| About | Contact | Subscribe | Calendar | Publish | Donate |
|---|
Police State'Felony stop' leaves family traumatized
"The officer shot him, just blew his head off" http://www.herald-citizen.com/NF/omf.wnm/herald/news_story.html?[rkey=0024251+[cr=gdn
Published January 02, 2003 11:54 AM CST Mary Jo Denton Herald-Citizen Staff It was the most traumatic experience the Smoak family of North Carolina has ever had, and it happened yesterday afternoon as they traveled through Cookeville on their way home from a vacation in Nashville. Before their ordeal was over, three members of the family had been yanked out of their car and handcuffed on the side of Interstate 40 in downtown Cookeville, and their beloved dog, Patton, had been shot to death by a police officer as they watched. What was their crime? There was no crime. But a passerby with a cell phone apparently assumed a crime had occurred when a wallet flew from a car on Interstate 40 near Nashville. That citizen called police and inadvertently set in motion what would make it the most horrible vacation the James Smoak family of Saluda, North Carolina, has ever had. Today, the Smoak children and their parents were still weeping over what happened to them in Cookeville. By today, they had also filed complaints with two police agencies, prompting internal investigations, they had met with Tennessee Highway Patrol Capt. Randy Hoover, and they were on their way to talk to Cookeville Mayor Charles Womack. Because official internal investigations are underway at the Tennessee Highway Patrol and at the Cookeville Police Dept., the Herald-Citizen was unable to get details of those two agencies' accounts of the incident. But the Smoak family willingly told their story to anyone who would listen; they hope by doing so that something might be done to prevent it from happening to another family. James Smoak, 38, who was traveling in the family station wagon with his wife, Pamela, their 17-year-old son, Brandon, and the family's two pet bulldogs, Patton and Cassie, had lost his wallet after stopping for gas as they left Davidson County on Wednesday afternoon. But he didn't know he lost it. Apparently, he had placed it on top of the car while pumping gas, and it flew off somewhere on the highway a short time later. Not knowing his wallet was lost, he and his family traveled on, heading east on their way home to North Carolina. A few cars behind James and Pamela's station wagon, his parents and the two younger Smoak children were traveling in the elder Smoak's car. Just a few miles east of Cookeville, James Smoak began to notice that a THP squad car was following him, though the officer was not pulling him over, just staying behind him, changing lanes any time Smoak did, moving in and out of traffic each time Smoak did. "It was obvious he was looking at me, not at other vehicles, and I'm thinking I must have done something (in my driving), but I don't know what," Smoak said today. When Smoak reached the 287 exit area in Cookeville, three other police cars suddenly appeared, and the trooper then turned on blue lights and pulled the Smoak car over. "I immediately pulled to the side, and expecting him to come to the window, I started reaching for my wallet to get my license and it was not there," Smoak said. About that time, he heard the officer broadcast orders over a bullhorn, telling him to toss the keys out the car window and get out with his hands up and walk backwards to the rear of the car. Still not knowing what he was being stopped for, Smoak obeyed, and when he reached the back of the car, with a gun pointed at Smoak, the trooper ordered him to get on his knees, face the back of the car and put his head down. When he did that, the officer handcuffed him and placed him in the patrol car. Then the same orders were blared over the bullhorn to "passenger" and Pamela Smoak got out with her hands up, was ordered to the ground, held at gunpoint, and handcuffed. Next, Brandon was ordered out and handcuffed in the same way. Terrified at what was happening to them for no reason they knew, the family was also immediately concerned about their two pet dogs being left in the car there on the highway with the car doors open. "We kept asking the officers -- there were several officers by now -- to close the car doors because of our dogs, but they didn't do it," said Pamela Smoak. And as the officers worked in the late evening darkness, their weapons drawn as the Smoaks were being handcuffed, the dog Patton came out of the car and headed toward one of the Cookeville Police officers who was assisting the THP. "That officer had a flashlight on his shotgun, and the dog was going toward that light and the officer shot him, just blew his head off," said Pamela Smoak. "We had begged them to shut the car doors so our dogs wouldn't get out, and they didn't do that." As the dog was heading out of the car toward the