top
US
US
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

An Anarchist Take on the Trump Campaign

by Armchair Anarchist
As of this writing, there is no obvious path to the White House for Donald Trump. As Harry Enten recently pointed out, Trump's strong unfavorability rating (not his unfavorability rating, his strong unfavorability rating) stands at 53%, a full 16 points ahead of Hillary Clinton's heroic-in-its-own-right 37%. While some combination of electoral fraud and liberal third party candidate could conceivably send Trump to the Oval Office, if the election were to be held today he would lose.

Trump has proven to the world that with enough hard work and dedication there is such a thing as bad publicity. What a lot of people don't seem to realize though, is that the election isn't the whole fight, it's only the first round.

What Trump has done that won't be undone any time soon, is to unite and bring out of the woodwork racist whites. Previous Republican strategy involved wooing their votes while pretending not to, using coded dog whistle language to tell racists what they wanted to hear while still maintaining deniability. These are the folks Nixon dubbed the "silent majority", and they were for years essential to the success of the Republicans' so-called southern strategy. They weren't a majority, although they made up a crucial voting bloc, and they weren't really silent either. However their presence was obscured by both liberals and conservatives, neither of whom had any interest in seeing their reactionary attitudes get too much attention.

For the Republicans this was a no brainer. Had they pandered too openly to the racist vote they would have found themselves in Trump's predicament long ago. And both sides had a shared interest in preserving the credibility of capitalist democracy, which open racism tends to erode. But the contribution of the liberals hasn't been explored much, so let's focus on that for a moment.

We can start with the classic liberal attitude toward conflict. Basically, liberals believe that there are no enemies, that everyone is part of the 99%, that the other side just hasn't been subjected to enough indignant speeches/giant puppets/candlelight vigils/petitions on change.org to see the error of their ways. Thus when confronting the issue of racism, liberals tend to focus on the systemic and structural varieties, while pretending that actual racists haven't really existed since the sixties. This attitude played into the hands of the Republicans and the southern strategy. While institutional racism is certainly a major problem, it doesn't maintain itself, but must be nurtured through constant intervention by individual racists. And Trump has demonstrated beyond any doubt that individual racists are alive, well, and becoming an organized political force. They will need to be opposed long after this election is over, whether Trump wins or loses.

As usual, we probably won't get much help from the liberals. Most of them will declare victory and go home the day after President Hillary's inauguration. But for the rest of us, it's worth thinking about what the future of Trumpism might look like. One factor that has yet to emerge is the unofficial army of thugs that historically has been an integral part of fascist and reactionary uprisings. We have not yet seen any equivalent to the Ku Klux Klan of the post-Reconstruction years or Mussolini's Blackshirts. The so-called Lions Guard has not materialized on the ground, and a recent attempt on Reddit by a Pittsburgh-based Trumpist to mobilize an armed group to attack anti-Trump protesters went nowhere. No one who has seen a Trump rally up close can be too reassured by this however. The racist invective spewed by Trump's supporters when gathered in large numbers (or on the internet) leave little doubt that many of them are prepared use violence.

Of course Trump has another problem in this regard. While he has run further to the right than any major candidate since George Wallace, there is still an unbridgeable gulf between his campaign and avowed white supremacists. Trump can get away with rejecting David Duke only half heartedly, but he can't adopt Duke's positions. This makes it harder to recruit a personal army from the ranks of the modern KKK and their ilk. For this we can credit the civil rights campaigns of the fifties, sixties, and since, which whatever their failings, have helped make overt white supremacy so socially taboo that not even a Donald Trump can embrace it.

