Publish to Newswire
Add an EventFrom the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Section 8 renters face discrimination and are being abused
There is plenty of documentation and evidence revealing that Section 8 renters are being targeted, and are facing major problems in Oakland, the Bay Area, and across the nation because very few states, counties, and cities prohibit discrimination against Section 8 voucher holders!
Section 8 renters face discrimination and are being abused
By Lynda Carson - December 10, 2015
Oakland - Section 8 renters are facing major problems in Oakland, the Bay Area, and across the nation because very few states, counties, and cities prohibit discrimination against Section 8 voucher holders.
The “Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program” provides rental assistance to the most vulnerable members of our nation, including woman with children, the elderly, and disabled. Section 8 renters generally pay 30% - 40% of the rent to the landlord, and sometimes more, and the housing program pays the rest.
Despite the major problems Section 8 renters face because of discrimination, the Section 8 Voucher Program, presently called the Housing Choice Voucher Program, has become the dominant form of federal housing assistance across the nation. With more than 5 million people, in 2.1 million low-income families that are currently using vouchers to subsidize their rents, it is a very successful program all across the nation.
However, in October, it was reported that 609 residents in Oakland had secured a federal Section 8 housing voucher during 2015, and only around 115 of them had managed to find housing in Oakland with their vouchers.
During April of 2015, in the nearby City of Richmond, it was reported that many public housing tenants trying to relocate away from slum conditions at their public housing units could not move, because landlords declined to accept their Section 8 vouchers.
Click below for more about Richmond voucher holders…
http://tinyurl.com/ptzcc4y
Before a City Council vote took place and passed in Santa Monica, CA., to protect Section 8 renters, according to Denise McGranahan, senior attorney with the Legal Aid Foundation in Los Angeles, as of May 2015, only 12 states, 9 counties, and 18 cities have outlawed discrimination against section 8 renters.
“Studies suggest that landlords discriminate against Section 8 voucher holders as a pretext for discriminating against minorities, disabled, and families with children,” McGranahan said. “These populations are over represented in the Section 8 program, including in Santa Monica, as compared to the general population,” reported David Mark Simpson.
Section 8 Renters Face Many Kinds Of Problems & Discrimination
In a court ruling during late November 2015, that affects thousands of poor Section 8 tenants in Oakland, San Francisco, Berkeley, Richmond, and millions across the nation, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals declared that the Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles illegally cut subsidies to thousands of Section 8 renters.
During 2004, the Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles (HACLA) cut Section 8 housing subsidies for around 20,000 low-income residents without giving proper notice in advance, a three-judge panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals declared.
The illegal cut-backs to the rental subsidies for the poor Section 8 tenants resulted in many elderly and disabled residents, including families with young children, paying much higher rents that averaged around $104 more per month, the court said.
According to court documents, the Housing Authority failed to provide comprehensible information to Section 8 beneficiaries about the payment standard change and its effect one year in advance of the change’s implementation.
Click below for more…
https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2015/12/01/18780583.php
In a different case, on July 20, 2015, the Justice Department announced a settlement with the Housing Authority of Los Angeles County (HACoLA), and the cities of Lancaster, California, and Palmdale, California, to resolve allegations that these parties targeted African Americans with discriminatory enforcement of the Section 8 housing choice voucher program, according to a press release. The parties have agreed to enter into a court-enforceable agreement that will provide broad relief meant to ensure unbiased enforcement of the voucher program so that African-American voucher holders in the Antelope Valley are not targeted because of their race.
“Local government officials worked with the Los Angeles County Housing Authority and the Sheriff’s Department to subject African-American families to discriminatory enforcement actions in an effort to discourage them from using Housing Choice vouchers to live in Lancaster and Palmdale,” said U.S. Attorney Eileen M. Decker of the Central District of California. “This type of discrimination is fundamentally wrong and is inconsistent with American values of freedom and equality. This settlement, together with an earlier settlement with the Sheriff’s department, will ensure it does not recur, and will also provide more than $2.6 million to compensate those harmed.”
Click on link below for more…
http://tinyurl.com/o36uzoo
In a July 31, 2015 press release from Congresswoman Maxine Waters, she blasts the housing authority, and Sheriff’s Department for their use of discriminatory actions against the Section 8 renters.
Congresswoman Maxine Waters released the following statement:
“I am appalled by recent revelations of discriminatory and illegal actions of the cities of Palmdale and Lancaster, along with the Housing Authority of the County of Los Angeles and Sheriff’s Department, against low-income African American residents in the County’s Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program. The Department of Justice findings that are being resolved with these settlement agreements are simply shameful and part of a disgraceful effort to discourage these families from utilizing their Section 8 vouchers to live in certain neighborhoods.
