Publish to Newswire
Add an EventFrom the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
NYS Wastes Medicaid Funds on Fluoridation Schemes with PEW's help?
Medicaid is a government sponsored health insurance plan for low-income people. The NYS Department of Health proposes to use Medicaid money, instead, to fund its burning desire to add fluoride chemicals into more New Yorkers via the water supply (fluoridation). NYS counties are responsible for about half of Medicaid costs and have already rejected fluoridation.
New York State may Waste Medicaid Dollars on Fluoridation
Pew Foundation to Force Fluoridation in NYS?
The NYS Department of Health proposes to spend Medicaid funds on fluoridation equipment, supplies and staff (1) despite clear evidence that fluoridation fails to prevent tooth decay in NYS and can be health-harming. Many NYS cities and counties have already rejected fluoridation, reports the NYS Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation, Inc. (NYSCOF)
NY City spends $25 million on fluoridation annually (2). Yet, tooth decay is rampant in NYC’s low-income population (3). And NYS DofH statistics show that highly-fluoridated NYS counties don’t have less tooth decay and fluoridation has not leveled out tooth decay between lower and higher income children (4).
Further, in 1990, the NYS DofH published a study, "Fluoride: Benefits and Risks of Exposure," alerting officials that fluoride can be harmful to kidney patients, diabetics and those with fluoride hypersensitivity even at "optimal" levels.(4a)
NY City Council Member Peter Vallone, Jr. co-sponsored legislation to stop fluoridation in NYC (5). And a NYC resolution is pending “calling on the NYS Department of Health to remove fluoride from NYS’s water supply.” (6)
A unique NYS law requires elected officials make fluoridation decisions to disallow mandates by a single non-elected entity e.g. Health Commissioner, as almost happened in Suffolk County in the 1990’s until residents fought successfully to reject fluoridation.
However, it appears the multi-billion dollar Pew Charitable Trust wants to overturn that law so fluoridation can be forced on municipalities without citizen input, according to a Pew sponsored website, owned by a Public Relations company. (7)
Long Island (Nassau and Suffolk Counties) is the largest non-fluoridated area in otherwise 73% fluoridated NYS and tops the Pew’s fluoridation “hit” list (8) even though the Suffolk County Water Authority “vehemently” opposes water fluoridation (9). And Long island Water Conference Chairman Karl Schweitzer says, “Studies have shown that adding fluoride provides limited or no benefit to dental health.” (10)
Will Pew Bulldoze NY democracy as they have elsewhere?
Pew thwarted Arkansas democracy by paying lobbyists to convince novice state legislators to quickly pass a statewide fluoridation law, using incorrect information, without citizen input and over-riding citizen referenda in several Arkansas cities which rejected fluoridation repeatedly (11).
Despite government cautions to avoid mixing infant formula with fluoridated water (12) a Pew representative urged the Austin City Council to conceal this information (13).
“Pew decided to protect fluoride instead of babies," says attorney Paul Beeber, NYSCOF President.
Low-income New Yorkers aren’t fluoride deficient but many are dentist deficient because fewer than 25% of NYS dentists accept Medicaid patients (14).
The Centers for Disease Control reports that over 41% of adolescents now suffer with fluoride damaged (discolored) teeth – 4% of it is moderate or severe. At the same time tooth decay rates are increasing in toddlers and untreated tooth decay has become epidemic.
A recent San Antonio, TX, news report revealed “After 9 years and $3 million of adding fluoride, research shows tooth decay hasn’t dropped among the poorest of Bexar County’s children. It has only increased—up 13% in 2010.”(15) Tooth decay hasn’t declined in fluoridated Gainsville, Florida (16) or fluoridation state-mandated Kentucky (17) Actually tooth decay crises are occurring in all fluoridated cities, states and countries (18)
Despite widespread fluoridation, Australians are spending more than ever on dental care where 60% of six- to eight-year-olds have cavities. (19) Prompting a dramatic expansion in access to dental services, estimated to cost $9 billion over four years which might require a new tax.
