top
East Bay
East Bay
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

KPFA Labor Programmer/Labor Musician and Activist Francisco Herrera Banned By KPFA Bosses

by repost
Lemlem Rijio has banned well known labor singer and activist Francico Hererra from the airwaves at KPFA. She did this without any warning or notice and continues to stonewall about why this action was taken.

http://www.kpfalaborcommunity.net/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=135



KPFA interim manager Lemlem Rijio who refuses to recognize the unpaid staff organization (UPSO) despite calls by the KFPA Local Station Board and the Pacifica National Board has now banned KPFA community volunteer programmer Francisco Herrera without any warning or notice. This is similar to action she has taken by Rijio to purge Youth Radio and other programs.
Lemlem Rijio has been also actively supported by Concerned Listener supporters on the board including labor education Warren Marr and his wife and Alameda Labor Council staffer Susan McDonough. Marr and McDonough when they were campaigning for the board did not inform KPFA listerners that they were a married couple and might have a "conflict of interest". Marr has also now been used by KPFA labor programmer David Bacon on his weekly show as an interviewer for guests. Bacon when introducing Marr has not mentioned that Marr is also on the board as a listener representative and should not be doing programming while representing the listeners. This rule was made to prevent conflicts of interests but apparently it does not apply to supporters and members of the Concerned Listerner's grouping.
Letter From Banned KPFA Programmer Francisco Herrera
Date: Apr 2, 2008 11:30 AM
From: Francisco Herrera
Date: Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 7:56 AM
Subject: response to silencing
To: igm [at] kpfa.org


Dear Lem Lem, I am writing in response to my silencing
as a volunteer broadcaster. I appreciate the
cordiality we have had with each other since we met
and the one or two times we have spoken since then.

With all due respect, I experienced your decision, to
ban me from the air as an insult to the work I have
done in the benefit of our community radio station and
as an over reaction, particularly after examining
other programs which constantly raise funds and
promote products, events or campaigns. From the
beginning of our conversation last Friday(3/28/08), I
expressed to you that I entered the La Onda Bajita
program (3/21/08) with the clarity of mind that I
would not sound as if I was fund raising. I welcome an
investigation and believe it will be helpful.

I understand my directing people to the web site:
http://www.keepnewcollegealive.org might have been
misconstrued as fundraising particularly by people who
are bent on demonizing members of the New College
Community who were giving positve testimony of their
time at said college during that evening's program.
However, I don't feel it merited such harsh decision.

By way of this note, I simply want to make record of
my disagreement with your decision to keep me off the
air, particularly on the day we were going to
celebrate the life of UFW founder Cesar Chavez and
more specifically informing me 55 minutes before the
show went on the air. With all due respect, I will
also request the national and local board to
investigate the harshness of this decision and ask
some action be taken on my behalf.

Sincerely,
Francisco Herrera
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by N.C. Alumni
When New College entered this last, final crisis what did Francisco do?

He became a toady for the corrupt bureaucratic tyrant who ran the school into the ground, replete with completely denying the schools founding by a pedophile; that pig, whose ass Francisco kissed, was Martin Hamilton.

So who does he think he is coming off as so righteous. Why doesn't he ask for Martin and all the bureaucratic cronies at New College to help him?

This posting doesn't belong on Indybay.

N.C. Alum
by NC Insider
The views expressed by former New College professor Genny Lim are shared by many of the college's faculty, staff, students and alums. When is KPFA going to provide honest reporting about New College?


KPFA CALLED ON CARPET
by Genny Lim
http://newcollegealumni.net/2008/03/28/kpfa-called-on-carpet/

As a long time listener and guest poet on many of your broadcast programs, including 'In Your Ear' and the program, 'La Onda Bajita,' which recently aired a one-sided, testimonial fundraiser for the beleaguered New College, I am appalled by the shocking lack of journalistic integrity and unabashed propaganda and lies presented on that program.

I am one of over 100 employees who have been screwed by the financial mismanagement and incompetent leadership of Peter Gabel, Martin Hamilton and their Board of Trustees, to the tune of five months back wages, lapsed healthcare and loss of severance. The program, housed in New College property, for several years has enjoyed the sponsorship of the college and its host, a former student, and personal friend of its ousted president, Martin Hamilton, overstepped, in my opinion, journalistic ethics, by promoting and soliciting for a misleading and outright deceptive cause.

New College's accreditation was pulled by WASC and the Dept. of Ed. terminated its eligibility for TItle IV funds due to discrepancies over the disbursement of federal funds last fall, when many students never received their financial aid and faculty and staff payroll went unmet. The leadership has failed to disclose any and all records leading to the financial collapse of the college and have, in fact, recently placed personal liens on all the properties housing the school on Valencia Street, so that our back pay will likely never be recovered. Meanwhile they are restructuring the school behind our backs and planning to launch a morphed version of the college with whatever assets they've hidden from us, without ever paying a cent to us workers who have been left holding the bag.

We have among us, faculty who have suffered a stroke and other health crises due to lapsed coverage and impoverished faculty, who were never even accorded the decency of a formal layoff so that we could file for unemployment and back wages in a timely, orderly, and humane manner.

