From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Related Categories: International | San Francisco | U.S. | Global Justice & Anti-Capitalism | Labor & Workers
NO to another NAFTA!
by Bill Carpenter (wcarpent [at]
Thursday Jan 20th, 2011 8:55 PM
As the Obama administration moves closer to introducing the NAFTA-style Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA) to Congress, citizens and activists joined Kim Kyung-Ran, Director of External Relations for the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions, in a rally at San Francisco's new Federal Building to oppose the deal.

Nine-minute QT movie. 42MB.

Representatives from labor, faith, environmental, fair trade, and family farm organizations called on Minority Leader Pelosi, Congress and President Obama to stop pursuing the KORUS FTA, an agreement expected to cost 159,000 American jobs and grant corporations in each country unprecedented rights to subvert public interest laws. President Obama, who campaigned against free trade agreements, has reached a revised deal with Korea, and is expected to introduce it to Congress for ratification soon.

The KORUS FTA is the Obama administration’s first potential trade agreement, and is a slight modification from the agreement negotiated by President Bush over three years ago. Since then, it has received little support from Congress or the public. In fact, according to an NBC/Wall Street Journal poll, 69% of Americans believe FTAs cost jobs, while just 17% think they help the American economy. This is not surprising, given that NAFTA-style trade deals have already cost Americans millions of jobs.

--California Fair Trade Coalition

No to Another NAFTA:
Pt. 1: Christine Ahn, Tim Robertson, Kim Kyung & Suh Seung Hye <-- This is Pt. 1.
Pt. 3: Anuradha Mittal & Frank Martín del Campo
Pt. 4: Steve Zeltzer
Pt. 5:

§NO to another NAFTA!
by Bill Carpenter Thursday Jan 20th, 2011 8:55 PM
§NO to another NAFTA!
by Bill Carpenter Thursday Jan 20th, 2011 8:55 PM
§NO to another NAFTA!
by Bill Carpenter Thursday Jan 20th, 2011 8:55 PM
§NO to another NAFTA!
by Bill Carpenter Thursday Jan 20th, 2011 8:55 PM

Comments  (Hide Comments)

by Robert B. Livingston
(robert.b.livingston [at] Friday Jan 21st, 2011 7:56 AM
To dispel all illusions, people should really begin calling the Fascists by name.
by Not Easy Closing Pandora's Box!
Saturday Jan 22nd, 2011 10:42 AM
Not another Pandora's box! It is difficult enough to close the first Pandora's box, NAFTA!!

There is now a bipartisan resolution to repeal the failed NAFTA free trade agreement, though it is not certain in will succeed. Once Pandora's box is opened, it is difficult to put all the demons back inside the box!!

Though in reality NAFTA was not written in stone tablets and handed by GOD to Moses (or was it handed to Mr. William Clinton?) and can be repealed if not for the stubborness of the status quo from BOTH political parties and their corporate lobbyists!!

However, the honest individuals from both parties such as Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich have joined forces to support H.R. 4759 and repeal NAFTA. Let's just hope that the socialist left and libertarian right activists can put aside their differences and also support H.R. 4759!!

H.R.4759 - To provide for the withdrawal of the United States from the North American Free Trade Agreement.

3/4/2010--Introduced.Withdraws Congress' approval of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Directs the President to provide written notice of the withdrawal to the governments of Canada and Mexico.

check status here;

Background on H.R. 4759;

"Bill requires U.S. withdrawal from NAFTA

'Proponents have had more than enough time to make this work – it didn't'

Posted: March 12, 2010
12:45 am Eastern

By Chelsea Schilling
© 2010 WorldNetDaily

"A coalition of 27 lawmakers from across the political spectrum is sponsoring a bill to withdraw the U.S. from the North American Free Trade Agreement in as little as six months.

Rep. Gene Taylor, D-Miss., has introduced H.R. 4759, "To provide for the withdrawal of the United States from the North American Free Trade Agreement."

"NAFTA and similar free-trade agreements have resulted in a 29 percent decline in U.S. manufacturing employment since 1993," Taylor's office said in a statement. "NAFTA discourages investments in U.S. manufacturing facilities and accelerates the erosion of our industrial base."