Oakland California is fluoridated yet dental care is dismal where "healthy teeth are often a sign of socio-economic status"(20)
Despite fluoridation being state-mandated in Minnesota, the Pew Charitable Trust reports “A study of seven Minneapolis-St. Paul hospitals showed that patients made over 10,000 trips to the emergency room because of dental health issues, costing more than $4.7 million.”
“Fluoridation should be terminated; not funded and promoted,” says Beeber. “To propose that Medicaid funds be wasted on fluoridation, placing more New Yorkers in harm’s way, is unconscionable, unethical and should be illegal,” says Beeber “Further, Pew should be embarrassed to sully its name and reputation by associating with over-zealous and misinformed fluoridationists,” says Beeber.
Fluoride’s Adverse Health Effects Database: http://www.FluorideAction.Net/health
References:
1) New York State Department of Health, “Redesigning the Medicaid Program,”Medicaid Redesign Team (MRT), Health Disparities Work Group Final Recommendations October 20, 2011 http://www.health.ny.gov/health_care/medicaid/redesign/docs/health_disparities_report.pdf
2) http://www.scribd.com/doc/18235930/NYC-Fluoridation-Costs-2008-Feb-2-2009-Letter-Page-1 and http://www.scribd.com/doc/18235931/NYC-2008-Fluoridation-Costs-Page-2-Feb-2009-Letter
3) Evidence that fluoridation fails New Yorkers http://www.freewebs.com/fluoridation/fluoridationfailsnewyork.htm
4) http://www.freewebs.com/fluoridation/chart.htm
4a) Kaminsky LS, Mahoney MC, Leach J, Melius J, Miller MJ. Fluoride: benefits and risks of exposure. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1990;1:261–281 http://crobm.iadrjournals.org/cgi/reprint/1/4/261
5) http://www.petervallone.com/index.php?page=fluoride-if-in-doubt-keep-it-out
6) The New York City Council Legislative Research Center, “Resolution calling on the New York State Department of Health to remove fluoride from New York State’s water supply.” http://legistar.council.nyc.gov/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=917886&GUID=C3473AA2-67FE-4D2E-A901-CBD69085ED42&Options=ID|Text|&Search=fluoridation
7) New York State for Oral Health go to http://newyork.ilikemyteeth.org/fluoridation/ and click on NYS Laws and Regulations: New York Public Health – Title 1 – § 1100-A Fluoridation Law This was taken down in the middle of my creating this news release but can be found here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/74902611/NYSCOF-s-Home-Rule-Bill-Challenged-by-PEW
8) The Pew Charitable Trust, “The Importance of Children's Oral
Health: What Policymakers Need to Know,”
Shelly Gehshan, Director, Pew Children’s Dental Campaign Slide 15
http://www.pewcenteronthestates.org/uploadedFiles/wwwpewcenteronthestatesorg/Initiatives/Promotional_Items/Dental/dental_powerpoint.pdf?n=3439
9) http://www.freewebs.com/fluoridation/suffolkcountywaterdep.htm
10) http://www.liwc.org/pdf/PressRelease-020111-NoFlouride.pdf
11) http://securearkansasnetwork.org/uncategorized/vital-fluoride-concerns
12) http://www.FormulaFluoride.Webs.com
13) http://blog.fluoridefreeaustin.com/2011/11/03/fluoride-date-lecture-48--pew-theres-something-rotten-in-the-state-of-austin-texas.aspx?ref=rss
14) NYS Dental Journal November 2009 Oral Health During Perinatal
Period in New York State
Evaluation of 2005 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System Data
Hiroko Iida, D.D.S., M.P.H.; Jayanth V. Kumar, D.D.S., M.P.H.; Anne M. Radigan, B.A.http://www.nysdental.org/img/current-pdf/jrnlnov2009.pdf
15) Added to our drinking water: a chemical 'more toxic than lead?'
