top
East Bay
East Bay
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Actions in Oakland

by Anonymous
Actions in response to killing of Oscar Grant - CSA
On Wednesday, January 7th, a week after the killing, a protest march convened at the train station where the killing occurred. After listening to speeches for two hours, the crowd began marching towards downtown Oakland. At a nearby intersection, the windows of a police car were smashed and a dumpster was set on fire. Riot police arrived soon after and attempted to disperse the crowd with tear gas and targeted arrests. Marchers retreated and splintered, with some groups smashing the windows of businesses both local and corporate, torching two cars and smashing the windows of many others, and burning more dumpsters. As the rioting continued into the night, over a hundred marchers were eventually cornered by a large number of riot cops and arrested.

Yesterday, the windows of an Oakland police station were smashed during the night by anarchists. Further demonstrations are planned and solidarity actions are likely to continue in the coming days.

Corporate media reports of the mini-riot have focused on the damage caused to locally-owned small businesses and the destruction of private vehicles. The windows of a business called Creative African Braids were smashed, and the car of a local school teacher, a man taking tap-dancing lessons, and a local reporter were smashed or set on fire, all apparently at random. Part of what has attracted the media to this element of the story is that the owners of the damaged cars and businesses are mostly African Americans, as were many of the marchers seen carrying out the vandalism, muddying the racial narrative. It remains unclear how local businesses came to be targeted and by whom.

Undoubtedly, this aspect of the events in Oakland will cause the greatest controversy among anarchists. As the rhetoric of European insurrectionists has gained prominence in the American anarchist community, the literal manifestation of bombastic slogans like "Burn them all, big and small!" is bound to make some reconsider their language. Insurrectionary ideologues will likely accuse those made quesy by the sight of smashed Black-owned small businesses of bourgeois spinelessness or some other liberal pejorative.

Hopefully, a discussion of strategy will prevail in this debate. As long as an ideological commitment to one form of action or another remains the norm, whether pacifist or insurrectionary, strategy will be dictated by dogma instead of actual conditions. It's possible to have no sympathy whatsoever for small-time capitalists and still argue that destroying cars and stores at random, regardless of who does it, makes for bad strategy. It's also possible to argue the opposite and not have a fetish for window breaking. The C.S.A. encourages anarchists to discuss these events on their strategic merits rather than the dictates of their preferred doctrine.

As perceptive readers can probably discern from the tone above, the C.S.A. sees the destruction of random small businesses and the cars of tap-dancing students as a strategic mistake. The targeted attacks that have occurred in Oakland on cop cars, police stations, and the symbols of global capital such as banks, are far more effective at conveying the motivations of anarchists, and make a small but real dent in the institutions that actively reproduce capital and the state.

Lending support to undirected vandalism is often a misguided attempt to discover or encourage a direct action ethos among non-anarchists. But ignoring the context of actions and focusing exclusively on tactics is folly (Kristallnacht was a riot that involved a lot of window smashing, too.)

As a matter of power dynamics, hair braiding businesses probably cannot compare as oppressive institutions to cops and banks, and their wholesale destruction would lead no where. Anarchists who wish to participate meaningfully in solidarity actions ought to focus their attention on the institutions in their own communities that enforce hierarchies of oppression and privilege, whether those are physical spaces or social dynamics or something else entirely, not soft targets that are incidentally located along a parade route.
§DATE OF PUBLICATION
by Friday, January 9, 2009
This article was posted to the CSA website on Friday, January 9, 2009.
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by waa
Your "concern" about Grant is fine. Your justification for random or even targeted destruction is not.

All you are doing is alienating tens of thousands of normal people who are just as angry about Grant as you are. They, however, do not see the need to randomly destroy the property of others.

YOU may not like "property", but the rest of us do. There are far more of us than you, so perhaps you should redirect your anger toward people who are actually responsible for what you find so wrong.

I can assure you that if you continue on this path of unjustified violence, the backlash against you will be tremendous. Not only will the FBI and other VERY serious law enforcement be brought in, but you will be infiltrated, busted, arrested, convicted, and jailed.

And you will have no sympathy from the rest of us.

This has gone on long enough. I advise you to stand down before it's too late.

You might remember that the rest of us can get angry, too, and we can also lash out at those WE believe to be responsible for damage and violence. You might not like the result.
by ...
Did you even read the statement? They are not justifying the damage done to small businesses.
by dumpster baby
The author clearly addressed the STRATEGY and in fact DOES NOT CONDONE random destruction. You are not threatened, nor are other innocent people by this statement. Calm yourself.
by Anonymous
Try reading the entire article before making assumptions about what it was meant to imply... and it also seems like you made a threat. Get a fucking grip, and calm down.
by anonymous
What are you a cop WAA?
by regular
waa is a troll. waa flames articles as soon as they are posted. comments by waa are often removed quickly when seen by indybay editors. it might be a good idea to remove all these comments so people are read and discuss the article, not the troll..
by allumete
How many people who debate this issue of property destruction would actually put themselves in a situation where they could possibly influence events on the street? Yeah, strategy is important. But this type of shit is not even in that ballpark. A lot of people simply want to fuck shit up. So what's up with them? Maybe you could convince them to trash a bank and not a braid store, or a cop car and not a hoopty. Maybe not. What has media to do with this? Not just tv stations but just all the cameras everywhere, and kids doing shit sometimes like it's FOR the cameras? But then check the press: "violent protest." Yeah, IT IS STILL A PROTEST. On BART tonight, 12th ST station closed "DUE TO CIVIL UNREST." Yeah, that's just what it is, and people get that message.

We can't stress too much about the backlash. Regular working class people of all colors understand outrage and violent reactions. Why shouldn't property and business owners be pissed at the cops for not successfully defending their stuff, or even for provoking a riot in the first place? In France when the workers shut down the subway there's always a bunch of dipshits who complain but a lot more people who know the importance of the right to STRIKE. Does anyone really think that unstrategic riots are going to convert otherwise sympathetic people into supporters of a police state?

There's not much you can do to stop an explosion. And the people breaking shit seem driven as much by an awareness of popular SYMPATHY as they do by rage. Let's keep this pressure on the police - they are the ones who actually killed someone and then tried to get away with it.
by Anonymous
Well the purpose of this article isn't to promote the smashing of windows. This article is trying to tell us to analyzing the situation before deciding the type of action that we take rather than holding some sort of "religious" devotion to a certain way of doing things.

Sure, the corporate media will always demonize movements and we can't change that. What happened at the FTAA summit in Miami? The police ordered everyone to disperse, the people refused so rubber bullets were used. When the "Anarchists" responded by physically fighting back, the media used those clips first so it would appear as if the demonstrators sparked the violence. Some call it rioting, I call it defending yourself along with your right to free assembly.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$135.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network