Impeach Federal Judge Who Discriminate

Help me impeach U. S. District Court Judges Philip Pro, and Kent Dawson and 9th Circuit Court Judges Robert Boochever, Edward Leavy, and Otto R. Skopil Jr. under Article III, Section 1. 9th Circuit Court Chief Judge Mary Schroeder is fully aware of these judicial misconducts, violations, and discriminatory practices,

Removing a Judge from office is not a new, radical idea. Thirteen times in our nation’s history, federal Judges have been impeached and removed from office. The impeachment charges have ranged from bringing the court into disrepute, to abuse of power, to unlawful rulings. Article Three says that a federal Judge will serve during good behavior. According to the Constitution, We, the People, have the authority to impeach and remove any Judge who has broken his oath of office

A Federal Judge's Oath. Every Federal Judge must take the following oath: "I _______________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice
without respect to persons, and do equal right to the "poor" and to the rich, and that I will "faithfully" and "impartially" discharge and perform all duties incumbent
upon me as ____________ under the "Constitution" and "laws" of the United States. "So help me God" (emphasis added).

Judicial Immunity would not be needed, created, or in place, if every Judge adhered to the Oath. It clearly appears that at least half of the Federal judges today, violate their oath on a daily basis in their courtrooms across the United States. Ethical Federal judges adhering to their oath have become the minority. The
unethical judges answer to no one for violations of their oath.

One side note, these Judges are also considered White Collar Criminals since I was scammed out of money as a result of being a victim of bait and switch, fraud, and discrimination, at the hands of the Federal Courts.

When it comes to how Pro Se (self represented) litigants, the Federal Courts run a bait and switch, scam, fraud, discriminatory, and a multitude of other types of violation type of operation. I have endured this for about 4 years.

From the day that I filed his lawsuit, I unsuspectingly was going to be one of the many Pro Se victims of discrimination by the U. S. District Court - District of Southern Nevada and the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals (Case No. 04-16825 and 06-16259). Through research, I found that this is a common violation and victimization against Pro Se litigants at the hands of corrupt, unethical, Federal Judges. I have an abundant amount of factual evidence and documents regarding the failure to grant my Summary Judgments, deny my various motions and appeals, which are just a part of the 700 pages of proof, documents, and evidence. Because of the Judges’ Discrimination against Invidious Class Pro Se Litigant, I suffer from Legal Abuse Syndrome, additional depression, emotional distress, etc.

Dr. Charles W. Heckman clearly states in his Court Task Force Report. Full report can be found at http://victimsoflaw.net/9thcircuit1.htm. There are other Task Force Reports, as well.

“Prejudices often have a greater impact on the outcome of administrative hearings and lawsuits than parties with an obligation to be impartial like to admit. Whether the prejudice is deliberate and malicious or entirely unintended, decisions colored by personal biases can be just as devastating to the victims of the resulting injustice.”

“The most common complaints by litigants of misconduct by the courts include the following: 1. Perjury is tolerated by the judge, 2. Records submitted to the court disappear from the files, 3. Judges’ opinions fail to address the issues of the lawsuit, 4. Certain litigants must always win, 5. Different standards are applied to different litigants, 6. Recent handlings of civil lawsuits by the courts have instigated a white collar crime wave, 7. Court orders go unheeded, 8. Judges give orders contrary to law and accepted standards of behavior, 9. Judges refuse to take actions required by law, 10. Courts have become inconsistent and arbitrary, 11. Federalism theory interferes with practical justice.

In my 2 cases: Judges’ opinions fail to address the issues of the lawsuit, Judges give orders contrary to law and accepted standards of behavior, Judges refuse to take actions required by law, and allowed perjury and ex-parte communications. Said Judges also violated Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 8(d), 12(a)(1)(A), 55(a), 56(a), Local Rules 56-1 and 77-1(b)(2), 15 U.S.C. § 618, § 623, § 1681n, § 1681s, and § 1681s-2. Both courts have clearly shown violations of the 14th Amendments Equal Protection Clause, Canon Codes of Judicial Conduct 3(B)(5), 3(B)(6), 3(B)(8), as well as Civil Rights and the Preamble to the Constitution, and 42 U.S. C. §1983, 42 U.S.C. §1985, 42 U.S.C. §1981, 42 U.S.C. §1986 and 18 U.S.C. §241.

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals also has an unpublished policy, with regard to cases involving Pro Se litigants, and that is to delay a decision by 3 years. This court feels that a Pro Se would get tired of waiting and drop the case(s). I do not plan on dropping the case, until he has been granted justice and equality.

By helping, you will have saved others from being victimized.

I have 700 pages of proof.


Harold Krieg