officer, "we had yelled, begging them to let us get him, but the officer shot him," she said. Grieving for their dog and in shock over their apparent arrest for some unknown crime, the family could only wait. At one point, one state trooper did tell them they "matched the description" in a robbery that had occurred in Davidson County, Pamela Smoak said. The ordeal went on for a time after that, the family terrified and in grief over the dog. Finally, after a time, someone in authority figured out that the officers here had stopped and were holding the very family that someone in Davidson County had assumed had been robbed, though how that assumption grew to the authorization for a felony stop, James Smoak cannot understand, he said today. "Finally, they asked me my name and I told them my name, date of birth, and other information, and they talked by radio to someone in Davidson County and finally realized that a mistake had been made," he said. "A lady in Davidson County had seen that wallet fly off our car and had seen money coming out of it and going all over the road, and somehow that became a felony and they made a felony stop, but no robbery or felony had happened," Pamela Smoak said. "Apparently, they had listened to some citizen with a cell phone and let her play detective down there," said James Smoak. "Here we are just a family on vacation, and we had to suffer this." When the officers did discover the mistake, "they said, 'Okay, we're releasing you and we're sorry,'" Smoak said. As soon as Brandon was released from the handcuffs, he rushed over to the dead dog and began to cry, Smoak said. And that's when one of the most infuriating parts of the ordeal happened, according to James Smoak. "I saw one of the THP officers walk over to the city officer who had shot the dog and grin," he said. He reported that to the supervising officer, THP Lt. Jerry Andrews, and Andrews "was very nice, very professional," Smoak said. "He told me the officer was not laughing, but I know he was," said Smoak. Smoak's parents had come along behind the other car and had seen all the commotion and stopped too, and now all three children were crying over their pet dog, as they were still doing today. The Smoaks gathered the body of their pet and went to a motel here to spend the night. But they didn't get much rest, and at one point, James Smoak became so upset he had to go to the hospital for medical treatment. They also worked throughout last night to contact all the authorities they could in order to lodge their complaints about what had happened. Today, Beth Womack, a THP spokesperson in Nashville, told the H-C that an Internal Affairs investigation is underway and that every effort will be made to "find out exactly what happened and why." "As I understand it, a report was made in Davidson County to our officers that this car had been seen leaving at a high rate of speed and that a significant amount of money had come out of the car and someone became suspicious," she said. An internal investigation is also underway at the Cookeville Police Dept., Capt. Nathan Honeycutt told the H-C today. James Smoak wonders about the logic of "a robber who would be tossing the money out of the car." He also wonders about police procedure that would "take this insinuation from a citizen" and "turn it into what happened to us." "Out there after they handcuffed us at gunpoint and put us in the police cars, they did not ask for ID, and later on, they actually released us just on my word about my identity, with only the confirmation by radio from an officer in Davidson County who was looking at my lost wallet and the ID in it down there," he said. "What if I actually had been a robber and not just a family man on vacation?" His children hope they never come to Tennessee for another vacation. "Poor Patton," said 13-year-old Jeb Smoak. "When he was killed out there, it was the first time I ever saw my brother, Brandon, cry. Brandon is the toughest person I've ever met, and he cried." The other dog, a puppy named Cassie, was "trembling all over" after the ordeal, Jeb Smoak said. "She's being real quiet today. She knows we're all grieving." James Smoak, though still deeply upset today, said he understands that "the officer will say the dog was coming after him." But it could all have been prevented, didn't have to happen, he is convinced. In addition to telling his family's story to Capt. Randy Hoover, who "was very nice and very professional," and to a Cookeville Police official last night and to Mayor Womack today, Smoak also plans to tell his lawyer, he said. "And I also want to tell it to the Tennessee Department of Tourism," he said. Police Chief Bob Terry's statement http://www.herald-citizen.com/NF/omf.wnm/herald/news_story.html?[rkey=0024266+[cr=gdn |
I most certainly will not be spending any of my dollars vacationing in the harrass-a-tourist state. Nashville be damned!
