From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Gay Shame Says No to YES*
* The Youth (dis-)Empowerment Summit
Surviving as a queer and or trans youth is almost impossible. For sure many of us know this to be true which means collective organizing for and by trans/queer youth is vital. However, many of the services and non-profit organizations that claim to be working “in the name of” queer and trans youth are invested in consolidating power for those running the show (executive directors, and paid staff, not youth.) This imbalance of power ensures organizations get funding while at the same time ensures youth are not able to collectively organize for self-determination.
There are countless examples in what is now called the non-profit industrial complex, but perhaps among the most violent is the “GSA Network” a non-profit based out of San Francisco that, according to their mission “connects school-based Gay-Straight Alliances (GSAs) to each other and community resources.” The GSA Network was founded and run through an authoritarian and ageist structure that gives power to older LGBT people who assume to “know what is best” for queer youth. This, of course, is the standard in the youth non-profit world where youth are called on to do free/forced labor (also called internships) while “staff” members are paid.
Gay Shame has had a long tradition of critiquing these formations of power that further the domination and disempowerment of trans and queer youth. As ambivalent as we are about these structures of power we have for the past three years, upon invitation, given workshops at the annual GSA network conference, called the Youth Empowerment Summit (YES, http://gsanetwork.org/yes/). Like most unpaid activist, we are called on time and again to donate our labor, skills and life-blood to well funded organizations. We mostly refuse to be placed in these situations. It was only because the YES offers so little truly radical information that we thought we might be able to somehow undo a bit of the terror of the GSA Network. Gay Shame felt it might be possible to suggest ways that trans and queer youth could actualize their own forms of organizing.
This year, again upon invitation, we agreed to host a workshop called “End Marriage!” However, in hopes of disrupting the accumulation of our activist labor, we asked to create a more symbiotic and mutually beneficial relationship between Gay Shame and the GSA Network. What we asked for (weeks in advance, though email) was the ability to film for 15 min in the school cafeteria (with our own “actors”). This scene is part of a larger activist project on trans/queer people and the prison industrial complex.
Upon arrival at the YES we set-up at a table in the cafeteria and began to film. We were quickly approached by the “conference organizer” (AKA “lower-level management”) to ensure we were not filming any youth. We assured her we would never film someone without their permission and as abolitionists are against all forms of surveillance. We went back to filming then the same “organizer” approached us and “warned” us that those higher-up in the GSA Network (and not any of the youth there) were concerned about us filming in general, obviously because we were not totally under their control. We were, radical trans and queer folks, many of color, of various ages, creating activist art outside of the non-profit industrial complex in hope of working toward our collective liberation. This is clearly against the methods of the GSA Network.
After the “lower management” had interrupted filming a second time, we were approached by “midlevel management.” Their story was different: “we need this table for the youth.” This wish was not that of any youth. It was a lie manufactured in order to bring our “queer activism” into their model of “LGBT organizing”. We then agreed to let these non-existent youth use the table until 1:45, when lunch is over. We sat on the floor, with the empty table just a few feet away for the reaming 10 min until 1:45. Then as per our agreement (with “lower” and “mid level management”) we again tried to begin filming. Our workshop was scheduled to begin at 1:45 so we had decided to work with another workshop and join in after we were done filming.
However, a few minutes after we attempted to film for a fourth time, we were then approached by “lower,” “middle” and now “upper management” (the
founder/executive director, and Stanford Alum, Carolyn Laub). “What happened to us working together?” squawked “mid-level management.” We reminded them of the agreement we had reached just 10 minutes before. An agreement reached after a few lines back and forth on the subject of how we felt about queer and trans youth organizing for themselves, and how creating a non-exploitative relationship between the GSA Network and activists should be the goal of the conference, instead of the ridiculous expenditure of attention being paid to our one table in a now empty cafeteria. All three tiers of management then demanded we “stop filming, pack up and leave.” In hope of avoiding a confrontation with the police we complied with their request.
We then attempted to go to the workshop they asked us to give. We were met at the door by “lower level management” who said, “the door is closed and we cannot go in.” In what was a pathetic attempt to ensure the youth attending the conference did not know what was done to us, in their name, we were literally locked out.
This story is really nothing new. It is one of those examples when all our critiques of institutionalized power, white supremacy, and the multicultural replication of oppression, become immediately material.
As radical queer activists, we work toward an end of the “GSA Network,” and other groups that continue the colonial project of confining resistance and toward a world were trans/queer youth are empowered to organize on their own terms, in their own ways, for their freedom.
