top
Santa Cruz IMC
Santa Cruz IMC
Indybay
Indybay
Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Calendar
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
SCRAM! Statement of Support Issued by Homeless Persons Legal Assistance Project
by Steve Pleich
Wednesday Mar 11th, 2015 12:05 PM
We Support SCRAM!
HOMELESS PERSONS
LEGAL ASSISTANCE PROJECT
111 Errett Circle
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

March 11, 2015

Santa Cruz City Council
Civic Center
809 Center Street
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

RE: SCRAM! Statement of Support

To the Santa Cruz City Council:

The Homeless Persons Legal Assistance Project (HPLAP) supports the mission and purpose of SCRAM! (Santa Cruz Resistance Against Militarization!) and wishes to express its concerns about the purchase of the BearCat armored personnel vehicle which has been approved by your vote.

As the primary organization providing pro bono legal services and assistance to people experiencing homelessness in Santa Cruz and Santa Cruz County, we are concerned that the presence of a military-style armored vehicle in our community would further erode the already fragile relationship between local law enforcement and the homeless community.

Furthermore, in our view the potential for further militarization of a police force that is viewed by many to have an adversarial relationship with our local homeless would place additional strain on efforts by our organization to build a bond of trust between law enforcement and people experiencing homelessness.

For these reasons, we are publicly supporting the mission and goals of SCRAM!

Very Truly Yours,


___________________
Steve Pleich, J.D.
Director
Homeless Persons Legal Assistance Project

Comments  (Hide Comments)

Great position, Steve. Thanks. Maybe City of Santa Cruz can be persuaded to slow down the militarization of the SCPD (and thus, everyone who lives here or comes here)?

If SCRAM prevails, we will have to celebrate bigtime.

Whether SCRAM prevails or BEARCAT abides, one important thing still needed:

I feel the People need to get involved with Police Cief Kevin Vogel and other state agents to help create safer, more functional and more compassion-based policies and procedural changes. We need this for a greater justice here, as well as to,help cope with the growth swells.

I hope we will see people in, or recently in, the status of homelessness leading community efforts to help build such a community-wide responsiveness and engagement with the local police. We aren't done until we are all allies connecting on behalf of the City we are depending on and care about.

There has been scuttle-butt about a civilian police review body: even if this is NOT the time for it, it is past time for honest engagement.

Can you also post the SCRAM statements here?
by In need.
Wednesday Mar 11th, 2015 6:37 PM
I've seen this reference a few times. Now I read, "pro bono" legal support for homeless people.

I've been seeking some legal support but I'm having difficulty getting any response.
There is an address to an office that isn't staffed. There is no phone number and zero online presence.

Here the "project" is endorsing something has has nothing to do with homelessness.
What "pro bono" legal assistance does the project provide and how might I get in touch with them?
by Steve Pleich
Wednesday Mar 11th, 2015 6:53 PM
HPLAP can be reached at 831-466-6078 or by email at spleich [at] gmail.com. We never charge for services.
HUFF voted last week to support SCRAM's 3-10 protest at City Council and urge folks to attend. They rejected my proposed amendment to encourage SCRAM to become more specific and local in its concern about local police abuse, militarization, and lack of transparency.

HUFF has in the past few months, hopeful of raising a real activist and community focus on local police abuse, held four protests at Cop Corner (Laurel and Center--next to the SCPD station) urging an end to racial and class profiling, concealing stats on use of force, and political backroom power in city government,. We have documented disproportionate racial citations by Officer Bradly Barnett. We continue to press for more information on what contracts the SCPD has made with other agencies (still held back by City Hall).

Though we've been doing this for many years, the recent Ferguson protests seemed a particularly important time to raise these issues. It's also been part of HUFF's continuing concern about the blatant homeless profiling going on downtown and elsewhere.

I provided writer, FRSC broadcaster, and police accountability activist John Malken with Public Records Act information, finally wrested from the bowels of the SCPD, that seemed to indicate the stated "deadline" of December 31,2014 was not a real one, i.e. that there really was no hurry to order the BearCat.

At the Louden Nelson forum on the BearCat, I arranged with KSCO owner Michael Zwerling to put BearCat opponents on a two-hour KSCO show. I was able to provide missing audio from the 1-13 meeting missing from the City's official recordings at the risk of potential arrest and seizure of my equipment under the Council's new "decorum" rules.

