From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Related Categories: East Bay | Education & Student Activism | Environment & Forest Defense | Global Justice & Anti-Capitalism | Health, Housing & Public Services | Police State & Prisons
UC Files Lawsuit Against 14 Individuals Over Gill Tract Occupation
by Dave Id
Wednesday May 9th, 2012 3:48 PM
Before 7am this morning, UC police arrived at the Gill Tract in Albany and swiftly placed concrete barriers at the vehicle entrances to prevent easy resupply for the Gill Tract Farm Collective. Those present were threatened with the use of "chemical agents and impact force" by UCPD. UC followed up later in the morning by filing a lawsuit in Alameda County Superior Court against 14 individuals it says "conspired to cut locks, enter the property illegally and establish an illegal encampment" (PDF below). The civil suit filed allows for up to 150 "Does" to be added to the complaint. This, despite the fact that Occupy the Farm has not hindered the agricultural research of Professor Miguel Altieri which began today (see Occupy the Farm press release below) and has made good faith efforts to thoughtfully reply to UC ultimatums regarding the farm. Occupying farmers anticipate that a UC police raid could come at any time and are asking for food sovereignty activists and supporters to come to the farm and to be aware of re-convergence plans should a raid occur. A nightlong potluck has been called for tonight.
Those named are Gopal Dayaneni, Anya Kamenskaya, Devin Murphy, Stefanie Rawlings, Eric Larsen, David Grefarth, Russell Bates, Alejandra Cano, Vaden Dabney, Erik Eisenberg, Elizabeth Fairwearther, Marika Iyer, Nathan Pitts, Gabrielle Silverman, Francisco Stierle, and "DOES 1 through 150."


Occupy the Farm press release, May 8th:


Who: University of California Berkeley Professor Miguel Altieri

When: Wednesday, May 9th – 8:30 AM

Where: The Gill Tract; Albany, CA

Dr. Miguel Altieri, UC Berkeley researcher, to proceed with research at Gill Tract in solidarity with Occupy the Farm.

UC Berkeley Professor Miguel Altieri, who has been a researcher on the Gill Tract for 31 years, will plant his crops tomorrow, demonstrating that research can exist alongside the Farm. He announced his plan at a university community forum, organized by the Gill Tract Farmers Collective, on the UC Berkeley campus Tuesday evening.


UC press release about the civil suit, May 9th:


Today the University of California commenced legal action against fourteen individuals alleged to have participated in the illegal occupation of the University’s Gill Tract property. This lawsuit represents an additional step that the University is taking to regain control of its property so that it can be used for agricultural research and education. At the same time, the occupiers still have the opportunity to accept a proposal that would allow for a peaceful end to the illegal encampment, resumption of research activities and the continuation of urban farming on portions of the land that will not be utilized by faculty and students.

The suit, filed in Alameda County Superior Court today, alleges that the defendants, along with other unknown individuals who are sued as “Does,” conspired to cut locks, enter the property illegally and establish an illegal encampment. (There are no current UC Berkeley students among the named defendants.) It alleges that the defendants continue to trespass on the property, despite repeated warnings from the UC Police Department that their presence is illegal. The suit alleges that the defendants’ illegal occupation is preventing research and educational activities on the property and that “if defendants do not leave the property immediately, the growing season will be lost” resulting in substantial harm to researchers, students and the University. The suit requests a court order requiring the defendants to leave the property.

The University is also seeking an award of monetary damages for costs it has or will incur as a result of the trespass and for the rental value of the land during the occupation. The University also seeks payment by the defendants of its attorney’s fees under a state law that allows it to recover fees in a lawsuit involving “trespassing on lands . . . under cultivation.”

This legal action is not the only step that the University is prepared to take to protect the rights of its researchers and students, but it is one part of our efforts to end this illegal occupation. Among other things, it is a means to ensure that the trespassers—rather that the University, students and taxpayers--will bear the substantial expenses resulting from unlawful acts.

A copy of the suit is attached, and here is a link to the statement we released last night in response to new demands issued by the occupiers:


Dan Mogulof
Executive Director, Office of Public Affairs
UC Berkeley
Office: 510642-3715
Cell: 510-919-6954


For more information about Occupy the Farm, see and

Download PDF
(11-page PDF)
§The Last Class 1 Ag Land in the East Bay
by Dave Id Wednesday May 9th, 2012 3:48 PM
Farmland Is for Community - Farmland Is for Farming

Comments  (Hide Comments)

by Perplexed
Wednesday May 9th, 2012 4:53 PM
I certainly support urban agriculture. Though it is of course not physically possible to feed residents of the dense bay area solely through backyard gardens, small organic farms on empty lots scattered around the cities, rooftops, etc, I think it is an important step. However, I am curious as to exactly what Occupy's point is in this action. Why do Occupy members feel that they have a right to seize farmland? Seizing control of farmland has been a powerful action in many nations with large peasant populations which depend on farmland for survival. However, the demographic makeup of Occupy is quite different. You are generally upper middle class folk, not remotely touched by starvation. Albany can hardly be called a food desert. From past experience, the primary concern of Albany residents with the UC housing project there is that it brings in lower class people, specifically foreign grad students with kids, and that this means that residents have to contribute more money to schools and other social services. I suppose turning this area into a community garden would keep out the riffraff, but I am not really sure why Occupy supports this given its militant anti-gentrification stances. Perhaps I am missing something, but what exactly is the desired outcome of this action?
by golly gee
Wednesday May 9th, 2012 5:38 PM

"it's all so perplexing. these millionaires (stereotype alert!) occupying farmland that we don't really need. golly gee willikers. (throw in some tangential and irrelevant issues.) I swear I'm so genuinely confused. what is it all about?"

look, concern troll (or actually those who might be led astray by your supposed flailing), the UC is a public institution but wants to sell off its lands to private interests at will. the UC wants to turn this farmland into baseball fields and sell or pave everything around it. many folks, those occupying and countless others who support them, many longtime Albany residents, want to preserve this farmland for farming. it's as simple as that. adoy
by Zachary RunningWolf
(runningwolf.zachary [at] Thursday May 10th, 2012 9:41 AM
The first commentor on this subject states he is perplexed on Occupy snatching or "grabbing land". I ask that person have you ever read Amerikkklan history of just grabbing land like the Oklahoma sooners who lined up to steal indigenous land. The Louisiana Purchase where land thief (France) sold to another thief (murder of indigenous people) and the California history of having a state sponsored genocide of the indigenous population to land grab this state. Finally with the combination of the bank bailouts and the housing foreclosure is a modern day Dawes Act which was a Reservation land grab. Indigenous people support the "Occupy Farm" and other grabbing of land from this KKKorporate fascist state we live temporary with, Hopi Prophecy and Mayan Calendar. Democratize the Greediants (regents).