top
North Bay
North Bay
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Judge Throws Out Perdue’s Claims in Lawsuit Against Animal Activists

by Direct Action Everywhere
Sonoma County Judge Jane Gaskell also struck two of Perdue executive Scott Fitzpatrick’s claims, partially granting animal activists’ anti-SLAPP motion

February 6, 2026, SANTA ROSA, CA -- Today, Sonoma County Judge Jane Gaskell adopted her tentative ruling, striking both causes of action brought by the national poultry giant Perdue Foods in a lawsuit against the animal rights network Direct Action Everywhere (DxE). Judge Gaskell also struck these causes of action for Perdue executive Scott Fitzpatrick. Perdue is now removed from the case and only two causes of action remain for Fitzpatrick. The lawsuit seeks a permanent injunction barring protests over animal cruelty outside the home of Scott Fitzpatrick, the Live Production Manager of Perdue’s California subsidiary, Petaluma Poultry. 

Perdue’s lawsuit is a classic example of a SLAPP suit, or Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation, and DxE filed an anti-SLAPP motion to dismiss the lawsuit, which Judge Gaskell partially granted with today’s ruling. California’s anti-SLAPP statute was passed to protect protesters from being subjected to frivolous lawsuits filed by wealthy corporations which seek to burden activists with legal costs and court appearances. The ruling entitles DxE to file a motion to recover reasonable attorneys’ fees from Perdue Foods and Fitzpatrick.

Judge Gaskell specifically dismissed the suit’s claims of civil harassment and intentional infliction of emotional distress. She ruled that these two causes of action failed as a matter of law because DxE’s conduct is constitutionally-protected protest activity. Judge Gaskell also noted in her ruling that animal welfare “appears to be an objective issue of public interest” and stated in court Friday that this “is a well known issue in Sonoma County.”

“This ruling confirms what activists have said from the beginning. Speaking out against animal cruelty is protected by the law,” said Almira Tanner, the Lead Organizer of DxE. “Perdue attempted to stretch emotional distress and civil harassment laws to prevent protests from exposing their unethical business practices. The court rejected those efforts. We will be appealing on the remaining two causes of action to continue defending the right to protest.”

DxE investigations into Petaluma Poultry operations have documented birds unable to walk and suffering from untreated infections, overcrowding, and slaughter practices that violate California animal cruelty laws

Prior to protesting outside Fitzpatrick’s residence, DxE activists had repeatedly emailed Mr. Fitzpatrick and other company executives requesting a meeting about their findings. They received no response. Activists have also protested at the Petaluma Poultry slaughterhouse dozens of times since 2018. 

Add Your Comments
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$135.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network