Taylor called the loss of manufacturing jobs a matter of national defense. He pointed out that the U.S. had a trade surplus of $1.7 billion with Mexico in 1993, prior to its entry into NAFTA – and that number turned into a deficit that peaked at $75 billion in 2007 and dropped to $47 billion by 2009. Additionally, his office said the trade deficit with Canada in 1993 was $11 billion prior to NAFTA, swelling to $78 billion and dropping back to $20 billion with the decline of the economy in 2009.

"I voted against this legislation in 1993 because I knew that this trade agreement would lead to a decline in jobs and our industrial manufacturing base," Taylor said. "Just look at what happened when the Department of Defense needed to rapidly build Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles."

Taylor explained that the Department of Defense sought to increase the number of MRAP vehicles in Iraq in 2007 and purchased 17,700. He said because of diminished manufacturing capacity, it took nine different contractors working together to build all those vehicles.

"The decline in our manufacturing base left the contractors without a trained workforce to build these vehicles. This led to delays and choke points in production and overall delivery of the MRAPs," he said. "This was a logistical nightmare."

He continued, "Without a sufficient industrial base capable of mass production, we are forced to spend more tax dollars because each contractor had to train workers and reinvent the parts for production. In some cases, we were dependent on foreign countries. These contractors had to literally reinvent the wheel or purchase the tires from France and Israel."

Taylor's office said that the U.S. has lost 29 percent of its manufacturing base since 1993 and that 5 million jobs have left the United States and never returned. Before 1993, U.S. manufacturing jobs were responsible for approximately 17 million jobs, it said. By 2009 U.S. manufacturing employment dropped to about 12 million workers.

"Jim Hoffa, head of the Teamsters, one of the nation's oldest and largest labor unions that represents 1.4 million American workers, applauded Taylor's legislation.

"The lives of average workers in Mexico and in the U.S. have gotten so much worse since NAFTA," Hoffa said in a press release. "When you realize you've made a bad deal, you try to get out of it."

Hoffa said Americans were "sold a bill of goods" about NAFTA.

"We were told it would create export jobs because they were dying to buy our refrigerators, they were dying to buy our cars. None of that happened."

Likewise, Rep. Walter Jones, R-N.C., told the Democratic Daily, "The American people are suffering. NAFTA has resulted in significant U.S. job losses. One of the major reasons Americans are working for lower pay and fewer benefits is that free-trade agreements like NAFTA have pushed millions of good paying jobs outside our borders. This just is not what the people of this country need or deserve. We need to bring jobs back to the American people."

Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., told Michigan's Saginaw News, "Tell me somewhere NAFTA created a job. You're not going to find very many. Tell me where people have lost jobs because of NAFTA, and you'll find thousands of them."

Columnist Devvy Kidd reacted to news of Taylor's legislation: "'Free' trade has all but destroyed our most important and productive jobs sectors: manufacturing, agriculture and industrial. Not to mention stomping on our sovereignty. … We are full of rage, but here is our first very real shot at getting out of NAFTA. I sincerely hope the national tea-party groups will embrace this fight and make it a priority as well as every American who fully understands how important it is to get out of that treaty."

The complete text of Taylor's bill is as follows:

(a) Withdrawal of Approval- Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the approval of the NAFTA by the Congress provided for in section 101(a) of the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act shall cease to be effective beginning on the date that is six months after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(b) Notification of Withdrawal- On the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall provide to the Governments of Canada and Mexico written notice of withdrawal of the United States from the NAFTA in accordance with Article 2205 of the NAFTA.

(c) NAFTA Defined- In this section, the term 'NAFTA' means the North American Free Trade Agreement entered into between the United States, Canada, and Mexico on December 17, 1992.

The legislation would withdraw approval of NAFTA and requires the president to notify Canada and Mexico of the U.S. withdrawal from the treaty. H.R. 4759 has been referred to the House Ways and Means Committee for further consideration.

