Publish to Newswire
Add an EventFrom the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Governor Holds State Hostage to Peripheral Canal Water Bond
Governor Holds State Hostage to Peripheral Canal Water Bond
by Dan Bacher
Governor Arnold "Fish Terminator" Schwarzenegger has told Legislative leaders that he wants a water package including a peripheral canal and dams on his desk by Friday night before he will act on 700 bills sitting on his desk. He is in effect holding the State of California hostage to his plan to build a monument to his gigantic ego, the peripheral canal, a budget-busting government boondoggle estimated to cost $23 to $53.8 billion to build, according to an analysis by economist Steven Kasower.
"Where are the adults in Sacramento?," asks Barbara Barrigan-Parrilla, campaign director of Restore the Delta, in the latest Delta Flows e-news."Yes, the Governor has told Legislative Leaders that he wants a water package on his desk by Friday night before he will act on the 700 bills sitting on his desk. But with a significant portion of the Legislature not in town, and members scattered all over the world presently, can that really happen?"
Schwarzenegger's strong-arming to produce a water bill on the Governor's desk by Friday night becomes even more absurd with the announcement that next Tuesday's Assembly Committee on Water, Parks and Wildlife is cancelled. Is Schwarzenegger, the former action hero now transformed into the worst Governor in California history, trying to force the Big Five to agree on a canal/dams water package without any hearings or public input?
"You may have noticed in today's Assembly Daily File that the Water, Parks & Wildlife Committee was scheduled to hold an informational hearing next Tuesday, and you may have read about the continuing discussions on the water package in Big 5 meetings," says Alf W. Brandt, principal consultant for the committee. "In order to maintain our focus on the discussions among the State's leaders, we decided to postpone any water hearings. We will keep you informed when further hearings are re-scheduled."
The "Big Five" is an informal institution of California state government, consisting of the Governor, Assembly Speaker Karen Bass, Assembly Minority Leader Sam Blakeslee, Senate President Pro tem Darrell Steinberg, and Senate Minority Leader Dennis Hollingsworth.
"In an e-mail sent by Steinberg to his caucus earlier this week," according to the Capitol Weekly, "Steinberg told Senate Democrats that the governor had suggested, but not formally asked, that the Senate pull back all bills from his desk until a water deal has been reached."
Assembly Majority Leader Alberto Torrico (D-Newark) said Tuesday the governor's actions "have clearly crossed the line" and accused him of "extortion."
"The legal definition of that behavior is extortion," Torrico told the Capitol Weekly. "I am sending a letter to the Attorney General urging him to investigate the matter."
The Governor's water bond would indebt Californians for years to come to build a project that would economically devastate coastal, Central Valley and Delta communities dependent on Sacramento River salmon and other fisheries and family farms on the Delta.
The proposed $12 billion general obligation Delta bonds would result in debt service costs of nearly $780 million per year to the General Fund for the next 30 years, according to a recently completed analysis by the East Bay Municipal Utility District (EMBUD) on the proposed water bond and the Delta Water Package outlined in the latest Restore the Delta e-news alert.
"The state budget deficit for the next three years is projected to be as much as $15 billion per year, and could climb even higher," the analysis states. "Even these dire projections may not represent the worst case, should California's economy continue to slide. The $780 million debt service burden would consume an increasing share of discretionary state funding, without counting the $1.3 billion annually that it will cost to service debt from resource bonds already approved since 2000. Which state programs are we willing to sacrifice to take on this massive, additional debt?"
"A realistic assessment of the total costs of the Delta legislation comes to $52 billion to $78 billion or more," the report continues. "This includes a series of huge capital projects: new Delta conveyance, construction of several new surface storage reservoirs, construction of other local water management and delivery projects, Delta levee strengthening, ecosystem restoration, and creation of three new state agencies and expanded state programs to prepare and implement the Delta Plan."
California is in its worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. How can Schwarzenegger and pro-canal legislators even consider proposing such an enormously costly and environmentally destructive project when the state budget for game wardens, teachers, health care for children and state parks is being slashed? What parallel universe devoid of logic, intelligence and common sense do the Governor and pro-canal legislators live in?
Below is the Delta Flows e-news from Restore the Delta, including a link to the Capitol Weekly article.
Photo: Governor Schwarzenegger gives remarks at the closing ceremony of the Governors’ Global Climate Summit 2 as he holds the state hostage to his demand that a peripheral canal water bond package arrive on his desk by Friday night. There is nothing "green" about Schwarzenegger's scorched earth policy toward fish and the environment.
by Dan Bacher
Governor Arnold "Fish Terminator" Schwarzenegger has told Legislative leaders that he wants a water package including a peripheral canal and dams on his desk by Friday night before he will act on 700 bills sitting on his desk. He is in effect holding the State of California hostage to his plan to build a monument to his gigantic ego, the peripheral canal, a budget-busting government boondoggle estimated to cost $23 to $53.8 billion to build, according to an analysis by economist Steven Kasower.