GAY SHAME is a Virus in the System. We are committed to a queer extravaganza that brings direct action to astounding levels of theatricality. We will not be satisfied with a commercialized gay identity that denies the intrinsic links between queer struggle and challenging power. We seek nothing less than a new queer activism that foregrounds race, class, gender and sexuality, to counter the self-serving “values” of gay consumerism and the increasingly hypocritical left. We are dedicated to fighting the rabid assimilationist monster with a devastating mobilization of queer brilliance.
There are countless examples in what is now called the non-profit industrial complex, but perhaps among the most violent is the “GSA Network” a non-profit based out of San Francisco that, according to their mission “connects school-based Gay-Straight Alliances (GSAs) to each other and community resources.” The GSA Network was founded and run through an authoritarian and ageist structure that gives power to older LGBT people who assume to “know what is best” for queer youth. This, of course, is the standard in the youth non-profit world where youth are called on to do free/forced labor (also called internships) while “staff” members are paid.
Gay Shame has had a long tradition of critiquing these formations of power that further the domination and disempowerment of trans and queer youth. As ambivalent as we are about these structures of power we have for the past three years, upon invitation, given workshops at the annual GSA network conference, called the Youth Empowerment Summit (YES, http://gsanetwork.org/yes/). Like most unpaid activist, we are called on time and again to donate our labor, skills and life-blood to well funded organizations. We mostly refuse to be placed in these situations. It was only because the YES offers so little truly radical information that we thought we might be able to somehow undo a bit of the terror of the GSA Network. Gay Shame felt it might be possible to suggest ways that trans and queer youth could actualize their own forms of organizing.
This year, again upon invitation, we agreed to host a workshop called “End Marriage!” However, in hopes of disrupting the accumulation of our activist labor, we asked to create a more symbiotic and mutually beneficial relationship between Gay Shame and the GSA Network. What we asked for (weeks in advance, though email) was the ability to film for 15 min in the school cafeteria (with our own “actors”). This scene is part of a larger activist project on trans/queer people and the prison industrial complex.
Upon arrival at the YES we set-up at a table in the cafeteria and began to film. We were quickly approached by the “conference organizer” (AKA “lower-level management”) to ensure we were not filming any youth. We assured her we would never film someone without their permission and as abolitionists are against all forms of surveillance. We went back to filming then the same “organizer” approached us and “warned” us that those higher-up in the GSA Network (and not any of the youth there) were concerned about us filming in general, obviously because we were not totally under their control. We were, radical trans and queer folks, many of color, of various ages, creating activist art outside of the non-profit industrial complex in hope of working toward our collective liberation. This is clearly against the methods of the GSA Network.
After the “lower management” had interrupted filming a second time, we were approached by “midlevel management.” Their story was different: “we need this table for the youth.” This wish was not that of any youth. It was a lie manufactured in order to bring our “queer activism” into their model of “LGBT organizing”. We then agreed to let these non-existent youth use the table until 1:45, when lunch is over. We sat on the floor, with the empty table just a few feet away for the reaming 10 min until 1:45. Then as per our agreement (with “lower” and “mid level management”) we again tried to begin filming. Our workshop was scheduled to begin at 1:45 so we had decided to work with another workshop and join in after we were done filming.
However, a few minutes after we attempted to film for a fourth time, we were then approached by “lower,” “middle” and now “upper management” (the
founder/executive director, and Stanford Alum, Carolyn Laub). “What happened to us working together?” squawked “mid-level management.” We reminded them of the agreement we had reached just 10 minutes before. An agreement reached after a few lines back and forth on the subject of how we felt about queer and trans youth organizing for themselves, and how creating a non-exploitative relationship between the GSA Network and activists should be the goal of the conference, instead of the ridiculous expenditure of attention being paid to our one table in a now empty cafeteria. All three tiers of management then demanded we “stop filming, pack up and leave.” In hope of avoiding a confrontation with the police we complied with their request.
We then attempted to go to the workshop they asked us to give. We were met at the door by “lower level management” who said, “the door is closed and we cannot go in.” In what was a pathetic attempt to ensure the youth attending the conference did not know what was done to us, in their name, we were literally locked out.
This story is really nothing new. It is one of those examples when all our critiques of institutionalized power, white supremacy, and the multicultural replication of oppression, become immediately material.
