Publish to Newswire
Add an EventFrom the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Trump Moves to Open Alaska Wilderness to More Oil Leasing
New Plan Could Remove Wildlife Protections From Western Arctic
ANCHORAGE, November 20, 2018 — The Trump administration today moved to open protected wildlife habitat in the northern Alaska wilderness to expanded oil and gas leasing. The Bureau of Land Management announced plans to redo the Integrated Activity Plan for the National Petroleum Reserve – Alaska, aiming to remove “special area” protections around Colville River and Teshekpuk Lake, home to the world’s largest caribou herds and flocks of migratory birds.
This western Arctic region is the largest roadless area and largest parcel of public land in the United States. The Center for Biological Diversity and other groups sued the Trump administration in February for failing to study how its drastic expansion of NPR-A fossil fuel leasing would impact wildlife and climate change.
“We should protect our last remaining wilderness areas, not industrialize them. Keeping northern Alaska wild helps avert climate chaos and the extinction crisis,” said Miyoko Sakashita, ocean program director at the Center for Biological Diversity. “Once we let the oil industry build roads, wells and pipelines in this special place, there’s no going back. What’s needed is an end to exploiting the Arctic for fossil fuels, not a new plan for drilling.”
The Trump administration last year offered all available land in the Arctic reserve to oil companies — a total of 900 tracts covering more than 10.3 million acres, an area larger than 12 states. In response to a lawsuit from conservation groups, in 2013 the BLM agreed to exempt the most ecologically sensitive areas from fossil fuel leasing, a decision the Trump administration is now revisiting.
“Our wilderness areas have only become more valuable as the extinction crisis grows and our climate changes. There’s absolutely no basis for the Trump administration to expand its assault on the Western Arctic,” Sakashita said. “We need to leave this oil safely in the ground and protect this vital habitat for birds, caribou and grizzly bears.”
The Center for Biological Diversity is a national, nonprofit conservation organization with more than 1 million members and online activists dedicated to the protection of endangered species and wild places.
https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/press_releases/2018/arctic-drilling-11-20-2018.php
This western Arctic region is the largest roadless area and largest parcel of public land in the United States. The Center for Biological Diversity and other groups sued the Trump administration in February for failing to study how its drastic expansion of NPR-A fossil fuel leasing would impact wildlife and climate change.
“We should protect our last remaining wilderness areas, not industrialize them. Keeping northern Alaska wild helps avert climate chaos and the extinction crisis,” said Miyoko Sakashita, ocean program director at the Center for Biological Diversity. “Once we let the oil industry build roads, wells and pipelines in this special place, there’s no going back. What’s needed is an end to exploiting the Arctic for fossil fuels, not a new plan for drilling.”
The Trump administration last year offered all available land in the Arctic reserve to oil companies — a total of 900 tracts covering more than 10.3 million acres, an area larger than 12 states. In response to a lawsuit from conservation groups, in 2013 the BLM agreed to exempt the most ecologically sensitive areas from fossil fuel leasing, a decision the Trump administration is now revisiting.
“Our wilderness areas have only become more valuable as the extinction crisis grows and our climate changes. There’s absolutely no basis for the Trump administration to expand its assault on the Western Arctic,” Sakashita said. “We need to leave this oil safely in the ground and protect this vital habitat for birds, caribou and grizzly bears.”
The Center for Biological Diversity is a national, nonprofit conservation organization with more than 1 million members and online activists dedicated to the protection of endangered species and wild places.
https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/press_releases/2018/arctic-drilling-11-20-2018.php
For more information:
https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
http://smirkingchimp.com/thread/robert-reich/82232/the-rule-of-law
The Rule of Law
Donald Trump
by Robert Reich | November 23, 2018 — from Robert Reich's Blog
Democracies depend on what’s known as the “rule of law.” It’s based on three fundamental principles. Trump is violating every one of them.
The first is that no person is above the law, not even a president. Which means a president cannot stop an investigation into his alleged illegal acts.
Yet in recent weeks Trump fired Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who at least had possessed enough integrity to recuse himself from special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Trump’s possible collusion with Russia in the 2016 election, and replaced him with an inexperienced loyalist hack, Matthew G. Whitaker – whose only distinction to date has been loud and public condemnation of the investigation. As a conservative legal commentator on CNN, Whitaker even suggested that a clever attorney general could secretly starve the investigation of funds.
There’s no question why Trump appointed Whitaker. When asked by the Daily Caller, Trump made it clear: “As far as I’m concerned this is an investigation that should have never been brought. It should have never been had…. It’s an illegal investigation.”
The second principle of the rule of law is a president cannot prosecute political opponents or critics. Decisions about whom to prosecute for alleged criminal wrongdoing must be made by prosecutors who are independent of politics.
Yet Trump has repeatedly pushed the Justice Department to bring charges against Hillary Clinton, his 2016 rival, for using a private email server when she was Secretary of State, in alleged violation of the Presidential Records Act.
During his campaign, Trump led crowds in chanting “lock her up,” called Clinton “crooked Hillary,” and threatened to prosecute her if he was elected president.
After taking office, according to the New York Times, Trump told White House counsel Donald McGahn he wanted the Justice Department to prosecute Clinton. McGahn responded that Trump didn’t have the authority to do so, and such action might even lead to impeachment.
Yet Trump has continued to press Justice Department officials – including Whitaker, when he served as Sessions’s chief of staff – about the status of Clinton-related investigations.
