top
North Coast
North Coast
Indybay
Indybay
Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Calendar
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Related Categories: North Coast | Government & Elections
How Dependent Are Police On “Asset Forfeiture” To Pay Police Salaries?
by Dan Scott
Friday Mar 13th, 2009 1:45 PM
Any fresh denial to the government when questioned about committing a crime “even when you did not do it” can “involuntarily waive” your right to assert in your defense—the “Criminal Statute of Limitations” has passed for prosecution.
Americans should be alert to a problematic increase in “police property seizures” as the economy worsens: Police departments having a budget crisis, faced with having to layoff police officers, may increasingly look to civil asset forfeiture of Citizens’ property to pay their salaries and operating costs.

Police corruption abounds U.S. Cities: Citizens are illegally shot, falsely arrested, prosecuted and imprisoned. Every American is at risk of being falsely imprisoned despite the conviction standard “evidence beyond a reasonable doubt.” Frequently reported, Police falsify evidence and or purchase testimony from paid informants to convict Citizens. Imagine how easy it would be for corrupt police to forge evidence to cause “civil asset forfeiture” of a person’s property like their home. Civil Asset Forfeiture requires a lower standard of evidence than criminal evidence, “only a Preponderance of Civil Evidence” to seize property: government can use as civil evidence to forfeit someone’s real property, the fact the owner reported to police that a tenant was dealing drugs to show that the owner—had prior knowledge of the activity.

In 2000 HR1658 passed: the “old statute of limitations” died that gave government “five years” to seize property from the actual date a “property” was involved in crime. Police now have five-years to seize property from “whenever police claim” they learned a “property” was made subject to civil asset forfeiture. There are over 200 U.S. laws and violations that can subject property to civil asset forfeiture. For example a misrepresentation on a federally insured mortgage loan application can make your home—forever subject to federal civil asset forfeiture.

Most property and business owners that defend their assets against Government Civil Forfeiture claim an “innocent owner defense.” This defense can become a criminal prosecution trap for both guilty and innocent property owners. Any fresh denial to the government when questioned about committing a crime “even when you did not do it” can “involuntarily waive” your right to assert in your defense—the “Criminal Statute of Limitations” has passed for prosecution. Any fresh denial of guild, even 30 years after a crime was committed may allow Government prosecutors to use old and new evidence, including information discovered during a Civil Asset Forfeiture Proceeding to launch a criminal prosecution. For that reason many innocent property and business owners are reluctant to defend their property and businesses against Government Civil Asset Forfeiture. Re: Waiving Criminal Statute of Limitations: See James Brogan V. United States. N0.96-1579; USC18, Sec.1001

Corrupt Police framing property is seldom reported, probably because victims of civil asset forfeiture trade off not going to jail for giving up their confiscated property to Police Forfeiture Squads.
Shocking "Police Asset Forfeitures" Article at:

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2008851454_forfeit13.html

By Howard Witt
Chicago Tribune

TENAHA, Texas — You can drive into Tenaha, a dusty fleck of a town near the Texas-Louisiana border, if you're African American. But you might not be able to drive out — at least not with your car, cash, jewelry or other valuables.
by Ross Wolf
Thursday Mar 19th, 2009 12:17 AM
Some U.S. mercenary and security corporations have greatly expanded into intelligence gathering. Consequently there might be more money made by private army corporations participating in "Asset Forfeitures” as a result of utilizing and sharing domestic intelligence with police, than being private soldiers. Currently some private security corporations work so closely with law enforcement, they appear to have merged into one entity.

As noted in the above article: Provisions in passed HR 1658 “The Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000” and the Patriot Act appear to have opened the door for government-contractors to get involved with the U.S. Government forfeiting billions of dollars in assets, perhaps from even American Citizens using “federal civil asset forfeiture laws.” Under civil forfeiture laws, no one need be charged with a crime for government to take their property. There are a couple hundred U.S. laws and violations included in HR. 1658 and the Patriot Act that can subject property to civil asset forfeiture.”


by SJPD Victim
Monday Aug 16th, 2010 9:42 AM
This sounds like something that San Jose, California Police Officers: Tom Tortoricci & Gabriel Cuenca Would do! We had an incident with them in 2006 and I was threatened that they would falsely arrest me on trumped up charges if I spoke about it! These sickos are still on the streets "acting as" Police Officers! The Santa Clara County District attorney's office is well aware of it! see also: http://www.SanJoseCopwatch.org
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

donate now

$ 217.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network