From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
RVs Need Safe Spaces, Not More Restrictions
An Open Letter to the City of Santa Cruz Transportation and Public Works Commission
Commissioners,
As a resident of the City of Santa Cruz I believe that new and tighter restrictions on recreational vehicles and the people who are forced by circumstance to call these vehicles home does a disservice to this community. The Transportation and Public Works Commission has a unique opportunity to recommend that a more creative and humanistic approach be considered. By exercising your advisory power to recommend to the City Council that it consider the Safe Spaces Parking Program outlined below, you can take the lead in moving public policy away from punitive measures and toward positive outcomes. In that spirit and with that hope, I respectfully offer the following:
Safe Spaces Parking Program
A Model Program for Recreational Vehicle Overnight
Program Overview:
Safe, even temporary, shelter is one of the most pressing needs in our community. According to the 2013 Homeless Census and Survey more that 3,500 people in Santa Cruz County are without shelter of any kind every night. Of those, 28% reside in recreational vehicles, vans or automobiles. It is estimated that more than 200 recreational vehicles, vans and automobiles serve as the primary home for families. Many families see this option as the only way to keep the family unit together in the absence of affordable housing. Most of these vehicles are forced by circumstances to park overnight on city or county streets in violation of local ordinance. This is the problem and the need.
Although parking for the purpose of overnight camping on a public thoroughfare is unlawful in all local jurisdictions, parking a vehicle overnight on private property or public property designated for that purpose is not. The Safe Spaces Parking Program is designed to provide a limited number of recreational vehicles with a safe, secure place to pause overnight.
We understand that governmental agencies that oversee public property are responsible to their neighborhoods and their communities at-large when regulating the uses such properties are put to. To insure that all questions are answered and each concern is addressed, this program specifically details a process through which it hopes to make participation in our Safe Spaces Parking Program both easy and ultimately successful.
Program Description:
The program as developed consists on clearly defined elements, duties and responsibilities. Here’s what we propose:
1. We propose that the city or county designate a parcel of currently unused public property for the purpose of establishing a Safe Spaces Overnight Parking Program.
2. The Program would accommodate no less that 10 but no more than 15 recreational vehicles. Potential sites would be located on city or county owned property in commercial or industrial areas.
3. Overnight parking would be from 6:00pm to 6:00am without exception. Registration for overnight stay would begin at 5:00pm and end at 5:45. Staff and security personnel would then review the overnight roster and set the night’s security procedures. Under the proposal, volunteers or a non-profit agency would manage the site.
4. Garbage service and portable toilets would be provided at no cost to the city or county.
5. A general liability insurance policy would be provided to indemnify and hold harmless the city or county for any loss, harm or injury suffered by it or any overnight guest.
6. Perimeter fencing would be erected at no cost to the city and county to define the boundaries of the site and provide additional security. A secure entrance would be created and staffed by qualified security personnel throughout the night.
7. City and/or county Public Works would be consulted as to the requirements of each of these structures.
8. Funding for the program would be obtained through private sources administered through a Fiscal Sponsorship Agreement with a recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit agency.
9. Volunteer staff would be on site at all times. The program would assume the cost of at least one private security officer to be on site one hour before registration until one hour after all overnight guests have exited the site.
Program Agreements and Understandings:
The program coordinators understand that a number of important questions must be discussed and resolved before a project of this scope can go forward. To that end, we are ready to work with city or county staff at their convenience. Any and all Memoranda of Agreement or Understanding will be drafted at the program’s expense and submitted to the City Attorney or County Counsel for his or her review.
Summary:
If we are ever to effectively address the challenges of homelessness in our community, we must embrace all reasonable approaches to the issue. That means that ideas which hold the promise of positive outcomes for the unsheltered among us must be given full and fair consideration. Smart Solutions, the Santa Cruz Sanctuary Village, Faith Community Shelters and the Homeless Services Center all can and must contribute to these outcomes. The Safe Spaces Parking Program asks only the opportunity to make its contribution. For more information, please contact:
Steve Pleich at (831) 466-6078 or by email at spleich [at] gmail.com
Thank you in advance for your consideration of this program.