Never mind that Trump’s senior adviser and daughter, Ivanka Trump sent hundreds messages on her private email server to government employees and aides that detailed government business, policies, and proposals. Or that other Trump officials have used their private email to conduct official business as well.
Breaking the rule of law doesn’t require consistency. It requires only a thirst for power at whatever cost.
The third principle of the rule of law is that a president must be respectful of the independence of the judiciary.
Yet Trump has done the opposite, openly ridiculing judges who disagree with him in order to fuel public distrust of them – as he did when he called the judge who issued the first federal ruling against his travel ban a “so-called” judge.
Last week Trump referred derisively to the judge who put a hold on Trump’s plan for refusing to consider asylum applications an “Obama judge,” and railed against the entire ninth circuit. "You go the 9th Circuit and it’s a disgrace,” he said. He also issued a subtle threat: “It’s not going to happen like this anymore.“
In an unprecedented public rebuke of a sitting president, John Roberts, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, condemned Trump’s attack. “We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges,” Roberts said. “What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them. That independent judiciary is something we should all be thankful for.”
Trump immediately shot back: “Sorry Chief Justice John Roberts, but you do indeed have ‘Obama judges,’ and they have a much different point of view than the people who are charged with the safety of our country.” This was followed by another Trump threat: “Much talk over dividing up the 9th Circuit into 2 or 3 Circuits. Too big!”
Almost a half-century ago, another president violated these three basic principles of the rule of law. Richard Nixon tried to obstruct the Watergate investigation, pushed the Justice Department to prosecute his political enemies, and took on the judiciary.
But America wouldn’t allow it. The nation rose up in outrage. Nixon resigned before Congress impeached him.
The question before us is whether this generation of Americans will have the strength and wisdom to do the same.
The Rule of Law
Donald Trump
by Robert Reich | November 23, 2018 — from Robert Reich's Blog
Democracies depend on what’s known as the “rule of law.” It’s based on three fundamental principles. Trump is violating every one of them.
The first is that no person is above the law, not even a president. Which means a president cannot stop an investigation into his alleged illegal acts.
Yet in recent weeks Trump fired Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who at least had possessed enough integrity to recuse himself from special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Trump’s possible collusion with Russia in the 2016 election, and replaced him with an inexperienced loyalist hack, Matthew G. Whitaker – whose only distinction to date has been loud and public condemnation of the investigation. As a conservative legal commentator on CNN, Whitaker even suggested that a clever attorney general could secretly starve the investigation of funds.
There’s no question why Trump appointed Whitaker. When asked by the Daily Caller, Trump made it clear: “As far as I’m concerned this is an investigation that should have never been brought. It should have never been had…. It’s an illegal investigation.”
The second principle of the rule of law is a president cannot prosecute political opponents or critics. Decisions about whom to prosecute for alleged criminal wrongdoing must be made by prosecutors who are independent of politics.
Yet Trump has repeatedly pushed the Justice Department to bring charges against Hillary Clinton, his 2016 rival, for using a private email server when she was Secretary of State, in alleged violation of the Presidential Records Act.
During his campaign, Trump led crowds in chanting “lock her up,” called Clinton “crooked Hillary,” and threatened to prosecute her if he was elected president.
After taking office, according to the New York Times, Trump told White House counsel Donald McGahn he wanted the Justice Department to prosecute Clinton. McGahn responded that Trump didn’t have the authority to do so, and such action might even lead to impeachment.
Yet Trump has continued to press Justice Department officials – including Whitaker, when he served as Sessions’s chief of staff – about the status of Clinton-related investigations.
Never mind that Trump’s senior adviser and daughter, Ivanka Trump sent hundreds messages on her private email server to government employees and aides that detailed government business, policies, and proposals. Or that other Trump officials have used their private email to conduct official business as well.
Breaking the rule of law doesn’t require consistency. It requires only a thirst for power at whatever cost.
The third principle of the rule of law is that a president must be respectful of the independence of the judiciary.
Yet Trump has done the opposite, openly ridiculing judges who disagree with him in order to fuel public distrust of them – as he did when he called the judge who issued the first federal ruling against his travel ban a “so-called” judge.
Last week Trump referred derisively to the judge who put a hold on Trump’s plan for refusing to consider asylum applications an “Obama judge,” and railed against the entire ninth circuit. "You go the 9th Circuit and it’s a disgrace,” he said. He also issued a subtle threat: “It’s not going to happen like this anymore.“
In an unprecedented public rebuke of a sitting president, John Roberts, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, condemned Trump’s attack. “We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges,” Roberts said. “What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them. That independent judiciary is something we should all be thankful for.”
Trump immediately shot back: “Sorry Chief Justice John Roberts, but you do indeed have ‘Obama judges,’ and they have a much different point of view than the people who are charged with the safety of our country.” This was followed by another Trump threat: “Much talk over dividing up the 9th Circuit into 2 or 3 Circuits. Too big!”
Almost a half-century ago, another president violated these three basic principles of the rule of law. Richard Nixon tried to obstruct the Watergate investigation, pushed the Justice Department to prosecute his political enemies, and took on the judiciary.
But America wouldn’t allow it. The nation rose up in outrage. Nixon resigned before Congress impeached him.
The question before us is whether this generation of Americans will have the strength and wisdom to do the same.
For more information:
http://smirkingchimp.com/thread/robert-rei...
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Donate
$170.00 donated
in the past month
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network