From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Between the Minutes: Scenes from a KPFA board meeting
There's an authoritarian left, and there's a democratic left. KPFA's Local Station Board is where the twain meet, but not always in good faith.
BETWEEN THE MINUTES
There's an authoritarian left, and there's a democratic left. KPFA's Local Station Board is where the twain meet, but not always in good faith.
For the democratic left at KPFA, public board meetings have been an essential part of the hope for transparency and accountability. These meetings were held monthly, but that has now changed. Only 7 meetings will be held in 2009.
That decision was a significant blow to listener and staff participation in KPFA governance, especially in the wake of the management take-over or elimination of 3 other by-law-mandated routes for community input: the Program Council, the UnPaid Staff Organization, and the Community Advisory Board. The reduction of monthly board meetings was enacted at the January 10th meeting of the Local Station Board (LSB), held at the Humanist Hall in Oakland. But it wasn't the only strange item on the agenda of that meeting. There was also to be an "investigation" of a flyer written by Tracy Rosenberg, a prominent KPFA activist, board member, and whistleblower.
Tracy Rosenberg had offended the dominant faction of the board, the Concerned Listeners (CL), by criticizing their upcoming fundraiser. The Cl'ers had publicized the fundraiser as a benefit for their own slate, but when criticized claimed that was erroneous, and that the benefit was actually for KPFA itself. The benefit was canceled when confused performers pulled out due to the lack of clarity about the purpose of the benefit. This displeased the CL'ers, and so it looked like this board meeting of January 10th would be GET TRACY day. Another board member, Noelle Hanrahan, was also in the CL's crosshairs.
22 board members were present, 13 of them CL'ers & allies. The opposition was in the minority, only Tracy and 8 others. The CL'ers and opposition sat facing each other across a U-shaped configuration of tables, exchanging looks that were not always friendly.
The very first thing the CL'ers did, after the meeting was called to order, was to unseat board member Noelle Hanrahan on the "technicality" that since she had recently joined the KPFA staff, she could no longer be a listener rep. However, Pacifica by-laws do not support removal of a board member on those grounds; in fact, there've been at least two precedents to the contrary. So the technicality was invalid. But the CL unseated her anyway, over objections from the opposition. The CL'ers replaced Noelle with one of their own, John Van Eyck, who ran on the CL slate in the last election.
The next significant item on the agenda was public comment. In each meeting half an hour is set aside for the audience to speak from the floor. There was an audience of 25 or more observers--KPFA listeners and staff, nearly all of them there in support of Tracy. A dozen signed up to speak at the open mike; each got 3 minutes.
They spoke to express support for Tracy and castigate the CL for its scheduled investigation, or voice dissatisfaction with the management and the way the station was being run. Nick Alexander, a KPFA staff person, criticized the management's de-recognition of the UnPaid Staff Organization (UPSO).
Several speakers expressed support for Nadra Foster, the KPFA staff person who was arrested inside the radio station last August; Nadra still faces criminal charges in Alameda County Court. Her arm was so badly injured in the arrest that she is also awaiting at least one operation to recover use of it. Many of the staff were outraged that KPFA management brought police into the station, but the CL is backing the management on that issue--as they do in everything. A leading CL'er, Sherry Gendelman, has said she tipped her hat to KPFA management for calling the police on Foster.
There are also people who don't support Nadra but nevertheless feel that management handling of the situation showed an arrogance and incompetence which shows itself in other matters as well. If Nadra had been dealt with properly in the first place, the entire incident could have been obviated with no resultant schism between staff and management. It was a case of over-reaction as well as a lack of communication.
Most speakers commented on several matters. One woman pointed out that the CL didn't need to hold benefits to raise money; they had two millionaires sitting right there on the board who could fund their slate. She also criticized the fact that with Pacifica facing the worst crisis in its history, they would waste time holding an investigation. Another listener thanked the opposition members for continuing to be there, for persisting through these difficult times.
