Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

35th Anniversary of Title IX: Much to Celebrate, A Way to Go

by Mandy Benson
Editorial marking the anniversary of Title IX--the impact it has had on the academic opportunities and recognition of girls and women, and how much further athletic opportunities for women needs to go. Calls on readers to look at their own schools to see if they are complying with Title IX.
35th Anniversary of Title IX
Much to Celebrate - A Way to Go

On June 23, 1972, Congress passed the federal law that has become known as “Title IX.” It succinctly states:

“No person in the United States shall, on the
basis of sex, be excluded from participation in,
be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to
discrimination under any education program
or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.”

Within a few years, the sexist practice of requiring girls to take “home-maker” classes such as Cooking and Sewing -- and boys courses such as Metal and Wood Shop – was discontinued. It is taking much longer to reach the point where girls and boys are both encouraged to excel in math and science classes.

The widespread practice of admitting only 5 to 10 percent women students to graduate schools, in such fields as Law and Medicine, was eliminated. Now women comprise at least fifty percent of the students in most of these professional schools.

Thus, Title IX has had a major impact on the academic opportunities and recognition of girls and women. But there is one area in which the battle for equal opportunity, while making significant progress, still has quite a way to go. That area is athletics.

Before Title IX was passed in 1972, only 1 out of 27 girls was given the opportunity to participate on a high school athletic team. That figure has since improved to 1 out of every 2.5 girls. Girls now comprise 41.1% of high school athletes nationwide.

In California, 278,284 girls and 386,248 boys had the opportunity to participate on a high school athletic team in 2005-06. That’s 107,964 more opportunities for boys than for girls.

Worse -- indeed, significantly worse -- at the 107 community colleges in CA in the 2005-06 school year, women were only 33% of the athletes. That figure represents a 1% decrease since the 2000-01 school year. This level continues to lag behind other educational levels in providing equal athletic opportunity for women.

Setting an example for the whole country, the 22 campus California State University system made significant gains after the California National Organization for Women (CA NOW) filed suit against them in 1993. In the late 1980’s, the percentage of women athletes had actually declined from 36% to 30%, in violation of both state and federal law. Women now account for over 50% of the athletes on almost all of the CSU campuses, receiving significantly more funding and an equitable share of scholarship dollars.

Fifteen years ago you didn’t have the dilemma of deciding whether to watch a WNBA game on a major network, the NCAA Women’s Softball World Series on ESPN or 6 and 7-year- old girls play softball in a nearby park on a Saturday morning in early June.

Polls show the public overwhelmingly supports equality in educational and athletic opportunities -- a dramatic change from several decades ago. But there are those who are working to weaken Title IX.

You can find out how the two- and four-year colleges and universities in your area are doing at:

How are things at your local high school? Are there three basketball teams for the boys, but only two for the girls? Do the girls’ teams get new uniforms as often as the boys’ teams? Would the baseball team be willing to trade facilities with the softball team? Do the girls feel that the school is supportive of their athletic efforts or are they made to feel somehow second-tier?

In 2004, California was the first state to pass a law promising equal access to facilities, participation opportunities and resources provided by city and county recreation departments. How is your local Parks and Recreation District doing when it comes to implementing this new law?

All students, male and female, deserve a high-quality educational and athletic experience. What are you going to do to make sure this promise of equal opportunity is a reality? Find out more about Title IX on the CA NOW website

Mandy Benson, President
California National Organization for Women

Add Your Comments
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!


$35.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.


Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network