IT'S THE ZIONIST RACIST *IDEOLOGY* 'STUPID' ! -- by JA

"Terrorist strikes begin in response to attack on Iraq
by Brent Herbert Tuesday March 25, 2003 at 02:18 PM"

http://www.indybay.org/news/2003/03/1590488_comment.php#1591299



IT'S THE ZIONIST RACIST *IDEOLOGY* 'STUPID' !
by JA
Wednesday March 26, 2003 at 03:38 PM


The essay (see URL above) by Brent Herbert is VERY good.

However, I would like to add a few CORRECTIVE points. (CAPS FOR EMPHASIS.)

As far as Israel is concerned, it is not really a matter of the Sharon regime--which more drastically mirrors our own in the U.S.--or Barak or Peres or Shamir, etc.:
SHARON IS MERELY THE NEAR ULTIMATE PERSONIFICATION AND THE LOGICAL PROGRESSION OF ***ZIONISM***. (SHORT OF ZIONIST ISRAEL'S "FINAL SOLUTION" FOR THE PALESTINIANS: COMPLETE POPULATION EXPULSION.)

SHARON IS THE LOGICAL IDEOLOGICAL PROGRESSION AGAINST A PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN AND WILL KEEP RESISTING THE DECADES-LONG RACIST, SETTLER-COLONIALIST, IMPERIALIST-SPONSORED, OPPRESSIVE AND VIOLENT ***IDEOLOGY*** THAT HAS ALWAYS SOUGHT TO DISPLACE AND TAKE THE LAND AND HOMES OF AN INDIGENOUS PEOPLE (WHO WERE ALREADY LIVING IN PEACE WITH THE MINORITY *INDIGENOUS* JEWS): THE PALESTINIANS.

IF POLITICAL AND RELIGIOUS MILITANT FUNDAMENTALIST ZIONIST JEWS (AS MILITANT AS ISLAMIC FUNDAMENTALISM) CLAIM TO PINE FOR THEIR LAND--FROM 2,000 YEARS AGO !-- A LAND THEY CLAIM THAT "GOD" PROMISED JEWS *5,000* YEARS AGO! -- A RIDICULOUS CLAIM THAT NO PEOPLE OR COUNTRY IN THE WORLD WOULD ACCEPT -- BUT FOISTED BY EUROPEAN IMPERIALIST POWERS AGAINST THE PALESTINIANS -- THEN YOU CAN IMAGINE HOW CONTINUOUSLY INDIGENOUS PALESTINIANS FEEL, WHO HAVE LOST THEIR LAND AND HOMES CONTINUOUSLY FROM 60 YEARS AGO TO JUST *YESTERDAY*, LAND AND HOMES (OR THEIR RUINS/FOUNDATIONS) THAT, IN MANY CASES, THEY CAN STILL *SEE* ACROSS THE VALLEY FROM THE BANTUSTAN REFUGEE CAMPS/TOWNS ISRAEL HAS PUT PALESTINIANS IN!

IT WAS HENRY SIEGMAN, JEWISH-AMERICAN HOLOCAUST SURVIVOR AND SENIOR ANALYST IN THE MIDEAST DEPT OF THE COUNCIL OF FOREIGN RELATIONS (CFR, A BIPARTISAN INSTITUTION WHICH IS COMPOSED OF BOTH LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES FROM THE ESTABLISHMENT) WHO SAID THAT SHARON WAS **PROVOKING**
"SUICIDE/MARTYR BOMBERS" AS A WAY TO TAKE PALESTINIAN LAND, TO DESTROY ANY PEACE PROCESS, AND TO FINALLY ANNEX THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES AND ULTIMATELY EXPELL THE PALESTINIANS.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re Brent's remarks on Hitler:

HITLER ONCE SAID OF HIS BLITZKRIEG METHODS: "VICTORY ASKS NO QUESTIONS!" -- THIS IS WHAT THE BUSH-CHENEY-RUMSFELD REGIME EXPECTS.

