lack of judgement and apparent lack of morality than I am for Mr. Martin. Perhaps he disobeyed authorities ( I truly doubt that he endangered anyone accept himself) but he acted as a truly courageous and moral person would and has drawn attention to the lack of good leadership within these two departments. Shame on you! Dan Sinawski, Denver, Co
by Jack
Three cheers for the HERO who rescued his dog. Shame on the Fire Dept. for not doing more to rescue the dog and BOO! to the police for the arrest.
by Megan Duffy
that they wouldn't do the same for their dogs? personal pets? rescue dogs,? bomb sniffing dogs,? K-9 units?

I understand the position they have taken but let's be a little human here fellas. The fact of the matter is he responded the way that he did because you told him one thing (i.e. the fire wouldn't reach his apartment) and when it did you didn't/couldn't do anything about it.. Cut the guy a little slack for being a hero to his children for christ sake.
by Keith (BettysFetish [at] aol.com)
The dog was rescued by a person with no protection or apperatice other than a bar to break the glass.
No human with heart could watch an animal burn. Shame on the firefighters and good for the owner.
by Vicki (vtiernan_sf [at] yahoo.com)
The legal waters are murky and I can see a bit of both sides, but Jarrod did wait 30 minutes and according to an MSNBC article he acted only after hearing someone shout "We're out of water" as the fire escalated.

If a child were trapped, I'd hope that *any* parent would have done exactly the same thing Jarrod did. He rescued a being incapable of fending for himself.

Presecuting Jarrod for this would amount to punishing the highest of human motivations.
by mary
this case won't be prosecuted.
by Michael R. (Falarms [at] earthlink.net)
"Pets" are not Pets to some people. In some cases they are better people than humans. You can get unconditional love, loyality, devotion from a cat or dog. Try getting it from a human. If my house was on fire and I died tring to save my 19yr old "cat", my dearest companion....I would have NO regrets. So they said don't go in, he did, if he got trapped it was his decision..leave him. It was his choice, as a decent human, with free rights in the USA. And finnally, if it was so dangerous, why was he able to rescue his dog so quickly, in and out in 2 min? Lets call it what it was.... The police and fire department DIDNT CARE!
My god curse those who think so little of life
by Feebs
I agree with Mary it almost certainly won't be prosecuted but I just feel like making noise about it as it's so stupid. If it had been their dog would they have stood watching on the other side of the glass watching it jump up and down as the flames got closer...
Yeah right!
by Ingot (nospam [at] nospam.com)
I wish I could believe that this man wouldn't be prosecuted, but I've seen more rediculous things done...

I do agree that the police and firemen need authority on the site of a fire, but what we have here is a man that when faced with a decision of either watching his dog burn alive, or make the local officials look bad, compassionately chose the life of his dog.

There is such a thing as selective enforcement. The whole reason our forefathers insisted on a jury system in the first place is that people in authority often start putting too much emphasis on the letter of the law. When the system becomes more important than the people that it is supposed to serve, the jury is our safety valve.

This is obviously a case where the local police have decided that the letter of the law is more important than a man or a dog's life. I just hope that a jury will decide otherwise.

Ingot
by Lynn Berg
Jarrod Martin should not be arrested for saving his dog! Did the police expect him to watch as his friend burned to death? The fact that he was able to rescue his dog without injurying either himself or his dog shows that the rescue could be done safely. I think the better question is why the firefighters did nothing.

by Amazed!
Good for Jarrod Martin, the guy who rescued his dog from a fire in Tennessee! ---- and shame shame shame on the local constables who insist on pressing criminal charges against Mr. Martin.

According to one news account the firefighters had completely run out of water before Mr. Martin took matters into his own hands and rescued Bishop, the family dog. When the firefighters ran out of water --- why didn't THEY rescue the dog? What did these public servants intend to do --- stand around without any water, watch the fire slowly move toward the apartment with the dog in it --- and then watch dog die in the fire?

I would have done the same thing Jarrod did --- only I wouldn't have had the patience to wait as long as he did (30-40 minutes) to save my animals.

by Tati (lostinthecity [at] yahoo.com)
Jarrod is great. There's nothing else to say. They should leave him alone. He did what I would do and not only for my dog. Maybe they don't understand how beautiful the dogs are and how pure inside, without any second thought...No one normal could watch poor animal burning...beleive me...Those who could do it are cruel...
by Angie
So has this matter been before the Courts yet? If so, what happened?
by Brian
I can see the point of view by the fire fighters, but the action taken by Martin was out of desparation and love. He thought the dog had no chance of living if he waited any longer, so he became amateur fireman and did the job. For his punishement he should have to watch "Backdraft" with subtitles and then write an essay on the main points of the movie. Hooray for Martin and his love for his animal!
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$160.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network