From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Maxxam out of Humboldt, PL to goto Mendo Redwoods
A New Era in Humboldt County:
Mendocino Redwood Company to Assume Control of Pacific Lumber
Mendocino Redwood Company to Assume Control of Pacific Lumber
Humboldt County, CA – Ending a 23-year drama, Texas bankruptcy Judge
Richard S. Schmidt will announce that he favors a sustainable and
economically viable plan for north coast forests formerly held by
now-bankrupt Pacific Lumber Company.
Judge Schmidt’s ruling for bankrupt Pacific Lumber Company and its 220,000
acres of Humboldt County forests, expected to be filed later today,
represents real progress for the region, environmental groups say.
After the ruling is filed, within a few weeks the Mendocino Redwood
Company will take over Pacific Lumber operations, including logging on
lands now held by the Scotia Pacific Company and the Pacific Lumber mill
in Scotia. The Environmental Protection Information Center and the Sierra
Club have battled Pacific Lumber’s destructive logging practices since
Texas-based Maxxam Corp took over the timber company 23 years ago.
“At long last, Maxxam is gone,” said Sam Johnston, Private Lands
Campaigner for EPIC. “This marks a new era for both the people and forests
of Humboldt County.”
“This is a positive development for the forested watersheds and people of
Humboldt County,” said Paul Mason with the Sierra Club. “We look forward
to working with a company that has a much stronger track record of
responsible management than its predecessor.”
To protect the ongoing health of the local community, the local economy,
and the working forests of this region, Sierra Club and EPIC hope to see:
1) no more cutting of old growth, (2) recovery of species habitat, (3) use
of selection harvest methods (4) permanent maintenance of timberland, and
(5) permanent protection for key resource areas, such as the Marbled
Murrelet Conservation Areas.
Sierra Club and EPIC are optimistic that Mendocino Redwood Company can
meet these challenges and recover this important area, according to
Johnston.
“MRC inherits a landscape that has suffered grievously from more than two
decades of serious abuse,” said EPIC’s Johnston. “We appreciate MRC’s
background in restoration-focused forestry, and want to work with MRC to
build a truly sustainable timber company for the long term. MRC needs to
make dramatic changes from Pacific Lumber’s practices to fulfill the
commitments they have made.”
One of the first tasks MRC will face will be to deal with destructive PL
logging plans already in the pipeline, such as the disastrous “Railcar”
logging plan to clear-cut redwoods next to Humboldt Redwoods State Park.
MRC also needs to perform extensive restoration work on damaged watersheds
such as Elk River, Freshwater and Bear Creek.
The decision, expected to be finalized later today, resolves vast
uncertainties that had loomed heavily over the bankruptcy proceedings as
creditors staked their positions about who should take over Pacific Lumber
and its subsidiary, Scotia Pacific. Pacific Lumber’s abandoned plan would
have subdivided and sold some 21,000 acres of prime timberlands for
development. The plan by the largest secured creditors of the company,
the “Noteholders,” would have entailed a risky auction that could have
divided forestland and mill, or forced an inflated price resulting in
unsustainable harvest levels.
The MRC Plan comes closest to implementing the standards EPIC advocates
for timber management in the Redwood Region. These standards flow from
three core principles for timberland management: recovery of high-quality
timberland and wildlife habitat for salmon & steelhead and other aquatic,
terrestrial, and avian wildlife; recovery of an economy based on these
resources and full integration of the region's human communities in these
efforts.
EPIC & Sierra Club look forward to working with MRC, and are pleased that
Judge Schmidt and the bankruptcy court recognized that the MRC plan
affords a solid opportunity to realize long-term, sustainable forestry.
-end-
Richard S. Schmidt will announce that he favors a sustainable and
economically viable plan for north coast forests formerly held by
now-bankrupt Pacific Lumber Company.
Judge Schmidt’s ruling for bankrupt Pacific Lumber Company and its 220,000
acres of Humboldt County forests, expected to be filed later today,
represents real progress for the region, environmental groups say.
After the ruling is filed, within a few weeks the Mendocino Redwood
Company will take over Pacific Lumber operations, including logging on
lands now held by the Scotia Pacific Company and the Pacific Lumber mill
in Scotia. The Environmental Protection Information Center and the Sierra
Club have battled Pacific Lumber’s destructive logging practices since
Texas-based Maxxam Corp took over the timber company 23 years ago.
