From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Related Categories: International | Police State & Prisons
Canada spending nearly $1billion on G20/G8 security
by G&M repost
Friday May 28th, 2010 4:21 PM
($1billion in canadian dollars. By contrast, the cost of the Oakland Bay Bridge is about $6 billion. The state budget of California is $144 billion).

Parliament’s budget watchdog has begun probing the hefty and controversial $1-billion security bill for the two global summits the Harper government is holding next month in Ontario.

Parliamentary Budget Officer Kevin Page says his study will founder, however, if the Conservatives fail to provide him with the necessary records to scrutinize policing and protective spending for the Group of Eight and Group of 20 meetings.
“We will investigate with the purpose of issuing a report for parliamentarians and Canadians,” Mr. Page told The Globe and Mail.

“For the report to be helpful, we will need co-operation from the government on information and this will need to be done in a timely manner.”

The $930-million the Conservatives say is necessary for policing costs appears to outstrip by far what other countries have spent protecting similar events, even if calculations account for two meetings instead of one.

Defending the tab on Thursday, Public Safety Minister Vic Toews said the bombing of an Ottawa bank branch on May 19 justifies the government’s security bill. An anarchists group claimed responsibility for the blast, which caused an estimated $300,000 in damage, and warned it would be at the G8 summit in Muskoka and the G20 gathering in Toronto.

“Canadians were shocked last week over the fire bombing at the Royal Bank in Ottawa,” Mr. Toews told the Commons. “This is a prime example why we need to be prepared to face thugs and terrorists who threaten our safety.”

Opposition parties, however, said the rising tab is only the latest misstep on the summit. Ottawa was forced to move the G20 part of the event to downtown Toronto last fall because the demands of accommodating 20 leaders proved too much for the Muskoka region.

“The handling of this issue is comical,” Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff said.

“We would not organize a children's party this way, and now we are on the hook for a billion-dollar security charge on top of a $54-billion deficit.”

The opposition parties have asked both Auditor-General Sheila Fraser and Mr. Page to scrutinize the spending in light of the fact that security cost so much less for previous summits, including the United Kingdom’s G20 gathering in April of 2009, which ran a tab of only $30-million.

“How can this government and these Conservatives justify spending 30 times more than London did just a year ago to talk about austerity?” NDP Leader Jack Layton asked.

Mr. Page said his staff will compare the security bill of the G8 and G20 gatherings to those of past summits and probe whether the Tory government has been transparent about the costs. In March, the government released figures suggesting the bill would be only $179-million – although now it says that was only the first tranche of spending.

Mr. Toews said he would welcome scrutiny by Mr. Page.

Separately, Toronto Police Chief Bill Blair said his police force – with help from forces in other municipalities – will use only $50-million to $100-million of funds allotted for securing the G20 meeting.

“We did not see this as a windfall opportunity,” Chief Blair told reporters on Thursday evening.

The biggest cost, Chief Blair said, is staffing. But gear also adds incrementally to the bill. For example, Toronto police bought four long-range acoustic devices, which emit noise to disperse crowds and can cost as much as $25,000 each.
Associated Press Writer Rob Gillies, Associated Press Writer – Thu May 27, 5:13 pm ET

TORONTO – Canada's Conservative government says the nearly $1 billion it plans to spend on security at the G-8 and G-20 summits next month is worth it.

Canada has budgeted up to $930 Canadian (US$885 million) for the summits. By comparison, the stated amount spent by Pittsburgh on security for last September's G-20 summit was US$12.4 million. London's stated amount for the G-20 last year was US$10.9 million.

Public Safety Minister Vic Toews said Thursday the cost is expensive but the security "worth it."

Toews argues that hosting separate summits back-to-back is unprecedented.

Canada is hosting the G-20 economic summit on June 26-27 in Toronto. The G-8 is meeting in Huntsville, Ontario, a day earlier.

Comments  (Hide Comments)

Some Globalists the G20 benefits! Are they worth $1.2 Billion dollars? ROCKEFELLER'S SPEECH In 1971 David Rockefeller predicted that globalization of ... After Deindustrialization: Uneven Growth and Economic Inequality in ..... the interests of the power elite of Europe and North America. ... In 1973, the Rockefeller Foundation again gave $500,000 to the Population Council and $25,000 to the Population Crisis Committee, while the Rockefeller Brothers Fund gave $250,000 to the Population Council, and $250,000 to the Population Institute.The Population Council was founded by John D. Rockefeller the 3rd in 1952. Osborn stated in the 1956 edition of "The Eugenics Review John Holdren: Forced abortions. Mass sterilization. A "Planetary Regime" with the power of life and death over American citizens. The tyrannical fantasies of a madman? Or merely the opinions of the person now in control of science policy in the United States? Or both? These ideas (among many other equally horrifying recommendations) were put forth by John Holdren, whom Barack Obama has recently appointed Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, and Co-Chair of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology -- informally known as the United States' Science Czar. Henry Kissinger allowed the Khmer Rouge to grasp golden opportunities," Kai Moon: The One World Government has specific requirements, Ban added, namely a "legally binding" commitment to "25 to 40 percent greenhouse gas reduction . . . as recommended by the IPCC, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change." My point does our Canadian Government advocate "showing off" and "super hosting", some of the world's nastiest psychopathic aristocrats, who'd have Canadians dressed in loin cloths and hanging from our maple trees in a New York minute! But yet our minority elected government sees fit to entertain them to the tune $1.2 Billion dollars, while we have a defecit of over $50 Billion dollars created by design by, some of the same people we are entertaing? Tell Prime Minister Stephen Harper how you feel about this aristocratic show we the pians are witnessing at: Re:Don't Tread On Me - Rise Of The Republic Part-1 of 11