Santa Cruz IMC
Santa Cruz IMC
Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Vancouver, WA Move to End Nighttime Camping Ban Should Encourage Freedom Sleepers
by Robert Norse
Wednesday Sep 16th, 2015 11:56 PM
Shattering my mood of curmudgeonly despair, the city of Vancouver, Washington looks to be taking the lead in moving to decriminalize nighttime camping for homeless folks--even without a successful lawsuit. This could be the domino that topples the House of Bigotry in Santa Cruz. Stay tuned. And support the Freedom Sleepers while you're watching...
City politicians in Vancouver, WA has taken a dramatic step in decriminalizing not just sleeping, but camping itself at night, anticipating that they will lose a court fight. The DOJ recently filed a "statement of interest" holding that camping bans in cities with no adequate shelter (i.e. everywhere, and particularly in Santa Cruz) violate the U.S. Constitution's ban on cruel and unusual punishment. This is not a court precedent, but could lead to one, and Vancouver politicos--who likely have no more compassion for homeless folks than the chairwarmers in Santa Cruz--are nervous. I regard this as a major breakthrough and a good issue for the unhoused and housed supporters to bring to the 9-22 Santa Cruz City Council and community.

The public education campaign at City Council can be sandwiched nicely in-between a scheduled 3 PM press conference denouncing violence against homeless advocates and individuals and the 11th SleepOut slated for later that night. Last night, police falsely arrested Abbi Samuels for "insufficient ID" (the charge was "obstructing an officer') when they knew perfectly well who she was. First Alarm security guards, concealing their name tags and badge numbers brutalized Christina Barnes for battery after stalking her throughout the early evening.

Some have suggested taking sleeping bags into City Council chambers during the evening and simply rolling them out to sleep there, given the city refusal to fund emergency shelter or lift the sleeping ban, as Vancouver is now doing. Folks are invited to come on down to witness or participate in the day (and night)'s events.

Here are two stories about an unexpected breakthrough of sanity (or perhaps just fiscal common sense--realizing how vulerable cities are with camping bans). Will Santa Cruz get a clue? Best to keep up the pressure until City Manager Martin Bernal, Police Chief Vogel, and City Attorney Condotti sniff which way the wind is blowing.

Vancouver may allow overnight camping in public places
Potential change to ordinance prompted by federal opinion

By Joe Douglass, KATU News Sep 14, 2015

VANCOUVER, Wash. – The Vancouver City Council is considering allowing homeless people to sleep outside overnight legally.
The city has banned people from camping outside in public places since the late 1990s.
Police stopped enforcing the ban entirely about two weeks ago after the U.S. Justice Department put out a statement of interest on Aug. 6 saying the government can't ban people from sleeping outside.
The document says banning people from doing so is like saying being homeless is illegal, which the Justice Department says is unconstitutional.

“… it just keeps ‘em homeless.”
Tents and tarps line the streets around the Share House homeless shelter on West 13th Street in Vancouver.
Katherine Garrett, the shelter's program director, said the problem is worse than ever.

“I've never seen this much open camping before," said Garrett, who’s been working with the homeless in Vancouver since 2001.
She said the Share House is now serving a record 9,000 meals per month.
“It impacts more garbage,” said Garrett about the camping situation. “It impacts things that we can't provide for them. We don't have enough blankets, we don't have backpacks."

Technically, the people camping out in the area are now breaking the law.
Since 1997, the city has made camping in public places a misdemeanor.
“A lot of times it just keeps 'em homeless," said Garrett. “Getting tickets for camping, vagrancies, any of that always puts a black mark when it comes to getting employment or housing."

Police Chief James McElvain told KATU officers hadn't been cracking down on illegal camping all that much.
“On average, we were finding our officers citing about nine people in a month," said McElvain.

A proposed ordinance going before the city Monday night would allow people to camp out legally from 9:30 p.m. to 6:30 a.m.
McElvain said the ordinance would still allow police to crack down on other behaviors.
“You can't be drinking alcohol in public, you can't be urinating in public, you can't be fighting in public,” said McElvain, “and you can't block people’s pathway on a sidewalk.”

Kevin Lisman, who just became homeless in March, said he wishes people would have more sympathy.
“I had a job,” said Lisman. “I was working. I was making a good salary and then all of the sudden the roof fell in."
The City Council will vote on the proposal Monday night. (Update: Council has approved the first reading of proposed ordinance. It will move to a second reading and a public hearing next Monday.)

Tristia Bauman, senior attorney for the National Law Center on Homelessness & Poverty in Washington D.C., sent KATU a statement saying:
We are pleased that cities are paying attention to what the Justice Department has said, and that they are revising their criminalization policies. We are concerned, however, when cities attempt to do the bare minimum. Vancouver's law does not go far enough to address the constitutional problems identified by the federal government. Moreover, it is not the kind of constructive policy that the federal government is actively promoting, and that other cities are successful implementing. The much more cost-effective, constitutional, and humane approach is to provide permanent housing to homeless people.