"Where are the adults in Sacramento?," asks Barbara Barrigan-Parrilla, campaign director of Restore the Delta, in the latest Delta Flows e-news."Yes, the Governor has told Legislative Leaders that he wants a water package on his desk by Friday night before he will act on the 700 bills sitting on his desk. But with a significant portion of the Legislature not in town, and members scattered all over the world presently, can that really happen?"
Schwarzenegger's strong-arming to produce a water bill on the Governor's desk by Friday night becomes even more absurd with the announcement that next Tuesday's Assembly Committee on Water, Parks and Wildlife is cancelled. Is Schwarzenegger, the former action hero now transformed into the worst Governor in California history, trying to force the Big Five to agree on a canal/dams water package without any hearings or public input?
"You may have noticed in today's Assembly Daily File that the Water, Parks & Wildlife Committee was scheduled to hold an informational hearing next Tuesday, and you may have read about the continuing discussions on the water package in Big 5 meetings," says Alf W. Brandt, principal consultant for the committee. "In order to maintain our focus on the discussions among the State's leaders, we decided to postpone any water hearings. We will keep you informed when further hearings are re-scheduled."
The "Big Five" is an informal institution of California state government, consisting of the Governor, Assembly Speaker Karen Bass, Assembly Minority Leader Sam Blakeslee, Senate President Pro tem Darrell Steinberg, and Senate Minority Leader Dennis Hollingsworth.
"In an e-mail sent by Steinberg to his caucus earlier this week," according to the Capitol Weekly, "Steinberg told Senate Democrats that the governor had suggested, but not formally asked, that the Senate pull back all bills from his desk until a water deal has been reached."
Assembly Majority Leader Alberto Torrico (D-Newark) said Tuesday the governor's actions "have clearly crossed the line" and accused him of "extortion."
"The legal definition of that behavior is extortion," Torrico told the Capitol Weekly. "I am sending a letter to the Attorney General urging him to investigate the matter."
The Governor's water bond would indebt Californians for years to come to build a project that would economically devastate coastal, Central Valley and Delta communities dependent on Sacramento River salmon and other fisheries and family farms on the Delta.
The proposed $12 billion general obligation Delta bonds would result in debt service costs of nearly $780 million per year to the General Fund for the next 30 years, according to a recently completed analysis by the East Bay Municipal Utility District (EMBUD) on the proposed water bond and the Delta Water Package outlined in the latest Restore the Delta e-news alert.
"The state budget deficit for the next three years is projected to be as much as $15 billion per year, and could climb even higher," the analysis states. "Even these dire projections may not represent the worst case, should California's economy continue to slide. The $780 million debt service burden would consume an increasing share of discretionary state funding, without counting the $1.3 billion annually that it will cost to service debt from resource bonds already approved since 2000. Which state programs are we willing to sacrifice to take on this massive, additional debt?"
"A realistic assessment of the total costs of the Delta legislation comes to $52 billion to $78 billion or more," the report continues. "This includes a series of huge capital projects: new Delta conveyance, construction of several new surface storage reservoirs, construction of other local water management and delivery projects, Delta levee strengthening, ecosystem restoration, and creation of three new state agencies and expanded state programs to prepare and implement the Delta Plan."
California is in its worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. How can Schwarzenegger and pro-canal legislators even consider proposing such an enormously costly and environmentally destructive project when the state budget for game wardens, teachers, health care for children and state parks is being slashed? What parallel universe devoid of logic, intelligence and common sense do the Governor and pro-canal legislators live in?
Below is the Delta Flows e-news from Restore the Delta, including a link to the Capitol Weekly article.
Photo: Governor Schwarzenegger gives remarks at the closing ceremony of the Governors’ Global Climate Summit 2 as he holds the state hostage to his demand that a peripheral canal water bond package arrive on his desk by Friday night. There is nothing "green" about Schwarzenegger's scorched earth policy toward fish and the environment.
Delta Flows e-News from Restore the Delta: Where are the adults in Sacramento?
Yes, the Governor has told Legislative Leaders that he wants a water package on his desk by Friday night before he will act on the 700 bills sitting on his desk. But with a significant portion of the Legislature not in town, and members scattered all over the world presently, can that really happen?
To read more about these events in Sacramento click here for an update from the Capitol Weekly, http://capitolweekly.net/article.php?_c=ybnf6scq2y5l9i&xid=ybl6q43i1glqv9&done=.ybnf6scq2yol9i#
Why is the Governor pushing for this water package?