No, wait, now I remember. That was New York.
What was that guy's name, anyway? Rodney something or other?
No wait, now I remember. That was California.
It would also seem that between a 911 call and the actual stop that someone made the decision that these were dangerous people. Whether that was the result of an overly excited citizen reporting or another officer making the decision, somebody screwed up and must be held accountable. Several apologies won't be enough to make sure that some fool dosen't get others killed in a similar situation.
It is probably common knowledge for law enforcment officers to know how to respond properly to a felony stop, but our average citizen will be bewildered and probably get into much trouble for questioning the reasons for being stopped.
This is not an unusual experience as a Florida Police Department has financed projects such as new radios by confiscating large amounts of money from traveling folks. The Police have the right to do just that if the owners can not provide instant proof that the money is theirs. Even after they do obtain proof, they have a hard time getting it back if at all.
One story that occurred about six years ago was of an elderly couple that had sold their Northern residence for a good profit and were on their way to Florida to buy a retirement home. They were carrying the money with them (not smart, but their right?). They were pulled over by a local policeman and the money was confiscated. It took them about two years and legal fees to get it back. So, it can happen in places other than Tennessee.
If it had happened to me and mine, the officers involved would have to look over their shoulders for a very long time.
In response to others comments, they werent under arrest, just detained for the officers safety at that time(I remind you, this is all part of procedure), which does not warrant a reading of Miranda rights. As far as a dog being shot, I hate to sound cold, but it is an animal, granted a family pet, but when it comes down to it, the dog is at the same level of a hamster or cat or anything, it is an animal. Not to say that it wasnt extremely sad for the family, and i do think they should be compensated for more than the price of the dog, their emotional stress as well, but this isnt a person being shot here, it is a dog. People rank above animals. Should we start prosecuting those out there who hit dogs on the street with their cars? Should the dog have been read his rights too?
I think the thing that needs to be questioned here is the chain of events that analyzed the call from the woman on the cell and sent field officers to stop the family. Unfortunately, some things went sour in this situation, poop happens sometimes. I dont think the family shouldnt be traumatized about being detained and forced to come out of the car, who wouldnt? I dont think they shouldnt be shocked and grieving for their beloved dog killed in front of them, who wouldnt? But life isnt always fun and games, unfortunately some bad things happened, which is life. We dont get monetary compensation for every bad thing in life that makes us unhappy.
I just hope you dont talk to the cops the way some of you have been commenting when they help you out.
Considering the information they had, proper police proceadure was followed as far as the stop was concerned.
The thing fell apart because no one took charge of the scene. It sounds like every one was acting from his own script. It was the State Trooper's stop, he should have taken charge.
When you consider that two large dogs were in the car it didn''t make sense to not close the doors.
The police officials on the scene were responsible for the Smoak property. It appears to me that they get a NO GO at that station. Someone is going to pay for this one.
1) no reprimand whatsoever given to the officer by internal affairs, and
2) absolutely no further consequences for the officer.
Working on police brutality activism, you begin to learn that no matter how serious the corruption, how brutal the transgression, the phenomenon of the Blue Wall always kicks in. I mean, killing dogs is horrible, but I've worked on at least 10 cases of cops killing humans for about the same reason and jack shit happens.
U.S. police are an occupying army. And an occupying army does not answer to the occupied.
BY JIM SCHAEFER, Detriot Free Press Staff Writer
January 7, 2003
A Detroit police officer with a knife cut off the finger of a 45-year-old woman he was trying to handcuff in a parking lot on 8 Mile.
The police, who were in plainclothes, said she was resisting arrest. The woman, Joni Gullas of Detroit, said Monday that she thought she was being carjacked.