“At long last, Maxxam is gone,” said Sam Johnston, Private Lands
Campaigner for EPIC. “This marks a new era for both the people and forests
of Humboldt County.”
“This is a positive development for the forested watersheds and people of
Humboldt County,” said Paul Mason with the Sierra Club. “We look forward
to working with a company that has a much stronger track record of
responsible management than its predecessor.”
To protect the ongoing health of the local community, the local economy,
and the working forests of this region, Sierra Club and EPIC hope to see:
1) no more cutting of old growth, (2) recovery of species habitat, (3) use
of selection harvest methods (4) permanent maintenance of timberland, and
(5) permanent protection for key resource areas, such as the Marbled
Murrelet Conservation Areas.
Sierra Club and EPIC are optimistic that Mendocino Redwood Company can
meet these challenges and recover this important area, according to
Johnston.
“MRC inherits a landscape that has suffered grievously from more than two
decades of serious abuse,” said EPIC’s Johnston. “We appreciate MRC’s
background in restoration-focused forestry, and want to work with MRC to
build a truly sustainable timber company for the long term. MRC needs to
make dramatic changes from Pacific Lumber’s practices to fulfill the
commitments they have made.”
One of the first tasks MRC will face will be to deal with destructive PL
logging plans already in the pipeline, such as the disastrous “Railcar”
logging plan to clear-cut redwoods next to Humboldt Redwoods State Park.
MRC also needs to perform extensive restoration work on damaged watersheds
such as Elk River, Freshwater and Bear Creek.
The decision, expected to be finalized later today, resolves vast
uncertainties that had loomed heavily over the bankruptcy proceedings as
creditors staked their positions about who should take over Pacific Lumber
and its subsidiary, Scotia Pacific. Pacific Lumber’s abandoned plan would
have subdivided and sold some 21,000 acres of prime timberlands for
development. The plan by the largest secured creditors of the company,
the “Noteholders,” would have entailed a risky auction that could have
divided forestland and mill, or forced an inflated price resulting in
unsustainable harvest levels.
The MRC Plan comes closest to implementing the standards EPIC advocates
for timber management in the Redwood Region. These standards flow from
three core principles for timberland management: recovery of high-quality
timberland and wildlife habitat for salmon & steelhead and other aquatic,
terrestrial, and avian wildlife; recovery of an economy based on these
resources and full integration of the region's human communities in these
efforts.
EPIC & Sierra Club look forward to working with MRC, and are pleased that
Judge Schmidt and the bankruptcy court recognized that the MRC plan
affords a solid opportunity to realize long-term, sustainable forestry.
-end-
For more information:
http://wildcalifornia.org
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
i find it interesting that nowhere in this article/press release do they quote anyone around the EARTH FIRST! milieu. They have been fighting PL and Maxxam for years. Are they being totally ignored when the credit coems for this probable victory (but i don't know enough and don't trust the Sierra Club)? Judy Bari is turning over in her grave.
Not trying to toot my own horn but I believe that activists who have been on the front lines of direct action deserve partial credit for this along with all the rest who have fought long and hard against Maxxam's rapacious logging. The community opposition to Maxxam-style logging certainly played a role in the bankrutpcy proceedings. Since the start of the bankruptcy hearings, the issue of "Tree-huggers" and the climate of conflict was brought forward as a serious financial challenge faced by Pacific Lumber.
I don't think EPIC and the Sierra Club are in a position to give voice to, as you called us, the "EARTH FIRST! milieu". I for one think that the proof is in the pudding when it comes to MRC's practices and there is still a lot of skepticism about MRC within the Humboldt community. They should not yet get anything close to a social license to log at will. I hope they turn out to be great stewards of the land but this has not yet been shown to me.
MRC has a chance to prove that they can be trusted. "Selection logging" has a wide definition within the timber industry. The results of "selection logging" often resemble a clear-cut with a few scraggly trees. I recently heard that the restrictions for "selection" require that the company leaves enough trees on an acre, so that if those trees were all standing in a bunch they would fit within a rectangle the size of a queen-size mattress.
This makes the term "selection" seem like disingenuous greenwash when used by industry folks. I don't think that's what EPIC means by selection logging and I think they should be a little more specific because of the wide definition.
