From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Related Categories: Santa Cruz Indymedia | Environment & Forest Defense | Government & Elections
A New Beginning: Desal on Pause. What Now?
by SC News
Thursday Aug 22nd, 2013 3:06 PM
In the wake of the City of Santa Cruz's decision to stall the public's vote and possibly alter and resubmit the plan for the proposed desalination plant planned for the westside of Santa Cruz, Desal Alternatives' Rick Longinotti and Paul Gratz released statements in response. Gratz remains skeptical of the city's intentions, and cautions about the lack of transparency of the whole process that wasted $17 Million of the taxpayers money. Longinotti announced the Desal Alternatives steering committee has, "issued a call to all citizen supporters to advocate that the City Council adopt water security measures that can be implemented immediately."
From Rick Longinotti:

A New Beginning: Desal on Pause. What Now?

In case you didn't read the Sentinel article, City puts brakes on desal project, Mayor Hilary Bryant and City Manager Martín Bernal have issued a press release entitled, "RECOMMEND THERE NOT BE A VOTE IN 2014, WHILE SHIFTING FOCUS TO CONSERVATION AND ADDITIONAL PUBLIC INPUT TO CRAFT A NEW VISION FOR THE CITY’S WATER SUPPLY".

In the press release, Mayor Bryant says, "A greater focus on water conservation practices and potential is needed". Bernal calls for community involvement, "I will ask the Water Department to bring forward a plan to engage our community to become a top water conservation city in California." Those statements are music to my ears, although we should be careful to point out that there are lots more alternatives to desalination than just cutting back on our water use.

According to the Sentinel, "To be clear, city officials recognized they need more time to build support for desal and made a politically tough decision to delay the project." So what should we do during this pause in the desal timeline? Wait to be "educated" about the need for desalination? I prefer to accept the Mayor and City Manager's offer of citizen engagement to "craft a new vision for the City's water supply". I would like you to join me.

Fall Campaign

The Desal Alternatives steering committee has issued a call to all citizen supporters to advocate that the City Council adopt water security measures that can be implemented immediately. The steering committee is still honing the list of measures, which we'll discuss in the next email. We'll be contacting you to give your input to the Council this Fall. Meanwhile, come to the Desal Alternatives meeting on September 19th where we'll organize ourselves for the Fall campaign and hear some inspiration from Conner Everts, who traveled to Australia to find out how California can learn from their conservation methods.


Let's celebrate that "when the people lead, the leaders will follow". Join us Sunday afternoon, August 25 from 2-4pm for food, music and good company at Garfield Park Village Clubhouse, 721 Bay St. near California Ave. Bring some finger food. I'll bring some punch.

Joe Jordan and Mary Flodin are hosting an informational gathering at their home on Saturday, August 24 at 4:30pm, 140 Heath St.

Fly in the Punchbowl

The statement from Martín Bernal is problematic for the City Council in one respect. Bernal writes, "In order to complete the significant public investment made to date in the draft Environmental Impact Report, to respond to comments by community members offered on the draft EIR, and in order to inform future discussions about the City’s water supply, the EIR will be completed." The decision whether to complete the EIR belongs to the Council, since it will cost a lot more money to complete than the $1.6 million already spent.

The four hundred comments submitted on the Draft EIR comprise a devastating critique of the desal project. There is only one way that a Final EIR can "fix" the deficiencies in the Draft: by recommending a package of alternatives to the project. Anything less from a Final EIR would not be credible. The Council may hesitate to spend more money just to get a Final EIR that recommends alternatives to the project. Council members can reach that conclusion just by reading the comments on the Draft.

Consider the comments from the National Marine Fisheries Service, which is engaged in negotiations with the City over fish habitat:

"Unfortunately the Alternatives Analysis does not appear to thoroughly evaluate alternatives recommended by National Marine Fisheries Service and California Department of Fish and Wildlife through more than 10 years of technical assistance provided to the City." As government-speak goes, this is pretty damning. You can practically feel the heat of impatience radiating from the page.

And consider this conclusion at the end of seven pages of comments from Gerald Weber, geologist, "How can the dEIR be accepted as adequate when there is essentially no detailed study and assessment of the ground water potential along the north coast?"

I recommend a book by UCSC emeritus social psychologist, Elliot Aronson, Mistakes Were Made, But Not By Me. In the book Aronson explains why we humans so often throw good money after bad even though it is more rational to cut our losses.

- Rick Longinotti

An unpublished letter to the editor of the Santa Cruz Sentinel from Paul Gratz:

8.20.13 - The only drought is a leadership drought

After wasting $17M, city officials now want to re-engage the public by backing off on their promised desal vote in 2014.