Ironic.

Yesterday I had to announce to HUFF members at our weekly Wednesday meeting that HUFF had been dropped from the SCRAM Coalition and removed from its literature as a support organization in a closed door meeting to which HUFF had not been invited.

I was told afterwards by phone that I personally "twisted people's words" and "had burned my bridges", apparently tainting the HUFF organization. When I asked for more specifics, particularly about anything having to do with the BearCat issue, I got none. No one in HUFF was given any credit or acknowledgment for their work.

Sherry Conable, principal spokesperson for SCRAM, declined to give any specifics when I confronted her at the Tuesday meeting. Other members were similarly silent or vague. In the past, Conable has made it a point to try to exclude me from various groups she's led, so perhaps this is simply part of a continuing pattern.

I have concluded--though given the blanket of silence, it's hard to know with any certainty--that SCRAM wants to appeal to local Democratic Party folks like Rep. Farr and the Democratic Central Committee (from which it recently received endorsement) and present a smooth image that does not seem broadly or deeply critical of the SCPD and its political allies on more fundamental matters.

Farr initially backed this backdoor/backroom initiative by the SCPD initiative and did not inform the community. Yet at the Council meeting SCRAM activists took time to read his letter in its entirity--including Farr's false statement that there was a December 31st deadline. While much of Farr's letter was positive, Farr esentially passed the buck to a hostile City Council.

I've suggested that SCREAM needs to be more creative, direct, outspoken and high-profile in its protests. I've suggested they have to move behind the BearCat issue to address local police abuse specifically and the need for deeper change here. There are diminishing numbers and an increasingly tamed group at the biweekly protests at City Hall. Opponents are settling for half an hour of speakers with Mayor Lane ignoring those waiting to speak before an oblivious City Council. Why not expose the real powers in the Community behind the BearCat decision more directly and visibly like the City Manager, the Police Chief,and Farr himself.

I as an individual and HUFF as a group certainly supports such liberal projects as declaring Santa Cruz an NDAA-free zone, dumping the license surveillance software, and, of course, returning the BearCat. However, as national Black Lives Matter activists have repeatedly pointed out (and Michelle Alexander eloquently discussed on the 3-4 Democracy Now! show at http://www.democracynow.org/2015/3/4/michelle_alexander_roots_of_todays_crisis )--strong action in the streets and at the grass roots is key.

Berkeley activists recently got its City Council to make (on paper at least) some significant changes to its department (See http://www.thestreetspirit.org/berkeley-city-council-takes-action-on-police-abuse-finally/).

We certainly need to dump the BearCat, but dumping those who support more necessary fundamental changes, is a step backwards.

And, of course, elitist smears of more radical activists either out of personal animus or an attempt to move to the center pisses me off. It's particularly loathsome when it happens behind closed doors in a group preaching to the Community about transparency and due process.

These are my views though, I believe, they reflect the opinion of some others in HUFF. Some prefer to keep this issue quiet in the interests of solidarity around BearCat opposition. I believe it has significance for tboth activists and the broader community.

I believe that the speeches made by SCRAM members on Tuesday were of high quality generally, though the repeated hope that the planned Council meeting on March 24th may actually yield a real change of policy on the BearCat seems unlikely without stronger and more creative protest.
by Robert Norse
Thursday Mar 12th, 2015 8:34 AM
The last sentence of the previous comment is missing two final words and should read:

I believe that the speeches made by SCRAM members and others on Tuesday were of high quality generally, though the hope that the planned Council meeting on March 24th may actually yield a real change of policy on the BearCat unlikely without stronger and more creative protest seems fanciful.
by G
Thursday Mar 12th, 2015 12:29 PM
I recall Robert/Becky/Ed banishing the PC2010 protesters from that pointless and insulting HUFF grovelfest; when Beiers granted them an audience on that (since removed) bench outside the library. So, yes, it's ironic that Norse now complains about receiving the same treatment from the same crowd of 'concerned non-facists'.

Meanwhile, I haven't noticed 'homeless activists' like Linda speak up about the Right To Rest effort, nor have I seen the local (D) machine speak up, nor their favored figureheads (Farr/Stone/Monning/Lane/etc). So her call for coalition is also ironic.

Meanwhile, back in Ferguson...
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

donate now

$ 140.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network