Israel Bars One of its Most Prominent Critics, Norman Finkelstein, for 10 Years
Finkelstein is known one of the most prominent academic critics of Israel’s occupation of the West Bank and Gaza. The Ha’aretz editorial reads in part: “Considering his unusual and extremely critical views, one cannot avoid the suspicion that refusing to allow him to enter Israel was a punishment rather than a precaution….The right to enter Israel is not guaranteed to noncitizens, but the right of Israeli citizens to hear unusual views is one that should be fought for. It is not for the government to decide which views should be heard here and which ones should not. The decision to ban Finkelstein hurts us more than it hurts him.”
Norman Finkelstein joins me now in the firehouse studio. We are also joined on the telephone from Hebron by Musa Abu Hashhash, Professor Finkelstein’s friend whom Norman had intended to visit. We called the Israeli embassy and New York consulate to invite them on the program but they declined our requests.
Norman Finkelstein, Author of several books, including “The Holocaust Industry”, “Image and Reality of the Israel-Palestine Conflict” and “Beyond Chutzpah.”
Musa Abu Hashhash, field representative of Israeli human rights group Btselem in the Hebron district.
LISTEN ONLINE
To: [extensive recipeint list deleted]
Subject: FW: Is Obama Turning (Further) Right? By GREG KAFOURY http://www.counterpunch.org/
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 17:14:55 -0700
From: cuibono
To: [extensive recipient list deleted]
CC: kafoury [at] kafourymcdougal.com.
Subject: "Is Obama Turning (Further) Right?" -- By GREG KAFOURY http://www.counterpunch.org/
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 18:49:38 -0700
http://www.counterpunch.org/ May 27, 2008
[http://counterpunch.org/kafoury05272008.html]
"From AIPAC to the Cuban Exiles"
[cuibono has a cpl cuibbles but otherwise Mr Kafoury nails Obummer to the mast.
Cuibble the first: I sub to Mr Nader's daily feed but have not seen anything re "Israel" or Palestine recently enough to remember it. And I would remember it, since the q. of Nader's reliability re Zionism etc is a particular focus of mine, esp. his parroting of the "War For Oil", "No Blood For Oil" snowjob.
Cuibble Deuce: Dunno where Mr K. gets the notion that the Two State Illusion is "within reach" of becoming reality. It surprised me: Kafoury seems generally intelligent & informed, so why is he repeating that tired jive? Otherwise he's done a superb job exposing Obummer for what he is. As I may have said before, "Run Tom Run":) ]-------------
__________________________________________________________________
Dear Friends in The Struggle:
I'm just guessing that Kafoury might have gotten that "jive" most recently from Norman Finkelstein, who, inexplicably, suddenly --*after* he was fired from DePaul -- turned Zionist apologist and "two-stater". This, aside from, and like, Noam Chomsky.
I recently told Palestinian-British activist, academic and public speaker Ghada Karmi about this "victory is within reach / at hand!" or "we're on the verge of victory!" line of Finkelstein's (who, although he calls himself a "communist", ridicules those who advocate a *re-unified* Palestine as "armchair Marxist purists"), and she, too, said that it was "nonsense" and "where in the world does he get *that* from"?
I also told her about how Finkelstein -- and Chomsky (a self-described "Anarchist"!) -- believe that **THEY** know what's best for the Palestinians -- **regardless** of -- and to *hell* with -- what the *Palestinians* themselves (including progressive/leftist Palestinian activists) think -- and that if you don't agree with them (Finkelstein, Chomsky, and those other Jewish 'liberal Zionist' American leftist icons), then you're against (or, as Chomsky puts it, against "what's *best* for" -- i.e., what *Chomsky himself*, 'The Great White Hype', stipulates for) the Palestinians. And, as Chomsky further puts it, "if you *really care* about the Palestinians", then you'll listen to and not disagree with *him*. Chomsky and his mentee Finkelstein ultimately ignore *the Palestinians* and *Palestinian* thought (even ignore Edward Said, whom Chomsky otherwise compliments on Democracy Now, giving the revisionist impression that the 'now safely dead' Said agreed with him) -- *just like* the racist white Western imperialist powers and the original racist white Zionists did.