Mayor Bryant denies that "pulling the plug on a 2014 vote is not designed to keep desal from being a divisive issue during the November 2014 council race. ..." A classical political tactic where the main point is adeptly stated, but opposite of the proponents’ true motivation.

"We need to take in all the feedback that we've been getting, and say, 'Here's the problem and what are we collectively going to do about it?' A statement conveying what the city never did for two decades and has no intention of doing now.

Will this backfire if "delayed" desal remains a contentious topic for candidates running for the Board of Supervisors and City Council? In trying to dodge desal, politicians will out themselves as the election certainly will revolve around transparency, trust-building, and accountability.

Paul Gratz
Co-author of Measure P

More event info:

This Saturday,August 24, Mary Flodin and Joe Jordan are hosting a neighborhood house party/teach in concerning the proposed Santa Cruz desal plant. The event will include a discussion about the political maneuverings behind the city's announcement on Tuesday to sort of put the brakes on the regional desal project.

In the driveway out in front of 140 Heath Street, the event starts at 4:30 PM. There will be cookies and drinks, and local experts on hand to lead some fascinating and important discussion of all the issues associated with this possible project.

Join in and spread the word! It will be outdoors, so bring jacket and hat, perhaps. Heath St. parallels Delaware Ave., one block inland and connects between Fair and Swift.

-- Paul Gratz

For more info about Desal Alternatives, see:
§Bryant/Bernal City of Santa Cruz Press Release
by Indybay Volunteer Tuesday Aug 27th, 2013 7:21 PM

Download PDF
August 20, 2013

Comments  (Hide Comments)

by SC County News
Thursday Aug 22nd, 2013 4:54 PM
Water For Santa Cruz (Full Movie)
by (a)
Wednesday Aug 28th, 2013 12:14 AM
from what the article says Bernal is overstepping his authority by wasting more money on the EIR. maybe the City Council should be prudent and vote to finish Bernal's tenure with the City.
Thursday, September 19, 7pm
Circle Church, 111 Errett Circle, Santa Cruz

Conner Everts, Southern California Watershed Alliance, will report from his recent trip to Australia, where severe drought has motivated innovative conservation practices, and where six desal plants sit idle.
by SC Sentinel
Wednesday Aug 28th, 2013 9:49 PM
From an article in the SC Sentinel today:

State and federal agencies negotiating with Santa Cruz over fish habitat protection say the city has not thoroughly studied alternatives to a proposed seawater desalination facility designed to boost water supply.

Letters from the National Marine Fisheries Service and California Department of Fish and Wildlife critiquing an environmental evaluation of the now-stalled desal project say the city should explore the cumulative potential of its own infrastructure improvements and regional coordination.

The agencies -- whose requests for improved river and stream flows have been cited by the city as a primary reason for pursuing desal -- say a host of additional alternatives were rejected without adequate investigation.

The regulators have not taken a position on desal, but are among a host of agencies that would have some permitting authority over the plant.

"Unfortunately, the alternatives analysis does not appear to thoroughly evaluate alternatives recommended by the NMFS and CDFW through more than 10 years of technical assistance provided to the city" in the development of a fish conservation plan, the federal agency said in its letter.
by Vote Some More
Thursday Aug 29th, 2013 12:46 PM
Since Desal Alternatives was highly effective in organizing supporters for last year's ballot proposition and there will be no vote next year on desal, organizers should focus their energy on electing Rick Longinotti as county supervisor. The alternative is to let Ryan Coonerty, author of the agreement for UCSC expansion into the north campus and perennial supporter of the city's plan to build desal on the westside, to follow in his father's footsteps on LAFCO as a proponent of business interests and university growth. Rick has shown himself to be far more respectful of the interests of the broad public of all ages than Ryan and his cohorts. Rick is an effective speaker who could motivate student voters and his supporters can conduct the same sort of grassroots effort as last year and knock out Ryan in June. Otherwise the same sort of city councilmember who failed to reflect the values of the community will continue ramming through his private agenda.
by Got Cancer Yet?
Thursday Aug 29th, 2013 1:31 PM
I haven't heard much about the radioactive ocean water Desal will be serving up. I wouldn't sprinkle my lawn with that cesium enriched swill, much less actually drink it.
by JBK
Monday Sep 9th, 2013 8:58 PM
can someone please tell me if zero rainfall due to a coming severe drought equals zero desal alternatives, just where is the water going to come from??? the following link likely will show I take this question very seriously.
by dead crops
Wednesday Dec 25th, 2013 7:00 AM
from your link:
"Our addition to oil, gas and coal (despite a plethora of alternatives) is killing this planet"
fossil fuel fired desal plant is no solution.
carbon sequestering is.

there will be less water. farming will be difficult.
we will begin to starve.

there will be riots.