From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Related Categories: Health, Housing, and Public Services
BHA's public housing residents were not informed of their rights
by Lynda Carson (tenantsrule [at]
Monday Mar 29th, 2010 10:51 PM
BHA's public housing residents were not informed of their rights, when served notice and after being sent notice of the BHA's plan to sell Berkeley's public housing units!

BHA's public housing residents were not informed of their rights

By Lynda Carson -- March 29, 2010

Berkeley -- The Berkeley Housing Authority (BHA) did not inform it's public housing residents that they are protected by Berkeley's good cause rent laws that state it is not a good cause to evict, when a landlord (including the BHA) wants to sell an occupied residential rental property in Berkeley.

In addition, the BHA did not inform the public housing residents that they have the right to refuse to sign anything that materially changes the terms of their existing contracts, that would eliminate or void their eviction protections, under Berkeley's local good cause rent laws.

During late December 2009, the BHA filed a disposition plan with HUD to announce that the BHA intends to terminate it's public housing program, and sell it's occupied public housing units to a developer.

To fulfill a federal disposition requirement, in a BHA October 27, 2009, notice and information packet sent to Berkeley's public housing residents, including a public relations informational brochure titled "Berkeley Housing Authority Preservation Plan -- Questions and Answers," the BHA legally informed Berkeley's public housing residents of the plan to sell Berkeley's public housing units to a local developer. The BHA also mentioned that all the public housing residents will be displaced from their housing, as a direct result of the scheme to sell their public housing units.

However, when doing so, the BHA failed to inform Berkeley's public housing residents that it is illegal for landlords to evict their residents when selling occupied residential buildings in Berkeley, and that this law also applies to the BHA.

The disposition plan (application DDA0003874) was filed by the BHA in late December 2009, is currently under review by Arona Wiley, and the BHA is expecting the Housing and Urban Development Agency (HUD) to approve the plan to sell Berkeley's public housing units, sometime in April, 2010.

Furthermore, documentation exists revealing that the BHA tried to compromise or may have compromised some attorneys with the East Bay Community Law Center and Bay Area Legal Aid, when the BHA invited members of the local law firms that represent low-income renters to a private meeting, to discuss the proposed sale of Berkeley's public housing properties. Berkeley's many public housing tenants were not at this meeting.

The BHA was well aware before the meeting, that the public housing residents may need future assistance and legal representation from either of the law firms representing low-income renters, if or when the tenants chose to fight back against any attempts by the BHA to evict or relocate them from their housing, because of the BHA's plan to sell it's 75 public housing units.

For legal purposes, most or all of Berkeley's public housing residents should have been at this private meeting between the BHA and the local law firms that are representing the Bay Areas low-income renters, while the discussions took place regarding the plan to sell Berkeley's public housing units. At this point, the tenants could have been immediately informed by the law firms representing tenants, that landlords are not allowed to evict, when selling residential properties in Berkeley, including the Berkeley Housing Authority.

During a discussion with Gracie Jones of the East Bay Community Law Center (EBCLC) on March 29, 2010, when I asked why Berkeley's public housing tenants were not informed that it is illegal for landlords (including the BHA) to evict their renters when selling a property in Berkeley, Ms. Jones stated that no public housing residents were at the BHA's meeting that day.

Records reveal that 2 informational meetings were held by the BHA on Nov. 3, 2009, at the South Berkeley Senior Center, where the public housing residents were additionally informed about the BHA's plan to sell it's 75 public housing units, and the BHA's plan to displace the public housing residents from their long-time homes as a direct result.

During the Nov. 3, 2009, 1:30pm BHA meeting, 26 residents appeared, and during the second meeting on Nov. 3, 2009, only 18 public housing residents appeared. Additionally, in the minutes from those public meetings it was recorded that Berkeley's public housing tenants said that they believe they are being kicked out of their public housing by the efforts to gentrify Berkeley, that they were victims of the previous council, that their rights are being violated, and that they do not trust the Berkeley Housing Authority.

However, in a stunning bizarre development, public documents also reveal that the BHA and it's relocation (displacement) consultant Overland, Pacific and Cutler (OPC), had also met privately with members of the legal services advocacy community on Nov. 3, 2009 (a 3rd BHA meeting on Nov.3, 2009).

In this meeting, members of Bay Area Legal Services (Bay Legal), East Bay Community Law Center (EBCLC) and the National Housing Law Project (NHLP) joined the BHA and it's consultants for a discussion about the BHA's plan to sell Berkeley's public housing units.

