Santa Cruz IMC
Santa Cruz IMC
Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Proposed Camping Ban Amendment Set for March 8 Council Hearing
by Steve Pleich
Tuesday Feb 23rd, 2016 11:41 AM
Proposed Amendment Would Create the Right to Sleep in Santa Cruz
For several weeks, a group of concerned citizens has been meeting to strategize ways to move forward in support of the right to sleep in Santa Cruz. The group includes members of the faith community, civic leaders, advocates for people experiencing homelessness, nonprofit executives and Santa Cruz City Council Members Micah Posner and Don Lane. Lane, a former Mayor, describes the city’s existing camping/sleeping ban like this: “I do wonder what the harm is from the act of sleeping or wrapping oneself in a blanket on a cold night. And, more importantly, I wonder what the harm is when a government penalizes people for behavior they cannot and should not avoid.”

The group plans to introduce an Amendment to Section 6.36 of the Municipal Code (Camping) to remove reference to the act of sleeping and use of blankets. Among the talking points developed by the group for the campaign to generate broad community support for the proposed amendment are (1) Santa Cruz does not need a sleeping prohibition in its camping ordinance to effectively manage our public and private spaces; (2) All the activities that trouble so many community members: dirty campsites, long-term occupation of locations within parks and greenbelts, human waste depositing, etc. are fully addressed in other provisions in the Camping Ordinance, along with ordinances on littering, public urination/defecation, trespassing and “hours of use” in parks; and (3) Santa Cruz’s ban on sleeping outside has not been an effective tool in reducing the number of homeless individuals in the city, even with one of the most restrictive “sleeping” ordinances in California.

This new initiative comes at a time when federal agencies are closely scrutinizing cities and towns than continue to enforce camping/sleeping bans in the absence of adequate and available shelter. When the winter shelter program ends in mid-March, the city of Santa Cruz will literally have only a handful of beds available for the hundreds of individuals in the community without shelter. In other words, adequate shelter space does not exist. The existing ordinance would, in the opinion of the United States Department of Justice, be criminalizing some people simply because they are homeless. Additionally, the Department of Housing and Urban Development is now telling local communities that their applications for federal funding will be scored lower if criminalization of involuntary acts such as sleeping outside is part of local policy. Says Santa Cruz Housing NOW founder Linda Lemaster. “As a housing advocate, I fear that the current policies in our community prohibiting sleep may jeopardize the more than $2 million Santa Cruz receives annually from the HUD”. It is also notable that bans on sleeping are now being roundly criticized from a purely economic perspective. Scott Keyes, Senior Reporter for writes, “Criminalization policies are problematic not only from a human rights perspective, but also because they’re costly and counterproductive. Criminalizing homelessness also hurts taxpayers. When accounting for law enforcement and emergency health care costs, numerous studies have found that leaving homeless people on the streets winds up costing taxpayers more than three times as much as simply giving them housing and supportive services.”

The group talking points also reference The United Nations Human Rights Committee statement in reference to the criminalization of homelessness in the United States: “While appreciating the steps taken by federal and some state and local authorities to address homelessness, the Committee is concerned about reports of criminalization of people living on the street for everyday activities such as eating, sleeping, sitting in particular areas etc.” This statement echoes the concerns of Santa Cruz attorney and long time homeless activist Ed Frey who says, “Sleeping is and has always been a human right that should be protected and defended by international convention. The time is right for a full throated advocacy of that right at the highest levels.”

The proposed amendment is agendized for council consideration on March 8 although it is uncertain at this time whether it will be considered at an afternoon or evening session. Until then, efforts will continue to actively lobby business and community groups in support of the proposal as sound economic and public policy as well as a call to conscience for the entire community. The working group asks everyone who supports the Right to Sleep in Santa Cruz to email the Santa Cruz City Council at citycouncil [at] and to come to the council session on March 8 and speak in favor of the proposed amendment. There is also a petition supporters are urged to sign.

§Don Lane's proposed amendment to the camping ban
by Helper Monday Feb 29th, 2016 6:04 PM
Source: Source:
Listed below are the latest comments about this post.
These comments are submitted anonymously by website visitors.
Yes it needs to be changed further to be worthwhileSteve SchnaarMonday Feb 29th, 2016 5:50 PM
Maybe I am not getting it but what is being proposed isPetraSaturday Feb 27th, 2016 3:15 PM
Let the Santa Cruz chapter of the ACLU sleep outside without blankets.GThursday Feb 25th, 2016 12:01 PM
Let the Council Sleep Outside, With No Blanket, To Test The ProposalThis Is Progress?Thursday Feb 25th, 2016 7:44 AM
Correction to the Draft Agenda ReportSteve SchnaarWednesday Feb 24th, 2016 10:26 AM
Thanks for the clarity - but let's pass this on humanitarian grounds aloneIndyRadio/David RoknichWednesday Feb 24th, 2016 10:19 AM
Proposed Changes to Lane's Proposal--the Beginnings of ReformRobert NorseWednesday Feb 24th, 2016 9:53 AM
Lane's Proposal Needs Strengthening Badly and Vigorous Activist Follow-UpRobert NorseWednesday Feb 24th, 2016 9:23 AM
Too Little Too Late!Pat ColbyWednesday Feb 24th, 2016 1:37 AM
Steve said...Razer RayTuesday Feb 23rd, 2016 8:38 PM
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!


donate now

$ 162.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.


Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network