top
California
California
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

U.S. Taxpayers Should Not Be A Pawnshop to Guarantee California Bonds

by Ross Wolf
How Could California Or the Country Recover Economically If Gasoline Hits Four to Five Dollars A Gallon, As Predicted Yesterday By Some Major TV News Stations?
In effect California wants the U.S. Government to indirectly beg China for financial assistance, so the U.S. can guarantee California bonds.

China currently holds most of all U.S Debt. It is unlikely U.S. Government could guarantee California bonds without first getting permission from China, America’s number one creditor.

If U.S. Government guarantees California’s bonds for the world’s eighth largest economy, it is foreseeable China could reconsider the risks of future loans to the U.S.; reconsider whether to renew a trillion in outstanding U.S. debt and at the least raise its interest rate charged U.S. Taxpayers via U.S. Government borrowing. Any increase in China’s interest rate charged U.S. Government’s could be devastating to the U.S. annual budget, depleting funds needed for Americans.

California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and Democratic lawmakers say they are asking for help from the U.S. Government only until the California economy turns around. If California’s economy does not turn around, U.S. Taxpayers will be even more chained to China and to guaranteeing worthless California bonds.

Yesterday there were two conflicting TV news reports. The first, “The Recession is close to ending”, the second, “ Expect gasoline to go to four or five dollars a gallon.” Obviously if gasoline hits four or five dollars a gallon, many workers in CA and America could not afford to drive to work or buy as many store products or services. Much of America would not recover from the recession.
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by David Zimmerman (dzimmerman77 [at] hotmail.com)
The Country is currently is a profoundly confusing economic condition, to say the least. Even the renown economists contradict each other. The first 100 days made trillion a household word and as the phrase goes...the numbers themselves are too big to fail...like AIG, like GM, like California.

It is difficult for me to see so many financially knowledgeable, grown-up, college educated men go along with the destruction of all capitalistic principles. And not just go along, but agree with, and in most cases help develop the dangerous route to ruin.

The implications of the Federal Government becoming involved in the California financial mess are
staggering. What about NY, Mass, Michigan, etc?? Furthermore, what role would the Federals play in dictating the operating policy of California? No bank would guarantee a loan without airtight regulations and oversight.

Obama has pushed the nation to the limit (if not beyond), and has national healthcare yet to be addressed. Bailing out California right now should be last on his list. Not only last on his list, but last on the list of other, more solvent states and the taxpayers themselves.
by Billy Ray
Rep. Barneys Frank's bill UIGEA if passed, would repeal the "Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006" and subsequently regulate lawful Internet Casino gambling.
The big question, after on-line gambling is nationally legalized for so many Californians, how much money will California lose in casino tax revenues and how many Californians working inside “Casino buildings” may lose jobs because of the competition of legalized online casinos?

Have some "gambling establishment owners” taken the position “online Internet Casinos” are more profitable because owners won’t have the hire many live employees? Californians need to determine whether their Federal Senators support live-labor working inside real casino buildings or support UIGEA resulting in only photos of “pretend employees” working, dealing cards and serving drinks at online casinos?
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$135.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network