Why are legislative leaders following his lead?
According to a recently complete analysis by the East Bay Municipal Utility District on the proposed water bond and the Delta Water Package:
"The proposed $12B GO Delta bonds would result in debt service costs of nearly $780M/year to the General Fund for the next 30 years."
"The state budget deficit for the next three years is projected to be as much as $15B per year, and could climb even higher. Even these dire projections may not represent the worst case, should California's economy continue to slide. The $780M debt service burden would consume an increasing share of discretionary state funding, without counting the $1.3B annually that it will cost to service debt from resource bonds already approved since 2000. Which state programs are we willing to sacrifice to take on this massive, additional debt?"
"State expenditures for resources-related GO bond debt have grown rapidly, from 8% of General Fund spending in 2000-01 to a whopping 36% in 2009-2010. Adding a $12B bond would simply break the bank. According to State Treasurer Lockyer, between now and 2028, the state will assume another $225 billion in general fund bonded indebtedness. This mounting debt burden is an unsustainable trend, and is already interfering with the state's efforts to address its growing environmental and resource needs."
And it's not just costs from a GO bond. It is simply shocking to Restore the Delta staff members that the Governor and Legislative Leaders could be in favor of this package during this time of economic crisis. Look at what California's urban water users will be expected to pay, all to support agribusiness on the West side of the San Joaquin Valley. Also, according to the East Bay Municipal Utility District analysis:
"The legislature has embarked on a major reform of the state's water system, heedless of the enormous costs involved, just when the state's financial condition has never been more dire. A realistic assessment of the total costs of the Delta legislation comes to $52B to $78B or more. This includes a series of huge capital projects: new Delta conveyance, construction of several new surface storage reservoirs, construction of other local water management and delivery projects, Delta levee strengthening, ecosystem restoration, and creation of three new state agencies and expanded state programs to prepare and implement the Delta Plan."
"Of this total price tag, urban SWP and CVP customers (who comprise roughly 24 million Californians) located south of the Delta will pay between_$42B and $68B, likely to be amortized over thirty years. First, these customers will pay all of the costs of new Delta conveyance, which are estimated between $18B and $44B. As they comprise 70% of all Californians who reside within the Delta watershed, their cost share of all other components of this water package (totaling approximately $34B) will add another $24B. Paying this huge price tag via water user fees on the water bill will result in more than doubling of the water rates for these customers, as well as additional huge annual water rate increases for many years into the future."
"The costs of new Delta conveyance includes the construction cost of building a canal or tunnel on an eastern or western alignment, plus necessary levee upgrades to continue through Delta operations, new rights of way, mitigation and relocation of impacted facilities/infrastructure. The reason for the range ($18B-$44B) in estimated costs of new Delta conveyance is that a tunnel will be substantially more expensive than an open canal."
"All users of water from the Delta watershed will have to pay the $16B cost of new programs and projects in the "Delta Plan. These costs include:
·$14B in levee repair and strengthening, plus new staffing costs for the Delta Plan.
·$2B for ecosystem restoration not included as part of the new Delta conveyance."
So to be clear, Delta landowners and communities, which have riparian rights and rights to the use Delta water for beneficial use, will now have to pay for the restoration and mitigation needed from 50 years of excessive water exports. And if that's not enough...
"It is expected that these activities will be funded through a surcharge or fee on water use. $16B in state water fees spread over 30 years is approximately $530M per year in new state water fees, not counting the likely fee increases over time. For the same urban customers south of the Delta who are financing the new Delta conveyance, this fee would come to $11B more on their water bills."
The agricultural water districts have repeatedly told the Legislature that they can pay neither the costs of the new Delta conveyance, nor any fee on water use. This would shift all the costs enumerated above onto urban water customers in California. As a result, urban water customers south of the Delta carrying the full cost of a new Delta conveyance, two- thirds of the cost of the Delta Plan, plus their share of surface storage and regional projects. In the absence of drastic cost-cutting, the debt service for these urban customers could come to more than $4B/year.
"The money to pay the $52B to $78B price tag for these programs and projects will be demanded from the same Californians who are enduring the worst recession since the 1930s. The state share of any bond repayments will strain the state's already overburdened General Fund. This long-term over- commitment of taxpayer and ratepayer dollars must be rigorously scrutinized by the Legislature, and the costs scaled down to meet financial reality."
For more information, go to http://www.restorethedelta.org
Yes, the Governor has told Legislative Leaders that he wants a water package on his desk by Friday night before he will act on the 700 bills sitting on his desk. But with a significant portion of the Legislature not in town, and members scattered all over the world presently, can that really happen?