According to police reports obtained by the Free Press, Officer Anthony Johnson pulled out a knife Sunday morning to cut off the sleeve of Gullas' oversized coat so he could put her left hand in the handcuffs.
Johnson, of the 9th (Gratiot) Precinct, has been placed on desk duty, a typical move after officers use force during arrests. Gullas has not been charged with a crime.
Cmdr. Ralph Godbee Jr. said only that internal affairs was investigating the officer's behavior during the incident, which happened about 2:30 a.m. Sunday. Though the department does not issue knives, many officers carry them for, among other things, cutting seat belts to free accident victims.
Johnson and two other officers were riding in an unmarked car on a special burglary patrol when they noticed Gullas' van in a parking lot near the Huddle Lounge near 8 Mile and Gratiot.
Gullas said she had just left the bar and was waiting for others to come out so they could go together to breakfast when a car pulled up and someone shined a spotlight in her face.
A man approached, said he was the police and demanded her identification. Gullas said she could make out only a silhouette and asked the man for police identification.
"I just thought I was getting hijacked right then and there," she said. After some heated give-and-take between the two over IDs, Johnson approached the window and demanded Gullas' license.
He wrote in his report that Gullas smelled of alcohol but refused to produce her license, saying she wasn't doing anything wrong.
She shifted the car into reverse and began to back up, he wrote. Gullas denies that she moved the car.
Johnson wrote that he reached inside to open the door, and Gullas pinned his hand with her knee and began moving the car backward again. Johnson wrote that he hit her in the face, opened the door and pulled her outside onto the pavement. He said she was pulling and pushing away from him violently.
He cuffed her right hand, but couldn't get to her left hand, which she had tucked under her body. He pulled on her coat sleeve and she pulled her hand inside, he wrote. Gullas denied doing that and said the sleeves on the coat normally hang over her hands.
Concerned that she might be reaching for a weapon, Johnson pulled out a pocket knife and cut the sleeve off "to speed up cuffing process," he wrote.
He severed her left ring finger at the top knuckle and deeply cut her middle finger, she said. Police at the scene recovered the fingertip, but it could not be reattached.
At her east side home Monday, Gullas nursed her bandaged hand, which required surgery at Detroit Receiving Hospital.
"I wasn't fighting. I just didn't know what the heck was going on," she said. "Oh, my God, it hurts. I might as well have cut the whole hand off."
http://www.freep.com/news/locway/knife7_20030107.htm
There are stories in the News all too often about parents and children needlesly killed because a policeman is having what seems to be a 'rush' of power and can not stand the thought of someone getting away from him no matter how petty the offense. I was once in charge of a sercurity force at a large hospital in Cleveland. So, believe me when I say that I've personally seen what power can do to men. Remember the German Storm Troopers of WWII?
I agree with the other writers and offer an additional test be submitted to potential law enforecement officers. It would be called the 'Common Sense' test.
I pray Mr. Ross, that you or your family doesn't experience a similar episode as this family.
CONFERENCE: http://www.icsn.info
and JOIN: http://www.jail4judges.org
There is no excuse for this. Even once is too many.
I see. How about I come over and shoot your dog? It won't be fair, but such is life. After all, I don't know your dog, and I don't want to take any chances.
And be made to pay a heavy fine. NOTE not the departments, these should be personal fines.
The life of an innocent animal is more important than the life of a truly sick-minded individual...think about it.
Now, could the shooting of the dog have been done a little different. Of course. But don't blame every single officer involved, as some of you are, for the fault of a few.
Mr. Ross - it was only an animal, at the same level as cats and hamsters? Please! I work with animals on a daily basis and it is exactly beliefs like yours that lead to the frequent animal abuse cases that I see. People think they are expendable, think they dont have feelings, dont sense pain . . . . well newsflash, THEY DO!! I shouldn't even have to tell you that, it should be common sense! They are living creatures and they certainly deserve the same respect, care and love that humans do. Just because you think humans are superior, you think that gives us the right to torture, neglect or kill animals? It is exactly that mentality that confirms my belief the humans are often the lesser species when compared to most animals . . . . because only humans would be so arrogant and cruel. You obviously don't have any respect for life.