“It is legal in Portland to sleep overnight in public spaces,” said Dana Haynes, spokesman for Portland Mayor Charlie Hales. “That includes parks and sidewalks. It isn’t legal to put up structures. That includes tents.”

Vancouver OKs overnight camping in public places
Unanimous vote by city council amends ordinance

Vancouver Police Cpl. Drue Russell, left, runs a man's identification that he found camping next to the Slocum House in Esther Short Park while VPD Cpl. Duane Boynton secures the man after he disclosed to officers that he was carrying a knife, as part of an ongoing effort by authorities to make the park a safer place on Friday March 4, 2011. (Zachary Kaufman/The Columbian)

By Amy Fischer, Columbian City Government Reporter
Published: September 14, 2015, 9:13 PM

Amending a Vancouver city ordinance to allow overnight camping in public places is just a “baby step” toward solving the city’s homeless troubles and lack of shelter space, citizens told the city council Monday.

“I don’t want to see the council put a bow on our problem and make it look all pretty by providing (camping) hours when we’re not addressing the real issues,” Hough neighborhood resident Heidi Owens said.

The council unanimously voted Monday to change Vancouver’s unlawful camping ordinance to allow camping in public places from 9:30 p.m. to 6:30 a.m. Such overnight camping previously had been a misdemeanor. The change wouldn’t affect park hours (parks close from 10 p.m. to 5 a.m.) or laws prohibiting disorderly conduct, drinking in public, urinating in public and other health and safety issues.

The city’s legal staff recommended the change in response to a federal Department of Justice opinion, issued Aug. 8, on a case pending in federal court in Boise, Idaho. The opinion states that outlawing camping in all places and all times, including when shelter space is unavailable, is cruel and unusual punishment and therefore unconstitutional. Basically, the opinion says, all people have a right to sleep.

Mayor Tim Leavitt said he realizes some residents aren’t happy about the change to the camping ordinance.

“We have to do this because we’re not going to win taking on the Supreme Court,” he said.
City Manager Eric Holmes emphasized that the ordinance revision is an interim measure while the city continues to look for solutions. Vancouver has a lack of toilets, showers and trash cans for the homeless — and an overwhelming need for beds.

Andy Silver, executive director of the Council for the Homeless, told the city council that 823 different people called the housing hotline this summer asking for emergency shelter. The agency was forced to say no to 722 of them — 88 percent — due to lack of shelter space, he said.

“Those folks have nowhere else to go,” Silver said. “I’m very optimistic that this is a step in the right direction, but I don’t want anyone to think this is the end of the road.”

Katherine Garrett, director of Share House, said that in the eyes of landlords, people who have three camping violations on their record might as well have a felony. Continuing to cite homeless people, fine them and jail them hinders their movement forward and keeps the cycle of homelessness going, she said.

“They don’t have a chance,” she said.

Councilor Bart Hansen said he didn’t want to see “an unnecessary amount of resources going into people who have a tent up.”

Police would not be doing “sweeps” of homeless camps, but they would respond to complaints from neighborhood residents and business people about problems such as fighting and drinking in public, Vancouver Police Chief James McElvain said. Even then, officers have discretion about handling situations.

“Our first go-to isn’t to enforce the law. Our first go-to is to gain compliance from people. I don’t see us immediately going out and citing somebody,” McElvain said. “We’re not going to ignore it. … But our priority starts with crimes against persons and then crimes against property.”

Listed below are the latest comments about this post.
These comments are submitted anonymously by website visitors.
Santa Cruz Leaders are too Stupid toRead the Handwriting on the WallTime to Wake up our City LeadersFriday Sep 18th, 2015 9:25 PM
What use, farcical laws?GFriday Sep 18th, 2015 1:02 PM
Loitering, lodging, what's the diff?Trip WeirFriday Sep 18th, 2015 11:56 AM
Wasn't 'loitering' hate struck down by the Supreme Court in Chicago v. Morales (1999)?!GFriday Sep 18th, 2015 11:13 AM
647(E) is LOITERINGTrip WeirFriday Sep 18th, 2015 10:17 AM
647(e) 647 (e)Razer RayFriday Sep 18th, 2015 8:18 AM
It's 647e, not 647(e), kinda like how bits are not bytes.GThursday Sep 17th, 2015 5:09 PM
TechicalitiesRazer RayThursday Sep 17th, 2015 3:52 PM
Heal thyself, oh chronically factually challenged.GThursday Sep 17th, 2015 3:10 PM
Stop misinforming readers GaryRazer RayThursday Sep 17th, 2015 2:49 PM
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!


donate now

$ 135.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.


Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network