Co-sponsors of H.R. 4759 include Rep. Michael Arcuri, D-N.Y.; Rep. Joe Baca, D-Calif.; Rep. Roscoe Bartlett, R-Md.; Rep. Bruce Braley, D-Iowa; Rep. Michael Capuano, D-Mass.; Rep. Jerry Costello, D-Ill.; Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-Ore.; Rep. Bob Filner, D-Calif.; Rep. Raul Grijalva, D-Ariz.; Rep. Phil Hare, D-Ill.; Rep. Maurice Hinchey, D-N.Y.; Rep. Walter Jones, R-N.C.; Rep. Steve Kagen, D-Wis.; Rep. Marcy Kaptur, D-Ohio; Rep. Mike McIntyre, D-N.C.; Rep. Michael Michaud, D-Maine; Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas; Rep. Mark Schauer, D-Mich.; Rep. Fortney Stark, D-Calif.; Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich.; Rep. Peter Viclosky, D-Ind.; Rep. Charles Wilson, D-Ohio; and Rep. Lynn Woolsey, D-Calif.

Former U.S. ambassador to Canada David Wilkins said the bill "just makes no sense" because "the United States is not losing jobs to Canada."

"It's shortsighted, it might be good local politics, it might please the labor unions, but it's terrible public policy," Wilkins told Power Play. "And a stand-alone bill like this I think with our system of government, where it's easy to block legislation, I think it would be very difficult for them to pass this."

According to the Canadian Broadcasting Centre, Canada's international trade minister, Peter Van Loan, said, "Our evaluation is that this is certainly inconsistent with the direction that the Barack Obama administration has chosen ... and as such we're optimistic that [the bill] will not come to pass."

WND has reported that President Obama has actively backtracked on his campaign promises to renegotiate NAFTA to get provisions more favorable to U.S. workers and U.S. jobs.

During the presidential campaign, Obama was forced to fire from his campaign an important economic adviser. Austan Goolsbee, an economics professor at the University of Chicago business school, was dismissed after reporters learned he had traveled to Canada to reassure Canadians that Obama's campaign promises to renegotiate NAFTA were just campaign rhetoric.

In the Ohio and Pennsylvania Democratic Party primaries, candidate Obama had pledged to renegotiate NAFTA as part of his appeal to Ohio and Pennsylvania workers who have lost manufacturing jobs under the free-trade agreements negotiated by Presidents Clinton and George W. Bush.

"We're well aware of what he said during the campaign, and we want the things reviewed and looked at," Stupak said. "We think it's run its course. All the rosy predictions they had about NAFTA have fallen flat."

Stupak told the Saginaw News it would take 218 votes in the House and 51 votes in the Senate to overturn NAFTA. He also said it would take a supermajority of 60 Senate votes to bring it up for a decision.

"It's an uphill battle," he said. "No doubt about it."

Upon announcing the legislation, Taylor said, "Timing is everything in life, and it's the right time to pass this legislation. Proponents have had more than enough time to make this work. It didn't."

Saturday Jan 22nd, 2011 2:28 PM
1/29 Stop KORUS March and Rally-Another NAFTA Type Agreement With Korea

From Congresswomen's Pelosi's Home To The Korean Consulate-Stop This Anti-People Trade Deal!
Protest the Korean-US KORUS Free Trade Agreement
Saturday Jan 29, 2011 11:00 AM 2740 Broadway St Assemble
with March To 3500 Clay St. /Laurel St. Korean Consulate
San Francisco

Although Obama promised he would not push another NAFTA
type agreement with South Korea, the recently negotiated
agreement does nothing to defend labor rights in either
Korea or the US. It will allow further outsourcing and more
temporary and part time workers in Korea and the US through
the deregulation of the labor market. In Korea today 50% of
the workers have now been forced into the temporary workforce.
It will also destroy the economic lives of tens of thousands of Korean farmers.
Today in Korea, dozens of trade unionists are also in jail
for labor activity including striking.
Public workers are also not allowed to unionize and the Teachers Korean Union
KTU was raided by the police for lobbying against legislation that would
hurt education.
At the same time this agreement will force privatization of the
Korean national healthcare system in part by forcing high drug
prices on the Korean healthcare system. This is why Pfizer and other big
Pharma multi-nationals have fully backed this agreement along
with other multi-national food and auto companies who will benefit.
We are calling on Congresswomen Pelosi to vote NO on this
agreement. She voted yes on NAFTA and that agreement
has harmed the people of Mexico and the US lowering wages
and destroying communities and jobs. We can't afford more
deregulation, privatization and union busting from KORUS.

This event has been sponsored by California Fair Trade Coalition, United Public Workers For
Action , The No On KORUS Coalition, San Francisco Peace and Freedom Party
For information phone (415)282-1908 or (415)987-4870