KENS 5 San Antonio by Joe Conger http://www.kens5.com/news/local/More-toxic-than-lead--134366538.html
16) “Dental health of low-income children is not good locally,” by Anne Geggis, December 3, 2011
http://www.gainesville.com/article/20111203/ARTICLES/111209857/-1/entertainment?Title=Dental-health-of-low-income-children-is-not-good-locally
17) “N.Ky. kids' teeth at risk,”
November 27,2011 http://nky.cincinnati.com/article/AB/20111127/NEWS0103/111270308/-N-Ky-kids-teeth-risk?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|FRONTPAGE
18) http://www.FluorideNews.Blogspot.com
19) “Half of young children have tooth decay,”Dec 7, 2011 http://news.ninemsn.com.au/health/8386146/half-of-young-children-have-tooth-decay
20)
http://oaklandlocal.com/article/dental-care-poor-challenging-oakland-across-state
Pew Foundation to Force Fluoridation in NYS?
The NYS Department of Health proposes to spend Medicaid funds on fluoridation equipment, supplies and staff (1) despite clear evidence that fluoridation fails to prevent tooth decay in NYS and can be health-harming. Many NYS cities and counties have already rejected fluoridation, reports the NYS Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation, Inc. (NYSCOF)
NY City spends $25 million on fluoridation annually (2). Yet, tooth decay is rampant in NYC’s low-income population (3). And NYS DofH statistics show that highly-fluoridated NYS counties don’t have less tooth decay and fluoridation has not leveled out tooth decay between lower and higher income children (4).
Further, in 1990, the NYS DofH published a study, "Fluoride: Benefits and Risks of Exposure," alerting officials that fluoride can be harmful to kidney patients, diabetics and those with fluoride hypersensitivity even at "optimal" levels.(4a)
NY City Council Member Peter Vallone, Jr. co-sponsored legislation to stop fluoridation in NYC (5). And a NYC resolution is pending “calling on the NYS Department of Health to remove fluoride from NYS’s water supply.” (6)
A unique NYS law requires elected officials make fluoridation decisions to disallow mandates by a single non-elected entity e.g. Health Commissioner, as almost happened in Suffolk County in the 1990’s until residents fought successfully to reject fluoridation.
However, it appears the multi-billion dollar Pew Charitable Trust wants to overturn that law so fluoridation can be forced on municipalities without citizen input, according to a Pew sponsored website, owned by a Public Relations company. (7)
Long Island (Nassau and Suffolk Counties) is the largest non-fluoridated area in otherwise 73% fluoridated NYS and tops the Pew’s fluoridation “hit” list (8) even though the Suffolk County Water Authority “vehemently” opposes water fluoridation (9). And Long island Water Conference Chairman Karl Schweitzer says, “Studies have shown that adding fluoride provides limited or no benefit to dental health.” (10)
Will Pew Bulldoze NY democracy as they have elsewhere?
Pew thwarted Arkansas democracy by paying lobbyists to convince novice state legislators to quickly pass a statewide fluoridation law, using incorrect information, without citizen input and over-riding citizen referenda in several Arkansas cities which rejected fluoridation repeatedly (11).
Despite government cautions to avoid mixing infant formula with fluoridated water (12) a Pew representative urged the Austin City Council to conceal this information (13).
“Pew decided to protect fluoride instead of babies," says attorney Paul Beeber, NYSCOF President.
Low-income New Yorkers aren’t fluoride deficient but many are dentist deficient because fewer than 25% of NYS dentists accept Medicaid patients (14).
The Centers for Disease Control reports that over 41% of adolescents now suffer with fluoride damaged (discolored) teeth – 4% of it is moderate or severe. At the same time tooth decay rates are increasing in toddlers and untreated tooth decay has become epidemic.
A recent San Antonio, TX, news report revealed “After 9 years and $3 million of adding fluoride, research shows tooth decay hasn’t dropped among the poorest of Bexar County’s children. It has only increased—up 13% in 2010.”(15) Tooth decay hasn’t declined in fluoridated Gainsville, Florida (16) or fluoridation state-mandated Kentucky (17) Actually tooth decay crises are occurring in all fluoridated cities, states and countries (18)
Despite widespread fluoridation, Australians are spending more than ever on dental care where 60% of six- to eight-year-olds have cavities. (19) Prompting a dramatic expansion in access to dental services, estimated to cost $9 billion over four years which might require a new tax.
Oakland California is fluoridated yet dental care is dismal where "healthy teeth are often a sign of socio-economic status"(20)
Despite fluoridation being state-mandated in Minnesota, the Pew Charitable Trust reports “A study of seven Minneapolis-St. Paul hospitals showed that patients made over 10,000 trips to the emergency room because of dental health issues, costing more than $4.7 million.”
