top
US
US
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

NO KILL MOVEMENT HITS MAJOR MILESTONES

by Nathan J. Winograd
September marks the one year anniversary of the release of the book Redemption: The Myth of Pet Overpopulation and the No Kill Revolution in America. Over the last year, the book climbed to the top 500 at Barnes & Noble and cracked the top 1,000 (out of 2 million) at Amazon. For its first six months, it was the Number 1 animal rights book in America. Tens of thousands of copies have been sold and the book received lots of press coverage. More than commercial and critical success, it is changing the face of animal sheltering in the U.S.
Los Angeles, CA… September marks the one year anniversary of the release of Redemption: The Myth of Pet Overpopulation and the No Kill Revolution in America. The book exposes the shelter’s industry dirty secret that the killing of millions of dogs and cats in U.S. shelters in unnecessary.
Over the last year, the book climbed to the top 500 at Barnes & Noble and cracked the top 1,000 (out of 2 million) at Amazon. For its first six months, it was the Number 1 animal rights book in America. The book sold tens of thousands of copies and received lots of press coverage. On sheltering issues, its author has become the third most cited person in the U.S. by the media on the topic.

The book has not only helped shift the national debate about killing, but also played a direct role in helping to transform communities. A shelter director in Ohio wrote this:

I spent almost a year as the director of the local so called "humane" society... I came into a high kill shelter and in one month stopped all the killing of dogs and ran a no kill for space county shelter (taking all the stray dogs)... Reading Redemption has brought me an understanding of the situation, the magnitude of the situation and the conviction to move forward.

A rescuer in Washington reported this from the shelter manager she gave a copy of Redemption:

She just called to say that [she] has read the book and has had a 180 degree turn around. She told [us] that she now sees they have all been brain washed. The book is going to make the rounds of the staff. The personal goal of the manager is no dogs [killed] due to space this year.

After reading Redemption, Porter County (Indiana) commissioners and advocates succeeded in getting the 20-year shelter director of the county’s animal control shelter in Valparaiso and almost all of the staff removed from their positions. What was once a shelter that killed the vast majority of dogs and cats, sold live animals to a research facility on the side, and even cruelly killed the animals has been No Kill since a new team took over. During a recent visit, dogs were playing outside, were being walked by volunteers, kittens were being bottle fed, adopters were coming through the shelter in droves, the place was clean, and the animals had enrichment items to play with and soft blankets to sleep on.

As Redemption celebrates its first anniversary, Tompkins County enters its seventh No Kill year, Charlottesville enters its third, and new communities like those in Reno, NV and Valparaiso, IN enter the No Kill club. Other communities have also embraced No Kill, and many others are aggressively moving in that direction. No Kill is on the agenda of local governments nationwide as advocates in communities as diverse as King County (Seattle), WA and Indianapolis, IN are using Redemption and the model it advocates to force changes in the practices of local shelters.
Redemption won a Silver Medal for the Best Book (Animals/Pets) of 2008 by the Independent Publishers Association. And was a Best Book nominee by the Dog Writers Association of America. Midwest Book Reviews called it “a passionate advocacy for ending the killing of homeless dogs and cats in shelters.” Animal People called it "[T]he most provocative and best-informed overview of animal sheltering ever written." The Bark said it was an “important work... The world owes much to those rare individuals who see things differently—and who then devote themselves to vindicating their maverick conclusions."

The book has also been favorably reviewed by the San Francisco Chronicle, Sacramento Bee, Pet Connection, and others. But that doesn't tell the whole story. Endorsements have also come from dog lovers, cat lovers, rabbit lovers, and others who were moved by it and either bought copies of the book to give to their local shelter directors and city council members or have blogged about it in order to help spread the word that we can build a brighter world for animals.
And while not everyone has been enthusiastic, this is just further proof that Redemption is having an impact. The book, for example, has raised the ire of PETA, who has gone so far as to take out a “sponsored link” condemning it—and the author—on Google. “Never mind the factory farms or unnecessary cosmetic testers. Never mind the hunters or the abusers,” says author Nathan J. Winograd. “PETA is spending donor funds to attack a person—and a vegan no less!—who is working to end the killing of animals and instead get them adopted into loving, new homes.”

There is an old saying: “follow the money.” In this case, the more apt saying is “follow the sodium pentobarbital,” the drug used to kill animals in shelters. Where there is a lot of usage of this lethal poison, you can expect a negative review. That is why it is not surprising that groups like PETA did not like the book. Not only was the book highly critical of PETA’s pro-kill policy towards shelter animals, especially feral cats and Pit Bulls, but PETA killed over 90% of all dogs and cats at its "shelter" last year. PETA, in short, uses a lot of sodium pentobarbital.

But groups like PETA aside, the public has overwhelmingly and enthusiastically embraced the book and the message. One year ago, the author started a 28-city national book tour. “We packed the house from coast to coast. And the momentum never slowed down,” says Winograd. “In Tucson, AZ, the official close of the book tour, over 500 registered to attend.”

