top
US
US
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Those who get broadband end up voting for Democrats. The war on the web.

by Kieren McCarthy
Those who get broadband end up voting for Democrats. The war on the web.
American cable giants go bananas after FCC slams broadband rollout
Cynical exercise or uncomfortable truths?

Kieren McCarthy

A big fight has broken out between ISPs and their regulator, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), in the US.

The FCC's annual Broadband Report will be published shortly, and late Thursday, chairman Tom Wheeler put out a "factsheet" about its main finding: that broadband is "not being deployed in a reasonable and timely fashion to all Americans."

The report will be discussed at the FCC's next meeting on January 28 and Wheeler noted in his summary that the regulator is required to "take immediate action" if it makes that finding.

Unsurprisingly, the ISPs are not happy, and USTelecom has rushed out a response. "It would seem that the FCC's report should carry the headline 'our policies have failed,'" the industry body complains, "since it concludes that six years after adoption of the national broadband plan, the commission's actions haven't produced even so much as a 'reasonable' level of broadband deployment."

It takes issue with the main finding. "No one actually believes that deployment in the United States is unreasonable. Unfortunately, this annual process has become a cynical exercise, one that eschews dispassionate analysis, and is patently intended to reach a predetermined conclusion that will justify a continuing expansion of the agency's own regulatory reach."
A history of slow

The rollout of broadband in the US has been a source of tension for more than a decade. The truth is that compared with many other nations, the provision of internet access is far behind, both in terms of speed and reach. It is also significantly more expensive than in comparable nations.

Wheeler lists the factors that led to the conclusion that broadband is not being deployed "in a reasonable and timely fashion," and they include:

34 million Americans don't have access to the FCC's benchmark speed of 25Mbps down, 3Mbps up – a benchmark it upped this time last year.
39 per cent of the rural population does not have access to fixed broadband – something he says is a "persistent urban-rural digital divide."
41 percent of schools have not met the FCC's goal of 100 Mbps per 1,000 students/staff.
Just 9 percent of schools have fiber connections capable of meeting the FCC's long-term goal of 1Gbps per 1,000 students.
The US is still far behind other countries, ranking 16th out of 34 developed nations.

Ever since Wheeler pushed net neutrality rules through last year, against the very strong wishes of the telcos, the regulator has been butting heads with those it oversees – somewhat of a change in what has traditionally been quite a cozy relationship.

But this report should not have come as much of a surprise to the industry: when the FCC changed the benchmark speed from 4Mbps to 25Mbps a year ago, Wheeler was quite open about the fact that he felt bandwidth speeds had not kept up with user demands.

An accompanying report at the time argued that rural areas of America were underserved, with 53 per cent of the rural population falling short of the new proposed minimum speed. It also estimated that 55 million people, or 17 per cent of the population, lacked access to the 25/3 standard.

The FCC has crystal clear authority to act when it feels not enough is being done under the one piece of modern telecommunications legislation – the 1996 Telecommunications Act.

Wheeler clearly signalled his intentions 12 months ago (and again last week) and in that time, ISPs have responded by getting broadband to an additional 14 per cent of the rural population and to an additional 21 million Americans.

Wheeler says that's not enough; the ISPs will beg to differ. Later this month, we will find out what the FCC proposes to do about it. Expect fireworks. ®
by Mike Novack
Can you spell "deregulation"?

THAT is the culprit here. Were it not for the fact that back in those days the utilities were regulated, forced to extend service into rural areas, rural areas would have no electrical service, no telephone service, etc. But back a couple decades ago, "deregulation" came into being with the supposed intent of fostering competition. Competition yeah, competing for the most profitable areas leaving the rest with no service at all.

The reason that my ISP can only give me a 28.8 KBaud connection when at home is because it is dial-up and the out of date phone lines won't support even DSL nor is there a fiber cable running up our road to allow even higher speeds. There is no cell phone service either. This is TYPICAL of the rural parts of the country. The only modest broadband available is by satellite, expensive and inferior/limited.

But when I take my computer off its dock, load it into the car, and drive some miles to where there is public broadband access available, I can get our mail from out ISP's server with blinding speed. So it is NOT the ISP.

I use us as an example, because when at the library, we are connecting via Comcast fiber, and like many such companies, Comcast is acting as an ISP. But that is more or less as a sideline. Most people in town who ae subscribers to their fiber are essentially TV customers, and that is what Comcast is making it money from. If and when Comcast (or a similar company) runs fiber up our road, we will probably be forced to pay for their cheapest TV service (we don't watch TV) in order to get the "for a little bit more, internet too".

I will repeat, deregulation is hte culprit. No public utilities required to provide service to ALL areas.

We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$255.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network