Max Blanchet, a former LSB member, pointed out that he and others have devoted years of their lives and put an enormous amount of work into building KPFA/Pacifica. He criticized policies of the current management. Apprenticeship Director Rainjita Yang-Geesler reproached the board for "trying to unseat people," and Lisa Dettner, part of the Women's Magazine Collective, also spoke in support of Tracy.
Other speakers included Nicole Milner, Richard Phelps, and Stan Woods. Former Pacifica election supervisor Les Radke said, "Anyone who investigates someone for free speech should be removed from this board."
Each of the speakers was warmly applauded by the rest of the audience--all except for Jim Weber. Jim is the CL's ever-present, unfailing mass audience of one. He praised the CL'ers and harshly denounced their critics. "Let's call it what it is," Jim said, "revolutionary fascism." Jim received no applause.
It must be lonely and dispiriting for the CL'ers who sit on the board month after month, in front of an adversely critical audience, especially one so well informed. That's perhaps why they decided to stop holding monthly meetings. Partly, at least. Another important reason may be the fact that KPFA/Pacific is now in a serious financial crisis. How is this to be handled and resolved? Not in open monthly meetings, apparently. The CL undoubtedly feels that the less transparency the better, particularly at a time like this.
The first item of business following comments from the public was not the investigation. It was the meeting schedule for 2009. The motion was made to end monthly meetings and meet only every other month.
The non-CL members of the board opposed that motion. Monthly meetings were necessary, they felt. "We're not ahead in our work, we're behind in our work," Tracy pointed out.
But that didn't seem to concern the CL'ers. A roll call was taken, with the CL'ers & allies all voting yes, and the opposition all voting no. CL'ers were in the majority and had their way. Monthly meetings are done with, and the next meeting won't be till March.
Interestingly, the public investigation of Tracy's flyer was put aside, left to be dealt with in executive session after the open meeting. Presumably the CL'ers had at this point concluded that the topic was not something they wanted to deal with, at least not in front of a less-than-supportive audience. What happened in that closed session has not been revealed.
This board meeting of Saturday, January 10th offered a pretty good look at the CL'ers in action. They call themselves the "Concerned Listeners," and, as candidates during board elections, they had promised to end strife and promote more amicable working relationships on the board. But in practice they've done precisely the opposite, and their real function has been to shield the less-than-competent KPFA management clique from scrutiny and accountability.
The ongoing struggle at KPFA has been between the authoritarian top-down left who operate in secrecy and the democratic left who want transparency and accountability.
Daniel Borgström
http://www.danielborgstrom.com
******
PLEASE ALSO SEE:
Casey Peters, the 2007 national election supervisor, has published his report and an appendix including local election supervisor reports:
http://www.pacificaelections.net/
KPFA Election Violated Rules and Bylaws by The Committee on Fair Elections (01-11-08)
http://www.berkeleydailyplanet.com/article.cfm?issue=01-11-08&storyID=28910
******
& please note --
THE COALITION FOR A DEMOCRATIC PACIFICA (CDP)
is back by popular demand
to host a series of meetings to consider many critical issues facing
KPFA AND THE PACIFICA NETWORK:
financial, programming, management & more.
First meeting:
Monday, February 9, 2009, 7:00 pm
Berkeley Fellowship of Unitarian Universalists
[Corner of Cedar & Bonita, Berkeley]
Wheelchair Accessible
Refreshments
Next meeting:
Monday, April 20, 7:00 pm, BFUU, Cedar and Bonita
For more info: 510-644-1937
For more information:
http://www.intergate.com/~daniel41/2009/01...
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
The Pacifica Mission Demands a Principled Approach to Politics
The solution for change of status of LSB members is not clearly articulated in the Bylaws. However, the spirit and intention are clear and should be followed. This should be decided on principle, not by who has the votes to do what they want, aka tyranny of the majority. We have seen enough of this tyranny here and on the PNB and it is primarily why we are having the financial crisis we have at present. A collusive majority from around the network, with an “if you won’t let the PNB stop our tyrannical LSB majority we won’t let them stop yours”, refused all requests to straighten out the mess at WBAI for several years. The CL/KPFAForward elected PNB members were charter members of this collusion. Principles were abandoned for short-term political goals and it got us to the brink of financial disaster. (Does this sound parallel to what the Iraq war etc. has done to the US? Parallel in method of operation, not in amount of damage done.)
