From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
The Fake Budget Debate in DC
By definition, a "debate" requires two opposing sides holding mutually exclusive opinions. In the U.S. Congress, however, real debate has all but vanished. Instead, we are subjected to endless blather that — if you listen closely — is a simple discussion over splitting hairs.
There can be no U.S. budget debate when both sides have already agreed that massive cuts to social programs — including Medicare and Social Security — will be the foundation of any plan.
There can be no U.S. budget debate when both sides have already agreed that massive cuts to social programs — including Medicare and Social Security — will be the foundation of any plan.
With this fundamental agreement already in place, Democrats and Republicans are pathetically trying to create a division where none exists. The right wing looks especially foolish, since Obama has been furiously sprinting to the political right throughout the budget "debate,” having already overtaken the right-wing deficit hawks; in response, the hawks have gotten more hawkish and restarted their rightward dash in a desperate attempt to appear in "opposition" to the right-wing President.
For example, the Republicans originally demanded that an astonishing $4 trillion be cut from the U.S. budget, mainly through cuts to social programs. Not to be outdone, Obama presented a plan that would cut $4 trillion, mainly through cuts to social programs. The furthest right are the so-called Tea Party Republicans, who want to cut $10 trillion by essentially privatizing the entire U.S. Government.
But, back to the hair splitting. Obama calls the $4 trillion Republican plan "radical,” and he's right; the plan seeks to privatize Medicare, destroy Medicaid, gut other social programs, lower corporate tax rates, etc.
But Obama is a radical budget cutter too; he seeks to gut Medicare/Medicaid by $480 billion(!), slash spending for many crucial programs for the poor, and privatize public education through his corporate-sponsored Race to the Top program.
Obama is trying to make his plan seem progressive by talking about "taxing the rich,” but this is a lie. Finally allowing the Bush-era tax cuts to expire is not "taxing the rich" (Bush himself planned for the cuts to have expired already, but Obama agreed to extend them.)
Obama's recent tough speech against the Republicans was the first sign of life for the President, just in time for him to begin his presidential run for 2012, which will surely be full of promises that will never see the light of day.
As the President wages a "battle" over secondary budget issues, such as how best to make $4 trillion in cuts, the main issues are already agreed upon. Economist Richard Reich helps explain:
"...the Democratic leadership in Congress refuse to refute the Republicans' big lie — that spending cuts will lead to more jobs. In fact, spending cuts now will lead to fewer jobs. They'll slow down an already-anemic recovery. That will cause immense and unnecessary suffering for millions of Americans"
"The president continues to legitimize the Republican claim that too much government spending caused the economy to tank, and that by cutting back spending we'll get the economy going again." (April 10, 2011).
This two-party big lie is not an accident, but an expression of a deeper held belief: that the U.S. government must be directed to meet the needs of the super wealthy who own U.S. corporations. Holding this belief requires that you gut social programs (since corporations hate paying taxes) and privatize everything publicly owned (so corporations can own them for profit).
As long as both Democrats and Republicans agree to these deeper beliefs, the country will shift continually to the right, with social programs and living standards evaporating. However, the stronger that labor and community groups unite and fight to save these social programs, the harder will it be to cut them; out of such a struggle will emerge practical solutions to solving the deficit problems of the country, such as dramatically increasing the taxes on the rich and corporations so that jobs can be created and social programs saved.
For more information:
http://www.workerscompass.org
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
Sorry comrades, but you don't understand our political system at all. Our parties are not ideological in the sense that you think parties should be and over time what coalition of intetrests they represent changes. Changes slowly, but indeed changes. If you looked 100 years ago you would have seen an internal battle within the Republican Party over whether they were to represent business interests or workers/farmers and the Democrats of that day were not the liberals following their absorption of many socialist interests several decades later).
Cause and effect. In essense, with "first past the post" vote counting all politics is a fight for the middle. Which means if one party (foolishly) moves far rightward the other party will (wisely) move rightward also to guarantee victory by capturing the middle. You can see THAT happening now but what you can't seem to understand is that the other way would be true. If the Democrats moved far leftward the Republicans would move back left too to try to shut the Democratrs out.
Your problem is perhaps lack of commitment to democracy? The bulk of the people ARE in the middle, and democracy isn't about making good, wise, just, in their own best interests (if only they knew better) decisions but when workign properly just the decisions that "the people" want, for good or ill.
STOP COMPLAINING and stop trying to pretend the blame belongs elesewhere than where it does. The reason that the left interests are currently irrelevant in US politics is that WE who want those things have failed to convince the people to want them also. We have been incompetent at popularizing our vision for a better world.
Cause and effect. In essense, with "first past the post" vote counting all politics is a fight for the middle. Which means if one party (foolishly) moves far rightward the other party will (wisely) move rightward also to guarantee victory by capturing the middle. You can see THAT happening now but what you can't seem to understand is that the other way would be true. If the Democrats moved far leftward the Republicans would move back left too to try to shut the Democratrs out.
Your problem is perhaps lack of commitment to democracy? The bulk of the people ARE in the middle, and democracy isn't about making good, wise, just, in their own best interests (if only they knew better) decisions but when workign properly just the decisions that "the people" want, for good or ill.
STOP COMPLAINING and stop trying to pretend the blame belongs elesewhere than where it does. The reason that the left interests are currently irrelevant in US politics is that WE who want those things have failed to convince the people to want them also. We have been incompetent at popularizing our vision for a better world.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network