Yet while the Trump campaign must maintain a distance from its most obviously racist supporters (and may well be discouraging efforts like the Lions Guard behind the scenes), we shouldn't expect any campaign to be able to exert full control over all its fans, especially this one. A modern version of the Blackshirts may yet emerge, particularly if it becomes obvious that Trump can't win the presidency. We should also keep a close eye on the upcoming Republican National Convention in Cleveland. Unlike whistle stop rallies that last only a few hours, the RNC is a four-day affair that is expected to attract many thousands of Trump supporters. They will have plenty of time to organize among themselves, especially as they no longer have to worry about a contested convention stealing the nomination from their candidate. As anarchists we know how powerful spontaneous horizontal organizing can be, and there's no point pretending it only works for us. We also know that fascists aren't unbeatable, that when we oppose them vigorously in the streets they tend to crumble. So let's do that...

Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by Mike Novack
"Most of them (the liberals) will declare victory and go home the day after President Hillary's inauguration."

Uh ... are you using "liberals" the same strange way that the conservatives call Obama a "socialist". Yes, a great many liberals will probably end up voting for Hillary as the (far) lesser evil compared to Trump. Maybe happy that she didn't lose, but no cause to celebrate.

It's the MODERATES who are the Hillary supporters, not the liberals, who at the mo,ment are mostly still supporting Bernie.

You are quite right that there is a great deal of uncertainty/instability in our political system right now << which seems to be cast in concrete for decades but then can change rather quickly >> So yes we might see the rise of a fascist faction. We might also see the rise of other things, splits in the major parities, etc. W ay too soon to tell.
The Comment title says it all.
by blues
/~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Atlantic Monthly --
Hillary Clinton and the Tragic Politics of Crime (The criminal-justice policies she now denounces once helped her husband capture the White House.) -- May 1, 2015
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/05/the-tragic-politics-of-crime/392114/

With the exception of gay rights, no public-policy debate has shifted more dramatically in my adult lifetime than the debate over crime. In 1992, when Bill Clinton flew back to Arkansas to oversee the execution of a mentally retarded African American murderer, the move helped him in New Hampshire’s Democratic primary. In 1994, Clinton’s crime bill—which among other things, expanded the death penalty, encouraged states to lengthen prison sentences and eliminated federal funding for inmate education—garnered the votes of every Democratic Senator except one.

Today, by contrast, Hillary Clinton is loudly repudiating the “tough on crime” policies that she and her husband once championed. Even more remarkably, prominent Republicans are nodding along.
\~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

So, most of the black people who are calling Trump racist are actually the victims of Bill and Hillary. Certainly Trump says a lot of goofy things, but I haven’t heard anything racist “in code” yet. If people just keep saying he's racist over and over, it doesn't mean anything, except that perhaps they have been bamboozled by billionaires such as George Soros. Just because all these people are saying it doesn't mean I have to believe it. (I've been there, done that, hey.) And never forget Bill's NAFTA (no jobs for you except in jail), which Donald denounced.

/~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Washington Times -- Hillary Clinton’s hawkish position on Russia troubles both sides of aisle -- June 9, 2015
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jun/9/hillary-clintons-hawkish-position-on-russia-troubl/?page=all

At a California fundraiser last year, she reportedly compared Russian President Vladimir Putin to Adolf Hitler. At a meeting earlier this year with London Mayor Boris Johnson, he said she faulted European leaders for being “too wimpy” about challenging Mr. Putin.

Conservative commentator Paul Craig Roberts, an economist who served as assistant secretary of treasury under President Reagan, warned that Mrs. Clinton will have a difficulty backing down from a confrontation with Mr. Putin after calling him Hitler.

“When you go that far out on a limb, you really kind of have to go the rest of the way,” he said in an interview at Infowars.com. [I know, Infowars, but it's still real] “I don’t’ think there is any candidate that we can end up with as president that would be more likely to go to war with Russia than Hillary.”
\~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

So, Hillary compares Putin to Hitler, says he needs to be “challenged.”

Sure, WW-III will solve all our problems.

Meanwhile, Trump says: "Wouldn't it be nice if actually we could get along with Russia? -- With China"

I don't know what Trump believes, but I do know what Hillary believes. And it's not about “conservative” or “moderate” or “liberal” -- she is a fascist.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$200.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network