From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
California
East Bay
San Francisco
Santa Cruz Indymedia
U.S.
Health, Housing & Public Services
Police State & Prisons
The law was struck down prohibiting people from living in vehicles in Los Angeles
In the case Desertrain v. City of Los Angeles, the court sent a strong message all across the nation that cities cannot end homelessness, by making homelessness illegal with egregious city laws that essentially make it impossible for homeless people to survive by staying in their vehicles!
The law was struck down prohibiting people from living in vehicles in Los Angeles
By Lynda Carson - June 20, 2014
On June 19, 2014, an insidious law used by the cops in Los Angeles to harass and criminalize homeless people for sleeping in their vehicles and using their vehicles as "living quarters," has been struck down by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Court.
In the case Desertrain v. City of Los Angeles, the court sent a strong message all across the nation that cities cannot end homelessness, by making homelessness illegal with egregious city laws that essentially make it impossible for homeless people to survive by staying in their vehicles.
For years, it has been a common practice for homeless people to use their vehicles as a form of shelter when necessary. Whether it is due to a lack of money, or dire circumstances that leave them little choice but to sleep in their vehicles when the City they reside in does not offer them any other decent options, living out of a vehicle is an alternative to staying in brutal homeless shelters, or sleeping on the sidewalks, or under the bushes, or other unsafe places.
In 1983, the City of Los Angeles enacted Municipal Code Section 85.02 to attack it's homeless population, making it illegal for people to use their vehicles as "living quarters" either overnight, day-by-day, or otherwise while the vehicle was parked on City streets, City owned parking lots, and parking lots owned or under the control of the Los Angeles County of Beaches and Harbors.
During the week of September 23, 2010, Los Angeles officials created the Venice Homelessness Task Force, that included 21 cops who had orders to use Section 85.02 to cite and arrest homeless people for using their automobiles as "living quarters." The cops were also supposed to hand out information to people about providers of shelters and other social services.
A number of brave souls including Cheyenne Desertrain, Steve Jacobs-Elstein, Bradford Echhart, Patricia Warivonchik, Leroy Butler, William Cagle, and Chris Taylor fought back against the insidious anti-homeless laws of Los Angeles that discriminated against homeless people, and as a result the court struck down the law that made it illegal for homeless people to use their vehicles as "living quarters" in the City, and County of Los Angeles.
Some of the people being arrested in Los Angeles for using their vehicles as "living quarters" while being homeless and had their vehicles impounded, included one person who had congestive heart failure, and another that had epilepsy. And yet another was an individual that suffered from severe anxiety and depression after losing his own legal temp business company that he had for almost ten years, and he also lost his home during bad economic times. One of the people were caught using a cell phone while sitting in his car, and others were found to have food in their vehicles which the cops used as a pretext to accuse them of living in their vehicles, and then arrested them and impound their cars.
The cops were instructed to look for vehicles containing possessions normally found in a home, such as food, bedding, clothing, medicine, and basic necessities people need to survive.
The brave souls that fought back against the insidious law that prohibited the use of vehicles as 'living quarters" in Los Angeles argued that Section 85.02 is unconstitutionally vague on its face because it provides insufficient notice of the conduct it penalizes and promotes arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement. The court agreed with them.
In conclusion, the court believes that Section 85.02 provides inadequate notice of the unlawful conduct it proscribes, and opens the door to discriminatory enforcement against the homeless and the poor. Accordingly, Section 85.02 violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendent as an unconstitutionally vague statute.
The court further believes that for many homeless people, their automobile may be their last major possession - the means by which they can look for work and seek social services. The City of Los Angeles has many options at it's disposal to alleviate the plight and suffering of it's homeless citizens. Selectively preventing the homeless and the poor from using their vehicles for activities many other citizens also conduct in their cars should not be one of those options.
The criminalization of the poor and the homeless in the U.S. is cruel and inhumane. Other attacks on the poor and the homeless include the notorious sit/lie laws in San Francisco and the attempt to create such vicious laws in the City of Berkeley.
Sleeping bans exist in Santa Cruz, San Diego, and St. Petersburg, FL., under the guise of "no camping laws." Some cities prohibit the sharing of food to homeless populations unless you have a permit, and many cities refuse to grant permits to feed the poor and homeless people in their communities.
In Orlando, FL., people from Food Not Bombs have been arrested and sent away to jail for feeding the poor and homeless, and the volunteers of Food Not Bombs have been harassed and arrested in San Francisco for the same activities, in recent past years.
Laws against panhandling are another attack on the poor and homeless in many cities, and are cruel and inhumane treatment against many citizens across the nation.
Lynda Carson may be reached at tenantsrule [at] yahoo.com
By Lynda Carson - June 20, 2014
On June 19, 2014, an insidious law used by the cops in Los Angeles to harass and criminalize homeless people for sleeping in their vehicles and using their vehicles as "living quarters," has been struck down by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Court.