KPFA urgently needs to rectify its lack of a responsible, balanced presentation of the facts behind the New College disaster by broadcasting the other side. La Onda Bajita did a real disservice to the cause of exploited workers and to the progressive cause of social justice.

Sincerely, Genny Lim
Poet, former Core Faculty of New College of California
I'm wondering what New College's financial issues will mean about Modern Times Bookstore and The Roxie.
by NC Insider
The defunct New College of California owes its faculty and staff several months back pay. It owes students financial aid support. It has been on the brink of bankruptcy for months. Needless to say, it can't continue to finance the Roxie and has probably cut Modern Times loose long ago.

This SF Weekly article reports on the mismanagement and financial disaster that did much to destroy New College:

http://www.sfweekly.com/2008-02-13/news/new-college-out-of-money-teachers-unpaid-not-teaching/2

Since this SF Weekly story was published, the college lost its accreditation and is now closed, except for a few teachout programs that will end in June.

Francisco Herrera's program on KPFA was a misleading fundraiser that failed to report essential facts like these. Where's the social Justice in siding with the defunct college's former bosses--the very people who were responsible for this shameful abuse of employees and students?



by maybe.
I'm not sure I'd trust just about anything the SF Weakly is peddling, especially when it comes to anything even remotely 'collectivist.'

Their agenda is apparent, and in short, it stinks.
by NC Insider
Fair enough, but the SF Weekly story is consistent with lots of press coverage by many different types of media; reports from the college's accreditation agency; petitions by alums, students, faculty & staff; views of old classmates who praised their education but deplored the school's mismanagement; and the positions taken by the faculty who collectively voted "No Confidence" in former President Martin Hamlton. Decide for yourself: Compare the following to the one-sided KPFA brroadcast:


Inside Higher Ed

Aug 1, 2007
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2007/08/01/newcollege

Feb 11, 2008:
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/02/11/newcollege


Petition signed last fall by 179 students, alums, faculty & staff:
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/save-new-college#signatures


Western Association of Schools and Colleges (WASC)

July 5, 2007 Letter
http://www.sfbg.com/PDFs/politics/wasc.pdf

Report of the WASC Special Visit Team - Nov 12-14, 2008
http://stopsilence.net/WASC.pdf

Letter - New College’s accreditation terminated - Feb 26, 2008
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/92/Accreditation_terminated_2.26.08.pdf


The North Bay Bohemian - March 5, 2008
http://www.bohemian.com/bohemian/03.05.08/news-0810.html


San Francisco Bay Guardian

Jan 17, 2008
http://www.sfbg.com/blogs/politics/2008/01/new_college_still_poorly_manag.html

Dec 18, 2007
http://www.sfbg.com/entry.php?entry_id=5228&catid=4

July 25, 2007
http://www.sfbayguardian.com/entry.php?entry_id=4142&catid=4
by No Double Standards
The defenders of the banning of Francisco Herrera from the airwaves at KPFA certainly have some explaining to do. They say he is a "scab" but was there ever a picket line or strike of New College by these "unionists"? They also apparently are unhappy with the program that Herrera did but do they believe that people should be removed from a position without a warning notice or any notice at all? This smacks of the same things that they are complaining about in the functioning of New College.
Finally it appears that they want New College to close and be sold off to property developers and apparently the person running the college now is a property developer/speculator. Is this what they support? The program at the college was open and after it was off the air there was an opportunity for these people to have spoken but they apparently boycotted the meeting or were unwilling to speak out. Is this because they were afraid of a democratic debate about where New College is going?
What is their agenda at New College. They say that they don't like how it was run and they want to get their back pay and healthcare but is that it?
Their vitriol seems to extend to anyone who is interested in keeping the college going and if that is their real view they need to put it out.
by It's About Good Journalism
This isn't about defending KPFA managment's actions regarding Herrera. It's about the one-sided, distorted picture provided by that broadcast, which was a staged showcase for the agenda of the invited guests, and it's about expecting better from KPFA. It's about simply telling the truth: New College has already closed, except for a small number of teachout operations that will end in June. It is no longer a viable institution that will be able to grant recognized degrees past June. New College as a legitimate college will soon be history. This is the terrible truth, and it's dishonest to pretend otherwise. An honest fundraiser would make all of this clear to potential donors. And radio journalism should make this clear to the listening public.

Professor Genny Lim wrote:

"The leadership has failed to disclose any and all records leading to the financial collapse of the college and have, in fact, recently placed personal liens on all the properties housing the school on Valencia Street, so that our back pay will likely never be recovered. Meanwhile they are restructuring the school behind our backs and planning to launch a morphed version of the college with whatever assets they've hidden from us, without ever paying a cent to us workers who have been left holding the bag."

These allegations should be investigated. It has been documented that the deposed leadership and some of their allies have indeed placed liens on the college's property, raising the suspician that they will divert resources to support their own projects at the expense of the students who are owed financial aid funds and the workers who are owed months of backpay in addition to losing their health coverage without notice.

If the New College name and its property are hijacked by the very people who are most responsible for the college's demise, this would make a mockery of the good work done over the years by the students, faculty and other employees. Very few would ever want to be associated with this "morphed version of the college."
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$160.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network