Is Lockheed Martin Trying to Get Vermont Politicians To Swallow the F-35 Magic Mushroom?

Is Lockheed Martin in California trying to feed Vermont politicians
magic mushrooms
and expecting them to swallow?

Is the F-35 strike fighter jet, designed to carry targeted smart
nuclear bombs, a "magic mushroom"?

Lockheed Martin · F-35 Lightning II
http://www.lockheedmartin.com/us/products/f35.html
The F-35's built-in sustainment establishes new levels of operational readiness.

Elected Officials have "design flaws" in their personalities,
like F-35 strike fighter jets and Obamacare!

The F-35 strike fighter jets might have the same design flaws
as our Vermont Congressional Delegation
and Vermont Governor Peter Shumlin
when it comes to designing a state and national health care plan -
it doesn't fly right either!

California's Lockheed Martin F-35 strike fighter jet design flaws:

(1)
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-09-01/lockheed-martin-f-35-wing-part-has-design-flaw-tester-says.html

The flawed part is the forward root rib,
an aluminum beam at the forward-inboard corner of the wing
that supports a fuselage fairing panel on the Joint Strike Fighter’s
leading edge flap,
according to Lockheed.

REO (Rate Elected Officials)
Which one of our Vermont elected officials is most likely to
have a flawed forward root rib that will be covered under
pre-existing conditions in our new health care plans?
Which one has the leading edge flap which is not
a covered medical condition because it is considered
normal for politicians?
(a) Peter Shumlin
(b) Peter Welch
(c) Patrick Leahy
(d) Bernie Sanders

(2)
http://www.publicintegrity.org/2013/10/01/13483/defense-department-poorly-managed-design-construction-f-35-fighter-auditor-says

By R. Jeffrey SmithSeptember 17, 2013
The Pentagon failed to supervise the design and construction
of its new fleet of F-35 stealth warplanes adequately...

REO (Rate Elected Officials)
Which one of our Vermont elected officials is most likely to
fail to supervise the design and construction
of new health care plans adequately?
(a) Peter Shumin
(b) Peter Welch
(c) Patrick Leahy
(d) Bernie Sanders

...The 136-page report, signed by deputy inspector
general for policy and oversight Randolph Stone,
urged the Pentagon to reasses all the
critical safety problems
in the advanced aircraft,
which
can’t fly in thunderstorms,
has
poor cockpit visibility,
and relies on the use of a state-of-the-art
helmet
that designers are having difficulty getting to work.

REO (Rate Elected Officials)
Which one of our elected officials in Vermont
can't fly in thunderstorms:
(a) Peter Shumlin, (b) Peter Welch, (c) Patrick Leahy, (d) Bernie Sanders?

... F-35 subcontractor L-3 Communications in Alpharetta, Georgia,
which is building the cockpit display system,
.. found that the system for calibrating tools — a key to insuring
that parts fit together and work properly
— “had serious deficiencies,”
and that quality control records weren’t properly maintained.

REO (Rate Elected Officials)
Which one of our elected officials in Vermont
has parts that do not fit together and work properly,
and does not maintain quality control records properly?
(a) Peter Shumlin
(b) Peter Welch
(c) Patrick Leahy
(d) Bernie Sanders


The office said further it didn’t have the “responsibility or resources”
to track the quality of work
through Lockheed Martin’s supply chain,
which includes five major subcontractors,
as the report recommended.

REO (Rate Elected Officials)
Which one of our elected officials in Vermont
claims to have no "responsibility or resources"
to track the quality of work
on either our state or national health care system?
(a) Peter Shumlin
(b) Peter Welch
(c) Patrick Leahy
(d) Bernie Sanders

...He noted that combat testing
— the “most challenging portions” of the testing
— isn’t scheduled to begin until 2018.

REO (Rate Elected Officials)
Which one of our elected officials in Vermont
is most likely to pass into law a health care program
which is not scheduled to go into action
until AFTER the NEXT general election?
(a) Peter Shumlin
(b) Peter Welch
(c) Patrick Leahy
(d) Bernie Sanders

Now, review these points, and ask yourself, is this the military
fighter JET you
want flying over your house at 1200 miles per hour,
doing a full training circle all around the
State of Vermont in just minutes, over and over again?