As radical queer activists, we work toward an end of the “GSA Network,” and other groups that continue the colonial project of confining resistance and toward a world were trans/queer youth are empowered to organize on their own terms, in their own ways, for their freedom.
GAY SHAME is a Virus in the System. We are committed to a queer extravaganza that brings direct action to astounding levels of theatricality. We will not be satisfied with a commercialized gay identity that denies the intrinsic links between queer struggle and challenging power. We seek nothing less than a new queer activism that foregrounds race, class, gender and sexuality, to counter the self-serving “values” of gay consumerism and the increasingly hypocritical left. We are dedicated to fighting the rabid assimilationist monster with a devastating mobilization of queer brilliance.
For more information:
http://www.gayshamesf.org
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
Your critique of the top-down approach of youth social services as well as critique of consolidation of power within the non-profit industrial complex that falls way short of anything close to having structural accountability in place to the youth served is well taken. On the other hand, this comes across as little more than brutal, ego-driven political rhetoric that is ineffective at best, and potentially devastating and divisive at worst. I wish I could muster a response that had more of the compassion I'm critiquing you for not having. Reading this, I am really struck by how all of these criticisms were not levelled by the youth attendees of the conference. I was at the YES all day doing outreach for mental health services. For a lot of the youth there, it is the one time a year they get a chance to be around a lot of other queers and is a really important event. Within this context, confidentiality is a real concern and there is not any reason that the organizers of the event should abandon the commitment they've made to protect the privacy of the youth there because you made an assertion about your politics being anti-surveillance. While you have a lot of great ideas about structural power shifts that need happen in order for youth to be organizing themselves from a basis of self-determination, this analysis is not only lost but further comes off as you potentially condescending to these youth that you don't represent, and are lacking trust and rapport with. It is pretty hypocrytical to come to an event that may be one of the most important and transformative for many attendees that year, albeit one that could use more accountability and poltiical analysis, and to assume that the youth are too stupid or lacking in their own analysis and need to be liberated by you and your rhetoric. It's universalizing, short-sighted, and offensive and it sounds like it devolved into you picking petty and inconsequential fights with conference organizers in the name of the youth there. I mean, really.
For more information:
http://www.trynabuildamystery.blogspot.com
We agree that gatherings of youth for youth are important. However, you should read the piece again as some of us were/are also "youth". So then, which "youth" count and which "youth" are spoke for? Also, the confrontation was not about us filming people that did not want to be filmed (also YES knew about this weeks ahead of time). We were literally filming against a wall, and the last time we tried to film the cafeteria was completely empty. The confrontation was about us acting outside their ideas of what was "activism". In other words, we did not represented a non-profit.
Really what we hope to do is basically ask why a "youth" org does not have youth on staff or even a youth ED? Why not work for people's self-determination and stop just using "youth" to ensure you have a well-funded non-profit? If we are really going to make radical changes, the structures of our organizing need to be equally radicalized. This means people taking chances, giving up privilege (and maybe their jobs), but is also the only way to push past the non-profit lock-down that is currently upon us.
Also, your assumption that this is "amazing" might speak for some, but not for the many younger folks that have been a part of Gay Shame over the years that have told horror stories of feeling total alienation and exploited by YES and the Network (and many other groups). We attempt to make space for these kinds of conversation as well, for those that fall outside the narratives you reproduce.
Really what we hope to do is basically ask why a "youth" org does not have youth on staff or even a youth ED? Why not work for people's self-determination and stop just using "youth" to ensure you have a well-funded non-profit? If we are really going to make radical changes, the structures of our organizing need to be equally radicalized. This means people taking chances, giving up privilege (and maybe their jobs), but is also the only way to push past the non-profit lock-down that is currently upon us.
Also, your assumption that this is "amazing" might speak for some, but not for the many younger folks that have been a part of Gay Shame over the years that have told horror stories of feeling total alienation and exploited by YES and the Network (and many other groups). We attempt to make space for these kinds of conversation as well, for those that fall outside the narratives you reproduce.