The complaint filed by the DOJ against HACoLA acknowledged that the cities of Palmdale and Lancaster have a ‘history of residential racial segregation and of excluding African-American residents.’ From the use of excessive force, to biased policing practices, including housing discrimination, and unlawful searches and seizures, HACoLA and the Los Angeles County Sherriff’s department conspired to unfairly target these residents. They actively sought to undermine the intent of the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program, which is to provides low-income families with the opportunity to move into neighborhoods with greater opportunities, such as better schools and better employment prospects.
With the recent Supreme Court decision to uphold disparate impact under the Fair Housing Act, and HUD’s recent release of its final regulation to clarify and strengthen a key aspect of the Fair Housing Act, conservatives continue to claim that segregation in American neighborhoods is simply the result of personal preferences, not discrimination. Nevertheless, these settlement agreements are prime examples of why this is a false assumption. Minorities continue to be actively discriminated against in the housing market, facing targeted harassment from police and local officials for simply choosing to live in certain neighborhoods.”
Click below for full press release…
http://tinyurl.com/j832x5x
In another case during 2009, a family of Section 8 landlords, Riaz, Maryam and Mark Patras of Antioch, CA, who have rented several homes to Section 8 families, have sued the City of Antioch and five members of its Police Department in federal court for civil rights violations, including loss of rental income, emotional distress, humiliation and loss of privacy. They have also alledged that the police department’s Community Action Team (CAT) used rough and illegal tactics to force the landlords to evict their Section 8 tenants, all of whom are African-American.
Click on link below for more…
http://tinyurl.com/h3oyzjj
The City of Antioch has faced numerous allegations regarding discrimination against Section 8 renters, and the targeting of Section 8 renters, that have made it into the news throughout the San Francisco Bay Area on different occasions.
Click below for more information regarding the cops in Antioch who allegedly targeted Section 8 renters…
http://www.publicadvocates.org/project-news/all/541
There is plenty of documentation and evidence revealing that Section 8 renters are being targeted, and are facing major problems in Oakland, the Bay Area, and across the nation because very few states, counties, and cities prohibit discrimination against Section 8 voucher holders.
Lynda Carson may be reached at tenantsrule [at] yahoo.com
>>>>>>>>
By Lynda Carson - December 10, 2015
Oakland - Section 8 renters are facing major problems in Oakland, the Bay Area, and across the nation because very few states, counties, and cities prohibit discrimination against Section 8 voucher holders.
The “Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program” provides rental assistance to the most vulnerable members of our nation, including woman with children, the elderly, and disabled. Section 8 renters generally pay 30% - 40% of the rent to the landlord, and sometimes more, and the housing program pays the rest.
Despite the major problems Section 8 renters face because of discrimination, the Section 8 Voucher Program, presently called the Housing Choice Voucher Program, has become the dominant form of federal housing assistance across the nation. With more than 5 million people, in 2.1 million low-income families that are currently using vouchers to subsidize their rents, it is a very successful program all across the nation.
However, in October, it was reported that 609 residents in Oakland had secured a federal Section 8 housing voucher during 2015, and only around 115 of them had managed to find housing in Oakland with their vouchers.
During April of 2015, in the nearby City of Richmond, it was reported that many public housing tenants trying to relocate away from slum conditions at their public housing units could not move, because landlords declined to accept their Section 8 vouchers.
Click below for more about Richmond voucher holders…
http://tinyurl.com/ptzcc4y
Before a City Council vote took place and passed in Santa Monica, CA., to protect Section 8 renters, according to Denise McGranahan, senior attorney with the Legal Aid Foundation in Los Angeles, as of May 2015, only 12 states, 9 counties, and 18 cities have outlawed discrimination against section 8 renters.
“Studies suggest that landlords discriminate against Section 8 voucher holders as a pretext for discriminating against minorities, disabled, and families with children,” McGranahan said. “These populations are over represented in the Section 8 program, including in Santa Monica, as compared to the general population,” reported David Mark Simpson.
Section 8 Renters Face Many Kinds Of Problems & Discrimination
In a court ruling during late November 2015, that affects thousands of poor Section 8 tenants in Oakland, San Francisco, Berkeley, Richmond, and millions across the nation, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals declared that the Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles illegally cut subsidies to thousands of Section 8 renters.
During 2004, the Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles (HACLA) cut Section 8 housing subsidies for around 20,000 low-income residents without giving proper notice in advance, a three-judge panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals declared.
The illegal cut-backs to the rental subsidies for the poor Section 8 tenants resulted in many elderly and disabled residents, including families with young children, paying much higher rents that averaged around $104 more per month, the court said.