As a resident of the City of Santa Cruz I believe that new and tighter restrictions on recreational vehicles and the people who are forced by circumstance to call these vehicles home does a disservice to this community. The Transportation and Public Works Commission has a unique opportunity to recommend that a more creative and humanistic approach be considered. By exercising your advisory power to recommend to the City Council that it consider the Safe Spaces Parking Program outlined below, you can take the lead in moving public policy away from punitive measures and toward positive outcomes. In that spirit and with that hope, I respectfully offer the following:
Safe Spaces Parking Program
A Model Program for Recreational Vehicle Overnight
Program Overview:
Safe, even temporary, shelter is one of the most pressing needs in our community. According to the 2013 Homeless Census and Survey more that 3,500 people in Santa Cruz County are without shelter of any kind every night. Of those, 28% reside in recreational vehicles, vans or automobiles. It is estimated that more than 200 recreational vehicles, vans and automobiles serve as the primary home for families. Many families see this option as the only way to keep the family unit together in the absence of affordable housing. Most of these vehicles are forced by circumstances to park overnight on city or county streets in violation of local ordinance. This is the problem and the need.
Although parking for the purpose of overnight camping on a public thoroughfare is unlawful in all local jurisdictions, parking a vehicle overnight on private property or public property designated for that purpose is not. The Safe Spaces Parking Program is designed to provide a limited number of recreational vehicles with a safe, secure place to pause overnight.
We understand that governmental agencies that oversee public property are responsible to their neighborhoods and their communities at-large when regulating the uses such properties are put to. To insure that all questions are answered and each concern is addressed, this program specifically details a process through which it hopes to make participation in our Safe Spaces Parking Program both easy and ultimately successful.
Program Description:
The program as developed consists on clearly defined elements, duties and responsibilities. Here’s what we propose:
1. We propose that the city or county designate a parcel of currently unused public property for the purpose of establishing a Safe Spaces Overnight Parking Program.
2. The Program would accommodate no less that 10 but no more than 15 recreational vehicles. Potential sites would be located on city or county owned property in commercial or industrial areas.
3. Overnight parking would be from 6:00pm to 6:00am without exception. Registration for overnight stay would begin at 5:00pm and end at 5:45. Staff and security personnel would then review the overnight roster and set the night’s security procedures. Under the proposal, volunteers or a non-profit agency would manage the site.
4. Garbage service and portable toilets would be provided at no cost to the city or county.
5. A general liability insurance policy would be provided to indemnify and hold harmless the city or county for any loss, harm or injury suffered by it or any overnight guest.
6. Perimeter fencing would be erected at no cost to the city and county to define the boundaries of the site and provide additional security. A secure entrance would be created and staffed by qualified security personnel throughout the night.
7. City and/or county Public Works would be consulted as to the requirements of each of these structures.
8. Funding for the program would be obtained through private sources administered through a Fiscal Sponsorship Agreement with a recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit agency.
9. Volunteer staff would be on site at all times. The program would assume the cost of at least one private security officer to be on site one hour before registration until one hour after all overnight guests have exited the site.
Program Agreements and Understandings:
The program coordinators understand that a number of important questions must be discussed and resolved before a project of this scope can go forward. To that end, we are ready to work with city or county staff at their convenience. Any and all Memoranda of Agreement or Understanding will be drafted at the program’s expense and submitted to the City Attorney or County Counsel for his or her review.
Summary:
If we are ever to effectively address the challenges of homelessness in our community, we must embrace all reasonable approaches to the issue. That means that ideas which hold the promise of positive outcomes for the unsheltered among us must be given full and fair consideration. Smart Solutions, the Santa Cruz Sanctuary Village, Faith Community Shelters and the Homeless Services Center all can and must contribute to these outcomes. The Safe Spaces Parking Program asks only the opportunity to make its contribution. For more information, please contact:
Steve Pleich at (831) 466-6078 or by email at spleich [at] gmail.com
Thank you in advance for your consideration of this program.
