top
Santa Cruz IMC
Santa Cruz IMC
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Leveraging Water to Reduce Student Enrollment Just Bad Policy

by Steve Pleich (spleich [at] gmail.com)
Higher Education Deserves Our Support
It has been suggested that the City of Santa Cruz limit the "water footprint" at UCSC as part of a policy to ensure sustainable growth with respect to the number of new students the university accepts for enrollment each year. This coming year, the university will increase enrollment by 650 students and while that seems like a significant number which might well place added pressure on the city's ability to provide fresh water, that number does not accurately reflect the relationship between growth and water use which seems at the heart of the above-described position.

Any analysis of the issue must start with the understanding that UC Santa Cruz is the city's biggest water customer consuming between 150 and 200 million gallons annually over the past two plus decades. That represents about 6 percent of the total Santa Cruz Water Department service area demand. But not only is our university the biggest customer, they are also among the most responsible. During the recent (and to a large extent ongoing) drought, the campus cut water use by 27 percent, exceeding the city's Stage 3 Water Emergency reduction goal of 25 percent.

In point of fact, campus water use per capita has declined for more than a decade. The campus baseline use - a three-year average from fiscal years 2003-2005 - is 14,200 gallons per person a year. In fiscal year 2012, the campus used 9,100 gallons per person, a 36 percent reduction from the baseline. Today's per capita use is at about 8,400 gallons per year, a 40 percent decline from the baseline. And more relevantly, total annual campus water use is 20 million gallons less than 20 years ago, even though campus population has grown.

Last year our local institution of higher learning provided a quality education to more that 17,000 students, a fact of which we, as a community, should be immensely proud. In light of the university's good faith and measurably successful efforts to be a good water partner now and in the future, enrollment growth of less that 4% should not be the basis for a policy that not only endangers a mutually beneficial partnership, but also reduces the opportunity for a quality education and the social advancement that it can bring.
§Most conserving, but...
by That One guy
Steve -

It's true that UCSC has a good track record for water savings/conservation. However, they also only house a fraction of their students. We would need to look at all student rentals, etc. to understand total impact.

Limiting water availability to the UC is a dumb idea, because you can't tie usage to residential vs. classes/administrative, etc.

I do think UCSC needs to curb it's enrollment. Even with the most ambitious corridors plans, ignoring non-students, you aren't going to build enough housing to meet demand.

Steve Pleich is a pro-growth candidate for Santa Cruz City Council. He is not a true environmentalist, or progressive, in my view.

Pleich supports adding new highway lanes. He is an advocate for Measure D. The construction of new highway lanes only increases congestion and pollution, according to scientific studies. I won't support any candidate or organization that supports Measure D.

Pleich has said recently the City of Santa Cruz should grow to a population of 75,000. This is a strong pro-growth position to take, and actually a dramatically bad proposition for the community.

Pleich parrots the generic business community's call for economic growth as the solution to local social problems, but historically this model favors business development, and does not ever bring in enough tax revenue to solve any of the social problems that arrive with new growth.

Pleich wants UCSC to grow, but there is no room for it. Any development at UCSC would do permanent damage to the not only the city's greenbelt, but also the many different sensitive eco-systems on the campus. UCSC is built out.

The UC system should grow in communities that aren't as environmentally impacted by overpopulation as Santa Cruz is, such as at their new Merced campus.

I will not be supporting Steve Pleich as a candidate for Santa Cruz City Council.

Pleich is a center-left/center-right moderate who, if elected, would oversee and encourage a scourge and expansion of environmentally unsustainable growth in Santa Cruz.
Add Your Comments
Listed below are the latest comments about this post.
These comments are submitted anonymously by website visitors.
TITLE
AUTHOR
DATE
Real in Santa Cruz
Sat, Oct 8, 2016 7:06PM
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$110.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network