Thanks for your return comments. Your analysis makes a lot of sense. I agree not much meaningful work happens when people are at work and that a massive reorganization of power and resources is needed to make, in the case of services, effective and accountable services, and with massive implications in the case of youth organizing, and "leadership development" as in the case with GSAN. It makes sense to hear you locate your experience there as being targeted for not representing a non profit, and so not having your work, presense and analysis be containable and manageable in the ways needed to support and reproduce the kind of work that GSAN is doing. There are a lot of other youth orgs that do have youth boards with real leverage and where the youth are paid. I'm not familiar with the structural set up of GSAN and would like to hear/see space made for young queer people whose work and analysis has been margainalized by GSAN/YES as well as see space made for youth to talk about what they envision as possibilities for self-mobilization as students and young people around issues affecting queer people. A coupla things though..So, YES "amazing" but did say it is important in real ways for a lot of young people who attend. Likewise, I don't think that by acknowledging that that it means I am being apologist or entirely bent on "reproducing" only that narrative. Rather, I think your analysis is really important, as well as the experiences of YES that are not being told and think it will take creativity and less knee jerk to think about how to build capacity for that kind of organizing within and among the youth who, for reasons that make sense to them and need be respected, are involved with GSAs. According to your post, and maybe this is the point and I'm overworking it, GSAN would like to systematically work against your or other's potential to do that. I think where I waver is the piece around whether dilligent commitments to brutal shit-talking like Gay Shame often does is an important part of the queer activist terrain or how much it actually has to do with the actual building of a revoutionary left. I don't mean to suggest liberal "who should we work with" reformism. The who to knee cap can be an important strategical question but I think this is where I get bummed out: I am really pretty desperate for the kind of intersectionality and analysis that GS puts forth and wish that there was a radical left queer fighting org in the Bay that was putting forth analysis and work that came from a place of compassion, accessibility, caring about queer people's complicated lives and that people could look at as a real departure point. I think that your return comment is a decent example of what I'm talking about, saying that by leveling criticism or working for non-profit that I am then the one reproducing these "narratives" is the same kind of reductionism I brought up in my last post. Obviously, I expressed a significant interest in your analysis and I think that I, my coworkers, and many of the youth at the YES could benefit from you showing up with radical poltical analysis that is affirms people's intelligence and ability to find stake in a massive restructuring of power and collective liberation, not just for-or-against haters games.
i re-read your post and am sorry that i didn't say: bummer. it is totally uncool and sucky that that went down and i am glad you originally posted about it. i think what i'm speaking to is a deeper and poorly articulated weariness about my own discord between politics and profession as well as my own political subculture and knee-cappiness vs. desire to love people well and give it all a life in the world where it belongs. anyway, sorry that i even got involved in the procrasti-core and consuming world of online hater blogginess. a first and last time. be well.
Speaking for myself/ not gay shame:
I agree, compassion is important and Gay Shame often gets read as having little to none. I think, for me, the most important part of GS is that they will make critiques even when they are not popular. Their willingness to place them self in the liberal line of fire is, in my view, more important now and here,than ever. GS is not always right, and not often totally wrong, but what i think they do is open up space for critique when there seems to be little of that in the Bay.(dont critique my org and our organizing structure because i am on the committee that funds yours, ill scratch your back, you get mine kinda thing) This is one of the amazing things about working outside of non-profits, you can say and do whatever, collectively, you decide. You have to answer to no ED, no managing body, no funders. I wish , like you, there were many more people willing to organize for a new kind of world, which also asks for a new kind of politics. On one last note about love. I know few people that would meet every week, for free, for the past eight years if some version of love, were not somewhere in the center. I think much of the politics GS puts forth is actually not hate, but heart break, a kind of hear break that all the dreams of living free that we want for ourselves and for everyone else are constantly crushed by the realities of our present.... thanks for your words and thought!
xx
I agree, compassion is important and Gay Shame often gets read as having little to none. I think, for me, the most important part of GS is that they will make critiques even when they are not popular. Their willingness to place them self in the liberal line of fire is, in my view, more important now and here,than ever. GS is not always right, and not often totally wrong, but what i think they do is open up space for critique when there seems to be little of that in the Bay.(dont critique my org and our organizing structure because i am on the committee that funds yours, ill scratch your back, you get mine kinda thing) This is one of the amazing things about working outside of non-profits, you can say and do whatever, collectively, you decide. You have to answer to no ED, no managing body, no funders. I wish , like you, there were many more people willing to organize for a new kind of world, which also asks for a new kind of politics. On one last note about love. I know few people that would meet every week, for free, for the past eight years if some version of love, were not somewhere in the center. I think much of the politics GS puts forth is actually not hate, but heart break, a kind of hear break that all the dreams of living free that we want for ourselves and for everyone else are constantly crushed by the realities of our present.... thanks for your words and thought!
xx
appreciate hearing from not/mary. thanks for yr thoughts. a.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network