top
San Francisco
San Francisco
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Prop K To Suppress Trafficking and Prevent Child Prostitution

by Slava (slava8 [at] ymail.com)
Because of their status of prostitutes most victims of trafficking do not trust the police and have no confidence that their complaint will be taken seriously and their violators will be prosecuted, no matter if they were coerced into prostitution or knew on forehand they would work as prostitutes.
Re: San Francisco Proposition K, "Enforcement of Laws Related to Prostitution and Sex Workers"

From: Marjan Wijers (LL.M, MA) Independent researcher on human rights and human trafficking, former policy officer and project leader of the Dutch Foundation Against Trafficking in Women, former president of the Experts Group on Trafficking in Human Beings, established by the European Commission.

Having worked for more than 20 years in the field of anti-trafficking, I would like to share with you my analysis of the Initiative Measure Entitled "Enforcement of Laws Related to Prostitution and Sex Workers."

The proposition would require the Police Department to rigorously enforce existing laws against coercion, extortion, rape and other violent crimes, regardless of the victim's status as sex worker; to not use public resources for the investigation and prosecution of sex workers for prostitution related offences, nor for racial profiling as a means of targeting alleged trafficking victims and to decriminalise prostitution.

According to my opinion, the proposition would substantially contribute to the effective combat of trafficking in persons and to a better protection of sex workers against violence and abuse for a number of reasons.

In the first place, a persistent problem in combating trafficking is the lack of willingness of victims to report the crime. One of the reasons is the fear to be prosecuted themselves for prostitution. The criminalisation and prosecution of prostitutes feeds into this fear, and in doing so benefits the traffickers while deterring the victims to report the crime. In fact, one should be aware that any measure that further stigmatises and marginalises prostitutes adds to their vulnerability to trafficking and other forms of violence and abuse.

Secondly, because of their status of prostitutes most victims of trafficking do not trust the police and have no confidence that their complaint will be taken seriously and their violators will be prosecuted, no matter if they were coerced into prostitution or knew on forehand they would work as prostitutes. To my experience people can enter prostitution for very different reasons, varying from their own decision to being forced by others. In all cases, no matter how they entered prostitution, they should be entitled to protection against violence and abuse. However, even when one assumes that women cannot choose to engage in sex work and, consequently, that all prostitutes are victims, it makes no sense to prosecute the very victims. Rather it would make sense to redirect funds to instead prosecute trafficking and other crimes against sex workers. This would help to increase the confidence of victims in the police and encourage them to denounce their traffickers.

Thirdly, research shows that victims of trafficking come from all parts of the world, including the country itself. Racial profiling will therefore not add to the effective prevention or prosecution of trafficking. On the contrary, it might divert attention from certain groups of trafficking victims who do not fit the presumptions underlying the concept of racial profiling.

Fourthly, decriminalising prostitution creates the conditions for regulating the industry and the application of health and safety standards. It opens the way to use a whole new array of instruments to suppress trafficking and prevent child prostitution other than the criminal law, which - though necessary - has proven to have only very limited preventive effect.
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by No on K
This sex positive radical is not in support of prop K. How are pimps going to be prosecuted if this passes? The way the prop is written, they wouldn't count as traffickers.

Try Sweden's model instead, criminalize the purchaser (john) but not the seller. Legalizing just makes the pimps into respectable businessmin. Yes, not all sex workers work under pimps, but those who do and who deal w/ abuse and addiction need better ways to gain their autonomy and well-being. Prop K won't do it.

http://noonk.net/
by Slava
Actually, we want abusive or violent pimps to be prosecuted. Prop K calls for "rigorous enforcement of laws against coercion, extortion, battery, rape and other violent crimes regardless of the victim's status as sex worker."

I don't understand why the no on prop K campaign is using these kinds of scare tactics. Prop K IS about safety for sex workers.

Currently, the police barely ever arrest pimps. They usually arrest sex workers. Prop K will result in the opposite happening. It refocuses police resources on violence and abuse, rather than on arresting sex workers.

by Slava
After the Swedish model was implemented, the overall amount of visible prostitution decreased, but the new criminalization pushed prostitution underground and to neighboring countries. Street-based sex work became more dangerous. Sex workers were faced with demands for unsafe sex more often, and the underground nature of the work led to more compromises.

In less criminalized environments, police can obtain assistance from clients who are often the first to report trafficking and other abuses. Many sex workers have good, sometimes long term relationships with their clients. On the other hand, if a client is violent or abusive, decriminalization will help sex workers have recourse with the authorities. The legislation calls on the police department to rigorously enforce laws against sexual assault, coercion, extortion, battery, rape and other violent crimes, regardless of the victim's status as sex worker.

Sex worker advocates prefer the New Zealand/ New South Wales, Australia model, NOT the Swedish model.
by Denise Jameson
Prop. "Kinky' is about decriminalization of consensual paid sex acts between adults. That's it! It does nothing to stop legal enforcement of underage child prostitution and pornography (otherwise known as sex trafficking) By the way, I've heard most "sex trafficking" or child prostitution and pornography is done through the parents, directly or indirectly. So maybe the abusive parents need to be prosecuted instead of the children. Also, not all prostitutes are victims. I've had many sex worker friends of legal age, male, female, tranny, intersex, who are very happy with their professions.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$110.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network