Publish to Newswire
Add an EventFrom the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
WTC Killer in Town tomorrow...1-12-16 Mousre Report
Murder Bosses in Berkeley???!!!...thats right kids...Wednesday night at St John's...one of Big Brother's more notorious getaway drivers, Michael Shermer, discusses his new book, “Skeptic: Viewing the World with a Rational Eye" observing the smoking gun pointed at our heads in the hands of the only possible suspect (in a defense stand down operation) while turning blind eyes and deaf ears to the inside job...spinning donuts for bad cops over the graves of the millions of innocents in the way of drone bomber's Opium War masters in the Poppy Bush gang... (120 minutes)
Listen now:
(reading from Sunday Show comments about MSM's latest assault on reason) "ACE ACME •
Dr. Shermer's ignorance about 9/11 is quite shocking. He confidently asserts a 2002-era collapse theory about the WTC towers, apparently unaware that the official 2005 report repudiated that theory.
His dismissal as "smoke from fires" of the mysterious jets of pulverized building materials emanating from
isolated windows as much as 40 stories below the active collapse zone--floors that had no fires--is quite reckless.
He blithely claims there's no mystery to WTC7's collapse, apparently unaware that the NYT said engineers were baffled by it, the FEMA report said it could not explain it, and it took NIST several years to come up with a plausible-sounding story. His claim that the steel structure sagged and got weaker from fire damage is contrary to NIST's collapse initiation mechanism, which would be impossible had the steel sagged.
He then argues from incredulity that explosive or incendiary charges could not have been planted in the three buildings because of the building security. Apparently he does not know that most of the
buildings' core columns were accessible from the elevator shafts, and that the twin towers had an elevator renovations project going on in the towers' 15 miles of elevator shafts in the 9 months before 9/11 that would have provided cover for construction-type activity going on in the shafts. Apparently he does not know that the four floors immediately above the floor where the collapse allegedly began in WTC7 were all, according to FEMA, vacant.
He then claims it would take hundreds or even thousands of charges to take a tower down. He does not explain why it would take so many charges to do a job that he believes was caused by fire and weak
floor anchors. Anything fire can do, incendiaries can do better."
Dr. Shermer's ignorance about 9/11 is quite shocking. He confidently asserts a 2002-era collapse theory about the WTC towers, apparently unaware that the official 2005 report repudiated that theory.
His dismissal as "smoke from fires" of the mysterious jets of pulverized building materials emanating from
isolated windows as much as 40 stories below the active collapse zone--floors that had no fires--is quite reckless.
He blithely claims there's no mystery to WTC7's collapse, apparently unaware that the NYT said engineers were baffled by it, the FEMA report said it could not explain it, and it took NIST several years to come up with a plausible-sounding story. His claim that the steel structure sagged and got weaker from fire damage is contrary to NIST's collapse initiation mechanism, which would be impossible had the steel sagged.
He then argues from incredulity that explosive or incendiary charges could not have been planted in the three buildings because of the building security. Apparently he does not know that most of the
buildings' core columns were accessible from the elevator shafts, and that the twin towers had an elevator renovations project going on in the towers' 15 miles of elevator shafts in the 9 months before 9/11 that would have provided cover for construction-type activity going on in the shafts. Apparently he does not know that the four floors immediately above the floor where the collapse allegedly began in WTC7 were all, according to FEMA, vacant.
He then claims it would take hundreds or even thousands of charges to take a tower down. He does not explain why it would take so many charges to do a job that he believes was caused by fire and weak
floor anchors. Anything fire can do, incendiaries can do better."
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Donate
$330.00 donated
in the past month
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network
But there is a problem. For this to be a rational plan, would have to know WHICH BUILDINGS we going to be hit. And that is not which buildings were planned to be hit, but which would actually be hit. So to make this a rational plan, would have to have prepared for demolition ALL the buildings in the general area. I mean it would have been weird if say the UN got hot bit one of the WTCs went down.
I think there IS a secret being protected, but you aren't seeing it. These are buildings built after the switch from asbestos plaster insulation for beams to non-asbestos insulation. But the old asbestos insulation tended to stay in place even if badly shocked (asbestos is a fibrous mineral). That's what makes it so hard to remove. Explosion followed by fire, the beams are still partially protected from heat. I might be wrong. but I think the secret being protected is "the post asbestos sky scrapers are NOT safe against explosion followed by fire".
When the buildings were in the hands of the new owners they immediately fired the buildings security guards, and then hired their own security who then fenced off the Elevators at different areas so that the public could not see the doings or work being done by the new security agents.
One year of secreted for safety purposes is time enough to plant any explosives which are monopolized by the U.S. Military and so not available to the common public. The explosive is carefully guarded and jobbed out to a place called Berkley Labs where is is manufactured in most modern labratories including the manufacture of mini-atomic bombs, and therefore no other possiblities for its possesion existed any where else in the world, certainly not in some far off cave in ancient Afghanistan, where is was rumored to be from.
As soon as the buildings were blown down by explosives that could reach temperatures that could melt steel like a hot knife through butter, why then Marvin Bush and his cabal collected the insurance money. Somewhere near seven billion dollars. How is that for a one year profit maker. Something like a couple of million dollars an hour for each working day of eight hours.
You yet have a world to win!! End pollution of fossil fuels like coal, gas, oil, and nuclear fission atomic power plants and re-tool the entire industrial revolution to renewable energy such a wind, tidal, and solar power which when tranformed to electricity is more power than all the fossil fuels combined.
Why this? It is because fossil fuels burn-out of oxygen (already 40% gone to carbon-dioxide which we cannot live on) is taking place in the atmosphere. So don't burn out the remaining 60%.
The Ozone is the precious oxygen zone and we cannot live without it globallly. What good is your billions as gold, silver, and precious stones or even paper money if we the peoples burn out the remaining oxygen supply.
At least tidal, wind, and solar power has a proven practice of much peaceful co-existence with the atmosphere and allows the green organic revolution to return the oxygen to make a livable planet again.
You yet have a planet to win!! End fossil fuel destruction of the oxygen supply. Workers of the world unite!!