There are two classes of LSB representatives: Listener and Staff. If a listener rep becomes staff or if a staff rep quits working at the station they should step down and the next person on the list should move up. This shouldn’t be a political struggle. Precedent is not made by LSB action, only PNB action. And a wrong decision does not make precedent. It makes me sad to see my allies ignoring principles for a temporary political goal. In this struggle with the "authoritarian left", Concerned Listener Mgt. Group, we should not play in the mud with them on these issues or we risk becoming them and all hope for a democratic Pacifica is lost.
We had a similar situation in 2006. A staff member who was a CL/KPFAForward ally not only stopped working at the station, he took a job at another station. His absences were excused for several months after he had stopped working at the station and he told me he didn’t ask for them to be excused. This was done by the majority since they didn’t want the next staff member on the list to come onto the board since they knew it was a vote against them. This situation got even uglier when the CL/KPFAForward elected LSB Secretary, Mark Hernandez, changed the minutes to reflect an excused absence for the ex-staff member when it had not been excused. None of their folks asked to have him excused, as the audio record demonstrated. An audio record that the Secretary had in his possession the entire time. That particular tyrannical majority voted down a motion to discipline their Secretary for his despicable conduct and this tyrannical majority has rewarded his dishonest and unprincipled vote changing by appointing him their Parliamentarian.
If Pacifica and its stations are to really make any significant progress for peace and social justice as our bylaws speak out for, we must practice a new, principled politics where truth and the Mission and progressive principles, transparency, accountability, inclusive democratic practices, and due process, are our compass, not temporary political power that has us acting like the DNC or the RNC. This message is directed to all sides.
The reduction of the LSB meetings is just one more step in "dismantling" the LSB toward eliminating the democratic process. The CL Mgt Group has consciously worked to eliminate any competing centers of power: they eliminated the Program Council without revoking the LSB Resolution of 2004 that codified its existance, they have refused to recognize the Unpaid Staff Organization, UPSO, despite LSB and PNB resolutions to do so, and now they are reducing the LSB to every other month, thus limiting opportunities for public comment, motions to make changes and chances to question the GM, who is supposed to report at each LSB meeting, which she often doesn't attend.
The good news is that the PNB now has a slim democratic majority and thus the CL Mgt. Group doesn't have protection from above anymore. Sherry Gendelman is out as PNB Chair, Dan Siegel is out as Foundation Counsel and Lonnie Hicks is out as CFO, replaced by La Varn Williams. More on this later.
Richard Phelps, Former Chair KPFA LSB
The solution for change of status of LSB members is not clearly articulated in the Bylaws. However, the spirit and intention are clear and should be followed. This should be decided on principle, not by who has the votes to do what they want, aka tyranny of the majority. We have seen enough of this tyranny here and on the PNB and it is primarily why we are having the financial crisis we have at present. A collusive majority from around the network, with an “if you won’t let the PNB stop our tyrannical LSB majority we won’t let them stop yours”, refused all requests to straighten out the mess at WBAI for several years. The CL/KPFAForward elected PNB members were charter members of this collusion. Principles were abandoned for short-term political goals and it got us to the brink of financial disaster. (Does this sound parallel to what the Iraq war etc. has done to the US? Parallel in method of operation, not in amount of damage done.)
There are two classes of LSB representatives: Listener and Staff. If a listener rep becomes staff or if a staff rep quits working at the station they should step down and the next person on the list should move up. This shouldn’t be a political struggle. Precedent is not made by LSB action, only PNB action. And a wrong decision does not make precedent. It makes me sad to see my allies ignoring principles for a temporary political goal. In this struggle with the "authoritarian left", Concerned Listener Mgt. Group, we should not play in the mud with them on these issues or we risk becoming them and all hope for a democratic Pacifica is lost.