There have been other notable changes. The Humane Society of the United States’ favorite misnomer “euthanasia” has lost its cache. People are no longer hiding behind it and other HSUS euphemisms (“putting them to sleep”) to describe the abhorrent practice of shelter killing. People are more aware of widespread mistreatment of animals in shelters. And they are less tolerant of both the poor care and the killing, the excuses built up over the decades to justify it, and the legitimacy groups like HSUS give to it. In fact, even the large national groups are on the defensive, trying to take credit for the decline in killing nationally (even as they opposed and in some cases continue to oppose the programs responsible for it) and by softening their anti-No Kill positions.

Redemption debunked the myth of pet overpopulation and put the blame for the killing where it belongs: on the shoulders of the very shelter directors who find killing easier than doing what is necessary to stop it, on the local governments who continue to underfund their shelters or place them under the regressive oversight of health and police departments (and even under sanitation!), and on the unions and managers who would rather protect lazy, uncaring and even cruel members at the expense of the animals.

“Average people are now aware that shelters kill. And they are aware that there are some shelters (and communities) which do not kill,” says Winograd. “And as one advocate in Los Angeles told me: ‘At least now we know what—or more accurately, who—the problem is.’ We also know how to make them stop. In short, we know the real reasons they are killing. We know how to stop the killing. And in more communities nationwide, we have.”

“But there is still much work to be done and too many animals continue to lose their lives in the face of readily available alternatives. The 3.7 million dogs and cats killed in shelters every year are a stark reminder of just how far we have yet to go. But we will get there. The tide has decidedly shifted in our favor.”
by hoo-rah
"My book was released a year ago, and that is cause for celebration," as your pretext, more or less, for publishing this piece.

Yuck.

Btw, it's a misnomer to refer to your book as "animal rights." You are at war with animal rights activists, never failing to attack PeTA and the HSUS in every last thing you write -- and frankly you don't seem to give a shit about any animals other than cats or dogs. Animal welfare would be a more apt description, especially since animal welfare folks tend to just worry about cute and cuddly animals, or "pets," and not much about farm animals.

Now back to your birthday parties for your doggy woggies (as you've written before). Then later you can go barbecue some chicken or pork in your backyard and never get the irony in your value differentiations in animals as you falsely claim the "animal rights" banner.

by pinkietoes
At what point are PeTA and HSUS animal rights when they argue on behalf of the animal sheltering status quo, defending and encouraging the slaughter of animals in our shelters and even (in the case of PeTA) killing the animals themselves. Wake up. And while I'm helping you with fact checking you should know that Winograd is vegan.
by Not Falling For It
There's nothing to celebrate here. Redemption is being used by the breeding community to defeat laws that would help the shelter pets as exhibited by the defeat of AB 1634. But the joke is on them because we still have the dangerous dog (BSL) giving local authorities the ability to pass mandatory spay/neuter. California has responded on a local level, thank goodness. And don't try to hand me that crap about how it will kill more animals. You are so full of it when you make that ignorant statement. All you have to do to educate yourself is look at the numbers 20-30 years ago to see that spay/neuter has had a tremendous effect on the numbers of impounded animals going into the shelters. Use your common sense to figure out this one. Who benefits the most from creating chaos in our shelter system? Who benefits the most from lying about our shelters? Who benefits the most from defeating new laws? The answer is plain as the nose on your face, if you are able to see beyond it. You don't help the animals in the shelters by making the public think that they are not the responsible parties. The animals don't end up in the shelters because of what animal control does, they have no power to change things. The power is in the elected officials and these officials are using the shelters as a scapegoat. These officials know they are to blame for a lack of budget for the shelters but they want to divert the public from blaming them, so they blame animal control. YES, the public is responsible, they allow their pets to breed, they leave their pets in foreclosed homes, they dump their pets. How can you say otherwise? And to tell the public they aren't to blame only serves to have them dump more of their pets. Don't believe me? Just look at the numbers. Rancho Cucamonga has gone from taking in 50-100 animals a year from the public (not owner surrenders) to over 4,000. They are begging in newspaper articles that they are not "No Kill" to try to offset the influx. Even though they are now at $12+ per person per year for animal control, they have been unable to make "No Kill" work. Yell committment if you want, but Rancho has and is showing they are committed with all the money they are throwing at it. And more are jumping on the bandwagon that realizes the term "no kill" defeats their agenda of helping animals. God, just use your common sense on this one, it's so obvious.
by henry101 (henry101henry [at] yahoo.com)
Love what he has to say. Glad we have a cat and dog advocate! Nathan has said he is vegetarian but that's a different topic. The massive municipal killing of billions of 'pets' for over decades is appalling as any animal horror. I am glad that Nathan is out there, wish there were thousands more like him. Self-promotion yes, but it gets him a lot further than the few of us on the frontlines feeding/caring/spaying ten at a time. He is reaching the masses and getting the word out. That is essential for change. There has been little progress and sadly there will be little in our livetime because of the narcistic nature of humans who put themselves first and who care little for the helpless creatures around us.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$160.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network