I don't think EPIC and the Sierra Club are in a position to give voice to, as you called us, the "EARTH FIRST! milieu". I for one think that the proof is in the pudding when it comes to MRC's practices and there is still a lot of skepticism about MRC within the Humboldt community. They should not yet get anything close to a social license to log at will. I hope they turn out to be great stewards of the land but this has not yet been shown to me.
MRC has a chance to prove that they can be trusted. "Selection logging" has a wide definition within the timber industry. The results of "selection logging" often resemble a clear-cut with a few scraggly trees. I recently heard that the restrictions for "selection" require that the company leaves enough trees on an acre, so that if those trees were all standing in a bunch they would fit within a rectangle the size of a queen-size mattress.
This makes the term "selection" seem like disingenuous greenwash when used by industry folks. I don't think that's what EPIC means by selection logging and I think they should be a little more specific because of the wide definition.
Another factor ignored during the trial was the potential for community owned and operated forests instead of a continuation of another corporate logging industry. There are several operational community forests (CF) where the logging plans are discussed and decided locally and there are more options for community involvement if overlogging becomes an issue. Profits are generally claimed by the community. Two examples are Weaverville and Sunny Brae..
Here's the intro from Weaverville CF;
"The "Weaverville 1000", as it has been called, is the culmination of citizens' continuing efforts to protect their viewshed on the southwest side of town. What started as a protest against a proposed land exchange between BLM and a private timber company has evolved into a proposed Stewardship Contract between the RCD and BLM. This significant development has allowed the community to reiterate its desires for the community forest, has provided a local entity (the RCD) to provide a bridge between the community and the BLM, and lets revenue generated from forest health activities be used for other forest projects. Stewardship contracting has the potential to realize community goals and actions, while retaining the land in BLM stewardship."
Here's Weaverville community forest;
http://www.tcrcd.net/w-ville_forest/wcf_index.htm
If Mendo Redwoods Corp is the lesser evil choice when compared to Maxxam/PL's continued stay in Humboldt, then community forestry would be the least evil, what if Fortuna, Rio Dell and other local towns were given their share of the former Maxxam/PL land for their own community forestry programs?
The Bear River Tribe also presented a proposal for indigenous tribal forestry that could have benefitted the tribe and local community also, though this plan was also ignored. The Bear River Tribe has as much claim to the Maxxam/PL land as anyone, if not more so. What makes a corporation like MRC so much more desirable for the "economy" than allowing the local and indigenous people to have greater say in how the forests they inhabit are logged?
My recommendation from afar is that the treesitters and forest defenders stay around for a while longer and maintain active treesits until people can discover for themselves how this MRC is going to behave in Humboldt. Thanks again to treesiting and forest defense community for all their efforts to save the old growths from Maxxam/PL's chainsaws!!
Here's the intro from Weaverville CF;
"The "Weaverville 1000", as it has been called, is the culmination of citizens' continuing efforts to protect their viewshed on the southwest side of town. What started as a protest against a proposed land exchange between BLM and a private timber company has evolved into a proposed Stewardship Contract between the RCD and BLM. This significant development has allowed the community to reiterate its desires for the community forest, has provided a local entity (the RCD) to provide a bridge between the community and the BLM, and lets revenue generated from forest health activities be used for other forest projects. Stewardship contracting has the potential to realize community goals and actions, while retaining the land in BLM stewardship."
Here's Weaverville community forest;
http://www.tcrcd.net/w-ville_forest/wcf_index.htm
If Mendo Redwoods Corp is the lesser evil choice when compared to Maxxam/PL's continued stay in Humboldt, then community forestry would be the least evil, what if Fortuna, Rio Dell and other local towns were given their share of the former Maxxam/PL land for their own community forestry programs?
The Bear River Tribe also presented a proposal for indigenous tribal forestry that could have benefitted the tribe and local community also, though this plan was also ignored. The Bear River Tribe has as much claim to the Maxxam/PL land as anyone, if not more so. What makes a corporation like MRC so much more desirable for the "economy" than allowing the local and indigenous people to have greater say in how the forests they inhabit are logged?
My recommendation from afar is that the treesitters and forest defenders stay around for a while longer and maintain active treesits until people can discover for themselves how this MRC is going to behave in Humboldt. Thanks again to treesiting and forest defense community for all their efforts to save the old growths from Maxxam/PL's chainsaws!!
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network