Yet, as I've pointed out, they don't want to lift a damn finger to do anything *practical* -- even *nonviolent* measures -- for the Palestinian cause: they even oppose boycotts (commercial, economic or cultural), divestment, and sanctions against Israel. (They even oppose universal right-of-return to Palestine for the Palestinians -- but not for the Jews.) Karmi was very dismayed hearing this about Finkelstein, after she told me that he was recently arrested and deported from Israel. (Joel Kovel, anti-Zionist Jew-American academic and author, most recently his book "Overcoming Zionism", was also severely dismayed with Finkelstein -- although, beyond disappointment with Chomsky, a long time covert functional Zionist.)
I'm sorry, but getting kicked out of Israel (or not being allowed in) is just not that hard to have happen to any critic of Israel -- an occasion that Finkelstein, and progressive media people like Amy Goodman, will no doubt use as political cover for him -- like Stephen Zunes uses attacks against him by the Zionists/lobby, who attack anyone to the left of Atilla the Hun when it comes to the political spectrum and Israel. I'm surprised that Chomsky -- who's opposed to even politically attacking or fighting, or otherwise merely exposing, the Israel lobby -- as well as opposed to boycotts against apartheid *Israel* -- hasn't gone and gotten himself arrested and deported from Israel as his "leftist" PR move/cover.
To borrow Jeffrey Blankfort's term, we all, in the Palestinian movement/cause/solidarity, should publicly renounce, get rid of, and otherwise abandon all those "Zionist 5th column" agents, infiltrators, apologists and obfuscators (especially obfuscating to white-American progressives/leftists) -- and from Chomsky right down to Michael Lerner and the likewise rest of them, shouldn't be invited to speak at pro-Palestinian conferences like the Sabeel Conference. This is because AT ANY CRITICAL TIME IN EVENTS (as with NAOMI KLEIN's attack article on those around the world, and especially in the West, who protested Israel's genocidal military rampage through Jenin and other Palestinian cities/towns, suddenly discovering "widespread anti-Semitism" -- SUDDENLY AT THAT PARTICULAR INSTANCE IN TIME -- AND WHERE ELSE BUT ON "THE *LEFT*"!), or at the last moment, or in the end, those liberal/leftist closet Zionists/apologists will suddenly, calculatingly, politically *TURN* ON THE MOVEMENT.
THE THRESHOLD LITMUS TEST should be: ARE YOU PUBLICLY ANTI-ZIONIST? -- Zionism and it's entailments and requirements being a morally *repugnant* racist ideology. If they aren't, they should be kicked to the curb and thrown on the garbage heap of history. I'm beginning to believe that those icons are "leftists" only as a cover for their covert (or *overtly proclaimed*, in Stephen Zunes' case) Zionism.
I wouldn't give a traditional/conservative/"liberal"/"progressive"/"leftist" Zionist, or Zionist apologist, the time of day. If they want to go out and "fight the Occupation", they can go out and do it on their own, *INDEPENDENTLY*, because they are really just serving their *own Zionist purposes* anyway: a little, geographically corrupted and unviable, leftover scraps, suiggly little rump state, on the worst land, for the Palestinians.
[Hey, I know alll about those *"liberal" racist white people*! -- and if Palestinians don't learn from the Black-American political experience, the positives and the negatives (like Obama), the Palestinians will *suffer* for it. *40 YEARS* from now Israeli soldiers, like American cops, with worriless impunity, always state-exnonerated, will *still* be killing Palestinians, like American cops are still killing Black-Americans, even in hails of mass bullets, 40 years after the mainstay Civil Rights movement, and still mass-imprisoning those they don't outright kill. And the Palestinians will end up with their false prophet, like Obama (like they don't already have one with Mahmoud Abbas, whom the Bush administration has repeatedly, let me politely say, uhhh, kicked in the ass) -- Obama, who would have been written off in the mid/late '60's by Black-Americans (by even Black athletes, like Mohammad Ali, Kareem Abdul Jabbar, John Carlos, Tommie Smith, etc.) as a Black liberal sambo, when even many Black *comedians* (like Moms Mabley, Godfrey Cambridge, Dick Gregory and others) had more consciousness than Obama has. NO ONE BLACK would have said that Obama was really giving us Blacks "the wink-wink" while he was supposedly trying to disguise from white people his true intentions as 'The Mulatto Savior'. Obama wouldn't have gotten off the ground with Black folks back then -- he's explicity, repeatedly, promised ZIONIST JEWS/ISRAEL'S (especially establishment Blacks', including Black politicians', new masters) *everything*, but even Black Katrina victims, or the most egregious police Black murder victims, and state murder, Black death row, victims, *nothing* -- and that's how far we Black folks have sunk as a whole.