When I asked Ms. Jones who else attended the private Nov. 3, 2009, BHA meeting, she stated that Lisa Grief of Bay Area Legal Services was at the same meeting, but stated that she could not recall who else attended the meeting.

Indeed, public records reveal that on Nov. 3, 2009, low-income renter legal representatives Lisa Grief (Bay Legal), Gracie Jones (EBCLC), Sharon Djernal (EBCLC), and Catherine Bishop (NHLP) were all at the BHA's little private meeting, when Berkeley's many public housing residents were not present at the meeting. Others at the BHA's little meeting included BHA consultants Eric Novak of Praxis Consulting, and BHA displacement consultant Chad Wakefield of OPC.

No one picked up the phone at Bay Area Legal Services when I repeatedly called to inquire further into the private Nov. 3, 2009, BHA meeting that included members of Bay Area Legal Services, East Bay Community Law Center (EBCLC) and the National Housing Law Project (NHLP).

Documents also reveal that the BHA intentionally used members of the legal services advocacy community and Berkeley's public housing residents in it's all out push to convince HUD to approve the plan to sell Berkeley's public housing units.

Records reveal that the BHA sent copies to HUD, of all the the sign-in sheets that were signed by people who appeared at the three Nov. 3, 2009, BHA meetings. Another breach of trust by the BHA, to all who were not informed in advance that copies of the sign-in sheets would be sent to HUD by the BHA, in the effort to pressure HUD into approving the plan to sell Berkeley's public housing units.

In addition, during my discussion with Ms. Jones, she also stated that she knows it is illegal for landlords to evict tenants in Berkeley when trying to sell a property (including landlord BHA), and she further stated that if I hear of any public housing tenants facing eviction from their housing because the BHA wants to sell it's public housing units, that I should tell the tenants to immediately call the East Bay Community Law Center (EBCLC).

Additionally, I also asked Ms. Jones when the EBCLC plans to serve notices to Berkeley's public housing residents to let them know that it is illegal for landlords to evict in Berkeley when trying to sell their residential buildings, and asked her when the tenants would be informed that they do not have to sign anything if they do not want to, regarding the BHA's plan to sell Berkeley's 75 public housing units.

In reply, Ms. Jones stated that she is not an attorney, that she does not know what the plan is for the EBCLC regarding the BHA's public housing renters, and that her supervisor (Sharon) will be out of town for at least 2 weeks.

As of the afternoon of March 29, 2010, according to BHA consultant OPC, the BHA has not yet received approval from HUD to sell it's public housing units, and that the BHA has not yet sent out an RFQ (request for qualifications) in an effort to see who is the best nonprofit developer that may be qualified or interested in buying Berkeley's occupied public housing units.

Lynda Carson may be reached at tenantsrule [at]

Comments  (Hide Comments)

A little background info on BHA's Disposition Plan, reviewer Arona Wiley

The BHA's Disposition Plan application is being reviewed by Arona Wiley of HUD, in the Chicago-land area...

No doubt, the City of Berkeley, the BHA and Berkeley's public housing residents have the highest confidence in HUD's choice of Arona Wiley, as the best person available to review the BHA's disposition application (scheme) to terminate Berkeley's public housing program, and plan to sell Berkeley's 75 public housing units.

Pubic records show that Arona Wiley resides in Gary, Indiana, along with her husband Joshua, right next door to Chicago.

See more about the Arona Wiley - Joshua Wiley family below...


Arona M. Wiley -- Age 52?

Arona Wiley

Click below for details...

Arona Wiley

3630 E 12th Ave
Gary, IN 46403-3422

Joshua Wiley

Arona,Wiley -- awiley57 [at],
3630 E. 12th Avenue,Gary, Indiana, 46403

( Note: Arona Wiley is also a Notary Public (LC) )

Notaries Public Search


There were 2 matches to your search.

Please pick a record below and click on the "Get the Record" button.


Commission Number:


Expire Date:

Teminate Date: It does not say...

GARY , IN   46403

Bonding Agent:

Primary County:



Commission Number: 517024

There were 1 history records on this notary!

Action Date: 06/03/02

Action: N


Address: 1112 UTAH STREET
GARY  IN   46403 
County: LAKE

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
Reviewer: Arona Wiley. Status Date: 12/29/2009. OMB Approval No. 2577-0075 .... Arona Wiley. 12/29/2009. Section 5: Description of Proposed Removal Action ...