As for the police, even if the dog seemed aggressive, i see no reason why the officer felt he had to shoot it in the head! If he really felt he had to shoot it, he could have easily aimed elsewhere. . . something that might have stopped the animal without killing it. I think the fact that he aimed straight for the head on the first shot proves that he was acting irresponsibly and doing whatever he damn well pleased. He showed no compassion for this innocent animal and he most definitely deserves a harsh punishment, though unfortunately I doubt that will happen. And why didnt they just close the damn door?! That would've saved them all the trouble, they wouldnt have had to worry about any "aggressive" dogs coming after them cuz they would've been locked safely in the car. And, more importantly, a life would've be saved!
But if justice is served, your department will not be able to afford toilet paper for the next 20 years, let alone any type of training. Maybe you will be able to whipe your asses with the badge of the trigger happy officer who brought so much shame upon you...:)
Your comment to the effect that the Smoak pet was "just an animal" indicates the sort of retrograde thinking that one would hope might be overcome now that we're in the 21st century. Anyone who has ever had a pet knows that they can easily become part of the family. For the Smoaks, I'm sure the shooting of their dog was little less traumatic than the shooting of a child. The fact that a dog is a non-human in no way mitigates the pain and the loss suffered by this unfortunate family. I trust that legal restitution will be based on the actual pain and suffering inflicted on the Smoaks, and not on the "price of the dog".
1-931-526-2125
Cookeville Police Department
Public Safety Building
10 E. Broad Street
Cookeville, TN 38501
You obviously don't have someone close to you that has a strong emotional bond with a pet. With three officers in the area, it was in no way appropriate for the "trigger happy" officer to fire on the dog. It's simple, the officer didn't pay attention detail, he didn't watch the dog as it exited the car and when the animal approached he was surprised and shot him. Completely the officers FAULT.
In response to your particular emphasis on the "seriousness" of the situation dispatched over the radio, The officers looked less than threatened, as they sauntered over to the three "suspects" on the ground. If thats procedure for a highly dangerous situation, I think those officers were extremely lucky the family was as harmless as they were.........much "luckier" than the family and the pet, for having to deal with such reckless law enforcement individuals who don't deserve their position.
http://www.tennessean.com/
http://www.tennessean.com/video/dogshooting0103/dog2.rm (PC)
http://www.tennessean.com/video/dogshooting0103/dog2.ram (Mac)
And better yet contact the poilce dept's BOSS:
City Hall:
City of Cookeville
45 East Broad Street
Cookeville, TN 38501
(931) 526-9591
info [at] ci.cookeville.tn.us
Unbelievable!
I am writing in reponse to the actions of both the Highway Patrol and Cookeville Country police, specifically officer Eric Hall concerning their stop of the Smoak family. My opinion is that the incident should be reviewed to determine who was at fault for allowing the pet which was killed to be loose from the car. Furthermore, I feel quite strongly that officer Eric Hall should be fired or re-assigned to a position that does not allow him to use his negligent judgement to hurt anyone else.
According to the news, a review of the incident yeilded:
Likewise, the Cookeville Police Department's internal investigation determined that its officers, who were providing backup for the troopers, "performed their duties according to training and policy," said department spokesman Capt. Nathan Honeycutt.
If this is true your training and policy is dead wrong! I am going to follow this situation and if this is whitewashed, or those responsible for taking action in this practice the good 'ole boy mentality of protecting their own at the expense of the public I will do everything in my power to fight against the re-election of the Cookeville Country Police Chief and Mayor! I am furious that this occurred and further insensed that the initial reaction has been to close ranks among a group of offiers who showed dubious judgement and charecter.
