What is at stake at KPFA

Subject: What is at stake at KPFA

What is at stake in the conflict at KPFA? It is not the continued
existence of the Morning Show. It will be back with new hosts. It is
not the competence of the hosts. By all accounts, they did a fine job.
It is not whether there will be local programming at KPFA. Local
programming has been a mainstay of the Pacifica Network and will
continue to be.

What is at stake is the financial viability of the Pacifica
Foundation, and its ability to manage the stations in the network.
That viability depends on the ability of each of the stations to raise
sufficient money to meet payroll and expenses. That hasn’t been
happening at KPFA for at least two years.

The board in 2009 mandated reductions in staff that the management at
the time didn’t make and the ED didn’t enforce. The cash reserves of
KPFA, about $800,000 dollars in 2009, are now gone, The board has
again this year observed that reductions had to be made, and our
Executive Director is seeing to it that it happens.

She has the unanimous support of the board for the principles that she
laid out for the reductions, respect for seniority, the best interests
of KPFA and the network, maintaining the programming grid where
possible, and keeping the strongest possible skill set at the station.

The Pacifica Foundation owns the licenses for all five stations.
Should one station failing to meet its expenses drain the resources of
the network past what can be sustained by the remaining stations, the
entire network will be bankrupt and the fate of all five stations will
be in the hands of a bankruptcy court judge. The board has the
responsibility of seeing to it that that doesn’t happen.

Some have attempted to make the salary of the national staff,
consisting of an ED, a CFO, two accountants, an administrative
assistant, two part time technical workers and an affiliates station
coordinator, an issue. Or the in person meetings of the board now
costing half of what they cost for the previous 6 years. This level of
staffing the salaries and the expenses are minimal in managing a $12
million dollars/year enterprise. To the extent that this accusation
stems from a desire to have no national collective supervision, and
ultimately no network but a collection of five independent stations,
this is misguided both in purpose and strategy. The times require a
national network, and the outcome of bankruptcy hearings will not be
five progressive stations running their own affairs, but more likely
two commercial stations and three new Christian radio channels.

KPFA has been a bulwark of the network in the past. The farsightedness
of the leadership created and then supported the growth of the other
stations. The network has been a strength for all of us, recently when
money had to be transferred from KPFT to pay salaries at KPFA, and
in the past when contributions from the other stations kept KPFT on
the air.

I ask that you support the Pacifica National Board and its Executive
director Arlene Englehardt in maintaining the financial viability of
the Pacifica Foundation and its ability to manage and develop the
network.

George Reiter

Chair, Pacifica National Board