“Fluoridation should be terminated; not funded and promoted,” says Beeber. “To propose that Medicaid funds be wasted on fluoridation, placing more New Yorkers in harm’s way, is unconscionable, unethical and should be illegal,” says Beeber “Further, Pew should be embarrassed to sully its name and reputation by associating with over-zealous and misinformed fluoridationists,” says Beeber.
Fluoride’s Adverse Health Effects Database: http://www.FluorideAction.Net/health
References:
1) New York State Department of Health, “Redesigning the Medicaid Program,”Medicaid Redesign Team (MRT), Health Disparities Work Group Final Recommendations October 20, 2011 http://www.health.ny.gov/health_care/medicaid/redesign/docs/health_disparities_report.pdf
2) http://www.scribd.com/doc/18235930/NYC-Fluoridation-Costs-2008-Feb-2-2009-Letter-Page-1 and http://www.scribd.com/doc/18235931/NYC-2008-Fluoridation-Costs-Page-2-Feb-2009-Letter
3) Evidence that fluoridation fails New Yorkers http://www.freewebs.com/fluoridation/fluoridationfailsnewyork.htm
4) http://www.freewebs.com/fluoridation/chart.htm
4a) Kaminsky LS, Mahoney MC, Leach J, Melius J, Miller MJ. Fluoride: benefits and risks of exposure. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1990;1:261–281 http://crobm.iadrjournals.org/cgi/reprint/1/4/261
5) http://www.petervallone.com/index.php?page=fluoride-if-in-doubt-keep-it-out
6) The New York City Council Legislative Research Center, “Resolution calling on the New York State Department of Health to remove fluoride from New York State’s water supply.” http://legistar.council.nyc.gov/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=917886&GUID=C3473AA2-67FE-4D2E-A901-CBD69085ED42&Options=ID|Text|&Search=fluoridation
7) New York State for Oral Health go to http://newyork.ilikemyteeth.org/fluoridation/ and click on NYS Laws and Regulations: New York Public Health – Title 1 – § 1100-A Fluoridation Law This was taken down in the middle of my creating this news release but can be found here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/74902611/NYSCOF-s-Home-Rule-Bill-Challenged-by-PEW
8) The Pew Charitable Trust, “The Importance of Children's Oral
Health: What Policymakers Need to Know,”
Shelly Gehshan, Director, Pew Children’s Dental Campaign Slide 15
http://www.pewcenteronthestates.org/uploadedFiles/wwwpewcenteronthestatesorg/Initiatives/Promotional_Items/Dental/dental_powerpoint.pdf?n=3439
9) http://www.freewebs.com/fluoridation/suffolkcountywaterdep.htm
10) http://www.liwc.org/pdf/PressRelease-020111-NoFlouride.pdf
11) http://securearkansasnetwork.org/uncategorized/vital-fluoride-concerns
12) http://www.FormulaFluoride.Webs.com
13) http://blog.fluoridefreeaustin.com/2011/11/03/fluoride-date-lecture-48--pew-theres-something-rotten-in-the-state-of-austin-texas.aspx?ref=rss
14) NYS Dental Journal November 2009 Oral Health During Perinatal
Period in New York State
Evaluation of 2005 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System Data
Hiroko Iida, D.D.S., M.P.H.; Jayanth V. Kumar, D.D.S., M.P.H.; Anne M. Radigan, B.A.http://www.nysdental.org/img/current-pdf/jrnlnov2009.pdf
15) Added to our drinking water: a chemical 'more toxic than lead?'