Obama would have 'had to' denounce a whole lotta people in the '60's.]
If you join with those "liberal/progressive/leftist" Zionists, or covert/backdoor Zionist apologists, all they'll be doing is (like Michael Lerner and his Tikkun outfit) causing you endless trouble and major headaches: stipulating *WIDE* restrictions, about who can/can't speak at what public events; about who can/can't even be on stage; about who can/can't be on any public panel; wide demands/stipulations/restrictions about what signs can't be present [like, "No signs or shirts with old pre-Israel Palestinian house keys on them!: they make us Jews feel *uncommmfortable* and even physically *thrrreatened*...!"]; about who can/can't ask questions or which questions are 'too controversial' and can't get selected; trying to stipulate, even on the left, who gets the stamp of approval of who's "A Good Palestinian", vs. who's "A Bad Palestinian", and who is otherwise stamped/slurred as "an anti-Semite" (or, like Zunes' back-up slur "*parallels* anti-Semitism").
And ultimately, like Israel -- if *everyone* around the Western world morally, finally, demanded at least "a Palestinian state" -- these Zionists would then force *endless* debate about some hypothetical, future, "take-it-or-leave-it", so-called "Palestinian state's" hyper-squiggly boarders, or even the very *definition* of a so-called "Palestinian state": 'after all, we must be sensitive to Zionist Jewish sensibilities about their "light unto the world", their nation and its ongoing major settlements. Gaza is one thing, not really that important in the over all scheme of their colonial nation project (and "evacuating" Gaza really fit right in), but elsewhere Israeli Jews already gotten all nicely settled in on those lovely hilltop 'suburban' sprawls of Greater Israel, for good!'
Those "leftist" Zionists (and now Zionist apologists, like Finkelstein and functional Zionists like Chomksy) have *repeatedly* shown that they care *more* about "Jewish sensitivites" than about Palestinian *oppression* and *suffering*. Or, like Finkelstein did in his last speaking engagement in Berkeley, he spent almost his entire lecture trying to exonerate, in general, today's Jews -- presumably 'the good Jews', a la 'the good Germans' of Nazi Germany) -- about Israel & Zionism, especially those Jews who haven't even given the Palestinian cause lip service, let alone *any* actual and practical *opposition* to Zionism: Finkelstein's, indeed, overwhelmingly 'silent majority' (later we can ask that supposed 'silent Jewish majority', "What did *you* do during Israel's 'Nazi/Apartheid era': did you turn *your* head and look away?).
As an aside, I like the way Karmi put it, my quoting her as closely as I can recall: 'There is already *one* state in so-called Israel-Palestine [a term she said she hates]: it's actually just *one* state with any number of different *zones* of restrictions for the Palestinians across it.
As I told Finkelstein about Chomsky, I'm glad that Chomsky wasn't an "Abolitionist" during the days of American slavery: he would have been covertly protecting the rich plantation owners and the slave plantation system (merely trying to make minor reforms, with a nip and a tuck here and there), as he 'once lived on plantations himself with many of his plantation friends'.
Or as one African American put it about American slavery:
"The conservatives said, 'Keep the system the way it is'."
"The liberals [including liberal plantation owners!] said, 'Keep the system, but let's be nicer to the slaves' [Desmond Tutu calls that attitude 'Apartheid with a smiling face']."
"But, the often-derided so-called 'purists' [as Finkelstein & Chomksy deride us] said, *'ABOLISH IT!'*"
(Interesting how Finkelstein, as a self-described "communist", advocates abolishing capitalism, but really not Zionism.)
Otherwise, good article, Mr. Kafoury. Or as I tell Blacks and whites beguiled for Obama: someone (like me) has to be able to later say I TOLD YOU SO.
And so it be's...
All Together in The Struggle,
Joseph Anderson,
Berkeley, CA
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.