I am sickened at the video I've seen. I'm even
more offended by the official reaction. I will never
travel through your state again even if I add many hours to my families vacation travels. If I can
figure out how to contribute to the poor family that
your department brutalized I'll do so. I hope they sue everyone there out of a job.
The world would be a safer place if that happened.
I did not see an aggressive dog on the video. I saw a playful dog that got excited by a lot of commotion and emotion surrounding its masters.
What I did see was an overreaction by a person who was running high on his own emotions.
It disgusts me to know that this officer who made a bad error in judgement is hiding behind his department and his badge. Responsible adults assume accountablility for thier actions and admit when they make mistakes. How can anyone trust a law enforcement body when they can't trust that the officers within will use reasonable judgement.
R.I.P. Patton Smoaks.
And yes, I feel compassion for the many poor individuals all over the world who are killed every day by ruthless dictators, however, there is a major difference here: Their deaths aren't broadcast in living color on TV .. . perhaps if they were, we would be more active.
That said, I hope the Smoak family bankrupts the Cookville police department (which is riddled with corruption . . .just do a "google" search). They never, ever get over this traumatic experience. Count me in as one person who will avoid the Volunteer State like the plague . . .. . ugh, I feel sick!
Please give ONE G O O D reason why a "animal's" life is more important than a human's. (other than "Because it's an animal.")
What makes you think humans are anything more than just animals?
To add insult to injury, the Good Old Boy mentality of Tennessee takes over and the police are making excuses and trying to cover their butts. Yes, this could and does happen in other states. That doesn’t make it right and it doesn't excuse the officers’ grin when he saw how upset the young man was to lose his beloved family pet. If an officer’s duty is "To Serve and Protect", these officers failed on both counts. All officers should be required to take animal control training to help them know how to handle situations like these so this kind of situation doesn't deteriorate into a senseless tragedy. Let’s hope this family follows through with a law suit against these officers. Tell me where I can send money to help with their legal fees.
"However, those of us that are not police officers or not law enforcement officers, do not have the experience of such situations" is hogwash.
Contrary to what you seem to know, many if not most of us have had the experience of being rushed by a dog whose intentions we are not absolutely certain of. Most of us, however, apply certain judgements regarding dogs which most people are familiar with: relative (to ourselves) size of dog, demeanor, protective clothing (e.g., "I'm wearing jeans"), proximity of children, etc. Because of the familiarity of this experience (being rushed by a dog), most people are able to correctly process the situation and make the appropriate judgement in a very short time -- generally, less than a second or two. Furthermore, it is fair ot assume a that law enforcement officer in a rural, hunting state such as Tennessee would have greater-than-average experience in making that judgement (the nature and threat posed by an approaching dog). However, it is obvious in this case that the officer in question had no consideration for the actual circumstances, but rather, is of a nature to simply fire his weapon rather than make a professional, or even humane, judgement. Aside from the brutal nature of the crime, for which he and his department should be punished, this flaw (a judgement obviously skewed strongly to intimidation and violence) absolutely disqualifies him from the position of a field law enforcement officer. In that position he is obviously a threat not just to the occasional dog, but to the very people he is supposed to serve and protect.
That, in case you missed it, is the real issue at hand, and you don't need to "have been there" to understand it.
That is a good example of true intellectual dishonesty.
This refers to the removed comment.
I would certainly wonder what are the requirements to be an officer of the law in Tennessee.
They should all be ashamed of themselves. The good thing about living in a small town is that everybody knows everybody . . . I hope those officers involved enjoy knowing that everyone knows who they are and what they've done.
I would certainly wonder what are the requirements to be an officer of the law in Tennessee.
They should all be ashamed of themselves. The good thing about living in a small town is that everybody knows everybody . . . I hope those officers involved enjoy knowing that everyone knows who they are and what they've done.
I would certainly wonder what are the requirements to be an officer of the law in Tennessee.
They should all be ashamed of themselves. The good thing about living in a small town is that everybody knows everybody . . . I hope those officers involved enjoy knowing that everyone knows who they are and what they've done.