According to court documents, the Housing Authority failed to provide comprehensible information to Section 8 beneficiaries about the payment standard change and its effect one year in advance of the change’s implementation.
Click below for more…
https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2015/12/01/18780583.php
In a different case, on July 20, 2015, the Justice Department announced a settlement with the Housing Authority of Los Angeles County (HACoLA), and the cities of Lancaster, California, and Palmdale, California, to resolve allegations that these parties targeted African Americans with discriminatory enforcement of the Section 8 housing choice voucher program, according to a press release. The parties have agreed to enter into a court-enforceable agreement that will provide broad relief meant to ensure unbiased enforcement of the voucher program so that African-American voucher holders in the Antelope Valley are not targeted because of their race.
“Local government officials worked with the Los Angeles County Housing Authority and the Sheriff’s Department to subject African-American families to discriminatory enforcement actions in an effort to discourage them from using Housing Choice vouchers to live in Lancaster and Palmdale,” said U.S. Attorney Eileen M. Decker of the Central District of California. “This type of discrimination is fundamentally wrong and is inconsistent with American values of freedom and equality. This settlement, together with an earlier settlement with the Sheriff’s department, will ensure it does not recur, and will also provide more than $2.6 million to compensate those harmed.”
Click on link below for more…
http://tinyurl.com/o36uzoo
In a July 31, 2015 press release from Congresswoman Maxine Waters, she blasts the housing authority, and Sheriff’s Department for their use of discriminatory actions against the Section 8 renters.
Congresswoman Maxine Waters released the following statement:
“I am appalled by recent revelations of discriminatory and illegal actions of the cities of Palmdale and Lancaster, along with the Housing Authority of the County of Los Angeles and Sheriff’s Department, against low-income African American residents in the County’s Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program. The Department of Justice findings that are being resolved with these settlement agreements are simply shameful and part of a disgraceful effort to discourage these families from utilizing their Section 8 vouchers to live in certain neighborhoods.
The complaint filed by the DOJ against HACoLA acknowledged that the cities of Palmdale and Lancaster have a ‘history of residential racial segregation and of excluding African-American residents.’ From the use of excessive force, to biased policing practices, including housing discrimination, and unlawful searches and seizures, HACoLA and the Los Angeles County Sherriff’s department conspired to unfairly target these residents. They actively sought to undermine the intent of the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program, which is to provides low-income families with the opportunity to move into neighborhoods with greater opportunities, such as better schools and better employment prospects.
With the recent Supreme Court decision to uphold disparate impact under the Fair Housing Act, and HUD’s recent release of its final regulation to clarify and strengthen a key aspect of the Fair Housing Act, conservatives continue to claim that segregation in American neighborhoods is simply the result of personal preferences, not discrimination. Nevertheless, these settlement agreements are prime examples of why this is a false assumption. Minorities continue to be actively discriminated against in the housing market, facing targeted harassment from police and local officials for simply choosing to live in certain neighborhoods.”
Click below for full press release…
http://tinyurl.com/j832x5x
In another case during 2009, a family of Section 8 landlords, Riaz, Maryam and Mark Patras of Antioch, CA, who have rented several homes to Section 8 families, have sued the City of Antioch and five members of its Police Department in federal court for civil rights violations, including loss of rental income, emotional distress, humiliation and loss of privacy. They have also alledged that the police department’s Community Action Team (CAT) used rough and illegal tactics to force the landlords to evict their Section 8 tenants, all of whom are African-American.
Click on link below for more…
http://tinyurl.com/h3oyzjj
The City of Antioch has faced numerous allegations regarding discrimination against Section 8 renters, and the targeting of Section 8 renters, that have made it into the news throughout the San Francisco Bay Area on different occasions.
Click below for more information regarding the cops in Antioch who allegedly targeted Section 8 renters…
http://www.publicadvocates.org/project-news/all/541
There is plenty of documentation and evidence revealing that Section 8 renters are being targeted, and are facing major problems in Oakland, the Bay Area, and across the nation because very few states, counties, and cities prohibit discrimination against Section 8 voucher holders.
Lynda Carson may be reached at tenantsrule [at] yahoo.com
>>>>>>>>
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
The Section 8 voucher program was launched in 1974 during the Nixon administration. This program was "by design" a temporary assistance program to help low income people afford better housing until they could handle the costs on their own. Unfortunately, the program is being utilized as a life time entitlement by most of the people who receive the vouchers.
One of the biggest problems with Section 8 is that there is no time limit on the voucher. Those who have received a voucher and found housing never give them up or strive to better themselves because they don't want to lose their voucher. As there is such a slow, if non exsistant rotation in the program, those seeking vouchers now are basically cut off by those who already have one.