...
can’t fly
in thunderstorms,
has poor cockpit visibility...

... the system for calibrating tools
— a key to insuring that parts fit together and work properly
— “had serious deficiencies,” and that quality control records
weren’t properly maintained.

.. it didn’t have the “responsibility or resources”
to track the quality of work through Lockheed Martin’s supply chain,
which includes five major subcontractors...

...He noted that combat testing — the “most challenging portions” of
the testing — isn’t scheduled to begin until 2018.

...The Joint Fighter Office said in its response that of the 363 corrective actions suggested in the report,
78 percent had been completed as of Monday.
The remaining 74 actions, it said, were still being implemented or developed.

http://sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov/
Another X-class flare!

Bridge over troubled waters of Lake Champlain, an
international body of water, the drinking water reservoir
for one-thirs of Vermonters is now threatened by
F-35 strike fighter jets which could crash into the
peoples' drinking water reservoir from GPS devices
giving false signals caused by X-Class solar flares.
SDO team say the sun continues to emit solar flares.
...can affect GPS & communciations.

29 Oct 2013
Active region 11875 let loose an X2.3 flare.
Strong radio emissions
were also measured during this flare.
The flare started at 2142 UT (5:42 pm ET)
and lasted about 20 minutes.
The active region is on the limb (edge)
and it rotating out of sight from SDO.

NEWS UPDATE: another! NEW OCT. 29 X-CLASS SOLAR FLARE
Our public drinking water supply is at risk, and this health
risk is more important right now than all the spying in the world.
We are becoming our own worst enemy, creating our own
worst health hazards.

Why doesn't U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy learn real fast
that the most important communication problem we
can have here in Vermont is if F-35 strike fighter jets
are based here and they are flying during a sudden
and unpredictable X-Class Solar Flare which disrupts
GPS and satellite communications so that we are at
risk of an F-35 fighter jet crashing into Lake Champlain
from which one-third of Vermonters draw their
drinking water, or it crashes into a school of
children, or it just accidentally drops a
targeted smart nuclear bomb on us because "smart"
bombs are so stupid that they can be disrupted by
an X-Class Solar Flare which can disrupt GPS, and
the unintended radiation leak will mean all who survive
have to leave Vermont forever.

Where is the guarantee, by the U.S. Airforce, that they
can instantaneously replace drinking water for 1/3 of
Vermonters who draw their drinking water from
Lake Champlain, if an F-35 fighter jet gets it's GPS
disrupted by an X-Class Solar Flare and does an
emergency fuel dump into Lake Champlain?

Isn't it an act of serious and intentional and willful
negligence on the part of the U.S. Air Force to
risk the drinking water supply of one-third of the State
of Vermont?

Isn't it an act of serious and willful and intentional
disregard of public safety for the City of Burlington, VT
to conspire with the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Senator
Patrick Leahy to negligently risk the drinking water
supply, a prima facie case of Lake Champlain being
a drinking water reservoir for one-third of Vermonters?

oCT. 29, 2013
NASA has just reported another X-class solar flare,
and remember, these can disrupt GPS global
positioning devices, including GPS devices
on F-35 strike fighter jets. Please stop the F-35s
from coming to Vermont because they are not safe
for our pristine garden, the green adventure we
have chosen in life is at risk if we allow the
government to destroy it.

NASA Solar Dynamics Observatory
http://sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov/
Another X-class flare!
Tue, 29 Oct 2013

SDO team say the sun continues to emit solar flares.
No danger to us, but can affect GPS & communciations.
29 Oct 2013

Active region 11875 let loose an X2.3 flare.
Strong radio emissions
were also measured during this flare.
The flare started at 2142 UT (5:42 pm ET)
and lasted about 20 minutes.
The active region is on the limb (edge)
and it rotating out of sight from SDO.

To cover any risk incidents caused by the
F-35 strike fighter jets,
THE CITY OF BURLINGTON BOUGHT 7 MILLION
IN INSURANCE.

WHAT DOES YOUR HOME OWNERS'
INSURANCE POLICY COVER IF AN F-35 JET CRASHES
ON YOUR HOUSE, OR DROPS A CUTE LITTLE BOMB
ON YOUR HOUSE?

