top
Santa Cruz IMC
Santa Cruz IMC
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Attorney, Artist, and Homeless Defender Berkeley's Osha Neumann on FRSC 7 PM 6-21

by Robert Norse
Attorney Osha Neumanan activist with the Suitcase Clinic of Berkeley, a former member of Berkeley's Police Review Commission (himself assaulted by police), an artist whose mural appears at Telegraph and Haste Aves. near People's Park, and a community activist for the homeless will speak about Mayor Bates's "Public Commons for Everyone [but the Homeless]" Initiative on 101.1 FM 7 PM Thursday.
Following local activist Gillian Greensite, Osha Neumann will call in to Free Radio Santa Cruz and discuss proposed anti-homeless legislation in Berkeley by psuedo-progressive Mayor Tom Bates.

Listeners can call in at 831-427-3772. The show will be archived at http://www.huffsantacruz.org

Judith Scherr's 6-15-07 Berkeley Daily Planet story describing the Berkeley City Council's anti-homeless actions, "Council OKs ‘Public Commons Initiative’ Concept" can be found at http://www.berkeleydailyplanet.com/article .cfm?issue=06-15-07&storyID=27287


Neumann wrote the following commentary on the subject for an earlier issue of the Berkeley Daily Planet[ 3-16-07] "Public Commons" Initiative Commentary: New-Speak Comes to Berkeley — Guess Who’s the Target?

"There is a lot that’s troubling about the mayor’s “Public Commons For Every One Initiative,” beginning with the name. I really regret that new-speak has made its way from our nation’s capital to Berkeley. A more accurate name for this initiative would be the “Get Homeless People Off the Streets of Berkeley Initiative.”

Of course such a naked avowal of intent is unseemly, so the initiative follows a pattern of sweetening the pill with provisions for increasing referrals to largely nonexistent services; stepped up activity by the Mobile Crisis team (often viewed on the street as an arm of the police); and no reduction in homeless services, without, however a commitment to any increase in funding for those services. There is still no daytime youth drop-in center in Berkeley and no detox.

At the core of this initiative is yet another push for new anti-homeless laws. The implication of the proposal is that there are currently not enough laws to do the job. The fact is that when the police get their marching orders they are perfectly capable of rousting just about anybody using threats, intimidation and the laws that are on the books right now.

The proposal calls for “creating consistent community standards for public behavior,” evoking images of Taliban-like patrols monitoring the conduct of citizens, although of course the only citizens whose conduct would be monitored would be the poor and the homeless.

The problematic street behaviors identified in the proposal are “prolonged sitting and smoking in front of businesses, yelling at people as they walk along the corridor, and/or selling or consuming drugs.” Selling or consuming drugs is already illegal. Smoking in the commercial corridor is likewise for all practical purposes illegal under the current ordinance that prohibits smoking within 20 feet of a doorway or air intake. That leaves “prolonged sitting” and “yelling at people.”

So seriously, are we going to have a “no yelling” ordinance? Are police going to be walking their beats with decibel meters? And really, is every happy-go-lucky yeller going to be cited or is it only going to be homeless yelling that gets the attention of the police. And do we really think this can be enforced without running afoul of the First Amendment? And have we forgotten that there is already a Berkeley ordinance that makes it unlawful “for any person to solicit another in any public place . . . ”in any manner which coerces, threatens, hounds, or intimidates the person solicited.” (BMC 13.37.020.)

If we agree a “no yelling” ordinance should be a nonstarter that leaves the terrible social problem of “prolonged sitting.” How exactly would this one work? Are we going to have police putting chalk marks on homeless people like the parking enforcement officers do on tires? And if the person moves does the clock start again?

We don’t need to go down this road. We’ve been here, we’ve done that, it doesn’t work, and it does us little credit. Criminalizing homelessness only increases the quotient of desperation in our community. It might be possible to sweep that desperation out of sight, but it will still be there to haunt us.

There is a better way."



A much earlier audio of Neumann at a Santa Cruz SPAN (Stop Police Abuse Now!) Forum back in 1991 can be heard at http://www.radiolibre.org/brb/brb070218.mp3


Add Your Comments
Listed below are the latest comments about this post.
These comments are submitted anonymously by website visitors.
TITLE
AUTHOR
DATE
Robert Norse
Sat, Jun 23, 2007 1:12AM
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$40.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network