From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Related Categories: California | Central Valley | North Coast | U.S. | Animal Liberation | Environment & Forest Defense
Legal Petition Calls for Return of Grizzly Bears to Vast Portions of American West
by Center for Biological Diversity
Wednesday Jun 18th, 2014 3:54 PM
WASHINGTON— The Center for Biological Diversity filed a legal petition today calling on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to greatly expand its plans for recovering grizzly bears, including returning the iconic animals to vast portions of the American West. The petition identifies 110,000 square miles of potential grizzly habitat in places like the Gila/Mogollon complex in Arizona and New Mexico, Utah’s Uinta Mountains, California’s Sierra Nevada and the Grand Canyon in Arizona.
Returning bears to some or all of these areas is a crucial step toward recovering them under the Endangered Species Act and could potentially triple the grizzly bear population in the lower 48, from a meager 1,500 to 1,800 today to as many as 6,000.

“Grizzly bears are one of the true icons of the American West, yet today they live in a paltry 4 percent of the lands where they used to roam,” said Noah Greenwald, the Center’s endangered species director. “We shouldn’t be closing the book on grizzly recovery but beginning a new chapter — one where these amazing animals live wherever there’s good habitat for them across the West.”

Today’s petition calls on the Service to revise its 1993 recovery plan to include suitable grizzly habitat across the West and to incorporate the findings of recent research that raises questions about the long-term viability of current grizzly bear populations, under relentless pressure from climate change, invasive species, human population growth, and related conflict and mortality.

Since grizzly bears were listed as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act in 1975, the Service has pursued a fragmented approach to recovery that fails to meet the intention of the Endangered Species Act to recover species across significant portions of their historic range.

To date the agency has developed recovery strategies for only six populations, living in a relatively small portion of the bears’ range, including the Greater Yellowstone, Northern Continental Divide centered on Glacier National Park, Cabinet-Yaak, Selkirk Mountains, North Cascades and Selway-Bitterroot. And for the most part, the agency has only carried out on-the-ground recovery efforts for the first four populations.

“The good news is that with the safety net of the Endangered Species Act, the health of Yellowstone and Glacier area grizzly bears has improved — but it’s way too early to declare victory and walk away,” Greenwald said. “All remaining populations are isolated, especially Yellowstone. Yet the science is clear that, if we’re serious about recovering grizzly bears, we need more populations around the West, and more connections between them, so they don’t fall prey to inbreeding and so they have a chance of adapting to a warming world. If we want these incredible bears around for centuries to come, we’ve still got a lot of work left to do.”

According to the petition, the Service’s failure to develop a plan for recovery and conservation of grizzly bears across significant portions of their historic range ignores the important ecological role they play in ecosystems and the fundamental conservation principle that the preservation of a species and its habitat over the long term depends on numerous connected populations across the landscape.

A comprehensive grizzly bear recovery plan that meets the requirements of the Endangered Species Act would establish specific landscape-wide population recovery targets capable of sustaining the species across its historic range; it would protect grizzly bear habitat holistically, allowing the bear to weather threats from global warming, nonnative species and human population growth.

Precedents for successful recovery plans that include species’ entire ranges in the United States include those for the bald eagle, brown pelican and peregrine falcon.

Click here to see an infographic on grizzly bears in the West:

As many as 100,000 grizzly bears likely once ranged throughout most of western North America, from the high Arctic to the Sierra Madre Occidental of Mexico and from the coast of California across most of the Great Plains. Within 200 years of European settlement, wanton slaughter had reduced populations to perhaps several hundred bears, mostly found today in Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming and the northern Rocky Mountains of Montana and Idaho. Outside the Yellowstone and Northern Continental Divide populations, very little progress has been made recovering grizzlies. Remaining populations cover an area that is a mere 4 percent of the bears’ historic range and only 22 percent of potentially suitable habitat identified by researchers.

Today there are only 1,500 to 1,800 grizzly bears left in the lower 48 states, including about 700 bears in the isolated Greater Yellowstone ecosystem, 800 in the Northern Continental Divide ecosystem, about 25 to 50 in the Selkirk ecosystem of Washington and Idaho, about 45 bears in the Cabinet-Yaak ecosystem of Montana and Idaho, and possibly a couple of bears in Washington’s North Cascades. At best the populations in the Selkirk and Cabinet-Yaak ecosystems have remained stable, but with such low numbers they are on the very brink of extinction. Grizzly bears have been functionally extirpated from the North Cascades, and are now also extirpated from the Selway-Bitterroot and San Juan mountains.

The Center for Biological Diversity is a national, nonprofit conservation organization with more than 775,000 members and online activists dedicated to the protection of endangered species and wild places.

June 18, 2014
by Center for Biological Diversity Wednesday Jun 18th, 2014 3:54 PM
Photo: USFWS
by Center for Biological Diversity Wednesday Jun 18th, 2014 3:54 PM

Download PDF

Comments  (Hide Comments)

by Beeline
Wednesday Jun 18th, 2014 4:20 PM
The habitat is not what is was in the day of the grizzly. What makes you guys think the present habitat could even begin support a population of apex predators/omnivores?
by Sludge
Wednesday Jun 18th, 2014 5:24 PM
The population of invasive introduced rural rednecks has exploded throughout the Western USA to unsustainable levels. This population explosion has many contributing factors but the elimination if large apex predators is clearly an important factor. Reducing this invasive population will benefit all the flora and fauna of the West.

Reintroducing the grizzly bear will be a start in managing the rampant redneck population through natural means. Let nature restore the balance, nature's way!
by som sai
Wednesday Jun 18th, 2014 7:58 PM
California is the place to get started, but I'd disagree as to the potential range there. I'd say everything in gray should be the appropriate bear habitat. I've been to San Francisco and over by Sausalito and the Muir woods. It all looked like great places for griz except for downtown. I'd contribute money in a heartbeat.
by Not oil goop
Friday Jun 20th, 2014 3:23 PM
Poor elitist sludge(isn't that the shit that collects in a sewer) calling names exposing his bigot ass for the typical hate filled progressive that he/she/it is. Hopefully you will end up as grizzly bear shit, you deserve it for supporting introducing this apex predator into areas that will not support them.
by not a threat
Wednesday Jun 25th, 2014 4:30 AM
You could reintroduce grizzly bears throughout the Sierra Nevada and most of the Coast Range and into Modoc county and most people in CA wouldn't even know they were there. In already existing grizzly territories (Idaho, Montana, etc...) there are not many reports of encounters between humans and grizzlies despite an avid outdoor culture. They are by nature reclusive and will avoid humans if not startled (don't sneak up on them, wear bells and/or make noise while hiking).

Most "rednecks" are familiar with outdoor living and would follow the needed precautions when dealing with apex predators like grizzlies. If urban folk venture into the wilderness they should read up on how to avoid confrontations with bears, lions, snakes and other potentially dangerous animals. If the recommended methods of avoidance and deterrence are followed there is almost zero chance of a negative interaction. There is nothing wrong with sharing habitat that was once the home of grizzly bears. I welcome them to the golden state to match their image on the flag with reality.