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
First they came for the sleepers...then they got around to the RV owners...
Assuming Desertrain v. City Of Los Angeles doesn't apply; isn't this idea yet more duct tape, covering up the ongoing lack of affordable housing (without the Sanctuary-esque AA requirement for participation)?
Are Steve's Clean Team and Take Back buddies on board with this proposal?! Would they be on board if AA participation were part of the process?
Assuming Desertrain v. City Of Los Angeles doesn't apply; isn't this idea yet more duct tape, covering up the ongoing lack of affordable housing (without the Sanctuary-esque AA requirement for participation)?
Are Steve's Clean Team and Take Back buddies on board with this proposal?! Would they be on board if AA participation were part of the process?
For more information:
http://PeaceCamp2010insider.blogspot.com/
Did SCPD even try? Which 'detective' was 'on the case'? Assuming there really was a case (it can be difficult to tell, given what I've heard about TBSC-ish people fabricating scary stories)...
For more information:
http://PeaceCamp2010insider.blogspot.com/
This posting ISN'T about letting anybody park in front of your house. It's about arranging for a "charity" to pick up the tab for the necessary support services for an "RV Campground" on some bit of public land. Asking for the public authorities to allow it to go forward.
As to the objection that this isn't addressing OTHER homelessness issues, gee whizz. Sorry but we all get and pick where to apply our effort and resources. This is presumably from a 501(c)3 which thinks it can raise money for THIS purpose.
As to the objection that this isn't addressing OTHER homelessness issues, gee whizz. Sorry but we all get and pick where to apply our effort and resources. This is presumably from a 501(c)3 which thinks it can raise money for THIS purpose.
Desertrain was a very narrow decision in which the court found the ordinance ambiguous in that the term "living quarters" was so vague as to create the potential for selective enforcement and gave too much discretion to law enforcement. Nothing in that decision has any practical application to Santa Cruz because our ordinances do not contain the words "living quarters.
Thanks for mentioned the forced participation in AA/NA. I and many others, and High Courts as well, see this as a fundamental human rights violation and a violation of the US Constituion. Yet it continues, and when I saw it in the SC Sanctuary Village Plan/Proposal, I almost got sick, literally. Those 12 Step Programs tell folks (in this case homeless folks) they are powerless. And guess who wants them to believe this? The Centers, orgs, and groups wanting to have power over them, wanting them to bow down and be a good slave to the system. Yet, SCSV is trying to do the same as HSC, and even SCHS, I guess you know to get food stamps many folks are forced to attend AA/NA, if they don't and if they don't prove it by submitting signed attendance documents they are denied GA and Food Stamps. What the hell does holding hands and praying to God have to do with the right to Food Stamps, or the right to shelter at night at a camp?
Bloom, a few thoughts....
First, no one is forcing anyone to accept food stamps or general assistance. It's totally voluntary.
Second, as I've mentioned before, the non secular programs are considered to have no credibility at all. After several court decisions in the 1990s, the California Office of Drug and Alcohol Programs informed treatment providers that attendance at 12 Step meeting was supposed to be voluntary. However, in the small counties 12 Step programs are the ONLY treatment or aftercare program available (a discussion of what changes to social security did to treatment programs in the '90s would take many pages to explain).
The Affordable Care Act was supposed to provide oodles of cash for treatment on demand, but it hasn't really materialized. There aren't enough programs to provide services.
Third, the mood of many in California communities is: you want taxpayer funded assistance and you're either addicted or an alcoholic, you better be doing something about it or you can forget getting any benefits from us. We're not here to finance your booze or drugs.
First, no one is forcing anyone to accept food stamps or general assistance. It's totally voluntary.