We won't live long enough to worry about government
surveillance of teenagers cell phone photos of their
emerging hormones, or listening to old ladies in
Germany discussing their calculus derivations,
because U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy is in favor of
risking our lives and destroying Vermont by
basing F-35 strike fighter jets here which are
designed to deploy targeted smart nuclear bombs
which can go the wrong way when a Class-X solar
flare disrupts their satellite controlled GPS;
and so our number one worry is the Russian Roulette
Wheel U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy has placed our
homes on, like a Monopoly Board, and he's the
Player, and we are the ones who will suffer .

I got all excited about the F-35 strike fighter jets when
an incredibly, amazingly loud and frightening jet
flew over my home in SOUTHERN Vermont,
and I ran out of the house and looked up at the sky,
then went back inside to search google images of
jet photos, and I do believe it was an F-35 or something
very close, very dark, and very pointed.

The F-35 strike fighter jet has to go somewhere once
it lifts off the ground, and it would only take 7.5 minutes
to get from Burlington International Airport to
fly over my house in Chester, Vermont 05143.
Remember, it flys at 1200 miles per hour, or faster.

F-35 strike fighter jets are designed to deploy
targeted smart nuclear bombs, and bombs
have been dropped by accident from other jets,
and the F-35 fighter jet is still known to have
serious design flaws, it doesn't work right yet,
so you need to know,
does your home owners' insurance policy
COVER YOU FOR AN ACCIDENTAL DROP OF A
SMART NUCLEAR BOMB FROM AN
F-35 STRIKE FIGHTER JET
OVER YOUR HOUSE IN VERMONT?

My house is insured by a very popular company
that probably provides coverage
to the most homes in Vermont.

My new home owners' insurance policy,
starting next month, November
2013, has a new number, different than the policy number
it has had the past ten years,
and some different conditions.

Check your policy for "Nuclear" coverage right now!

Section I - Exclusions

A. We do not insure for loss caused directly or
indirectly by any of the following. Such loss is
excluded regardless of any other cause or event
contributing concurrently or in any sequence to
the loss. These exclusions apply whether or not
the loss event results in widespread damage or
affects a sustantial area.

A 6. War

War includes the following and any
consequences of any of the following:

a. Undeclared war, civil war, insurrection,
rebellion or revolution;

b. Warlike act by a military force or military
personnel; or

c. Destruction, seizure or use for a military
purpose.

Discharge of a nuclear weapon will be deemed
a warlike act even if accidental.

7. Nuclear Hazard

This Exclusion A.7. pertains to Nuclear Hazard
to the extent set forth in N. Nuclear Hazard
Clause under Section I - Conditions.

N. Nuclear Hazard Clause

1. "Nuclear Hazard" means any nuclear reaction,
radiation, or radioactive contamination, all
whether controlled or uncontrolled or however
caused, or any consequence of any of these.

2. Loss caused by the nuclear hazard will not be
considered loss caused by fire, explosion, or
smoke, whether these perils are specifically
named in or otherwise included within the
Perils Insured Against.

3. This policy does not apply under Section I to
loss caused directly or indirectly by nuclear
hazard, except that direct loss by fire resulting
from the nuclear hazard is covered.

WHAT LOCKHEED MARTIN NEEDS TO THINK
ABOUT IS THIS:
Let's say for example you wanted a wife,
but you could only find one who cooked,
or one who was faithful. So, to avoid
getting AIDS, you chose the faithful woman
and go out to eat at restraunts. Now,
apply that logic to creating defense strategies.
Instead of having one great big overweight,
overloaded machine with too many expectations
for one jet, instead, make two jets. Divide
the workload, divide the expected performance
tasks, some to one jet, some to the other,
and, like a woman who is your wife 24 X 7 a
and a fast food restraunt which is open 24 X 7,
both new jets will work simultaneously in the
sky, in the atmosphere, each performing
different tasks with the same objectives.
That's what the U.S. Air Force and Lockheed
Martin need to do: instead of one F-35
strike fighter jet which is too heavy and too
overloaded with tasks, strip it down and
design TWO jets which will work simultaneously
together, soaring together. Try something
different and it might work.