Click below for the BHA's disposition plan, sent to HUD, and under review by the one and only, Arona Wiley...


Arona.M.Wiley [at]
Staff Directory - Special Applications Center (SAC) - HUD
Arona Wiley. Public Housing Revitalization Specialist. (312) 913-8021 ...
Joshua & Arona Wiley

Click below for links to info about the Joshua / Arona Wiley family, in Gary, Indiana...

(See article below that involves Arona Wiley & her husband Joshua Wiley)

Nov 29, 2006 9:27 am US/Central
Gary Police Sergeant Accused Of Bilking Neighbor
Authorities: Sgt. Joshua Wiley Took Helen Chentnik's House, Spent Most Of Her Savings

By Lori Caldwell / Post-Tribune
GARY, Ind. (Post-Tribune) ―

1 of 1

Gary police Sgt. Joshua Wiley befriended his elderly Aetna neighbor, Helen Chentnik. Then he dumped her into a nursing home, moved into her house and spent most of her savings, court records state.

Wiley, 48, an 18-year Gary Police Department veteran, is charged with six felony counts, including fraud on a financial institution, exploitation of an endangered adult and theft.

"Joshua Wiley gained control of approximately $138,495.46 of Helen R. Chentnik's assets through his deceptive scheme as set forth above," the four-page probable cause affidavit states.

In the past four years, Wiley allegedly cashed the woman's pension and Social Security checks, took money from her savings account and forged a quit claim deed to obtain ownership of her house.

He and his wife, Arona, a Gary Housing Authority employee, are living in Chentnik's home, next door to his residence.

Since April 1, 2004, when Wiley admitted Chentnik into Clark Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, officials say neither Wiley nor his wife ever visited their neighbor.

Debits from Chentnik's account include $318 to Kay Jewelers, $900 to Circuit City, more than $1,000 to Meijer, $245.69 to Kmart and "weekly debits between April 25, 2003, and Feb. 25, 2004, from Key Market and Walgreens," the affidavit states.

Lake County Adult Protective Services Director Mark Mora contacted police after an alert teller, Marina Zemlik, noticed the sudden decrease in Chentnik's savings account at U.S. Federal Credit Union.

"She was suspicious of the debits taken from Chentnik's account and she said that common sense would tell you that an elderly woman would not eat $200 in groceries per week," the affidavit states.

"Both Joshua and Arona Wiley (brought) Helen Chentnik into the credit union, and the Wileys would tell Zemlik how much money they wanted to withdraw from Helen's account. She would then have Helen sign the receipt and observe that Helen would never say anything and was quiet and would just stand there," the affidavit states.

Adult Protective Services froze the account in March 2004. A short time later, Joshua Wiley came to the credit union with a power of attorney document to withdraw cash. When he was denied, he said, "This is ridiculous. I'm a Gary cop and this is my power of attorney. Now take the freeze off." The teller said Wiley was "very cocky" during the exchange, the affidavit states.

On Jan. 18, 2005, Wiley executed a quit claim deed and took ownership of Chentnik's house for $10, court records state. Wiley told Mora Chentnik's son approved of the financial arrangement and provided a letter giving him power of attorney. Richard Chentnik died in federal prison two years ago.

Lake County Detective Michelle Weaver learned Chentnik, 87, suffers from dementia and senility and "was totally incapable of making any decisions," doctors reported.

Although Joshua Wiley never spoke to Weaver during her investigation, he told Mora that Chentnik was in the nursing home while he worked on repairs at her house. Weaver said she could not locate any building or construction permits for Chentnik's home.

Investigators said any documents Chentnik signed giving Wiley control over her finances and property "were considered invalid due to the fact that Helen could not appreciate nor recognize any document bearing her signature," court records state.

Wiley was not in custody Tuesday night. He will be held on $50,000 bond. Lake Superior Court Judge Diane Ross Boswell will preside over his case.

Wiley could face up to 20 years in prison if convicted of the charges.

His attorney, Jerry Peteet, told The Post-Tribune he would comment after reviewing the affidavit, but his cell phone was off and mail box was unable to accept messages Tuesday evening.

Wiley, recently assigned to a new "cold case" investigative unit, is expected to be transferred to a clerical job, police said.
(CBS 2 and the Post-Tribune are news partners covering stories in the communities of northwest Indiana. If you know of stories happening in this region, contact us.