In the case Desertrain v. City of Los Angeles, the court sent a strong message all across the nation that cities cannot end homelessness, by making homelessness illegal with egregious city laws that essentially make it impossible for homeless people to survive by staying in their vehicles.
For years, it has been a common practice for homeless people to use their vehicles as a form of shelter when necessary. Whether it is due to a lack of money, or dire circumstances that leave them little choice but to sleep in their vehicles when the City they reside in does not offer them any other decent options, living out of a vehicle is an alternative to staying in brutal homeless shelters, or sleeping on the sidewalks, or under the bushes, or other unsafe places.
In 1983, the City of Los Angeles enacted Municipal Code Section 85.02 to attack it's homeless population, making it illegal for people to use their vehicles as "living quarters" either overnight, day-by-day, or otherwise while the vehicle was parked on City streets, City owned parking lots, and parking lots owned or under the control of the Los Angeles County of Beaches and Harbors.
During the week of September 23, 2010, Los Angeles officials created the Venice Homelessness Task Force, that included 21 cops who had orders to use Section 85.02 to cite and arrest homeless people for using their automobiles as "living quarters." The cops were also supposed to hand out information to people about providers of shelters and other social services.
A number of brave souls including Cheyenne Desertrain, Steve Jacobs-Elstein, Bradford Echhart, Patricia Warivonchik, Leroy Butler, William Cagle, and Chris Taylor fought back against the insidious anti-homeless laws of Los Angeles that discriminated against homeless people, and as a result the court struck down the law that made it illegal for homeless people to use their vehicles as "living quarters" in the City, and County of Los Angeles.
Some of the people being arrested in Los Angeles for using their vehicles as "living quarters" while being homeless and had their vehicles impounded, included one person who had congestive heart failure, and another that had epilepsy. And yet another was an individual that suffered from severe anxiety and depression after losing his own legal temp business company that he had for almost ten years, and he also lost his home during bad economic times. One of the people were caught using a cell phone while sitting in his car, and others were found to have food in their vehicles which the cops used as a pretext to accuse them of living in their vehicles, and then arrested them and impound their cars.
The cops were instructed to look for vehicles containing possessions normally found in a home, such as food, bedding, clothing, medicine, and basic necessities people need to survive.
The brave souls that fought back against the insidious law that prohibited the use of vehicles as 'living quarters" in Los Angeles argued that Section 85.02 is unconstitutionally vague on its face because it provides insufficient notice of the conduct it penalizes and promotes arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement. The court agreed with them.
In conclusion, the court believes that Section 85.02 provides inadequate notice of the unlawful conduct it proscribes, and opens the door to discriminatory enforcement against the homeless and the poor. Accordingly, Section 85.02 violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendent as an unconstitutionally vague statute.
The court further believes that for many homeless people, their automobile may be their last major possession - the means by which they can look for work and seek social services. The City of Los Angeles has many options at it's disposal to alleviate the plight and suffering of it's homeless citizens. Selectively preventing the homeless and the poor from using their vehicles for activities many other citizens also conduct in their cars should not be one of those options.
The criminalization of the poor and the homeless in the U.S. is cruel and inhumane. Other attacks on the poor and the homeless include the notorious sit/lie laws in San Francisco and the attempt to create such vicious laws in the City of Berkeley.
Sleeping bans exist in Santa Cruz, San Diego, and St. Petersburg, FL., under the guise of "no camping laws." Some cities prohibit the sharing of food to homeless populations unless you have a permit, and many cities refuse to grant permits to feed the poor and homeless people in their communities.
In Orlando, FL., people from Food Not Bombs have been arrested and sent away to jail for feeding the poor and homeless, and the volunteers of Food Not Bombs have been harassed and arrested in San Francisco for the same activities, in recent past years.
Laws against panhandling are another attack on the poor and homeless in many cities, and are cruel and inhumane treatment against many citizens across the nation.
Lynda Carson may be reached at tenantsrule [at] yahoo.com
Add Your Comments
Latest Comments
Listed below are the latest comments about this post.
These comments are submitted anonymously by website visitors.
TITLE
AUTHOR
DATE
So what about Berkeley?
Sun, Jun 14, 2015 2:10PM
you still can't lodge in your car
Thu, Jul 3, 2014 9:08AM
The 9th's Ruling
Sun, Jun 22, 2014 12:10PM
The War on the Homeless
Sat, Jun 21, 2014 3:29PM
Safe parking.
Sat, Jun 21, 2014 12:20PM
The 9th Circuit court ruled on stuff in cars, NOT on sleep.
Sat, Jun 21, 2014 6:28AM
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network