Additionally HUD funding has been cut every year since 2005. The current FY2016 Transportation and Housing bill (which just passed the Senate) cut more funding resulting in a 28,000 voucher cut. This is in addition to the 70,000 vouchers lost by the sequester bill of 2011. Those vouchers have never been funded. HUD and Housing Authorities across the country do a diservice to people by opening waitlists which only provide a place on a list for very few. Then those few have a slim chance of ever getting a voucher and then the problem of finding housing.
The section 8 program is a voluntary program for landlords, they don't have to participate in the program if they don't want too. HUD has cut many of the incentives it use to supply to landlords as well as cut benefits, so there is far less of a reason for landlords to get into the program. Why take far less than market from a less than reliable government agency when you can rent market rate and not deal with the government at all. There are currently three court cases that I know of challanging the laws that local governments have passed about mandating landlords take Section 8. One such law in TX will probably be found unconstitutional by the TX Supreme court. It will probably go to SOCTUS but there is no guarantee it will ever be heard or they may choose not to rule against the lower court.
Section 8 is slowly crawling to its demise, of course the political hacks at HUD won't admit it but they have to justify their jobs so they just do alot of "spin" to make it look like they are doing something, while they are privitizing thousands of voucher attached units all over the country. If a Republican is elected president in 2016 you will see even more cuts and probably the elimination of the program, although they might grandfather in seniors and the handicapped but I just woundn't count on this program being around.
One of the biggest problems with Section 8 is that there is no time limit on the voucher. Those who have received a voucher and found housing never give them up or strive to better themselves because they don't want to lose their voucher. As there is such a slow, if non exsistant rotation in the program, those seeking vouchers now are basically cut off by those who already have one.
Additionally HUD funding has been cut every year since 2005. The current FY2016 Transportation and Housing bill (which just passed the Senate) cut more funding resulting in a 28,000 voucher cut. This is in addition to the 70,000 vouchers lost by the sequester bill of 2011. Those vouchers have never been funded. HUD and Housing Authorities across the country do a diservice to people by opening waitlists which only provide a place on a list for very few. Then those few have a slim chance of ever getting a voucher and then the problem of finding housing.
The section 8 program is a voluntary program for landlords, they don't have to participate in the program if they don't want too. HUD has cut many of the incentives it use to supply to landlords as well as cut benefits, so there is far less of a reason for landlords to get into the program. Why take far less than market from a less than reliable government agency when you can rent market rate and not deal with the government at all. There are currently three court cases that I know of challanging the laws that local governments have passed about mandating landlords take Section 8. One such law in TX will probably be found unconstitutional by the TX Supreme court. It will probably go to SOCTUS but there is no guarantee it will ever be heard or they may choose not to rule against the lower court.
Section 8 is slowly crawling to its demise, of course the political hacks at HUD won't admit it but they have to justify their jobs so they just do alot of "spin" to make it look like they are doing something, while they are privitizing thousands of voucher attached units all over the country. If a Republican is elected president in 2016 you will see even more cuts and probably the elimination of the program, although they might grandfather in seniors and the handicapped but I just woundn't count on this program being around.
Privatization of Section 8 vouchers?
For the moment, I will assume that J. Benning works for a so-called nonprofit affordable housing developer.
J. Benning is absolutely correct about tens of thousands of Section 8 vouchers being taken from the poor, and are being privatized by so-called affordable housing developers for their projects.
Mostly they are so-called affordable housing projects that discriminate against the poor with what are called "minimum income requirements." The privatized Section 8 vouchers are converted to what are known as Project Based Vouchers.
For many years so-called nonprofit housing developers throughout the Bay Area and across the nation have been demanding that more Section 8 vouchers should be taken from the poor, so that they may be privatized and used at their so-called affordable housing projects.
Projects that are excluding the poorest of the poor, including the elderly, and disabled, because of minimum income requirements.
Lynda Carson
>>>>>>
For the moment, I will assume that J. Benning works for a so-called nonprofit affordable housing developer.
J. Benning is absolutely correct about tens of thousands of Section 8 vouchers being taken from the poor, and are being privatized by so-called affordable housing developers for their projects.
Mostly they are so-called affordable housing projects that discriminate against the poor with what are called "minimum income requirements." The privatized Section 8 vouchers are converted to what are known as Project Based Vouchers.
For many years so-called nonprofit housing developers throughout the Bay Area and across the nation have been demanding that more Section 8 vouchers should be taken from the poor, so that they may be privatized and used at their so-called affordable housing projects.
Projects that are excluding the poorest of the poor, including the elderly, and disabled, because of minimum income requirements.
Lynda Carson
>>>>>>
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Donate
$210.00 donated
in the past month
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network