KENS 5 San Antonio by Joe Conger http://www.kens5.com/news/local/More-toxic-than-lead--134366538.html
16) “Dental health of low-income children is not good locally,” by Anne Geggis, December 3, 2011
http://www.gainesville.com/article/20111203/ARTICLES/111209857/-1/entertainment?Title=Dental-health-of-low-income-children-is-not-good-locally
17) “N.Ky. kids' teeth at risk,”
November 27,2011 http://nky.cincinnati.com/article/AB/20111127/NEWS0103/111270308/-N-Ky-kids-teeth-risk?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|FRONTPAGE
18) http://www.FluorideNews.Blogspot.com
19) “Half of young children have tooth decay,”Dec 7, 2011 http://news.ninemsn.com.au/health/8386146/half-of-young-children-have-tooth-decay
20)
http://oaklandlocal.com/article/dental-care-poor-challenging-oakland-across-state
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
Read the truth produced in the best scientific information on fluoridation here: (http://www.fluoridealert.org). You will see a petition signed by almost 4000 professionals, including hundreds of dentists, hundreds of doctors, and other medical researchers calling on governments everywhere to stop fluoridation.
There are many large scientific studies there to show that drinking fluoridated water has no positive effect on cavity reduction and to show that it causes cancer, thyroid damage, broken hips from brittle bones, lowered IQ and other health problems.
THe World Health Organization studied 16 countries and showed fluoride is of no value for teeth. Europe has rejected it and is 98% fluoride free. Many other large scientific studies in several countries show the same ineffectiveness.
If fluoride were "proven," there should be evidence of its success in Kentucky, which has been 100% fluoridated for over 40 years. However, government records show that Kentucky leads the nation in the number of dental cavities in children, and in the number of completely toothless adults. The same ineffectiveness is evident in many states and cities.
The industrial toxic waste fluoride used (Hexafluorosilicic acid) cures nothing and heals nothing and has never been tested or approved by FDA (in the USA) as safe and effective for human ingestion.
Even if fluoride was helpful to teeth, distributing any drug in drinking water is the most expensive and wasteful method. As a Civil Engineer, I know that people drink only 1/2% (one-half percent) of the water they use. The remaining 99 ½ % of the water with this toxic fluoride chemical (Hexafluorosilicic acid) is dumped directly into the environment through the sewer system.
For example, for every $1000 of fluoride chemical added to water, $995 would be directly wasted down the drain in toilets, showers, dishwashers, etc., $5 would be consumed in water by the people, and less than $0.50 (fifty cents) would be consumed by children, the target group for this outdated practice.
That would be comparable to buying one gallon of milk, using six-and-one-half drops of it, and pouring the rest of the gallon in the sink.
Fluoridation surely is in contention as the most wasteful government program. Giving away fluoride tablets free to anyone who wants them would be far cheaper and certainly more ethical, because then we would have the freedom to choose.
There are many large scientific studies there to show that drinking fluoridated water has no positive effect on cavity reduction and to show that it causes cancer, thyroid damage, broken hips from brittle bones, lowered IQ and other health problems.
THe World Health Organization studied 16 countries and showed fluoride is of no value for teeth. Europe has rejected it and is 98% fluoride free. Many other large scientific studies in several countries show the same ineffectiveness.
If fluoride were "proven," there should be evidence of its success in Kentucky, which has been 100% fluoridated for over 40 years. However, government records show that Kentucky leads the nation in the number of dental cavities in children, and in the number of completely toothless adults. The same ineffectiveness is evident in many states and cities.
The industrial toxic waste fluoride used (Hexafluorosilicic acid) cures nothing and heals nothing and has never been tested or approved by FDA (in the USA) as safe and effective for human ingestion.
Even if fluoride was helpful to teeth, distributing any drug in drinking water is the most expensive and wasteful method. As a Civil Engineer, I know that people drink only 1/2% (one-half percent) of the water they use. The remaining 99 ½ % of the water with this toxic fluoride chemical (Hexafluorosilicic acid) is dumped directly into the environment through the sewer system.
For example, for every $1000 of fluoride chemical added to water, $995 would be directly wasted down the drain in toilets, showers, dishwashers, etc., $5 would be consumed in water by the people, and less than $0.50 (fifty cents) would be consumed by children, the target group for this outdated practice.
That would be comparable to buying one gallon of milk, using six-and-one-half drops of it, and pouring the rest of the gallon in the sink.
Fluoridation surely is in contention as the most wasteful government program. Giving away fluoride tablets free to anyone who wants them would be far cheaper and certainly more ethical, because then we would have the freedom to choose.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Donate
$195.00 donated
in the past month
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network