Brent correctly points out that Hitler did not the votes in Germany to be elected. But, in his excellent essay, he did not also point out that even at the hieght of an practically overtly *THUG* Nazi party--threatening political opposition people and beating them up in the streets--THE NEXT PRGRESSION OF THE S.F. POLICE--THE NAZI PARTY COULD *NEVER* GET A MAJORITY IN THE GERMAN PARLIAMENT: HITLER HAD TO DISSOLVE THE PARLIAMENT. FURTHERMORE, AT EVERY MOMENT OF THE NAZI ENTITY (WHETHER THE PARTY OR THE REGIME) THERE WAS **ALWAYS** INTERNAL GERMAN OPPOSITION TO HITER -- WHICH THE WESTERN POWERS OFTEN UNDERCUT, UNTIL IT WAS TOO LATE.

AND, AFTER ALL, THE WESTERN POWERS IN THE LEAGUE OF NATION REALIZED, HITLER JUST WANTED AN EMPIRE--COLONIES--LIKE THE REST OF ANY SELF-RESPECTING 'GREAT' NATION WANTED.

(THAT'S WHAT THE MUNICH AGREEMENT *REALLY* ACKNOWLEDGE!--IT WASN'T "APPEASEMENT" [THAT'S POST-WWII WESTERN PR HYPOCRICY]: IT WAS *ACKNOWLEDGEMENT*--'SO *THROW* HITLER A BISCUIT OR TWO IN EASTERN EUROPE IF IT'LL KEEP THE PEACE!', THE EUROPEAN WEST, LIKE CHAMBERLAIN, THOUGHT.)

NO LESS THAN *WINSTON CHURCHILL* SAID THAT HAD HITLER -- WHO WAS INITIALLY POPULAR AMONG POLITICAL ELEMENTS AND GOVTS IN THE WEST (WHO E.G., LIKED HITLER'S SUPPRESSION OF POLITICAL DISSIDENTS AND LABOR) -- BEEN DIPLOMATICALLY, ECONOMICALLY, AND MILITARILY ISOLATED, AND HAD INTERNAL OPPOSITION TO HITLER BEEN SUPPORTED, WWII--THE SO-CALLED "GOOD WAR"--COULD HAVE BEEN WON WITHOUT FIRING A *SINGLE* SHOT!!!

The majority of the German people, who are often MORALLY SCAPEGOATED whenever, especially, the U.S. govt and people find it hypocritically useful, *NEVER* voluntarily supported Hitler. (Note this, especially, given the fact that as the Nazi rose to power, the U.S. army was doing mop-up operations in the genocide of Native Americans, hunting down the last great Native American chiefs, and had already set up American apartheid against former Black slaves.)

It was progressives and leftists who initially warned the west about Hitler -- but that was when they were even persecuted in the West. Likewise, it was progressives and leftists (in Iraq and in the West) who condemned Saddam when American Congressmen and administration politicians were over there cutting arms deals, political deals and shaking Saddam's hand. Now, "The United States of Amnesia" and its media apparatus ignores that in a war of conquest in which unknown thousands of innocent people will be killed. IN THE END, THE FATE THAT AWAITS OUR COUNTRY (AND PERHAPS OTHERS) WILL BE THE "ISRAELIZATION" OF AMERICAN SOCIETY--POLITICALLY, MILITARILY, AND TERRORISTICALLY.

IT MAY BE SOON THAT PEOPLE IN THE U.S. THINK TWICE BEFORE GOING TO THE MALL OR ON COMMUTER TRANSPORTATION WITH MORE THAN ONE FAMILY MEMBER TOO. IT MAY SOON BE THAT, AS IN ISRAEL, WE WILL BE WALKING AROUND CARRYING GASMASKS AS WE GO TO WORK, THE STORE, ETC.

IS THAT THE KIND OF FATE WE WANT TO AWAIT US? WHEN WE LEAFLET/OUTREACH, WE SHOULD TELL THOSE IN THE PUBLIC NOT YET ON OUR SIDE, THAT THEY IGNORE OUR GOVT'S RECKLESS FOREIGN POLICY AT THE PERIL TO ALL OUR LIVES.