To read more about these events in Sacramento click here for an update from the Capitol Weekly, http://capitolweekly.net/article.php?_c=ybnf6scq2y5l9i&xid=ybl6q43i1glqv9&done=.ybnf6scq2yol9i#
Why is the Governor pushing for this water package?
Why are legislative leaders following his lead?
According to a recently complete analysis by the East Bay Municipal Utility District on the proposed water bond and the Delta Water Package:
"The proposed $12B GO Delta bonds would result in debt service costs of nearly $780M/year to the General Fund for the next 30 years."
"The state budget deficit for the next three years is projected to be as much as $15B per year, and could climb even higher. Even these dire projections may not represent the worst case, should California's economy continue to slide. The $780M debt service burden would consume an increasing share of discretionary state funding, without counting the $1.3B annually that it will cost to service debt from resource bonds already approved since 2000. Which state programs are we willing to sacrifice to take on this massive, additional debt?"
"State expenditures for resources-related GO bond debt have grown rapidly, from 8% of General Fund spending in 2000-01 to a whopping 36% in 2009-2010. Adding a $12B bond would simply break the bank. According to State Treasurer Lockyer, between now and 2028, the state will assume another $225 billion in general fund bonded indebtedness. This mounting debt burden is an unsustainable trend, and is already interfering with the state's efforts to address its growing environmental and resource needs."
And it's not just costs from a GO bond. It is simply shocking to Restore the Delta staff members that the Governor and Legislative Leaders could be in favor of this package during this time of economic crisis. Look at what California's urban water users will be expected to pay, all to support agribusiness on the West side of the San Joaquin Valley. Also, according to the East Bay Municipal Utility District analysis:
"The legislature has embarked on a major reform of the state's water system, heedless of the enormous costs involved, just when the state's financial condition has never been more dire. A realistic assessment of the total costs of the Delta legislation comes to $52B to $78B or more. This includes a series of huge capital projects: new Delta conveyance, construction of several new surface storage reservoirs, construction of other local water management and delivery projects, Delta levee strengthening, ecosystem restoration, and creation of three new state agencies and expanded state programs to prepare and implement the Delta Plan."
"Of this total price tag, urban SWP and CVP customers (who comprise roughly 24 million Californians) located south of the Delta will pay between_$42B and $68B, likely to be amortized over thirty years. First, these customers will pay all of the costs of new Delta conveyance, which are estimated between $18B and $44B. As they comprise 70% of all Californians who reside within the Delta watershed, their cost share of all other components of this water package (totaling approximately $34B) will add another $24B. Paying this huge price tag via water user fees on the water bill will result in more than doubling of the water rates for these customers, as well as additional huge annual water rate increases for many years into the future."
"The costs of new Delta conveyance includes the construction cost of building a canal or tunnel on an eastern or western alignment, plus necessary levee upgrades to continue through Delta operations, new rights of way, mitigation and relocation of impacted facilities/infrastructure. The reason for the range ($18B-$44B) in estimated costs of new Delta conveyance is that a tunnel will be substantially more expensive than an open canal."
"All users of water from the Delta watershed will have to pay the $16B cost of new programs and projects in the "Delta Plan. These costs include:
·$14B in levee repair and strengthening, plus new staffing costs for the Delta Plan.
·$2B for ecosystem restoration not included as part of the new Delta conveyance."
So to be clear, Delta landowners and communities, which have riparian rights and rights to the use Delta water for beneficial use, will now have to pay for the restoration and mitigation needed from 50 years of excessive water exports. And if that's not enough...
"It is expected that these activities will be funded through a surcharge or fee on water use. $16B in state water fees spread over 30 years is approximately $530M per year in new state water fees, not counting the likely fee increases over time. For the same urban customers south of the Delta who are financing the new Delta conveyance, this fee would come to $11B more on their water bills."
The agricultural water districts have repeatedly told the Legislature that they can pay neither the costs of the new Delta conveyance, nor any fee on water use. This would shift all the costs enumerated above onto urban water customers in California. As a result, urban water customers south of the Delta carrying the full cost of a new Delta conveyance, two- thirds of the cost of the Delta Plan, plus their share of surface storage and regional projects. In the absence of drastic cost-cutting, the debt service for these urban customers could come to more than $4B/year.
"The money to pay the $52B to $78B price tag for these programs and projects will be demanded from the same Californians who are enduring the worst recession since the 1930s. The state share of any bond repayments will strain the state's already overburdened General Fund. This long-term over- commitment of taxpayer and ratepayer dollars must be rigorously scrutinized by the Legislature, and the costs scaled down to meet financial reality."
For more information, go to http://www.restorethedelta.org
Add Your Comments
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Donate
$230.00 donated
in the past month
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network