Pair Creation of Momentum and Energy Hypothesis

I would post a You tube video about this question, but I don't have a web cam or video
software.

About 20 years ago when I was in college studying for my Physics BA I had a physics theory
or hypothesis concerning parallel universes. It seemed reasonable to me to postulate
that one universe had positive energy matter (ours) and one universe had negative energy
matter (theirs). I was vaugely aware of the quantum mechanical problem of trying to allow
negative energy states for matter in our universe. All I knew for sure was that the math
experts working on the problem found that there were infinities in the equations describing
the interactions between positive and negative energy matter. It seems reasonable to suggest
that a simple collision between a positive and a negative energy particle would produce
an infinite variety of outcomes. That was probably the basis for this problem.

In my theory I proposed that the two types of matter never interact, except under the
condition where v=0, ie when a very small negative energy particle is attached to a larger
positive energy particle and they always move together at the same velocity. In the earlier
version of the theory, the negative energy particle could have a mass of 1% the mass of the
positive energy particle. Since this mass was about equal to the nuclear binding energy, I
called the negative energy particle a potential energy component. It was only a strong-electro-weak force potential energy component though, since gravitational potential energy is harder to
determine and would likely be quite large. I was going to include this hypothesis in my Senior Thesis as an explanation for the 5th force that seemed to be cropping up in some of the gravity
experiments that were being reviewed in the late 1980's. Since all of the experiments except
the Stacey et al mine shaft experiment and the reviewed Eotovos experiment showed null results,
I would have proposed that there was a negative energy Earth in the exact same place as
the positive energy Earth and that the reason why the mine shaft experiment showed a 1%
deviation in the value of G was because of the potential energy components of the negative
energy Earth that were filling the mine shaft. The later experiment by the same researchers
using water filling or not filling an artificial lake was giving null results because only
positive energy water was being manipulated. There was another experiment that was done
under water in the Gulf of Mexico that showed a 2% deviation in the value of G, which could
be explained if there was a negative energy land mass in the Gulf of Mexico.

The hypothesis is called Pair Creation of Momentum and Enery (PCME), because when a mostly
positive energy atom and mostly negative energy atom collide, one of their potential energy
components contacts one of the atomic components of the same sign of energy (atomic
components are the larger conventional particles such as protons) and the reaction velocities from the collision are the same as if the colliding systems had masses equal only to the potential energy component mass that was struck and the total mass (PE component plus atomic mass) of the atomic component that was struck. Since momentum and energy is not conserved when the atomic component of the atom that had only its potential energy component struck continues to move at the same velocity as its potential energy component, a reaction happens called PCME, which makes up for this deficiency. It is not clear if the reaction produces photons or nuetrinos, but either of those types of particles, if they are massless, would suffice to produce a reaction that
conserves momentum and energy. Basically in a head on collision where the velocity vectors are
simply reversed, the reaction produces two photons or nuetrinos, one of positive energy
and one of negative energy, headed in opposite directions. The total momentum vector of
the photons or nuetrinos makes up for the momentum change of the atomic component that was
attached to the potential energy compoent that was struck. The additional kinetic energy is
made up the same way, as the two created particles have almost equal energy, except for any
red shift or blueshift that an external observer sees, which will not be identical for particles
traveling in opposite directions. Note that in this situation, where direct interactions
between positive and negative energy particles are only permitted when v=0, the energies and momenta of the final products of the reaction are finite and well defined, unlike what happens in conventional quantum mechanics.

After thinking about this some more, it seems that the idea that the potential energy components
have 1% the mass of the atomic components and that there is a negative energy coparallel Earth
seems unlikely. Some of the later gravity experiments searching for a 5th force using underground tunnels probably would have detected a 1% poential energy component, but they got null results.
Also, the gravitational potential energy between positive and negative energy matter (due to the gravitational interactions that occur simultaneously between both sets of potential and atomic components) would probably generate a repulsive force. Hence it is not likely that large clumps of negative energy matter will be found near positive energy matter. Since gravitational-inertial mass equivalence is violated by the interactions between the potential energy components of the same sign of energy, the limit on the size of such components in the abscence of a coparallel negative energy Earth is quite small, say 1/1000 of an electron volt or less for a proton potential component.

In any event, it would be interesting to see if there will ever be enough tracking data for
interstellar systems to find a case where a system appeared to be repelling from a clump
of dark matter. That could indicate the existence of negative energy matter. If the PCME
produced by such an interaction is electromagnetic, it might even be possible to tune into
it using a radio telescope. And as far as that goes, the existence of vast quantities of negative energy matter would change cosmological theories anyway since if the total gravity due to matter in the universe were a net zero value, this would lead to the formation of an open universe, which would require the addition of a particular cosmological constant to get the observed flat universe. Also there would now be a mechanism for deriving a particular tendency for star and galaxy formation as the repulsion of the negative energy matter would perturb the density of matter in the early universe in a specific way.

What do you think of my idea so far?