Second, as I've mentioned before, the non secular programs are considered to have no credibility at all. After several court decisions in the 1990s, the California Office of Drug and Alcohol Programs informed treatment providers that attendance at 12 Step meeting was supposed to be voluntary. However, in the small counties 12 Step programs are the ONLY treatment or aftercare program available (a discussion of what changes to social security did to treatment programs in the '90s would take many pages to explain).
The Affordable Care Act was supposed to provide oodles of cash for treatment on demand, but it hasn't really materialized. There aren't enough programs to provide services.
Third, the mood of many in California communities is: you want taxpayer funded assistance and you're either addicted or an alcoholic, you better be doing something about it or you can forget getting any benefits from us. We're not here to finance your booze or drugs.
Does the Constitution matter to you? Does law and order matter to you? We'll skip things like compassion and adherence to religious beliefs, as those do not seem to be substantial concerns of yours.
At what point is it OK to abandon the Constitution? At what point is it OK to abandon law and order? It seems as though your limit is set disturbingly low.
Of course you could confuse that opinion with me thinking junkies are a great thing. In response, I could confuse your opinion with an unconditional embracement of trillions in theft by the financial industry (actually, TBSC makes that easier than it should be!), or embracement of illegal wars that cost trillions and kill, hmmm, perhaps it is millions of innocent people by now, or embracement of any number of other illegal (yet unprosecuted, due to power and influence) acts by individuals, corporations, or .gov itself. By coincidence, stopping any single one of those gross thefts could go a long way in helping mitigate the poverty and drug addiction you feel so proud of taking revenge upon. And some of those victims of poverty and drug addiction are the very people that put their lives on the line, serving in the military, to protect what you think is a proper way of life.
I assure you that there are plenty of people sick and tired of financing those sick habits. If only you and your kind were a little louder about those problems, perhaps we wouldn't be forced to repeat the more disgusting chapters of history, yet again.
At what point is it OK to abandon the Constitution? At what point is it OK to abandon law and order? It seems as though your limit is set disturbingly low.
Of course you could confuse that opinion with me thinking junkies are a great thing. In response, I could confuse your opinion with an unconditional embracement of trillions in theft by the financial industry (actually, TBSC makes that easier than it should be!), or embracement of illegal wars that cost trillions and kill, hmmm, perhaps it is millions of innocent people by now, or embracement of any number of other illegal (yet unprosecuted, due to power and influence) acts by individuals, corporations, or .gov itself. By coincidence, stopping any single one of those gross thefts could go a long way in helping mitigate the poverty and drug addiction you feel so proud of taking revenge upon. And some of those victims of poverty and drug addiction are the very people that put their lives on the line, serving in the military, to protect what you think is a proper way of life.
I assure you that there are plenty of people sick and tired of financing those sick habits. If only you and your kind were a little louder about those problems, perhaps we wouldn't be forced to repeat the more disgusting chapters of history, yet again.
For more information:
http://PeaceCamp2010insider.blogspot.com/
The City of Santa Cruz's Housing and Development Department is currently taking citizen input on how to spend its HUD blocks grants. My sister Patricia Colby and I support devoting at least half of the money each year to buying a parcel of land on the Westside for RV and car camping, as well as placing tiny houses on trailer beds. Furthermore community facilities can make this sustainable off the grid housing with solar panels, permaculture, urban foresting, aquaponics and raising small farm animals like chickens.
We plan to start a social media campaign with an online petition and have people write emails and fax letters to HUD Washington DC officials and the U.S. Senate to push the City — which will try to obstruct us — from getting this through. It's our money not the City staff's. Let's make them spend it the way we want.
We ask for the community's support!
We plan to start a social media campaign with an online petition and have people write emails and fax letters to HUD Washington DC officials and the U.S. Senate to push the City — which will try to obstruct us — from getting this through. It's our money not the City staff's. Let's make them spend it the way we want.
We ask for the community's support!
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network