top
Santa Cruz IMC
Santa Cruz IMC
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

FRSC: PRO IP Act, ACTA Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement Interview with John Anderson

by Skidmark Bob
Interview with John Anderson on Pro-IP Act H.R. 4279 that recently passed the house and ACTA
to create a new global standard for intellectual property rights enforcement.
Listen now:
Copy the code below to embed this audio into a web page:
Interview on Free Radio Santa Cruz 101fm
John and Bob talk about the purposed legislation of H.R. 4279 making substantial changes to federal copyright law appointing a copyright Czar and drug war like penalitys.
also ACTA multi-lateral intellectual property trade agreement a select handful of the wealthiest countries began a treaty-making process to create a new global standard for intellectual property rights enforcement, the "Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement"

DIY MEDIA (John Anderson's Website)
http://diymedia.net/

READ ACTA
http://wikileaks.org/wiki/G-8_plurilateral_intellectual_property_trade_agreement_discussion_paper

PRO IP ACT
http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_4279.html

Find out more at EFF leading civil liberties group defending your rights in the digital world.
http://www.eff.org/
§Sunlight for ACTA
by via eff.org
intl.png

In October 2007 the United States, the European Community, Switzerland and Japan simultaneously announced that they would negotiate a new intellectual property enforcement treaty, the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, or ACTA. Australia, the Republic of Korea, New Zealand and Mexico have joined the negotiations. Although the proposed treaty's title might suggest that the agreement deals only with counterfeit physical goods (such as medicines), what little information has been made available publicly by negotiating governments about the content of the treaty makes it clear that it will have a far broader scope, and in particular, will deal with tools targeting "Internet distribution and information technology." To date, disturbingly little information has been released about the actual content of the agreement. However, despite that, it is clearly on a fast track; treaty proponents want it tabled at the G8 summit in July, and completed by the end of 2008.

The Fact Sheet released by the Office of the United States Trade Representative, the arm of the US government that is negotiating the treaty, states that it will involve a new international standard of IP rights enforcement, and international cooperation including sharing of information between signatory countries' law enforcement agencies. A document recently leaked to the public entitled "Discussion Paper on a Possible Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement" from an unknown source and with an unclear status, includes a number of detailed proposals -- including new legal regimes to "encourage ISPs to cooperate with right holders", criminal measures, and increased border search powers, and raises considerable concerns for citizens' civil liberties and privacy rights.

Despite the potentially significant harmful impact on consumers and Internet innovation and the expedited timeframe in which the treaty is being negotiated, the citizens that stand to be directly affected by the treaty provisions have been given almost no information about its real contents, and very little opportunity to express their views on it.

In February, the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) asked for public comments with a short deadline of March 22, on the proposed treaty. Apart from the little information in the request for comments, citizens were given only a one and a half page "Fact Sheet" on ACTA, which failed to inform the public of its substance -- making the comment process a leap in the dark.

Given the speed with which this treaty is being negotiated, and its potentially significant impact, the lack of transparency in the negotiation process and failure to provide citizens with an opportunity for informed consultation is extremely concerning. But there is still time to change this.

Contact your Senator now -- urge them to shed some sunlight on the contents of ACTA and to give citizens an opportunity for meaningful consultation. It's your Internet too!

More info:

Add Your Comments
Listed below are the latest comments about this post.
These comments are submitted anonymously by website visitors.
TITLE
AUTHOR
DATE
Control Your Life, Use the Medias
Thu, Jun 19, 2008 5:40PM
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$70.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network