We had a similar situation in 2006. A staff member who was a CL/KPFAForward ally not only stopped working at the station, he took a job at another station. His absences were excused for several months after he had stopped working at the station and he told me he didn’t ask for them to be excused. This was done by the majority since they didn’t want the next staff member on the list to come onto the board since they knew it was a vote against them. This situation got even uglier when the CL/KPFAForward elected LSB Secretary, Mark Hernandez, changed the minutes to reflect an excused absence for the ex-staff member when it had not been excused. None of their folks asked to have him excused, as the audio record demonstrated. An audio record that the Secretary had in his possession the entire time. That particular tyrannical majority voted down a motion to discipline their Secretary for his despicable conduct and this tyrannical majority has rewarded his dishonest and unprincipled vote changing by appointing him their Parliamentarian.
If Pacifica and its stations are to really make any significant progress for peace and social justice as our bylaws speak out for, we must practice a new, principled politics where truth and the Mission and progressive principles, transparency, accountability, inclusive democratic practices, and due process, are our compass, not temporary political power that has us acting like the DNC or the RNC. This message is directed to all sides.
The reduction of the LSB meetings is just one more step in "dismantling" the LSB toward eliminating the democratic process. The CL Mgt Group has consciously worked to eliminate any competing centers of power: they eliminated the Program Council without revoking the LSB Resolution of 2004 that codified its existance, they have refused to recognize the Unpaid Staff Organization, UPSO, despite LSB and PNB resolutions to do so, and now they are reducing the LSB to every other month, thus limiting opportunities for public comment, motions to make changes and chances to question the GM, who is supposed to report at each LSB meeting, which she often doesn't attend.
The good news is that the PNB now has a slim democratic majority and thus the CL Mgt. Group doesn't have protection from above anymore. Sherry Gendelman is out as PNB Chair, Dan Siegel is out as Foundation Counsel and Lonnie Hicks is out as CFO, replaced by La Varn Williams. More on this later.
Richard Phelps, Former Chair KPFA LSB
One addition to the minutes relates to the reason CL stated that LSB meetings
should only be held every 2 months. Warren Marr gave the only reason for the
cessation of LSB meetings - he stated that the LSB members needed more time to
activate the KPFA committee structure.
As this is the only reason that I can
recall was given for the change, I would
like to know:
1) What committees is Warren activating? I've seen no meeting schedule,
and can't find one on the LSB site.
2) What committees are the folks who voted for the proposal activating? What
committees are they on? I can't find any information on this.
3) How are they notifying folks about the work of the committees?
4) Or was this a vote pure and simple to dismantle KPFA?
Les
******
RESPONSES FROM TRACY ROSENBERG
1) What committees is Warren activating? I've seen no meeting
schedule, and can't find one on the LSB site.
I'm on the LSB and I don't have a meeting schedule! Warren isn't
activating any committees and there is no schedule. The only
committees I'm aware of meeting this year were GM Hire until Nicole
asked it to commit suicide, governance which met 3 times with BET,
Lewis, Anthony and me and I am responsible for activating it and
personnel which is being activated by Chandra. I believe Warren's only
committee responsibilities were as an LSB rep to the program council.
2) What committees are the folks who voted for the proposal
activating? What committees are they on? I can't find any information
on this.
Neither can we and any they were on expire this month and we won't
make new assignments to March. The only one currently meeting is
personnel, Warren isn't on it nor is his wife - and governance may
meet if I make an effort.
3) How are they notifying folks about the work of the committees?
They aren't. Nobody has a clue and they haven't done much anyhow.
Governance had the LSB fill out a self-evaluation questionnaire.
Personnel is trying to do a GM evaluation six months late. GM Hire
disassembled itself in the hope Nicole was trying to do something
helpful.
4) Or was this a vote pure and simple to dismantle KPFA?
It's a go at the LSB now that program council and UPSO are flattened.
I hear however they may have lost Dan Siegel today in Los Angeles, and
that will be a problem for them ....
-Trace
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network